$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. centrality for $\pi^+$, $\pi^-$, and protons using the event plane method in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. centrality for $K^+$, and $K^-$ using the event plane method in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. centrality for $K^+$, and $K^-$ using the event plane method in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. rapidity for protons in three large centrality bins from a symmetric acceptance across midrapidity in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR. Protons exhibit an increasingly negative slope as the centrality increases.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. rapidity for protons in three large centrality bins from a symmetric acceptance across midrapidity in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR. Protons exhibit an increasingly negative slope as the centrality increases.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. rapidity for protons in three large centrality bins from only the backward region in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR. Note that the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ acceptance extends to a lower limit than in Fig. 6.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. rapidity for protons in three large centrality bins from only the backward region in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR. Note that the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ acceptance extends to a lower limit than in Fig. 6.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for protons in three large centrality bins in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR. $v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ becomes increasingly negative as $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and centrality increase.

$v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ vs. $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for protons in three large centrality bins in $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=3$ GeV Au+Au collisions at STAR. $v_3\{\Psi_1\}$ becomes increasingly negative as $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and centrality increase.

Mass dependence of the mid-rapidity $v_1$ slope, $dv_1/dy$, for $\Lambda$, $^{3}_{\Lambda}$H and $^{4}_{\Lambda}$H from the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV 5-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented by vertical lines and square brackets, respectively. The slopes of $p$, $d$, $t$, $^3$He and $^4$He from the same collisions are shown as black circles. The blue and dashed green lines are the results of a linear fit to the measured light nuclei and hypernuclei $v_1$ slopes, respectively. For comparison, calculations of transport models plus coalescence afterburner are shown as gold and red bars from JAM model, and blue bars from UrQMD model.

Mass dependence of the mid-rapidity $v_1$ slope, $dv_1/dy$, for $\Lambda$, $^{3}_{\Lambda}$H and $^{4}_{\Lambda}$H from the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV 5-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented by vertical lines and square brackets, respectively. The slopes of $p$, $d$, $t$, $^3$He and $^4$He from the same collisions are shown as black circles. The blue and dashed green lines are the results of a linear fit to the measured light nuclei and hypernuclei $v_1$ slopes, respectively. For comparison, calculations of transport models plus coalescence afterburner are shown as gold and red bars from JAM model, and blue bars from UrQMD model.

Mass dependence of the mid-rapidity $v_1$ slope, $dv_1/dy$, for $\Lambda$, $^{3}_{\Lambda}$H and $^{4}_{\Lambda}$H from the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV 5-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented by vertical lines and square brackets, respectively. The slopes of $p$, $d$, $t$, $^3$He and $^4$He from the same collisions are shown as black circles. The blue and dashed green lines are the results of a linear fit to the measured light nuclei and hypernuclei $v_1$ slopes, respectively. For comparison, calculations of transport models plus coalescence afterburner are shown as gold and red bars from JAM model, and blue bars from UrQMD model.

Mass dependence of the mid-rapidity $v_1$ slope, $dv_1/dy$, for $\Lambda$, $^{3}_{\Lambda}$H and $^{4}_{\Lambda}$H from the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV 5-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented by vertical lines and square brackets, respectively. The slopes of $p$, $d$, $t$, $^3$He and $^4$He from the same collisions are shown as black circles. The blue and dashed green lines are the results of a linear fit to the measured light nuclei and hypernuclei $v_1$ slopes, respectively. For comparison, calculations of transport models plus coalescence afterburner are shown as gold and red bars from JAM model, and blue bars from UrQMD model.

Mass dependence of the mid-rapidity $v_1$ slope, $dv_1/dy$, for $\Lambda$, $^{3}_{\Lambda}$H and $^{4}_{\Lambda}$H from the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV 5-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented by vertical lines and square brackets, respectively. The slopes of $p$, $d$, $t$, $^3$He and $^4$He from the same collisions are shown as black circles. The blue and dashed green lines are the results of a linear fit to the measured light nuclei and hypernuclei $v_1$ slopes, respectively. For comparison, calculations of transport models plus coalescence afterburner are shown as gold and red bars from JAM model, and blue bars from UrQMD model.

Reference multiplicity distributions obtained from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV data (black markers), Glauber model (red histogram), and unfolding approach to separate single and pileup contributions. Vertical lines represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pileup, and single+pileup collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green, and dashed pink lines, respectively. The 0–5% central events and 5–60% mid-central to peripheral events are indicated by black arrows. The ratio of the single+pileup to the measured multiplicity distribution is shown in the lower panel.

Reference multiplicity distributions obtained from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV data (black markers), Glauber model (red histogram), and unfolding approach to separate single and pileup contributions. Vertical lines represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pileup, and single+pileup collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green, and dashed pink lines, respectively. The 0–5% central events and 5–60% mid-central to peripheral events are indicated by black arrows. The ratio of the single+pileup to the measured multiplicity distribution is shown in the lower panel.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Ratios of proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Ratios of proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

UrQMD results of the proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$= 3 GeV. The black circles are without VF correction while blue squares and red triangles are results with VFC which used $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. The blue crosses are calculations using UrQMD events with b $\leq$ 3 fm. The above results are applied CBWC except for the one (blue crosses) using b $\leq$3 fm events.

UrQMD results of the proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$= 3 GeV. The black circles are without VF correction while blue squares and red triangles are results with VFC which used $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. The blue crosses are calculations using UrQMD events with b $\leq$ 3 fm. The above results are applied CBWC except for the one (blue crosses) using b $\leq$3 fm events.

Proton cumulants up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction is shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulants up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction is shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction are shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction are shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

UrQMD results of proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Experimental results on centrality dependence of cumulants (left panels) and cumulant ratios (right panels) up to sixth order of the proton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $N_{\rm part}$ = 3 GeV. The open squares are data without VF correction while red circles and blue triangles are results with VF correction with $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models, respectively.

Experimental results on centrality dependence of cumulants (left panels) and cumulant ratios (right panels) up to sixth order of the proton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $N_{\rm part}$ = 3 GeV. The open squares are data without VF correction while red circles and blue triangles are results with VF correction with $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models, respectively.

Same as Fig. 14 but for correlation function (left panels) and their normalized ratios (right panels).

Same as Fig. 14 but for correlation function (left panels) and their normalized ratios (right panels).

Cumulants and cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The transverse momentum window is $p_{\rm T}$ from $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ and the rapidity window is $−0.5<y<0$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD predictions are depicted by gold bands.

Cumulants and cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The transverse momentum window is $p_{\rm T}$ from $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ and the rapidity window is $−0.5<y<0$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD predictions are depicted by gold bands.

Same as Fig. 16 but for correlation functions and correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

Same as Fig. 16 but for correlation functions and correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{1}$ within $-0.4<y<-0.1$ for $t$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity and $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{1}$ for $^{3}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{1}$ within $-0.1<y<0$ for $^4$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{1}$ within $-0.4<y<-0.1$ for $^{4}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity and $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{2}$ for $p$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity and $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{2}$ for $d$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{2}$ within $-0.1<y<0$ for $t$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{2}$ within $-0.4<y<-0.1$ for $t$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity and $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{2}$ for $^{3}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{2}$ within $-0.1<y<0$ for $^4$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{2}$ within $-0.4<y<-0.1$ for $^{4}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity dependencies of $v_{1}$ for $p$, $d$, and $^{3}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity dependencies of $v_{1}$ for $t$ and $^{4}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity dependencies of $v_{1}$ from JAM plus coalescence calculations in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity dependencies of $v_{2}$ for $p$, $d$, and $^{3}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity dependencies of $v_{2}$ for $t$ and $^{4}$He in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

The rapidity dependencies of $v_{2}$ from JAM plus coalescence calculations in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

Light nucleus scaled $v_{1}$ slopes as a function os collision energy in 10-40 mid-cantral Au+Au collisions.

Light nucleus scaled $v_{1}$ slopes from JAM plus coalescence in 10-40 mid-cantral Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.

Centrality dependence of the proton cumulant ratios for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3.0 GeV. Protons are from $-0.5 < y < 0$ and $0.4 < p_{T} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. Systematic uncertainties are represented by gray bars. Statistical uncertainties are smaller than marker size. CBWC is applied to all cumulant ratios. While open squares represent the data without the VFC correction, blue triangles and red circles are the results with VFC using the $\langle N_{\rm{part}} \rangle$ distributions from the UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. UrQMD model results are represented as gold dashed line.

Centrality dependence of the proton cumulant ratios for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3.0 GeV. Protons are from $-0.5 < y < 0$ and $0.4 < p_{T} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. Systematic uncertainties are represented by gray bars. Statistical uncertainties are smaller than marker size. CBWC is applied to all cumulant ratios. While open squares represent the data without the VFC correction, blue triangles and red circles are the results with VFC using the $\langle N_{\rm{part}} \rangle$ distributions from the UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. UrQMD model results are represented as gold dashed line.

Rapidity and transverse momentum dependence of the proton cumulant ratios for 0–5% central collisions. Black-squares, red-dots and blue-triangles stand for data without and with the VFC using Glauber and UrQMD, respectively.

Rapidity and transverse momentum dependence of the proton cumulant ratios for 0–5% central collisions. Black-squares, red-dots and blue-triangles stand for data without and with the VFC using Glauber and UrQMD, respectively.

Rapidity and transverse momentum dependence of the proton cumulant ratios for 0–5% central collisions. Black-squares, red-dots and blue-triangles stand for data without and with the VFC using Glauber and UrQMD, respectively.

Rapidity and transverse momentum dependence of the proton cumulant ratios for 0–5% central collisions. Black-squares, red-dots and blue-triangles stand for data without and with the VFC using Glauber and UrQMD, respectively.

Collision energy dependence of the ratios of cumulants, $C_4/C_2$, for proton (squares) and net-proton (red circles) from top 0-5% Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for proton from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3.0 GeV collisions is shown as a filled square. HADES data of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.4 GeV 0-10% collisions is also shown. The vertical black and gray bars are the statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. In addition, results from the HRG model, based on both Canonical Ensemble (CE) and Grand-Canonical Ensemble (GCE), and transport model UrQMD are presented.

B.R. times dN/dy of $^{3}_{\Lambda}$H vs y in 3 GeV 10-50% Au+Au collisions

B.R. times dN/dy of $^{4}_{\Lambda}$H vs y in 3 GeV 10-50% Au+Au collisions

B.R. times dN/dy at |y|<0.5 of $^{3}_{\Lambda}$H vs B.R in 3 GeV 0-10% Au+Au collisions

B.R. times dN/dy at |y|<0.5 of $^{4}_{\Lambda}$H vs B.R in 3 GeV 0-10% Au+Au collisions

$^{3}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.25<y<0, Au+Au 3 GeV, 0-10%

$^{3}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.5<y<-0.25, Au+Au 3 GeV, 0-10%

$^{3}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.25<y<0, Au+Au 3 GeV, 10-50%

$^{3}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.5<y<-0.25, Au+Au 3 GeV, 10-50%

$^{4}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.25<y<0, Au+Au 3 GeV, 0-10%

$^{4}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.5<y<-0.25, Au+Au 3 GeV, 0-10%

$^{4}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.75<y<-0.5, Au+Au 3 GeV, 0-10%

$^{4}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.25<y<0, Au+Au 3 GeV, 10-50%

$^{4}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.5<y<-0.25, Au+Au 3 GeV, 10-50%

$^{4}_{\Lambda}$H $p_T$ spectra times B.R., -0.75<y<-0.5, Au+Au 3 GeV, 10-50%

$K^-$ (a), invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\phi$ meson (b) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\Xi^-$ (c) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$K^-$ (a), invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 40--60\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\phi$ meson (b) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 40--60\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

Rapidity density distributions of $K^-$ (squares), $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

Rapidity density distributions of $\phi$ meson (circles) $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

Rapidity density distributions of $\Xi^-$ (diamonds) $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

$\phi/K^-$ (a) and $\phi/\Xi^-$ (b) ratio as a function of collision energy, $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$. The solid black circles show the measurements presented here in 0-10\% centrality bin, while empty markers in black or grey are used for data from various other energies and/or collision systems. The grey solid line represents a THERMUS calculation based on the Grand Canonical Ensemble (GCE) while the dotted lines depict calculations based on the Canonical Ensemble (CE) with different parameters of strangeness correlation radius ($r_c$). The green dashed line, green shaded band and the solid red line show transport model calculations from the public versions $\mathrm{UrQMD}^{1}$, modified $\mathrm{UrQMD}^{2}$ and SMASH, respectively.

Rapidity($y$) dependence of $v_1$ (top panels) and $v_2$ (bottom panels) of proton and $\Lambda$ baryons (left panels), pions (middle panels) and kaons (right panels) in 10-40% centrality for the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3GeV Au+Au collisions. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The UrQMD and JAM results are shown as bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. The value of the incompressibility $\kappa$ = 380 MeV is used in the mean-field option. More detailed model descriptions and data comparisons can be found in Supplemental Material.

Rapidity($y$) dependence of $v_1$ (top panels) and $v_2$ (bottom panels) of proton and $\Lambda$ baryons (left panels), pions (middle panels) and kaons (right panels) in 10-40% centrality for the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3GeV Au+Au collisions. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The UrQMD and JAM results are shown as bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. The value of the incompressibility $\kappa$ = 380 MeV is used in the mean-field option. More detailed model descriptions and data comparisons can be found in Supplemental Material.

Rapidity($y$) dependence of $v_1$ (top panels) and $v_2$ (bottom panels) of proton and $\Lambda$ baryons (left panels), pions (middle panels) and kaons (right panels) in 10-40% centrality for the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3GeV Au+Au collisions. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The UrQMD and JAM results are shown as bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. The value of the incompressibility $\kappa$ = 380 MeV is used in the mean-field option. More detailed model descriptions and data comparisons can be found in Supplemental Material.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

$v_2$ scaled by the number of constituent quarks, $v_2/n_q$ , as a function of scaled transverse kinetic energy ($(m_T − m_0)/n_q$) for pions, kaons and protons from Au+Au collisions in 10-40% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3, 27, and 54.4 GeV for positive charged particles (left panel) and negative charged particles (right panel). Colored dashed lines represent the scaling fit to data in 7.7, 14.5, 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC [43–45]. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

Collision energy dependence of (top panel) directed flow slope $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ for p, $\Lambda, \pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$), K(combined from $K^{\pm}$ and $K_S^0$), $\phi$ and $\Xi^−$, and (bottom panel) elliptic flow $v_2$ for p, $\pi$(combined from $\pi^{\pm}$) in heavy- ion collisions. Collision centrality for all data from RHIC is 10-40%, except for 4.5 GeV where 10-30% is for $dv_1/dy|_{y=0}$ and 0-30% is for $v_2$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The JAM and UrQMD results are shown as colored bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. For clarity the x-axis value of the data points have been shifted.

The centrality dependence of Global $\Lambda$-hyperon Polarization at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=3$ GeV.

The $p_{\rm T}$ dependence of Global $\Lambda$-hyperon Polarization at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=3$ GeV.

The rapidity dependence of Global $\Lambda$-hyperon Polarization at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=3$ GeV.

Rapidity dependence of directed flow, v1(y), for positive pions with transverse momentum pT > 0.2 GeV/c and total momentum magnitude |p| < 1.6 GeV/c from events within 10-30% centrality. Here, the BBC-based Event Plane method is used. Plotted error bars are statistical only, and systematic errors are of comparable size.

The rapidity dependence of the directed flow for the Lambda using the TPC event plane for 10-30% centrality. Plotted error bars are statistical only, while systematic errors are +/- 0.007.

The rapidity dependence of the directed flow for the K0s using the TPC event plane for 10-30% centrality. Plotted error bars are statistical only, while systematic errors are +/- 0.017.

Beam energy dependence of the directed flow slope dv1=dy at midrapidity for baryons and mesons measured by STAR.

v2 scaled by the number of constituent quarks (nq) for charged pions and protons for 0-30% central collisions. The values of v2 scaled with nq for pions and protons are consistent with each other within errors. For comparison, points from E895 are also shown.

The excitation function v2 for all charged particles or separately for protons and pions, measured by several experiments. The STAR FXT points for protons and for pions are near the region where a change in slope occurs.

Excitation function of Rout, Rside, and Rlong.

Transverse mass dependence of Rout, Rside, and Rlong for three experiments: E895, STAR, and E866. The corresponding center-of-mass collision energies are 4.3 GeV, 4.5 GeV, and 4.9 GeV, respectively. Pairs for the STAR points are created from negative pion tracks in the momentum range 0.15 < pT < 0.8 GeV/c from events in the 0-15% centrality range.

The centrality dependence of Rout, Rside, and Rlong. Errors are statistical only. Here positive and negative pion pairs in the momentum range 0.15 < pT < 0.8 GeV/c are used.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{22}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{23}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{222}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{22}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{23}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{222}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{22}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{23}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{222}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{4}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{5}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{6}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{6}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{7}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{4}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{5}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{6}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{6}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

The overall flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{7}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{22}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{23}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{222}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{22}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{23}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{222}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 0-20% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of PT in the 20-60% centrality range.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{22}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{23}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{222}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_4\{\Psi_{22}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_5\{\Psi_{23}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{222}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_6\{\Psi_{33}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Mixed higher-order flow harmonic $v_7\{\Psi_{223}\}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 5.02 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{422}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{523}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{6222}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{633}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

Nonlinear response coefficient $\chi_{7223}$ from the scalar-product method at 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.

The cumulant $c_2\{8\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{6\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{8\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{\text{LYZ}\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{6\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{8\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{\text{LYZ}\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in pPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in pPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in PbPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in PbPb collisions.

Measured value of TT and LT polarized cross sections extracted from the data.

Values of r_04_00 and r_1_1-1 extracted from the angular distributions.

Cross sections for final states consisting of two charm mesons and an extra pion.

Total charm cross sections for exclusive and inclusive final states.

The measured total hadronic cross section and R value with correction for initial state radiation.

The cross section for E+ E- --> ETA K+ K- excluding the contribution from PHI --> K+ K- with statistical errors only.

The cross section for E+ E- --> PHI ETA with statistical errors only.

Isoscalar (I=0) component of the cross section for E+ E- --> K*(892) K with statistical errors only.

Isovector (I=1) component of the cross section for E+ E- --> K*(892) K with statistical errors only.

Isoscalar (I=0) component of the cross section for E+ E- --> K2*(1430) K with statistical errors only.

Isovector (I=1) component of the cross section for E+ E- --> K2*(1430) K with statistical errors only.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> OMEGA F0(975) with statistical errors only.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> 2(PI+ PI-) ETA with statistical errorsonly.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> ETAPRIME PI+ PI- with statistical errors only.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> F1(1285) PI+ PI- with statistical errors only.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> K+ K- PI+ PI- PI0 with statistical errors only.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> PHI ETA with statistical errors only.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> OMEGA K+ K- with statistical errors only.

Measured cross section for E+ E- --> K+ K- PI+ PI- ETA with statistical errors only.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 825 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 875 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 925 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 975 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1025 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1075 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1125 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1175 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1225 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1275 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1325 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1375 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1425 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1475 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1525 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1575 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1625 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1675 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1725 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1775 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1825 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1875 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1925 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 1975 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2025 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2075 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2125 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2175 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2225 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2275 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2325 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2375 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2425 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2475 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2525 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2575 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2625 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2675 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2725 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2775 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2825 MeV.

Differential cross section for indicent photon energy 2875 MeV.

Measurement of the E+ E- --> PHI F(980)0 cross section.

Measurement of the E+ E- --> K+ K- PI0 PI0 cross section. Statistical errors only.

Measurement of the E+ E- --> PHI F0 cross section for the F0 --> PI0 PI0 final state. Statistical errors only.

Measurement of the E+ E- --> K+ K- K+ K- cross section. Statistical errors only.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.332 GeV and W = 1.839 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.433 GeV and W = 1.889 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.534 GeV and W = 1.939 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.635 GeV and W = 1.987 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.737 GeV and W = 2.035 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.838 GeV and W = 2.081 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.939 GeV and W = 2.126 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.039 GeV and W = 2.170 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.139 GeV and W = 2.212 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.240 GeV and W = 2.255 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.341 GeV and W = 2.296 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.443 GeV and W = 2.338 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.543 GeV and W = 2.377 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.642 GeV and W = 2.416 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.741 GeV and W = 2.454 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.232 GeV and W = 1.787 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.332 GeV and W = 1.839 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.433 GeV and W = 1.889 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.534 GeV and W = 1.939 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.635 GeV and W = 1.987 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.737 GeV and W = 2.035 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.838 GeV and W = 2.081 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.939 GeV and W = 2.126 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.039 GeV and W = 2.170 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.139 GeV and W = 2.212 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.240 GeV and W = 2.255 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.341 GeV and W = 2.296 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.443 GeV and W = 2.338 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.543 GeV and W = 2.377 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.642 GeV and W = 2.416 GeV.

Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.741 GeV and W = 2.454 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 3.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 3.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7950 GeV.