The $\Delta p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The double $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ ratio of $R_{\mathrm{AA}}^{\gamma\text{-jet}}/R_{\mathrm{AA}}^{\text{inclusive jet}}$ as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The differential cross-section of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in pp collisions.

The yields of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in Pb+Pb collisions for different centrality intervals.

The nuclear modification factor of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for different centrality intervals.

The $\Delta p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The $R_{\mathrm{CP}}$ of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Summary of results for charm muon RAA as a function of pT for five different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for bottom muon RAA as a function of pT for five different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for charm muon RAA to bottom muon RAA ratio as a function of pT for five different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Corrected inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions for pTlead,min = 7 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

pTlead,min (7/5 GeV/c) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in peripheral Au+Au collisions. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

pTlead,min (7/5 GeV/c) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in central Au+Au collisions. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

R_CP (0-10%/60-80%) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (30%) has to be added.

R_CP (0-10%/60-80%) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2 and 0.3 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In the paper are shown all these three uncertainty sources (statistical, shape, correlated) summed in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (30%) has not been included (as for the other measurements compared with the STAR data).

R_AA for peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (29%) and PYTHIA reference (22%, 20%, 18% for R = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) have to be added.

R_AA for central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (7%) and PYTHIA reference (22%, 20%, 18% for R = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) have to be added. The unbiased data points are the 4 highest for R=0.2 and 3 highest for R=0.3 and 0.4, resp.

Ratio of inclusive charged-particle jet yields for R=0.2/R=0.4 for peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c (only unbiased region). The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). Please note that in the paper, the uncertainties shown are the quadrature sums of the uncertainties listed in the table.

Ratio of inclusive charged-particle jet yields for R=0.2/R=0.4 for central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c (only unbiased region). The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). Please note that in the paper, the uncertainties shown are the quadrature sums of the uncertainties listed in the table.

Inclusive J/$\psi$ nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ at midrapidity, integrated over $p_{\rm T}$, as a function of mean number of participating nucleons in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. The correlated systematic uncertainty due to the pp reference is not included and amounts to 6.9%, shown as the red box around unity in the paper figure.

Inclusive J/$\psi$ nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ at midrapidity for $p_{\rm T} > 0.15$ GeV as a function of mean number of participating nucleons in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. The low-$p_{\rm T}$ interval is removed to reject J/$\psi$ from photo-production. The correlated systematic uncertainty due to the pp reference cross section is not listed and amounts to 6.9%, shown as the red box around unity in the paper figure.

Inclusive J/$\psi$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{\rm AA}$, at midrapidity in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of transverse momentum, $p_{\rm T}$, for different centrality intervals. The systematic uncertianty from the pp reference, which is correlated with centrality and shown as grey band in the paper figure, is listed as sys,Reference. The systematic uncertainties on the $T_{\rm AA}$ which are correlated in $p_{\rm T}$ for each centrality bin are not listed and amount additionally to 2\%, 3\%, and 5\% for 0-20\%, 20-40\%, and 40-90\% centrality, respectively. These uncertainties are shown as boxes around unity in the paper figure.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of inclusive J/$\psi$ at mid-rapidity. For the midrapidity point all normalization uncertainties are included.

HFe cross section in Pb-Pb, 60-80 centrality

HFe RAA in Pb-Pb, 0-10 centrality

HFe RAA in Pb-Pb, 30-50 centrality

HFe RAA in Pb-Pb, 60-80 centrality

Rapidity dependence (in 0-90% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 4. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Rapidity dependence (in 0-90% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 0-20% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 7. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 0-20% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 20-40% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 10. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 20-40% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 40-90% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 13. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 40-90% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Rapidity dependence (in 0-20% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 16. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Rapidity dependence (in 20-40% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 18. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Rapidity dependence (in 40-90% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 20. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 0.3 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 2 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 22. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 0.3 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 2 $GeV/c$) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 25. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5 $GeV/c$) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 5 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 8 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 28. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 5 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 8 $GeV/c$) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 8 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 12 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 31. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 0.3 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 8 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, 60–70%, 70–80% and 80–90%. The values, already published in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.064 (Figure.4), were updated with the improved $\langle T_{AA} \rangle$ calculations reported in https://cds.cern.ch/record/2636623.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 33. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 2.5 < $y$ < 3) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 35. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 3 < $y$ < 3.5) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 37. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 3.5 < $y$ < 4) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 39. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of the inclusive J/$\psi$ in various centrality classes. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second is the uncorrelated systematic.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence of the inclusive J/$\psi$ average $p_{\rm T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second is the uncorrelated systematic. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $r_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is the quadratic sum of the statistical and uncorrelated systematic ones, while the second is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

Inclusive $\Upsilon$(1S) $R_{\rm AA}$ and Pb-Pb yields as a function of rapidity. The centrality and transverse-momentum ranges are 0-90% and $0<p_{\rm T}<15$ GeV/$c$, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are reported. A global systematic uncertainty of 2.7% (2.3%) affects all the $R_{\rm AA}$ (yield) values.

Inclusive $\Upsilon$(2S) $R_{\rm AA}$ and Pb-Pb yield for the centrality, transverse-momentum and rapidity ranges 0-90%, $0<p_{\rm T}<15$ GeV/$c$ and $2.5<y<4$, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are reported. (The yield is not normalized to the kinematic intervals).

Inclusive $\Upsilon\text{(2S)}/\Upsilon\text{(1S)}$ Pb-Pb yield ratio and $R_{\rm AA}$ ratio for the centrality, transverse-momentum and rapidity ranges 0-90%, $0<p_{\rm T}<15$ GeV/$c$ and $2.5<y<4$, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are reported. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are reported.