Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(3S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(1S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of pT. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(2S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of pT. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(1S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of |y|. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(2S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of |y|. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(1S) meson production in PbPb collisions, as a function of centrality, displayed as the average number of participating nucleons. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainties from the PbPb data (3.2%) or from the pp reference (6.3%) are displayed at unity as empty and filled red black boxes, respectively.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(2S) meson production in PbPb collisions, as a function of centrality, displayed as the average number of participating nucleons. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainties from the PbPb data (3.2%) or from the pp reference (6.9%) are displayed at unity as empty and filled black black boxes, respectively.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(1S), Υ(2S) and Υ(3S) meson production in PbPb collisions, integrated over centrality. For the Υ(3S), the upper limit derived on the nuclear modification factor is given.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of rapidity.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality at high $p_{\rm T}$, 6.5$<p_{\rm T}<$30 GeV/c, in three different $|y|$ regions.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality at high $p_{\rm T}$, 6.5$<p_{\rm T}<$30 GeV/c, in three different $|y|$ regions.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality, at forward rapidity, 1.6$<|y|<$2.4, for two different $p_{\rm T}$ regions.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality, at forward rapidity, 1.6$<|y|<$2.4, for two different $p_{\rm T}$ regions.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

RMS of raw subtracted $p_T$ for jets reconstructed in PbPb collisions (in different centrality bins) with the anti-k$_T$ algorythm with a distance parameter $R=0.3$, in $|\eta|<0.2$.

Inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets with a distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The '3.7%' luminosity uncertainty is a fully correlated uncertainty, and not included in the point-to-point uncertainty.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.2$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.3$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.4$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 0-5\% PbPb centrality. The '5.5%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 5-10\% PbPb centrality. The '5.9%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 10-30\% PbPb centrality. The '6.9%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 30-50\% PbPb centrality. The '10%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 50-70\% PbPb centrality. The '15%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 70-90\% PbPb centrality. The '18%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of average Npart, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in the range $80< p_T < 90$GeV/c and $|\eta|<2$.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of average Npart, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in the range $130< p_T < 150$GeV/c and $|\eta|<2$.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3$, reconstructed in the range $|\eta|<2$, for 0-10\% PbPb centrality. The '5.7%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

(Color online) $\Upsilon$(1S+2S+3S) (a) and $\Upsilon$(1S) (b) $R_{AA}$ vs. $N_{part}$ in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV U+U collisions (solid circles), compared to different models [36–38], described in the text. The 95% lower confidence bound is indicated for the 30-60% centrality U+U data (see text). Each point is plotted at the center of its bin. Centrality integrated (0-60%) U+U and Au+Au data are also shown as open circles and squares, respectively.

(Color online) Quarkonium $R_{AA}$ versus binding energy in Au+Au and U+U collisions. Open symbols represent 0-60% centrality data, filled symbols are for 0-10% centrality. The $\Upsilon$ measurements in U+U collisions are denoted by red points. In the case of Au+Au collisions, the $\Upsilon$(1S) measurement is denoted by a blue square, while for the $\Upsilon$(2S+3S) states, a blue horizontal line indicates a 95% upper confidence bound. The black diamonds mark the high-$p_{T}$ $J/\psi$ measurement. The vertical lines represent nominal binding energies for the $\Upsilon$(1S) and $J/\psi$, calculated based on the mass defect, as 2$m_{D}$ $−m_{J/\psi}$ and 2$m_{B} −m_{$\Upsilon$}$, respectively (where $m_{X}$ is the mass of the given meson X) [39]. The shaded area spans between the binding energies of $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S). The data points are slightly shifted to the left and right from the nominal binding energy values to improve their visibility.

J/psi RCP results (with respect to 40−60% peripheral) for Au+Au collisions (39, 62.4 and 200 GeV) as a function of Npart.

J/psi RCP results for Au+Au collisions (39, 62.4 and 200 GeV) as a function of Npart.

J/psi RCP results for Au+Au collisions (39, 62.4 and 200 GeV) as a function of pT.

$(b\rightarrow e$ $R_{AA}) / (c\rightarrow e$ $R_{AA})$ as a function of $p_{T}$.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 10).

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 10).

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 12).

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 12).

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 12).

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 13).

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 13).

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 13).

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Nuclear modification factor RAA of psi(2S) integrated over centrality, for the midrapidity and forward rapidity analysis bins.

$D^0\,R_{AA}$ for different centralities.

Centrality dependence of the $D^0$ $p_{\rm T}$ differential invariant yield in Au+Au collisions (solid symbols). The curves are number-of-binary-collision-scaled Levy functions from fitting to the p+p result (open circles), which has been updated with the latest global analysis of charm fragmentation ratios from Ref and also taking into account the $p_{\rm T}$ dependence of the fragmentation ratio between $D^0$ and $D^{*{\pm}}$ from PYTHIA 6.4. The arrow denotes the upper limit with 90% confidence level of the last data point for 10$-$40% collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as square brackets.

Centrality dependence of the $D^0$ $p_{\rm T}$ differential invariant yield in Au+Au collisions (solid symbols). The curves are number-of-binary-collision-scaled Levy functions from fitting to the p+p result (open circles), which has been updated with the latest global analysis of charm fragmentation ratios from Ref and also taking into account the $p_{\rm T}$ dependence of the fragmentation ratio between $D^0$ and $D^{*{\pm}}$ from PYTHIA 6.4. The arrow denotes the upper limit with 90% confidence level of the last data point for 10$-$40% collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as square brackets.

Integrated $D^0$ $R_{AA}$ as a function of $N_{part}$ in different $p_T$ regions.

Panels (ab), $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ for peripheral 40$-$80% and semi a central 10$-$40% collisions; Panel (c), $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ for 0$-$10% most central events (blue circles) compared with model calculations from the TAMU (solid curve), SUBATECH (dashed curve), Torino (dot-dashed curve), Duke (long-dashed and long-dot-dashed curves), and LANL groups (filled band). The open symbol indicates the result with the extrapolated p+p reference. The vertical lines and brackets around the data points denote the statistical and systematic uncertainties respectively. The vertical bars around unity denote the overall normalization uncertainties in the Au+Au and p+p data, respectively. The $R_{\rm AA}$ probability distribution for the 0$-$0.7 GeV/$c$ data point is largely skewed. The uncertainty we report is the 68.3% probability range with respect to the measured central value assuming Gaussian distribution.

Panels (ab), $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ for peripheral 40$-$80% and semi a central 10$-$40% collisions; Panel (c), $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ for 0$-$10% most central events (blue circles) compared with model calculations from the TAMU (solid curve), SUBATECH (dashed curve), Torino (dot-dashed curve), Duke (long-dashed and long-dot-dashed curves), and LANL groups (filled band). The open symbol indicates the result with the extrapolated p+p reference. The vertical lines and brackets around the data points denote the statistical and systematic uncertainties respectively. The vertical bars around unity denote the overall normalization uncertainties in the Au+Au and p+p data, respectively. The $R_{\rm AA}$ probability distribution for the 0$-$0.7 GeV/$c$ data point is largely skewed. The uncertainty we report is the 68.3% probability range with respect to the measured central value assuming Gaussian distribution.

Integrated $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $N_{\mathrm{part}}$ in different $p_{\rm T}$ regions, 0$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (squares), 0.7$-$2.2 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (diamonds) and 3$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (circles). Open symbols are for the 0$-$80% minimum bias events. The vertical bar around unity denotes the overall normalization uncertainty from p+p reference.

Integrated $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $N_{\mathrm{part}}$ in different $p_{\rm T}$ regions, 0$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (squares), 0.7$-$2.2 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (diamonds) and 3$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (circles). Open symbols are for the 0$-$80% minimum bias events. The vertical bar around unity denotes the overall normalization uncertainty from p+p reference.