A Determination of electroweak parameters from Z0 ---> mu+ mu- (gamma)

The L3 collaboration Adeva, B. ; Adriani, O. ; Aguilar-Benitez, M. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 247 (1990) 473-480, 1990.
Inspire Record 297172 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29622

We have measured the partial width and forward-backward charge asymmetry for the reaction e + e - →Z 0 →μ + μ - (γ). We obtain a partial width Γ μμ of 83.3±1.3(stat)±0.9(sys) MeV and the following values for the vector and axial vector couplings: g v =−0.062 −0.015 +0.020 and g A =−0.497 −0.005 +0.005 . From our measurement of the partial width and the mass of the Z 0 boson we determine the effective electroweak mixing angle, sin 2 θ w =0.232±0.005, and the neutral current coupling strength parameter, ϱ =0.998±0.016.

4 data tables

No description provided.

Forward backward charge asymmetry.

No description provided.

More…

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to \mu^+ \mu^-$: A Test of Electroweak Theories

The Mark-J collaboration Adeva, B. ; Becker, U. ; Becker-Szendy, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 55 (1985) 665, 1985.
Inspire Record 214607 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3237

We use the reaction e+e−→μ+μ−, in the Mark J detector at the DESY high-energy e+e− collider PETRA, to test the standard electroweak theory and find good agreement. We also set limits on the parameters of several extended gauge theories.

6 data tables

CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENT RELATIVE TO PREDICTED QED CROSS SECTION.

FORWARD-BACKWARD ASYMMETRY. THE SYSTEMATIC ERROR IN THE ASYMMETRY IS <0.5 PCT.

ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS NOT GIVEN IN PAPER. SUPPLIED BY E.DEFFUR.

More…

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ Charge Asymmetry

Adeva, B. ; Barber, D.P. ; Becker, U. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 48 (1982) 1701, 1982.
Inspire Record 177308 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3116

The measurement of the nonelectromagnetic forward-backward charge asymmetry in the reaction e+e−→μ+μ− at s∼34.6 GeV and in the angular region 0<|cosθ|<0.8 is reported. With a systematic error less than 1%, we observe an asymmetry of (-8.1±2.1)%. This is in agreement with the standard electroweak theory prediction of (-7.6±0.6)%. The weak-current coupling constants are also reported.

4 data tables

SEE PRL 55, 665 FOR DISTRIBUTIONS AT 34.6 GEV AND ABOVE.

SEE PRL 55, 665 FOR CROSS SECTION VALUES AND FORWARD BACKWARD ASYMMETRY.

No description provided.

More…

A Summary of Recent Experimental Results From Mark-$J$: High-energy $e^+ e^-$ Collisions at {PETRA}

The Mark-J collaboration Adeva, B. ; Barber, D.P. ; Becker, U. ; et al.
Phys.Rept. 109 (1984) 131, 1984.
Inspire Record 196567 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30997

None

6 data tables

DATA ARE CORRECTED FOR TWO-PHOTON AND TAU PRODUCTION EFFECTS, ACCEPTANCE AND QED RADIATIVE EFFECTS UP TO ORDER ALPHA**3. THERE IS ALSO A 6 PCT NORMALISATION ERROR NOT INCLUDED. THE OVERALL AVERAGE VALUE OF R FROM THIS DATA IS 3.88 +- 0.04 +- 0.22.

No description provided.

SEE PRL 55, 665 FOR MOST RECENT VALUES OF THE MU+ MU- CROSS SECTIONS.

More…

Production of Sigma (1660) in K- p Interactions at 4.2-GeV/c

The Amsterdam-CERN-Nijmegen-Oxford collaboration Timmermans, Jan ; Engelen, J.J. ; Heinen, P.M. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 112 (1976) 77-106, 1976.
Inspire Record 108671 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.35709

The reaction of K − p → Σ + (1660) π − was studied in a 65 event/μb sample of Σππ(π), Λππ(π) and p K 0 π − final states. The main production features observed are that the Σ (1660) decaying into Σππ is mostly Λ (1405) π and is produced only at small t ; the Σ (1660) decaying into Σπ shows both forward and backward production. This confirms earlier results suggesting the existence of two Σ (1660) resonances. An Adair analysis and a (model-dependent) moments analysis find a J = 3 2 preference for the Σ + (1660)→ Λ (1405) π + → Σ + π − π + ; a Dalitz-Miller analysis of the decay Σ + (1660) → Λ (1405) π + → Σ − π + π + determines J P to be 3 2 − . For the Σ + (1660) → Σ 0 π + a moments analysis suggests J = 3 2 . Branching ratios are determined, which (with the exceptation of the Λ (1405) π mode) are in reasonable agreement with results from formation experiments for the J P = 3 2 − Σ(1660) resonance. We compare our branching ratios with SU(3) and SU(6) predictions; the latter comparison suggests that, unless there is strong configuration mixing, Σ (1660) → Λ (1405) π , if 3 2 − , cannot be a member of the (70, 1 − ) multiplet.

4 data tables

No description provided.

PRODUCTION ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS OF SIG(1670D13)+ DIFFER FOR THE TWO FINAL STATES <LAM(1405S01) PI+> AND <SIGMA PION> SUGGESTING THE EXISTENCE OF TWO SIG(1660) RESONANCES.

VALUES IN STRONG DISAGREEMENT WITH THE STODOLSKY-SAKURAI MODEL PREDICTIONS.

More…