Gerber, H.J.
DSIG/DOMEGA
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 5 of 5 results

Hidden Strangeness in the Proton? Determination of the Real Part of the Isospin Even - Forward Scattering Amplitude of Pion Nucleon Scattering at 54.3-{MeV}

Wiedner, U. ; Goring, K. ; Jaki, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 40 (1989) 3568-3581, 1989.
Inspire Record 287810 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23079

The contradiction of the σ term of pion-nucleon scattering as deduced from the Karlsruhe-Helsinki phase shifts with the smaller value calculated by the chiral perturbation theory of QCD is well known. In an effort to clarify the discrepancy we have determined the real part of the isospin-even forward-scattering amplitude of pion-nucleon scattering at a pion energy Tπ=54.3 MeV by measurement of the elastic scattering of positive and negative pions on protons in the Coulomb-nuclear interference region. The deduced value is in agreement with the prediction of the Karlsruhe-Helsinki phase-shift analysis for that energy. The resulting large value of the σ term may be interpreted as being due to the influence of s¯s sea pairs even at large distances (small Q2) as previously suggested by the European Muon Collaboration measurement of deep-inelastic scattering of polarized muons on polarized protons.

1 data table match query
Table 1

No description provided.


Determination of the Real Part of the Isospin Even Forward Scattering Amplitude of Pion Nucleon Scattering at 55-{MeV} as a Test of Low-energy Quantum Chromodynamics

Wiedner, U. ; Goring, K. ; Jaki, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 58 (1987) 648-650, 1987.
Inspire Record 246624 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20153

The real part of the isospin-even forward-scattering amplitude of pion-nucleon scattering has been determined at a pion energy of Tπ=55 MeV by measurement of the elastic scattering of positive and negative pions on protons within the Coulomb-nuclear interference region. The value confirms the prediction of the Karlsruhe-Helsinki phase-shift analysis for that energy. These phases have been used to determine the σ term of pion-nucleon scattering by means of dispersion relations, resulting in a value for σ which is in contradiction with chiral perturbation theory of QCD.

1 data table match query
Table 1

PI- P cross sections normalised to the Coulomb cross section taken from the Karlesruhe-Helsinki phase shift analysis (R. Koch, E. Pietarinen (NP A336(80)331).


The $\pi^- p$ reaction around the $\Lambda^0 K^0$ threshold

Crittenden, R.R. ; Martin, H.J. ; Musgrave, B. ;
116-123, 1963.
Inspire Record 1407768 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.70311

None

1 data table match query
Table 1

No description provided.


Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering Excitation Functions at Intermediate Energies

Albers, D. ; Bisplinghoff, J. ; Bollmann, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 78 (1997) 1652-1655, 1997.
Inspire Record 454620 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19581

Excitation functions of proton-proton elastic scattering cross sections have been measured in narrow steps for projectile momenta pp (energies Tp) from 1100 to 3300MeV/c (500 to 2500 MeV) in the angular range 35°≤Θc.m.≤90° with a detector providing ΔΘc.m.≈1.4° resolution. Measurements have been performed continuously during projectile acceleration in the cooler synchrotron COSY with an internal CH2 fiber target, taking particular care to monitor luminosity as a function of Tp. The advantages of this experimental technique are demonstrated, and the excitation functions obtained are compared to existing cross section data. No evidence for narrow structures was found.

16 data tables match query
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

PI+ P SCATTERING AT 65-MEV TO 140-MEV

Ritchie, B.g. ; Moore, R.s. ; Preedom, B.m. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 125 (1983) 128-132, 1983.
Inspire Record 194351 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30742

Differential cross sections for π + p elastic scattering were measured for seven incident energies from 65 to 140 MeV at laboratory scattering angles between 93° and 165°. The results are compared with previous results of Bertin et al. and the phase-shift analysis of Arndt and Roper. Agreement between the phase-shift analysis and the data is good.

7 data tables match query
Table 1

ABSOLUTE NORMALIZATION UNCERTAINTY = 2.4 PCT.

Table 2

ABSOLUTE NORMALIZATION UNCERTAINTY = 2.0 PCT.

Table 3

ABSOLUTE NORMALIZATION UNCERTAINTY = 1.4 PCT.

More…