Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the dilepton transverse momentum $p^{ll}_{\mathrm{T}}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the the four-body transverse momentum $p^{ll\gamma\gamma}_{\mathrm{T}}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the diphoton invariant mass $m_{\gamma\gamma}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the four-body invariant mass $m_{ll\gamma\gamma}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Expected and observed $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameters $f_{T,j}/\Lambda^{4}$ of transverse dimension-8 operators. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level. No unitarity constraints are applied.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,8}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,0}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,1}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,2}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,5}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,6}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,7}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,9}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.17$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.19$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.21$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.23$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.25$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.27$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.29$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.31$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.33$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances decaying to a quark-gluon pair, with $M(X)/M(Y) = 0.42$. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to predictions for a scalar diquark with couplings to pairs of up quarks, $y_{uu}$ = 0.4, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{χ}$ = 0.6.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for the non-resonant production of top squark pairs in the RPV SUSY decay scenario. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to the top squark model cross section.

Observed differential four-jet mass spectrum for 0.22 < $\\a$ < 0.24. The cross-section is calculated by dividing the event yield by the bin width and luminosity.

Observed differential four-jet mass spectrum for 0.24 < $\\a$ < 0.26. The cross-section is calculated by dividing the event yield by the bin width and luminosity.

Observed differential four-jet mass spectrum for 0.26 < $\\a$ < 0.28. The cross-section is calculated by dividing the event yield by the bin width and luminosity.

Observed differential four-jet mass spectrum for all $\\a$ bins together. The cross-section is calculated by dividing the event yield by the bin width and luminosity.

Observed differential average dijet mass spectrum within three $\\a$ bins of the non-resonant search. The cross-section is calculated by dividing the event yield by the bin width and luminosity.

Fit of elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ photoproduction off protons with a Soeding-inspired analytic function --- statistical correlations only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ photoproduction off protons, differential in the dipion mass and in bins of $W$. The tabulated cross sections are $\gamma p$ cross sections but can be converted to $ep$ cross sections using the effective photon flux $\Phi_{\gamma/e}$.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ photoproduction off protons, differential in the dipion mass and in bins of $W$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction off protons, in bins of the photon-proton energy $W$. The cross section is defined as the integral of the relativistic Breit Wigner resonance in the dipion mass over the range $2m_\pi<m_{\pi\pi}<1.53$ GeV. The tabulated cross sections are $\gamma p$ cross sections but can be converted to $ep$ cross sections using the effective photon flux $\Phi_{\gamma/e}$.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction off protons in bins of the photon-proton energy $W$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Fit of elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction cross sections off protons as a function of energy. Parameters with subscript "el" and "pd" correspond to elastic and proton-dissociative cross sections, respectively.

Fit of elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction cross sections off protons as a function of energy --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Fit of elastic $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction cross section off protons as a function of energy (various experiments)

Fit of elastic $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction cross sections off protons as a function of energy (various experiments) --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ photoproduction cross section off protons, double-differential in the dipion mass and the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$. The tabulated cross sections are $\gamma p$ cross sections but can be converted to $ep$ cross sections using the effective photon flux $\Phi_{\gamma/e}$.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ photoproduction cross section off protons, double-differential in the dipion mass and the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction off protons, single-differential in the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$. The cross section is defined as the integral of the relativistic Breit Wigner resonance in the dipion mass over the range $2m_\pi<m_{\pi\pi}<1.53$ GeV. The tabulated cross sections are $\gamma p$ cross sections but can be converted to $ep$ cross sections using the effective photon flux $\Phi_{\gamma/e}$.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction off protons, single differential in the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Fit of elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$. Parameters with subscript "el" and "pd" correspond to elastic and proton-dissociative cross sections, respectively.

Fit of elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ photoproduction double-differenial cross section off protons, as a function of the dipion mass and the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$, in bins of the photon-proton energy $W$ The tabulated cross sections are $\gamma p$ cross sections but can be converted to $ep$ cross sections using the effective photon flux $\Phi_{\gamma/e}$.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ photoproduction double-differenial cross section off protons, as a function of the dipion mass and the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$, in bins of the photon-proton energy $W$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction off protons, single-differential in the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$, in bins of the photon-proton energy $W$. The cross section is defined as the integral of the relativistic Breit Wigner resonance in the dipion mass over the range $2m_\pi<m_{\pi\pi}<1.53$ GeV. The tabulated cross sections are $\gamma p$ cross sections but can be converted to $ep$ cross sections using the effective photon flux $\Phi_{\gamma/e}$.

Elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction cross section off protons, single differential in the momentum transfer $\vert t\vert$ and in bins of the photon-proton energy $W$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Regge fit of elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$ and photon-proton energy $W$. Parameters with subscript "el" and "pd" correspond to elastic and proton-dissociative cross sections, respectively.

Regge fit of elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) and proton-dissociative ($1<m_Y<10$ GeV) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$ and photon-proton energy $W$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Fit of $b$-slopes in elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$ in bins of photon-proton energy $W$.

Fit of $b$-slopes in elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$ in bins of photon-proton energy $W$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Fit of Pomeron trajectories in elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$ in bins of photon-proton energy $W$.

Fit of Pomeron trajectories in elastic ($m_Y=m_p$) $\rho^0(770)$ photoproduction single-differential cross sections off protons as a function of momentum transfer $t$ in bins of photon-proton energy $W$ --- statistical correlations coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ only. Only one half of the (symmetric) matrix is stored. Bins are identified by their global bin number.

Differential fiducial cross section of the Z boson $|y|$ in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+1$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the leading b-jet $|y|$ in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+1$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the $\Delta \phi$ between Z boson and leading $b$-jet in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+1$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the $\Delta y$ between Z boson and leading $b$-jet in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+1$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the $\Delta R$ between Z boson and leading $b$-jet in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+1$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the $\Delta \phi$ between the first two leading $b$-jets in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+2$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the $\Delta y$ between the first two leading $b$-jets in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+2$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the $\Delta R$ between the first two leading $b$-jets in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+2$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the invariant mass of the first two leading $b$-jets in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+2$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the Z boson $p_{\text{T}}$ in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+2$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{\text{T}}$ of the first two leading $b$-jets in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+2$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

Differential fiducial cross section of the ratio between the $p_{\text{T}}$ and the invariant mass of the first two leading $b$-jets in events with $Z(\rightarrow ll)\ge+2$ b-jets. The statistical uncertainties and the individual components of systematic uncertainty are given in each bin. Statistical uncertainties are bin-to-bin uncorrelated.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $E_{\mathrm{T}}^\gamma$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $|\eta^\gamma|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $|\eta^\gamma|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $\Delta\phi(ll,\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $\Delta\phi(ll,\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}/m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}/m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $x_{I\!\!P}$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $y$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $Q^2$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $M_X$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $\langle\eta^{\text{jets}}\rangle$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $x_{I\!\!P}$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $y$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $x_\gamma$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $M_X$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $\langle\eta^{\text{jets}}\rangle$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $y$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Invariant mass distributions of the three SIGMA-PI combinations for centre-of-mass energies, W, from 2.25 to 2.35 GeV corresponding to incident photon energies from 2.23 to 2.47 GeV.

Invariant mass distributions of the three SIGMA-PI combinations for centre-of-mass energies, W, from 2.35 to 2.45 GeV corresponding to incident photon energies from 2.47 to 2.73 GeV.

Invariant mass distributions of the three SIGMA-PI combinations for centre-of-mass energies, W, from 2.45 to 2.55 GeV corresponding to incident photon energies from 2.73 to 3.00 GeV.

Invariant mass distributions of the three SIGMA-PI combinations for centre-of-mass energies, W, from 2.55 to 2.65 GeV corresponding to incident photon energies from 3.00 to 3.27 GeV.

Invariant mass distributions of the three SIGMA-PI combinations for centre-of-mass energies, W, from 2.65 to 2.75 GeV corresponding to incident photon energies from 3.27 to 3.56 GeV.

Invariant mass distributions of the three SIGMA-PI combinations for centre-of-mass energies, W, from 2.75 to 2.84 GeV corresponding to incident photon energies from 3.56 to 3.83 GeV.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda_c^+ X)/dp_T(J/\psi)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\Lambda_c^+)<4$, $3<p_T(\Lambda_c^+) <12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X)/dp_T(D^0)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X)/dp_T(D^+)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X)/dp_T(D_s^+)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda_c^+ X)/dp_T(\Lambda_c^+)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\Lambda_c^+)<4$, $3<p_T(\Lambda_c^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{dp_T( D^0 )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D^+ )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12~GeV/c$, $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{dp_T( C )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{dp_T( C )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X \right)}{d \Delta y }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X \right)}{d \Delta y }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X \right)}{d \Delta y}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12~GeV/c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ , $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ , $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12~GeV/c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ , $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X \right)}{d m_{J/\psi D^0} }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X \right)}{d m_{J/\psi D^+} }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X \right)}{d m_{J/\psi D_s^+} }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D^0} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D^+} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{d m_{D^0 \bar{D}^0} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D^-} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D_s^-} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D_s^-} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^- X \right)}{d m_{D^+ D^-} }$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^- X \right)}{d m_{D^+ D_s^-} }$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{d m_{D^+ \bar{\Lambda}_c^-} }$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Diphoton production cross section as a function of the diphoton rapidity.

Diphoton production cross section differential in the cosine of the polar angle in the Collins-Soper frame.

Diphoton production cross section differential in the sub-leading to leading photon transverse momentum ratio (z).