Data from 97.7 to 123.4 degrees are combined beam and target analyzing powers.

Data from 97.7 to 123.4 degrees are combined beam and target analyzing powers.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.840 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.860 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.877 GeV. Data taken with the CH2 target.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.880 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.910 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.940 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 1.00 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 1.08 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 1.10 GeV.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.84 GeV measured with the additional CH2 target.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 0.86 GeV measured with the additional CH2 target.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 1.00 GeV measured with the additional CH2 target.

Results of the analyzing power for n p scattering at 1.10 GeV measured with the additional CH2 target.

Analyzing power for n p elastic and quasielastic scattering measured with the CH2 target at 0.363 GeV. Only recoil protons were detected.

Analyzing power for n p elastic and quasielastic scattering measured with the carbon target at 0.363 GeV. Only recoil protons were detected.

Analysing power measurements in P P elastic scattering LEN(C=CU) is the length of CU degrader thickness used in each group.

Analysing power measurements in P P elastic scattering LEN(C=CU) is the length of CU degrader thickness used in each group.

Analysing power measurements in P P elastic scattering LEN(C=CU) is the length of CU degrader thickness used in each group.

Additional random-like systematic error of 11.8PCT.

Additional random-like systematic error of 2.5PCT.

Additional random-like systematic error of 2.7PCT.

Additional random-like systematic error of 1.5PCT.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 1.955 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.082 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 1.975 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.067 and 0.002.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 1.995 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.098 and 0.002.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.015 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.075 and 0.002.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.035 GeV from run I. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.065 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.035 GeV from run II. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.059 and 0.002.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.055 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.065 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.075 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.058 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.095 GeV from run I. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.062 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.095 GeV from run II. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.043 and 0.002.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.115 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.066 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.135 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.065 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.155 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.062 and 0.004.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.175 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.062 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.205 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.068 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.215 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.081 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.225 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.065 and 0.003.

Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.235 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.060 and 0.004.

The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.

The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.

The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.

The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.

The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on neutrons bound in carbon nuclei in the CH2 target.

The PN spin correlation parameter CNN of polarized protons scattered on polarized neutrons bound in the LiD target. The target polarization uncertainty is 4 PCT at 1.095 GeV and 10 PCT at 1.595 GeV.

The PN spin correlation parameter CNN of polarized protons scattered on polarized neutrons bound in the LiD target. The target polarization uncertainty is 4 PCT at 1.095 GeV and 10 PCT at 1.595 GeV.

The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.

The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.

The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.

The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.

The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.

The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.

The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.

Analysing power measurements in the scattering of polarized protons from either hydrogen in the LiH target or on bound protons in the LiD target. The three sets of results are independent.

Analysing power measurements in the scattering of polarized protons from either hydrogen in the LiH target or on bound protons in the LiD target. The three sets of results are independent.

Analysing power measurements in the scattering of polarized protons from either hydrogen in the LiH target or on bound protons in the LiD target. The three sets of results are independent.

Analysing power measurements in the scattering of polarized protons from either hydrogen in the LiH target or on bound protons in the LiD target. The three sets of results are independent.

The P P analysing power in elastic and quasi-elastic scattering on free (C=H) and strongly bound (C=C) protons in the CH2 target. All results are independent.

The P P analysing power in elastic and quasi-elastic scattering on free (C=H) and strongly bound (C=C) protons in the CH2 target. All results are independent.

The P P analysing power in elastic and quasi-elastic scattering on free (C=H) and strongly bound (C=C) protons in the CH2 target. All results are independent.

The P P analysing power in elastic and quasi-elastic scattering on free (C=H) and strongly bound (C=C) protons in the CH2 target. All results are independent.

The P P analysing power in elastic and quasi-elastic scattering on free (C=H) and strongly bound (C=C) protons in the CH2 target. All results are independent.

The P P analysing power in elastic and quasi-elastic scattering on free (C=H) and strongly bound (C=C) protons in the CH2 target. All results are independent.

The P P analysing power in elastic and quasi-elastic scattering on free (C=H) and strongly bound (C=C) protons in the CH2 target. All results are independent.

The spin correlation parameter CNN in the scattering of polarized protons from polarized hydrogen in the LiH target (C=H). At 1.095 GeV to uncertainty in the target polarization is 4 PCT.

The spin correlation parameter CNN in the scattering of polarized protons from polarized bound protons in the LiD target (Li+D(+H)). At 1.095 GeV to uncertainty in the target polarization is 4 PCT.

The spin correlation parameter CNN in the scattering of polarized protons from polarized bound protons in the LiD target (Li+D(+H)). At 1.095 GeV to uncertainty in the target polarization is 4 PCT.

The depolarization parameter DNN from elastic scattering of polarized protons on the polarized LiH target. The relative systematic error provided by the normalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT. There is also a +- 15 PCT uncertainty due to the relative normalization of measurements with the two opposite, (and small) target polarization values.

The polarization transfer parameter KNN measured with polarized protons on the polarized LiH and LiD targets. The relative uncertainty due to the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT.

The polarization transfer parameter KNN measured with polarized protons on the polarized LiD target. The relative uncertainty due to the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT.

The polarization transfer parameter KNN measured with polarized protons on the polarized LiD target. The relative uncertainty due to the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT.

The polarization transfer parameter KNN measured with polarized protons on the polarized LiH and LiD targets. The relative uncertainty due to the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT.

The polarization transfer parameter KNN measured with polarized protons on the polarized LiH and LiD targets. The relative uncertainty due to the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT.

The polarization transfer parameter KNN measured with polarized protons on the polarized LiH and LiD targets. The relative uncertainty due to the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT.

The polarization transfer parameter KNN measured with polarized protons on the polarized LiH and LiD targets. The relative uncertainty due to the P-C analysing power is +- 6 PCT.