$J/\psi$ production at low $p_T$ in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ = 200 GeV at STAR

The STAR collaboration Adamczyk, L. ; Adkins, J.K. ; Agakishiev, G. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 90 (2014) 024906, 2014.
Inspire Record 1258446 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.99158

The $\jpsi$ $\pt$ spectrum and nuclear modification factor ($\raa$) are reported for $\pt < 5 \ \gevc$ and $|y|<1$ from 0\% to 60\% central Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at $\snn = 200 \ \gev$ at STAR. A significant suppression of $\pt$-integrated $\jpsi$ production is observed in central Au+Au events. The Cu+Cu data are consistent with no suppression, although the precision is limited by the available statistics. $\raa$ in Au+Au collisions exhibits a strong suppression at low transverse momentum and gradually increases with $\pt$. The data are compared to high-$\pt$ STAR results and previously published BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider results. Comparing with model calculations, it is found that the invariant yields at low $\pt$ are significantly above hydrodynamic flow predictions but are consistent with models that include color screening and regeneration.

11 data tables

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 in 0-20% centrality in Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The results are compared to high-$p_T$ (3 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results from STAR [9] (solid squares) and PHENIX data [8] (open squares).

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 in 20-40% centrality in Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The results are compared to high-$p_T$ (3 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results from STAR [9] (solid squares) and PHENIX data [8] (open squares).

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 in 40-60% centrality in Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The results are compared to high-$p_T$ (3 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results from STAR [9] (solid squares) and PHENIX data [8] (open squares).

More…

A Measurement of the Energy Dependence of Elastic $\pi p$ and $p p$ Scattering at Large Angles

Jenkins, K.A. ; Price, L.E. ; Klem, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 425, 1978.
Inspire Record 6233 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3359

We have measured π±p and pp elastic differential cross sections in the range |cosθc.m.|<0.35 for incident momenta from 2 to 9.7 GeV/c for π−p and pp and from 2 to 6.3 GeV/c for π+p. We find that the fixed-c.m.-angle πp differential cross sections cannot be described as simple functions of s. The data are compared to the energy and angular dependence predicted by the constituent model of Gunion, Brodsky, and Blankenbecler.

56 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

ANGULAR AND ENERGY DEPENDENCE OF THE CROSS-SECTION AND ANALYZING POWER OF THE REACTION P P ----> D PI+ BETWEEN 725-MEV AND 1000-MEV

Mayer, B. ; Bertini, R. ; Cameron, J.M. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 437 (1985) 630-642, 1985.
Inspire Record 217258 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.37040

The differential cross section and analyzing power of the reaction pp → d π + were measured for nine incident proton energies between 725 and 1000 MeV. A magnetic spectrometer was used to detect either deuterons or pions. Cross-section and analyzing-power angular distributions were respectively fitted with Legendre polynomial and associated Legendre function expansions, the coefficients of which were found to vary smoothly with energy in the vicinity of the alleged 3 F 3 dibaryon resonance.

12 data tables

Data present here in form of Legendre polynomial fit.

Legendre Polynomial fit to cross section.

Legendre polynomial fit to analysing power.

More…

Analyzing Power Measurements of Coulomb Nuclear Interference With the Polarized Proton and Anti-proton Beams at 185 GeV/c

The E581/704 collaboration Akchurin, N. ; Carey, David C. ; Coleman, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 229 (1989) 299-303, 1989.
Inspire Record 280476 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29782

The analyzing power A N of proton-proton, proton-hydrocarbon, and antiproton-hydrocarbon, scattering in the Coulomb-nuclear interference region has been measured using thhe 185 GeV/ c Fermilab polarized-proton and -antiproton beams. The results are found to be consistent with theoretical predictions within statistical uncertainties.

3 data tables

No description provided.

Data from hydrocarbon target.

Data from hydrocarbon target.


Anisotropy in the pion angular distribution of the reaction pp -> pp pi0 at 400 MeV

Thorngren Engblom, P. ; Negasi Keleta, S. ; Cappellaro, F. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 76 (2007) 011602, 2007.
Inspire Record 725409 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.31500

The reaction pp -> pp pi0 was studied with the WASA detector at the CELSIUS storage ring. The center of mass angular distribution of the pi0 was obtained by detection of the gamma decay products together with the two outgoing protons, and found to be anisotropic with a negative second derivative slope, in agreement with the theoretical predictions from a microscopic calculation.

2 data tables

Acceptance corrected centre of mass PI0 angular distribution, normalized to 92.3 +- 7.2 MUB (Bilger et al.).

Acceptance corrected centre of mass PI0 angular distribution for relative proton momenta < 53 MeV, normalized to Bilger et al... Statistical errors only.


Centrality dependence of charm production from single electrons measurement in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV.

The PHENIX collaboration Adler, S.S. ; Afanasiev, S. ; Aidala, C. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 94 (2005) 082301, 2005.
Inspire Record 660611 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.57254

The PHENIX experiment has measured mid-rapidity transverse momentum spectra (0.4 < p_T < 4.0 GeV/c) of single electrons as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV. Contributions to the raw spectra from photon conversions and Dalitz decays of light neutral mesons are measured by introducing a thin (1.7% X_0) converter into the PHENIX acceptance and are statistically removed. The subtracted ``non-photonic'' electron spectra are primarily due to the semi-leptonic decays of hadrons containing heavy quarks (charm and bottom). For all centralities, charm production is found to scale with the nuclear overlap function, T_AA. For minimum-bias collisions the charm cross section per binary collision is N_cc^bar/T_AA = 622 +/- 57 (stat.) +/- 160 (sys.) microbarns.

18 data tables

Value of the Alpha power as used in a fit of dN/dy versus Ncoll of the form A*Ncoll^Alpha, where N is the non photonic electron yield and Ncoll the number of p+p collisions This value only includes data from Au+Au collisions The value of Alpha = 1 is the expectation in the absence of medium effects.

Value of the Alpha power as used in a fit of dN/dy versus Ncoll, of the form A*Ncoll^Alpha, where N is the non photonic electron yield and Ncoll the number of p+p collisions This value is calculated including previous data of p+p collisions, measured by PHENIX, in addition of the Au+Au data The value of Alpha = 1 is the expectation in the absence of medium effects.

Spectrum in transverse momentum of electrons created in open heavy flavor decays, for minimum bias events.

More…

Charged particle multiplicities in nuclear collisions at 200-GeV/N

The NA35 collaboration Bächler, J. ; Bartke, J. ; Bialkowska, H. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 51 (1991) 157-162, 1991.
Inspire Record 320907 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.14983

Data on multiplicities of charged particles produced in proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions at 200 GeV per nucleon are presented. It is shown that the mean multiplicity of negative particles is proportional to the mean number of nucleons participating in the collision both for nucleus-nucleus and proton-nucleus collisions. The apparent consistency of pion multiplicity data with the assumption of an incoherent superposition of nucleon-nucleon collisions is critically discussed.

4 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Charged-hadron production in $pp$, $p$+Pb, Pb+Pb, and Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; Abeling, Kira ; et al.
JHEP 07 (2023) 074, 2023.
Inspire Record 2601282 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.135676

This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.

140 data tables

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><i>p+Pb:</i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;0-5%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;5-10%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;10-20%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;20-30%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;30-40%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;40-60%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;60-90%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;0-90%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;0-5%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;5-10%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;10-20%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;20-30%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;30-40%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;40-50%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;50-60%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;60-80%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;0-5%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;5-10%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;10-20%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;20-30%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;30-40%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;40-50%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;50-60%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;60-80%:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

More…

Cold Nuclear Matter Effects on J/Psi as Constrained by Deuteron-Gold Measurements at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV

The PHENIX collaboration Adare, A. ; Adler, S.S. ; Afanasiev, S. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 77 (2008) 024912, 2008.
Inspire Record 768530 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.57373

All of the experimental data points presented in the original paper are correct and unchanged (including statistical and systematic uncertainties). However, herein we correct a comparison between the experimental data and a theoretical picture, because we discovered a mistake in the code used. All of the most probable sigma_breakup values differ by less than 0.4 mb from those originally presented. However, the one standard deviation uncertainties (that include contributions from both the statistical and systematic uncertainties on the experimental data points) are approximately 30-60% larger than originally reported. We give a table of the new comparison results and corrected versions of Figs. 8-11 of the original paper and we note that no correction is needed for results from the data-driven method in Fig. 13.

22 data tables

J/PSI invariant (1/(2PI*PT))*D2(N)/DPT/DYRAP versus rapidity in D+AU collisions, over 3 bins of rapidity.

J/PSI invariant (1/(2PI*PT))*D2(N)/DPT/DYRAP versus rapidity in D+AU collisions, over 5 bins of rapidity.

J/PSI invariant (1/(2PI*PT))*D2(N)/DPT/DYRAP versus PT at backward rapidity (-2.2<y<-1.2) in D+AU collisions.

More…

Comparison of Isoscalar Vector Meson Production Cross Sections in Proton-Proton Collisions

The COSY-TOF collaboration Abdel-Bary, M. ; Abdel-Samad, S. ; Brinkmann, K.-Th. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 647 (2007) 351-357, 2007.
Inspire Record 745517 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.31471

The reaction $ pp\to pp\bf \omega$ was investigated with the TOF spectrometer, which is an external experiment at the accelerator COSY (Forschungszentrum Julich, Germany). Total as well as differential cross sections were determined at an excess energy of $93 MeV$ ($p_{beam}=2950 MeV/c$). Using the total cross section of $(9.0\pm 0.7 \pm1.1) \mu b$ for the reaction $ pp\to pp\omega$ determined here and existing data for the reaction $pp\to pp\bf \phi$, the ratio $\mathcal{R}_{\phi/\omega}=\sigma_\phi/\sigma_\omega$ turns out to be significantly larger than expected by the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka (OZI) rule. The uncertainty of this ratio is considerably smaller than in previous determinations. The differential distributions show that the $\omega$ production is still dominated by S-wave production at this excess energy, however higher partial waves clearly contribute. A comparison of the measured angular distributions for $\omega$ production to published distributions for $\phi$ production at $83 MeV$ shows that the data are consistent with an identical production mechanism for both vector mesons.

5 data tables

Total cross section after acceptance correction and normalization.

Differential cross section as a function of the cosine of the polar angle of the protons in the overall c.m. system.

Differential cross section as a function of the omega meson angle in the overall c.m. system.

More…