Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL exclusion limits on the higgsino simplified model being considered. These are shown with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively. The limits set by the latest ATLAS searches using the soft lepton and disappearing track signatures are illustrated by the blue and green regions, respectively, while the limit imposed by the LEP experiments is shown in gray. The dot-dashed gray line indicates the predicted mass-splitting for the pure higgsino scenario.

Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL exclusion limits on the higgsino simplified model being considered. These are shown with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively. The limits set by the latest ATLAS searches using the soft lepton and disappearing track signatures are illustrated by the blue and green regions, respectively, while the limit imposed by the LEP experiments is shown in gray. The dot-dashed gray line indicates the predicted mass-splitting for the pure higgsino scenario.

Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL exclusion limits on the higgsino simplified model being considered. These are shown with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively. The limits set by the latest ATLAS searches using the soft lepton and disappearing track signatures are illustrated by the blue and green regions, respectively, while the limit imposed by the LEP experiments is shown in gray. The dot-dashed gray line indicates the predicted mass-splitting for the pure higgsino scenario.

Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL exclusion limits on the higgsino simplified model being considered. These are shown with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively. The limits set by the latest ATLAS searches using the soft lepton and disappearing track signatures are illustrated by the blue and green regions, respectively, while the limit imposed by the LEP experiments is shown in gray. The dot-dashed gray line indicates the predicted mass-splitting for the pure higgsino scenario.

Expected and observed CLs values per signal point represented by the grey numbers. The expected (dashed) and observed (solid) 95% CL exclusion limits are overlaid along with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively.

Expected and observed CLs values per signal point represented by the grey numbers. The expected (dashed) and observed (solid) 95% CL exclusion limits are overlaid along with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively.

Expected and observed cross-section upper-limit per signal point represented by the grey numbers. The expected (dashed) and observed (solid) 95% CL exclusion limits are overlaid along with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively.

Expected and observed cross-section upper-limit per signal point represented by the grey numbers. The expected (dashed) and observed (solid) 95% CL exclusion limits are overlaid along with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm 1\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively.

Truth-level signal acceptances for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$) in a SR with the $S(d_0)$ requirement removed. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of accepted events divided by the total number of events in the generator-level signal Monte Carlo simulation, where the signal candidate track is identified as the charged particle with the largest distance between the interaction vertex and the secondary vertex of the higgsino decays.

Truth-level signal acceptances for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$) in a SR with the $S(d_0)$ requirement removed. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of accepted events divided by the total number of events in the generator-level signal Monte Carlo simulation, where the signal candidate track is identified as the charged particle with the largest distance between the interaction vertex and the secondary vertex of the higgsino decays.

Truth-level signal acceptances for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$) in a SR with the $S(d_0)$ requirement removed. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of accepted events divided by the total number of events in the generator-level signal Monte Carlo simulation, where the signal candidate track is identified as the charged particle with the largest distance between the interaction vertex and the secondary vertex of the higgsino decays.

Truth-level signal acceptances for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$) in a SR with the $S(d_0)$ requirement removed. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of accepted events divided by the total number of events in the generator-level signal Monte Carlo simulation, where the signal candidate track is identified as the charged particle with the largest distance between the interaction vertex and the secondary vertex of the higgsino decays.

Truth-level signal acceptances for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$) in a SR with the $S(d_0)$ requirement removed. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of accepted events divided by the total number of events in the generator-level signal Monte Carlo simulation, where the signal candidate track is identified as the charged particle with the largest distance between the interaction vertex and the secondary vertex of the higgsino decays.

Truth-level signal acceptances for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$) in a SR with the $S(d_0)$ requirement removed. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of accepted events divided by the total number of events in the generator-level signal Monte Carlo simulation, where the signal candidate track is identified as the charged particle with the largest distance between the interaction vertex and the secondary vertex of the higgsino decays.

Signal efficiencies in SR-Low for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-Low for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-Low for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-Low for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-Low for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-Low for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-High for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-High for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-High for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-High for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-High for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Signal efficiencies in SR-High for each production process ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$), defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level, where the $S(d_0)$ selecton efficiency has the largest impact. The higgsino decay products from $\Delta \mathrm{m}(\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm,\tilde{\chi}_1^0) < 0.4$ GeV signal have $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ too low to be reconstructed as the signal candidate tracks, and therefore the identified signal candidate tracks are typically from pile-up collisions or underlying events similar to the QCD track background, causing a low $S(d_0)$ selection efficiency in these plots.

Event selection cutflows for signal samples with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^0)$ = 150 GeV and $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^\pm, \tilde{\chi}_{1}^0)$ = 1.5, 1.0, and 0.75 GeV, including all six production processes ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$). The cross-section used to obtain the initial number of events ($\sigma(\mathrm{n}_{\mathrm{jets}}) \geq 1$) refers to an emission of at least one gluon or quark with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 50$ GeV at the parton level.

Event selection cutflows for signal samples with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^0)$ = 150 GeV and $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^\pm, \tilde{\chi}_{1}^0)$ = 0.5, 0.35, and 0.25 GeV, including all six production processes ($\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_1^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0$, $\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^-$, and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0 \tilde{\chi}_1^0$). The cross-section used to obtain the initial number of events ($\sigma(\mathrm{n}_{\mathrm{jets}}) \geq 1$) refers to an emission of at least one gluon or quark with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 50$ GeV at the parton level.

The observed limit contour in the SQUARK-NEUTRALINO plane.

The expected limit contour in the SQUARK-NEUTRALINO plane.

Cross section x BR limit for the UED model.

Figure 2-a. Expected limit +1sigma.

Figure 2-a. Expected limit.

Figure 2-a. Expected limit -1sigma.

Figure 2-b. Observed limit +1sigma-th.

Figure 2-b. Observed limit.

Figure 2-b. Observed limit -1sigma-th.

Figure 2-b. Expected limit +1sigma.

Figure 2. Auxiliary material. Cross section for the Gbb and Gtt model.

Figure 3a. Auxiliary material. Theoretical uncertainty for the Gbb model.

Figure 3b. Auxiliary material. Theoretical uncertainty for the Gtt model.

Figure 4a. Auxiliary material. Number of MC events for the Gbb model.

Figure 4b. Auxiliary material. Number of MC events for the Gtt model.

Figure 5a. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 5b. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 5c. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 6a. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 6b. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 7a. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 7b. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 7c. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 8a. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 8b. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 9a. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 9b. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 9c. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 10a. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 10b. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 11a. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 11b. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 11c. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 12a. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 12b. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 13a. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 13b. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 13c. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 14a. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 14b. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 15a. Auxiliary material. Upper Limit for the Gbb model.

Figure 15b. Auxiliary material. Upper Limit for the Gtt model.

Figure 16a. Auxiliary material. Best Signal Region for the Gbb model.

Figure 16b. Auxiliary material. Best Signal Region for the Gtt model.

Observed 95 PCT exclusion limit in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Expected 95 PCT exclusion limit in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Observed 95 PCT exclusion limit in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Number of MC signal events in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Number of MC signal events in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Number of MC signal events in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Acceptance in the 1LSR signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Acceptance in the 1LSR signal region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Efficiency in the 1LSR signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Efficiency in the 1LSR signal region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 1LSR region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 1LSR region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Acceptance in the 2LSR1 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Acceptance in the 2LSR2 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Efficiency in the 2LSR1 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Efficiency in the 2LSR2 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 2LSR1 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 2LSR2 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

Acceptance in the 2LSR1 signal region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Acceptance in the 2LSR2 signal region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Efficiency in the 2LSR1 signal region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Efficiency in the 2LSR2 signal region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 2LSR1 region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 2LSR2 region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

Acceptance in the 2LSR1 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Acceptance in the 2LSR2 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Efficiency in the 2LSR1 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Efficiency in the 2LSR2 signal region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 2LSR1 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Total PCT systematic uncertainty in the 2LSR2 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

expected CLs values for the 1LSR region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

observed CLs values for the 1LSR region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

expected CLs values for the 2LSR1 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

observed CLs values for the 2LSR1 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

expected CLs values for the 2LSR2 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

observed CLs values for the 2LSR2 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

expected CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR1 regions in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

observed CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR1 regions in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

expected CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR2 regions in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

observed CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR2 regions in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

expected CLs values for the best expected combination in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

observed CLs values for the best expected combination in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in gaugino universality scenario.

expected CLs values for the 1LSR region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

observed CLs values for the 1LSR region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

expected CLs values for the 2LSR1 region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

observed CLs values for the 2LSR1 region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

expected CLs values for the 2LSR2 region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

observed CLs values for the 2LSR2 region in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

expected CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR1 regions in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

observed CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR1 regions in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

expected CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR2 regions in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

observed CLs values combining the 1LSR and 2LSR2 regions in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

expected CLs values for the best expected combination in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

observed CLs values for the best expected combination in the M(chargino), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(stop) = 180 GEV.

expected CLs values for the 2LSR1 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

observed CLs values for the 2LSR1 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

expected CLs values for the 2LSR2 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

observed CLs values for the 2LSR2 region in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

expected CLs values for the best expected combination in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

observed CLs values for the best expected combination in the M(stop), M(neutralino) plane in the scenario where M(chargino) = 106 GEV.

Observed CLs contour with plus 1-sigma signal cross-section uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with minus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with plus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Observed CLs contour in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Observed CLs contour with minus 1-sigma signal cross-section uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Observed CLs contour with plus 1-sigma signal cross-section uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with minus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with plus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario.

Upper 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario.

Lower 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section up by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section down by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Upper 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Lower 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO) = 150 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section up by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO) = 150 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section down by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO) = 150 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO) = 150 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Upper 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO) = 150 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Lower 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO) = 150 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section up by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section down by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Upper 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Lower 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section up by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL, when moving the nominal signal cross section down by the 1-sigma theoretical uncertainty, in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Upper 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Lower 1-sigma expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Signal region (SR) providing the best expected sensitivity in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario. In the case of SRA, the number shown represents the contransverse mass, M(CT), threshold used.

Nominal observed excluded cross sections at 95% CL in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario, once corrected by the luminosity and the efficiency times acceptance of the model itself.

Impact of reducing the branching ratios of SBOTTOM --> BOTTOM NEUTRALINO, assuming no sensitivity to the other decay possibilities, in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario. The numbers represent the maximum branching ratio excluded at 95% CL, taking the nominal cross section as reference.

Signal region (SR) providing the best expected sensitivity in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. In the case of SRA, the number shown represents the contransverse mass, M(CT), threshold used.

Signal region (SR) providing the best expected sensitivity in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. In the case of SRA, the number shown represents the contransverse mass, M(CT), threshold used.

Signal region (SR) providing the best expected sensitivity in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. In the case of SRA, the number shown represents the contransverse mass, M(CT), threshold used.

Nominal observed excluded cross sections at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario, once corrected by the luminosity and the efficiency times acceptance of the model itself.

Nominal observed excluded cross sections at 95% CL in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario, once corrected by the luminosity and the efficiency times acceptance of the model itself.

Nominal observed excluded cross sections at 95% CL in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario, once corrected by the luminosity and the efficiency times acceptance of the model itself.

Expected CLs values in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario.

Observed CLs values in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario.

Sbottom signal production cross sections in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane. These values are also used for the stop case since the differences in cross sections for these processes are negligible.

Relative theoretical uncertainties in percent on the sbottom signal production cross sections in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane coming from the usage of different PDF sets and renormalisation and factorisation scales. These values are also used for the stop case since the differences in cross sections for these processes are negligible.

Total number of generated MC events for the sbottom signal grid in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane.

Signal acceptance in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario. All the different "up" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(SBOTTOM), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane for the sbottom pair production scenario. All the different "down" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Expected CLs values in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Expected CLs values in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Expected CLs values in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed CLs values in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed CLs values in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Observed CLs values in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario.

Total number of generated MC events for the stop signal grid in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV.

Signal acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. All the different "up" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 5 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. All the different "down" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

.

Signal acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. All the different "up" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(STOP), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) = 20 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. All the different "down" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total number of generated MC events for the stop signal grid in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV.

Signal acceptance in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. All the different "up" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Total experimental systematic uncertainty in percent on the signal efficiency times acceptance in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(NEUTRALINO) ) mass plane with M(STOP) = 300 GEV for the stop pair production scenario. All the different "down" values have been added in quadrature. The best expected signal region selection is used per point.

Transverse mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Missing transverse energy after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Missing transverse energy after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Transverse mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Transverse mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass in the electron plus three jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus three jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus three jets top control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus three jets top control region.

Number of b-tagged jets in the combined electron plus three jets W+jets and top control region.

Number of b-tagged jets in the combined muon plus three jets W+jets and top control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus four jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus four jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus four jets top control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus four jets top control region.

Effective mass in the 3-jet loose signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet loose signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet tight signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet tight signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet loose signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet loose signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet tight signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet tight signal region (muon channel).

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits in the MSUGRA/CMSSM framework with the combined electron and muon channels.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the MSUGRA/CMSSM framework with the combined electron and muon channels.

Distribution of the variable ETmiss/sqrt(HT) for events with >= 7 jets each having transverse momentum > 80 GeV. The table gives the number of observed data events, the expected standard model backgroud prediction and the signal expected from the SUSY signal process.

Distribution of the variable ETmiss/sqrt(HT) for events with >= 9 jets each having transverse momentum > 55 GeV. The table gives the number of observed data events, the expected standard model backgroud prediction and the signal expected from the SUSY signal process.

Distribution of the variable ETmiss/sqrt(HT) for events with >= 8 jets each having transverse momentum > 80 GeV. The table gives the number of observed data events, the expected standard model backgroud prediction and the signal expected from the SUSY signal process.