Normalised fiducial differential tW production cross section as a function of the $Leading$ $lepton$ $p_{T}$. The vertical bars on the points give the statistical uncertainty in the data, the horizontal bars show the bin width. Predictions from POWHEG (PH) + PYTHIA 8 (P8) DR and DS, POWHEG + HERWIG 7 (H7) DR, MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO (aMC) + PYTHIA 8 DR, DR2, DS and DS with a dynamic factor are also shown. The grey band represents the statistical uncertainty and the orange band the total uncertainty. In the lower panels, the ratio of the predictions to the data is shown.

Normalised fiducial differential tW production cross section as a function of the $p_{Z}(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j)$. The vertical bars on the points give the statistical uncertainty in the data, the horizontal bars show the bin width. Predictions from POWHEG (PH) + PYTHIA 8 (P8) DR and DS, POWHEG + HERWIG 7 (H7) DR, MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO (aMC) + PYTHIA 8 DR, DR2, DS and DS with a dynamic factor are also shown. The grey band represents the statistical uncertainty and the orange band the total uncertainty. In the lower panels, the ratio of the predictions to the data is shown.

Normalised fiducial differential tW production cross section as a function of the $Jet$ $p_{T}$. The vertical bars on the points give the statistical uncertainty in the data, the horizontal bars show the bin width. Predictions from POWHEG (PH) + PYTHIA 8 (P8) DR and DS, POWHEG + HERWIG 7 (H7) DR, MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO (aMC) + PYTHIA 8 DR, DR2, DS and DS with a dynamic factor are also shown. The grey band represents the statistical uncertainty and the orange band the total uncertainty. In the lower panels, the ratio of the predictions to the data is shown.

Normalised fiducial differential tW production cross section as a function of the $m(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j)$. The vertical bars on the points give the statistical uncertainty in the data, the horizontal bars show the bin width. Predictions from POWHEG (PH) + PYTHIA 8 (P8) DR and DS, POWHEG + HERWIG 7 (H7) DR, MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO (aMC) + PYTHIA 8 DR, DR2, DS and DS with a dynamic factor are also shown. The grey band represents the statistical uncertainty and the orange band the total uncertainty. In the lower panels, the ratio of the predictions to the data is shown.

Normalised fiducial differential tW production cross section as a function of the $\Delta\phi(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm})/\pi$. The vertical bars on the points give the statistical uncertainty in the data, the horizontal bars show the bin width. Predictions from POWHEG (PH) + PYTHIA 8 (P8) DR and DS, POWHEG + HERWIG 7 (H7) DR, MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO (aMC) + PYTHIA 8 DR, DR2, DS and DS with a dynamic factor are also shown. The grey band represents the statistical uncertainty and the orange band the total uncertainty. In the lower panels, the ratio of the predictions to the data is shown.

Normalised fiducial differential tW production cross section as a function of the $m_{T}(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j, p_{T}^{miss})$. The vertical bars on the points give the statistical uncertainty in the data, the horizontal bars show the bin width. Predictions from POWHEG (PH) + PYTHIA 8 (P8) DR and DS, POWHEG + HERWIG 7 (H7) DR, MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO (aMC) + PYTHIA 8 DR, DR2, DS and DS with a dynamic factor are also shown. The grey band represents the statistical uncertainty and the orange band the total uncertainty. In the lower panels, the ratio of the predictions to the data is shown.

Response matrix between detector and particle level for the $Leading$ $lepton$ $p_{T}$.

Response matrix between detector and particle level for the $p_{Z}(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j)$.

Response matrix between detector and particle level for the $Jet$ $p_{T}$.

Response matrix between detector and particle level for the $m(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j)$.

Response matrix between detector and particle level for the $\Delta\phi(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm})/\pi$.

Response matrix between detector and particle level for the $m_{T}(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j, p_{T}^{miss})$.

Covariance matrix including all uncertainties of the differential result for the $Leading$ $lepton$ $p_{T}$.

Covariance matrix including all uncertainties of the differential result for the $p_{Z}(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j)$.

Covariance matrix including all uncertainties of the differential result for the $Jet$ $p_{T}$.

Covariance matrix including all uncertainties of the differential result for the $m(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j)$.

Covariance matrix including all uncertainties of the differential result for the $\Delta\phi(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm})/\pi$.

Covariance matrix including all uncertainties of the differential result for the $m_{T}(e^{\pm}, \mu^{\pm}, j, p_{T}^{miss})$.

Parameters of the polynomial fit of net-proton C3/C2 and C4/C2 vs energy in 0-5$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. Polynomial of order 5 and 4 are used to fit C3/C2 and C4/C2 ratio vs energies, respectively.

Cumulant ratios C3/C2 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions in STAR Au+Au collisions for nine energies from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 7.7 - 200 GeV for 0-5$\%$ and 70-80$\%$ centrality.

Cumulant ratios C3/C2 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions in Au+Au collisions from UrQMD for 0-5$\%$ centrality.

Cumulant ratios C3/C2 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions from HRG GCE, HRG GEC excluded volume, HRG CE model.

Cumulants and their ratios up to fourth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV using conventional analytical efficiency corrections and unfolding approaches with various cases of distribution of detector response.

Rapidity dependence of cumulant ratio C4/C2 of net-proton distributions for 0-5$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at nine energies from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 7.7 - 200 GeV.

Significance of deviations in net-proton C4/C2 (or kappa*sigma^2) for central 0-5$\%$ Au+Au collisions and those from UrQMD, HRG and peripheral 70-80$\%$ data.

RMS of raw subtracted $p_T$ for jets reconstructed in PbPb collisions (in different centrality bins) with the anti-k$_T$ algorythm with a distance parameter $R=0.3$, in $|\eta|<0.2$.

Inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets with a distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The '3.7%' luminosity uncertainty is a fully correlated uncertainty, and not included in the point-to-point uncertainty.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.2$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.3$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.4$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 0-5\% PbPb centrality. The '5.5%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 5-10\% PbPb centrality. The '5.9%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 10-30\% PbPb centrality. The '6.9%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 30-50\% PbPb centrality. The '10%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 50-70\% PbPb centrality. The '15%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 70-90\% PbPb centrality. The '18%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of average Npart, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in the range $80< p_T < 90$GeV/c and $|\eta|<2$.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of average Npart, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in the range $130< p_T < 150$GeV/c and $|\eta|<2$.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3$, reconstructed in the range $|\eta|<2$, for 0-10\% PbPb centrality. The '5.7%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Differential cross-section in bins of leading charged particle jet $\tau_1$. The actual measurement is unbinned and available with examples at <a href="https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024">gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024</a>

Differential cross-section in bins of leading charged particle jet $\tau_2$. The actual measurement is unbinned and available with examples at <a href="https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024">gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024</a>

Differential cross-section in bins of leading charged particle jet $\tau_3$. The actual measurement is unbinned and available with examples at <a href="https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024">gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024</a>

Differential cross-section in bins of leading charged particle jet $\tau_{21}$. The actual measurement is unbinned and available with examples at <a href="https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024">gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024</a>

Differential cross-section in bins of $\Delta R$ between the leading charged particle jet and the dilepton system. The actual measurement is unbinned and available with examples at <a href="https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024">gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/public/sm-z-jets-omnifold-2024</a>

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of dimuon invariant mass. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Forward-backward ratios for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. Quoted uncertainties are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Forward-backward ratios for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. Quoted uncertainties are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of dimuon invariant mass.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiency for quark and gluon jets to pass different tau identification discriminators versus the efficiency for genuine tau_h. The upper two plots are obtained with jets from the W+jets simulated sample and the lower two plots with jets from the tt sample. The left two plots include jets and genuine tau_h with pt < 100 GeV, whereas the right two plots include those with pt > 100 GeV. The working points are indicated as full circles. The efficiency for jets from the W+jets event sample, enriched in quark jets, to pass the discriminators is higher compared to jets from the tt event sample, which has a larger fraction of gluon and b-quark jets. The jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency is larger for jets and tau_h with pt < 100 GeV than for those with pt > 100 GeV. Compared with the previously used MVA discriminator, the DEEPTAU discriminator reduces the jet efficiency for a given tau_h efficiency by consistently more than a factor of 1.8, and by more at high tau_h efficiency. The additional gain at high pt comes from the inclusion of updated decay modes in the tau_h reconstruction, as illustrated by the curves for the previously used MVA discriminator but including reconstructed tau_h candidates with additional decay modes.

Efficiencies for simulated tau_h decays with |eta| < 2.3 to pass the following reconstruction and identification requirements: to be reconstructed in any decay mode with pt > 20 GeV and |eta| < 2.3 (black dashed line), to be reconstructed in a decay mode except for those with missing charged hadrons (labelled ''2-prong'' and shown as full black line), and to be reconstructed in a decay mode except the 2-prong ones and to pass the Loose, Medium, or Tight working point of the Djet discriminator (blue lines), obtained with a Z to tau tau event sample. The efficiencies are shown as a function of the visible genuine tau_h pt obtained from simulated decay products.

Efficiency for electrons against efficiency for genuine tau_h to pass the MVA and De discriminators, separately for electrons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). Vertical bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The tau_h candidates are reconstructed in one of the tau_h decay modes without missing charged hadrons. Compared with the MVA discriminator, the De discriminator reduces the electron efficiency by more than a factor of two for a tau_h efficiency of 70% and by more than a factor of 10 for τh efficiencies larger than 88%. Furthermore, working points (indicated as full circles) are now provided for previously inaccessible tau_h efficiencies larger than 90%, for a misidentification efficiency between 0.3 and 8%.

Efficiency for electrons against efficiency for genuine tau_h to pass the MVA and De discriminators, separately for electrons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). Vertical bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The tau_h candidates are reconstructed in one of the tau_h decay modes without missing charged hadrons. Compared with the MVA discriminator, the De discriminator reduces the electron efficiency by more than a factor of two for a tau_h efficiency of 70% and by more than a factor of 10 for τh efficiencies larger than 88%. Furthermore, working points (indicated as full circles) are now provided for previously inaccessible tau_h efficiencies larger than 90%, for a misidentification efficiency between 0.3 and 8%.

Efficiency for electrons against efficiency for genuine tau_h to pass the MVA and De discriminators, separately for electrons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). Vertical bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The tau_h candidates are reconstructed in one of the tau_h decay modes without missing charged hadrons. Compared with the MVA discriminator, the De discriminator reduces the electron efficiency by more than a factor of two for a tau_h efficiency of 70% and by more than a factor of 10 for τh efficiencies larger than 88%. Furthermore, working points (indicated as full circles) are now provided for previously inaccessible tau_h efficiencies larger than 90%, for a misidentification efficiency between 0.3 and 8%.

Efficiency for electrons against efficiency for genuine tau_h to pass the MVA and De discriminators, separately for electrons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). Vertical bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The tau_h candidates are reconstructed in one of the tau_h decay modes without missing charged hadrons. Compared with the MVA discriminator, the De discriminator reduces the electron efficiency by more than a factor of two for a tau_h efficiency of 70% and by more than a factor of 10 for τh efficiencies larger than 88%. Furthermore, working points (indicated as full circles) are now provided for previously inaccessible tau_h efficiencies larger than 90%, for a misidentification efficiency between 0.3 and 8%.

Efficiency for electrons against efficiency for genuine tau_h to pass the MVA and De discriminators, separately for electrons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). Vertical bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The tau_h candidates are reconstructed in one of the tau_h decay modes without missing charged hadrons. Compared with the MVA discriminator, the De discriminator reduces the electron efficiency by more than a factor of two for a tau_h efficiency of 70% and by more than a factor of 10 for τh efficiencies larger than 88%. Furthermore, working points (indicated as full circles) are now provided for previously inaccessible tau_h efficiencies larger than 90%, for a misidentification efficiency between 0.3 and 8%.

Efficiency for electrons against efficiency for genuine tau_h to pass the MVA and De discriminators, separately for electrons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). Vertical bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The tau_h candidates are reconstructed in one of the tau_h decay modes without missing charged hadrons. Compared with the MVA discriminator, the De discriminator reduces the electron efficiency by more than a factor of two for a tau_h efficiency of 70% and by more than a factor of 10 for τh efficiencies larger than 88%. Furthermore, working points (indicated as full circles) are now provided for previously inaccessible tau_h efficiencies larger than 90%, for a misidentification efficiency between 0.3 and 8%.

Efficiency for muons against efficiency for simulated τh to pass the cutoff-based and Dμ discriminators, separately for muons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). The four working points are indicated as full circles. Vertical bars cor- respond to the statistical uncertainties. In both pt regimes, the D_m discriminator rejects up to a factor of 10 more muons at tau_h efficiencies around 99%, and it leads to an increase of the τh efficiency for a similar background rejection by about 0.5%

Efficiency for muons against efficiency for simulated τh to pass the cutoff-based and Dμ discriminators, separately for muons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). The four working points are indicated as full circles. Vertical bars cor- respond to the statistical uncertainties. In both pt regimes, the D_m discriminator rejects up to a factor of 10 more muons at tau_h efficiencies around 99%, and it leads to an increase of the τh efficiency for a similar background rejection by about 0.5%

Efficiency for muons against efficiency for simulated τh to pass the cutoff-based and Dμ discriminators, separately for muons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). The four working points are indicated as full circles. Vertical bars cor- respond to the statistical uncertainties. In both pt regimes, the D_m discriminator rejects up to a factor of 10 more muons at tau_h efficiencies around 99%, and it leads to an increase of the τh efficiency for a similar background rejection by about 0.5%

Efficiency for muons against efficiency for simulated τh to pass the cutoff-based and Dμ discriminators, separately for muons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). The four working points are indicated as full circles. Vertical bars cor- respond to the statistical uncertainties. In both pt regimes, the D_m discriminator rejects up to a factor of 10 more muons at tau_h efficiencies around 99%, and it leads to an increase of the τh efficiency for a similar background rejection by about 0.5%

Efficiency for muons against efficiency for simulated τh to pass the cutoff-based and Dμ discriminators, separately for muons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). The four working points are indicated as full circles. Vertical bars cor- respond to the statistical uncertainties. In both pt regimes, the D_m discriminator rejects up to a factor of 10 more muons at tau_h efficiencies around 99%, and it leads to an increase of the τh efficiency for a similar background rejection by about 0.5%

Efficiency for muons against efficiency for simulated τh to pass the cutoff-based and Dμ discriminators, separately for muons and tau_h with 20 < pt < 100 GeV (left) and pt > 100 GeV (right). The four working points are indicated as full circles. Vertical bars cor- respond to the statistical uncertainties. In both pt regimes, the D_m discriminator rejects up to a factor of 10 more muons at tau_h efficiencies around 99%, and it leads to an increase of the τh efficiency for a similar background rejection by about 0.5%

Nuclear modification factors $R_{AA}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{\gamma}$ measured in the 0–100% centrality ranges in PbPb.

95% CL intervals on the double ratio of measured yields, $(N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{\mathrm{PbPb}} / (N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{pp}$, as a function of pT, for the forward rapidity analysis bin.

Double ratio of measured yields, $(N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{\mathrm{PbPb}} / (N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{pp}$, as a function of centrality, for the midrapidity analysis bin.

95% CL intervals on the double ratio of measured yields, $(N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{\mathrm{PbPb}} / (N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{pp}$, as a function of centrality, for the midrapidity analysis bin.

Double ratio of measured yields, $(N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{\mathrm{PbPb}} / (N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{pp}$, as a function of centrality, for the forward rapidity analysis bin.

95% CL intervals on the double ratio of measured yields, $(N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{\mathrm{PbPb}} / (N_{\psi\mathrm{(2S)}} / N_{J/\psi})_{pp}$, as a function of centrality, for the forward rapidity analysis bin.