The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.

Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.

Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Dijet mass spectra after the background only fit with the background prediction in the high-mass region with two b-tags.

Dijet mass spectra after the background only fit with the background prediction in the low-mass region with two b-tags.

The online b-tagging efficiency with respect to the offline b-tagging efficiency as a function of pT. The b-tagging online and offline working points correspond to an efficiency of 60% and 70%, respectively.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section for the b* model in the high-mass region with inclusive b-jet selection.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section times branching ratio for the SSM and leptophobic Z' models in the low- and high-mass region with two b-tags selection.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section for DM Z' models in the low-mass region with two b-tags selection. The Z' is expected to decay to all five quark flavors other than the top quark and the mediator to SM quark coupling (gSM) equal to 0.1 is assumed.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section times branching ratio for DM Z'->bb models in the high-mass region with two b-tags selection. The Z' is expected to decay to bb only and the mediator to SM quark coupling (gSM) equal to 0.25 is assumed.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances with intrinsic width smaller than the detector resolution. The width of the Gaussian reconstructed shape is dominated by the dijet mass resolution. The table shows the limits obtained from the high-mass inclusive one b-tag selection.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances with intrinsic width smaller than the detector resolution. The width of the Gaussian reconstructed shape is dominated by the dijet mass resolution. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection.

The mass distributions for the inclusive one b-tagged selection and two b-tagged selection using an integrated luminosity of 36.1 $fb^{-1}$. The inclusive one b-tagged Pythia8 MC distribution is normalized to the inclusive one b-tagged data. The two b-tagged Pythia8 MC distribution is normalized to the two b-tagged data. The systematic uncertainty band is dominated by the b-tagging scale factor and the b-jet energy scale.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for inclusive 1 b-tag and 2 b-tag categories as a function of the simulated b* and the Z' masses.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for 2 b-tag categories as a function of the simulated Z' masses.

The flavor composition of the simulated dijet background as a function of dijet mass before tagging. The fraction of the six combinations of the b-jet , c-jet and light-flavor jet are shown. All offline selections are applied.

The flavor composition of the simulated dijet background as a function of dijet mass with inclusive one b-tag. The fraction of the six combinations of the b-jet , c-jet and light-flavor jet are shown. All offline selections are applied.

The flavor composition of the simulated dijet background as a function of dijet mass with two b-tags. The fraction of the six combinations of the b-jet , c-jet and light-flavor jet are shown. All offline selections are applied.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 3%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 7%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 10%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 15%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 3%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 7%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 10%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 15%.

Differential cross sections in the full phase space obtained from the H->gammagamma and H->4l combined measurement for the transverse momentum of the leading jet pTj1. The first bin in the pTj1 distribution corresponds to the 0-jet bin in the Njets distribution. The NNLOPS ggF prediction scaled to the N3LO cross section is also provided.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of Higgs transverse momentum, in the 4l channel.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of Higgs transverse momentum, in the gamma gamma channel.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of Higgs rapidity, in the 4l channel.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of Higgs rapidity, in the gamma gamma channel.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of number of jets, in the 4l channel.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of number of jets, in the gamma gamma channel.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of the transverse momentum of the leading jet, in the 4l channel.

Acceptance factors to extrapolate from the fiducial phase space to the total phase space, in bins of the transverse momentum of the leading jet, in the gamma gamma channel.

Expected and observed upper limits at the 95% CL on the BB cross section as a function of B quark mass in the SU(2) singlet scenario.

Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on the mass of the B quark in the branching ratio plane of BR(B->Wt) versus BR(B->Hb).

The signal selection acceptance times efficiency (A$\times \epsilon$), defined as the ratio of the number of MC signal events in the category to the number of generated signal events, is presented as a function of the HVT resonance mass in the VBF category. The A$\times \epsilon$ is shown for the combination of all decay channels. For the HVT VBF samples, generator cuts are: m$_{jj} >$ 150 GeV. The decay of $W$ and $Z$ are to all flavors of leptons. The uncertainty shown represents the total statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Signal selection acceptance times efficiency (A$\times \epsilon$), defined as the ratio of the number of MC signal events in the category to the number of generated signal events, as a function of the HVT resonance mass for the quark-antiquark production. The $A\times\epsilon$ is shown for each decay channel and the inclusive one. The decay of $W$ and $Z$ are to all flavors of leptons. The uncertainty shown represents the total statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Signal selection acceptance times efficiency (A$\times \epsilon$), defined as the ratio of the number of MC signal events in the category to the number of generated signal events, as a function of the HVT resonance mass for the quark-antiquark production. The $A\times\epsilon$ is shown for each decay channel and the inclusive one. The decay of $W$ and $Z$ are to all flavors of leptons. The uncertainty shown represents the total statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Observed and expected distributions of the $WZ$ invariant mass in the q$\bar{\mathrm q}$ category after applying all selection cuts. Background contributions are obtained from background-only likelihood fit to the data.

Observed and expected distributions of the $WZ$ invariant mass in the q$\bar{\mathrm q}$ category after applying all selection cuts. Background contributions are obtained from background-only likelihood fit to the data.

Observed and expected distributions of the $WZ$ invariant mass in the $VBF$ category after applying all selection cuts. Background contributions are obtained from background-only likelihood fit to the data.

Observed and expected distributions of the $WZ$ invariant mass in the $VBF$ category after applying all selection cuts. Background contributions are obtained from background-only likelihood fit to the data.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\times$BR($W'\to W^\pm Z$) for the q$\bar{\mathrm q}$ production of a $W'$ boson in the HVT model as a function of its mass. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty in the expected limits are given. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 900 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\times$BR($W'\to W^\pm Z$) for the q$\bar{\mathrm q}$ production of a $W'$ boson in the HVT model as a function of its mass. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty in the expected limits are given. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 900 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\times$BR($W'\to W^\pm Z$) for the $VBF$ production of a $W'$ boson in the HVT model as a function of its mass. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty are given in the expected limits. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 700 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\times$BR($W'\to W^\pm Z$) for the $VBF$ production of a $W'$ boson in the HVT model as a function of its mass. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty are given in the expected limits. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 700 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\times$BR($H_5^\pm\to W^\pm Z$) of the Georgi-Machacek Model as a function of $m_{H_5^\pm}$. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty in the expected limits are given. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 700 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\times$BR($H_5^\pm\to W^\pm Z$) of the Georgi-Machacek Model as a function of $m_{H_5^\pm}$. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty in the expected limits are given. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 700 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on the parameter $\sin(\theta_H)$ of the Georgi-Machacek Model as a function of $m_{H_5^\pm}$. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty are given in the expected limits. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 700 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on the parameter $\sin(\theta_H)$ of the Georgi-Machacek Model as a function of $m_{H_5^\pm}$. The $\pm1\sigma$ and $\pm2\sigma$ uncertainty are given in the expected limits. Limits are calculated in the asymptotic approximation below 700 GeV and are obtained from pseudo-experiments above that.

Distributions of kinematic variables in the signal regions for the $2\ell$ channels after applying all selection requirements. The histograms show the post-fit background predictions. The last bin includes the overflow. The distribution for $R_{\textrm{ISR}}$ in SR$2\ell$_ISR is plotted. The expected distribution for a benchmark signal model, normalized to the NLO+NLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, is also shown for comparison.

Distributions of kinematic variables in the signal regions for the $3\ell$ channels after applying all selection requirements. The histograms show the post-fit background predictions. The last bin includes the overflow. The distribution for $H_{3,1}^{\textrm{PP}}$ in SR$3\ell$_Low is plotted. The expected distribution for a benchmark signal model, normalized to the NLO+NLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, is also shown for comparison.

Distributions of kinematic variables in the signal regions for the $3\ell$ channels after applying all selection requirements. The histograms show the post-fit background predictions. The last bin includes the overflow. The distribution of $p_{\textrm{T}}^{\ell_{1}}$ in SR$3\ell$_Low is plotted. The expected distribution for a benchmark signal model, normalized to the NLO+NLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, is also shown for comparison.

Distributions of kinematic variables in the signal regions for the $3\ell$ channels after applying all selection requirements. The histograms show the post-fit background predictions. The last bin includes the overflow. The distribution of $p_{\mathrm{T\ ISR}}^{~\textrm{CM}}$ in SR$3\ell$_ISR is plotted. The expected distribution for a benchmark signal model, normalized to the NLO+NLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, is also shown for comparison.

Distributions of kinematic variables in the signal regions for the $3\ell$ channels after applying all selection requirements. The histograms show the post-fit background predictions. The last bin includes the overflow. The distribution of $R_{\textrm{ISR}}$ in SR$3\ell$_ISR is plotted. The expected distribution for a benchmark signal model, normalized to the NLO+NLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, is also shown for comparison.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on the masses of C1/N2 and N1 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the 2$\ell$ search, assuming 100\% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and LSP.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on the masses of C1/N2 and N1 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the 2$\ell$ search, assuming 100% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and LSP.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on the masses of C1/N2 and N1 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the the $3\ell$ search, assuming 100% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and LSP.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on the masses of C1/N2 and N1 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the the $3\ell$ search, assuming 100% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and LSP.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on the masses of C1/N2 and N1 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the statistical combination of the $2\ell$ and 3$\ell$ search channels, assuming 100\% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and LSP.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on the masses of C1/N2 and N1 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the statistical combination of the $2\ell$ and 3$\ell$ search channels, assuming 100% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and LSP.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_High. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_High.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_High.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_Int. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_Int.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_Int.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_Low. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_Low.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_Low.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_ISR. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_ISR.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR2L_ISR.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_High. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_High.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_High.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_Int. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_Int.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_Int.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_Low. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_Low.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_Low.

Signal region acceptance for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_ISR. The acceptance is with respect to all possible $W/Z$ decays.

Signal region efficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_ISR.

Signal region acceptanceXefficiency for chargino-neutralino production in SR3L_ISR.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross-section of C1/N2 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the 2$\ell$ search, assuming 100% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and N1.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross-section of C1/N2 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the 3$\ell$ search, assuming 100% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and N1.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross-section of C1/N2 from the analysis of 36.1fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data obtained from the statistical combination of 2 and 3$\ell$ searches, assuming 100% branching ratio of the sparticles to decay to SM $W/Z$ bosons and N1.

Signal cutflow for SR2L_High and m[C1/N2,N1] = [500,0] GeV. 5000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

Signal cutflow for SR2L_Int and m[C1/N2,N1] = [400,200] GeV. 10000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

Signal cutflow for SR2L_Low and m[C1/N2,N1] = [200,100] GeV. 20000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

Signal cutflow for SR2L_ISR and m[C1/N2,N1] = [200,100] GeV. 20000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

Signal cutflow for SR3L_High and m[C1/N2,N1] = [500,0] GeV. 5000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

Signal cutflow for SR3L_Int and m[C1/N2,N1] = [400,200] GeV. 10000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

Signal cutflow for SR3L_Low and m[C1/N2,N1] = [200,100] GeV. 20000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

Signal cutflow for SR3L_ISR and m[C1/N2,N1] = [200,100] GeV. 20000 events were generated for this point. The unweighted number of events correspond to the number of selected MC events in the produced sample, while the weighted yield is normalized to the luminosity of the data.

The systematic uncertainty on the unfolded distribution as a function of minimax-mbl, broken down by components.

The covariance matrix for the unfolded, normalized data in bins of minimax-mbl shown in Figure 2. Redundant entries are suppressed.

Leading lepton transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading lepton transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Leading lepton pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading lepton pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Leading b-jet transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading b-jet transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Leading b-jet pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading b-jet pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

The detector-level minimax-m(bl) distribution for events entering the Z+jets control region.

The detector-level minimax-m(bl) distribution for events entering the same-sign lepton control region.

Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet and lepton transverse momenta, $S_T$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the pair-production (PP) $\geq 3\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $S_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a $B\bar B$ signal in the singlet model with $m_B$ = 900 GeV is overlaid.

Comparison of the distribution of the invariant mass of the $Z$ boson candidate and the highest-$p_T$ top-tagged large-$R$ jet, $m_{Zt}$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the single-production (SP) 2$\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $m_{Zt}$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a single-$T$-quark signal with $m_T$ = 900 GeV and $\kappa_T = 0.5$ is overlaid.

Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet and lepton transverse momenta, $S_T$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the single-production (SP) $\geq 3\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $S_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a single-$T$-quark signal with $m_T$ = 900 GeV and $\kappa_T$ = 0.5 is overlaid.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ in the singlet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ in the singlet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ in the doublet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ in the doublet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ with a BR of 100$\%$ to $Zt$. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ with a BR of 100$\%$ to $Zb$. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Expected 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$, adding up to unity.

Observed 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$, adding up to unity.

Expected 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$, adding up to unity.

Observed 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$, adding up to unity.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section times BR to $Zt$ of single production (SP) of a $T$-quark. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits. The expected cross section times BR to $Zt$ for single-$T$-quark production is also shown for a coupling $\kappa_T = 0.5$, which corresponds to a coupling of $c_W = \sqrt{c^2_{W,L} + c^2_{W,R}} = 0.45$ from Ref. [14]. The BR assumed here corresponds to the singlet benchmark model, i.e. $\approx 25\%$.

Expected and observed 95$\%$ CL limits from the combination of the single-production channels on the coupling of the $T$ quark to SM particles, $c_W = \sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, assuming the singlet-model BR of $\approx 25\%$, as a function of the mass of the $T$ quark, $m_T$. Values of $c_W$ larger than the observed limit are excluded.

Expected and observed 95$\%$ CL limits from the combination of the single-production channels on the mixing angle in the singlet model between the $T$ quark and the top quark, $|\sin\theta_L|$, as a function of the mass of the $T$ quark, $m_T$. Values of $|\sin\theta_L|$ enclosed by the observed limit are excluded, i.e. for $m_T$ larger than $\approx 1200$ GeV, no value of $|\sin\theta_L|$ is excluded.

Expected lower limit from the combination of the single-production channels on the mass of the $T$ quark as a function of the couplings of the $T$ quark to the $W$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, and to the $Z$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$ with the assumption of equal BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$ and $T\rightarrow Ht$ in the limit of large $T$-quark masses.

Observed lower limit from the combination of the single-production channels on the mass of the $T$ quark as a function of the couplings of the $T$ quark to the $W$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, and to the $Z$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$ with the assumption of equal BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$ and $T\rightarrow Ht$ in the limit of large $T$-quark masses.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 500 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 600 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 700 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 750 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 800 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 850 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 900 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 950 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1000 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1050 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1100 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1150 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1200 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1300 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1400 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 500 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 600 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 700 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 750 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 800 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 850 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 900 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 950 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1000 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1050 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1100 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1150 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1200 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1300 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1400 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section times BR to $Zt$ as a function of the vector-like $T$-quark mass and coupling $\kappa_T$ for the combination of the SP $2\ell$ and SP $\geq 3\ell$ channels.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for single-$T$-quark production with $\kappa_T = 0.5$ in the SP $2\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for single-$T$-quark production with $\kappa_T = 0.5$ in the SP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the SP $2\ell$ channel for $\kappa_T = 0.5$. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the SP $\geq 3\ell$ channel for $\kappa_T = 0.5$. Uncertainties are statistical only.

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods