Showing 10 of 18 results
Measurements of the suppression and correlations of dijets is performed using 3 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ of Xe+Xe data at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.44$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Dijets with jets reconstructed using the $R=0.4$ anti-$k_t$ algorithm are measured differentially in jet $p_{\text{T}}$ over the range of 32 GeV to 398 GeV and the centrality of the collisions. Significant dijet momentum imbalance is found in the most central Xe+Xe collisions, which decreases in more peripheral collisions. Results from the measurement of per-pair normalized and absolutely normalized dijet $p_{\text{T}}$ balance are compared with previous Pb+Pb measurements at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} =5.02$ TeV. The differences between the dijet suppression in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb are further quantified by the ratio of pair nuclear-modification factors. The results are found to be consistent with those measured in Pb+Pb data when compared in classes of the same event activity and when taking into account the difference between the center-of-mass energies of the initial parton scattering process in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions. These results should provide input for a better understanding of the role of energy density, system size, path length, and fluctuations in the parton energy loss.
This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a> <br><i>p+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a> <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a> <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 40-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 60-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 0-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a> <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Studies of the correlations of the two highest transverse momentum (leading) jets in individual Pb+Pb collision events can provide information about the mechanism of jet quenching by the hot and dense matter created in such collisions. In Pb+Pb and pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV, measurements of the leading dijet transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) correlations are presented. Additionally, measurements in Pb+Pb collisions of the dijet pair nuclear modification factors projected along leading and subleading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ are made. The measurements are performed using the ATLAS detector at the LHC with 260 pb$^{-1}$ of pp data collected in 2017 and 2.2 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb data collected in 2015 and 2018. An unfolding procedure is applied to the two-dimensional leading and subleading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions to account for experimental effects in the measurement of both jets. Results are provided for dijets with leading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ greater than 100 GeV. Measurements of the dijet-yield-normalized $x_{\mathrm{J}}$ distributions in Pb+Pb collisions show an increased fraction of imbalanced jets compared to pp collisions; these measurements are in agreement with previous measurements of the same quantity at 2.76 TeV in the overlapping kinematic range. Measurements of the absolutely-normalized dijet rate in Pb+Pb and pp collisions are also presented, and show that balanced dijets are significantly more suppressed than imbalanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions. It is observed in the measurements of the pair nuclear modification factors that the subleading jets are significantly suppressed relative to leading jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ between 100 and 316 GeV for all centralities in Pb+Pb collisions.
The correlations between flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n=2$, 3 and 4 and mean transverse momentum $[p_\mathrm{T}]$ in $^{129}$Xe+$^{129}$Xe and $^{208}$Pb+$^{208}$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV and 5.02 TeV, respectively, are measured using charged particles with the ATLAS detector. The correlations are sensitive to the shape and size of the initial geometry, nuclear deformation, and initial momentum anisotropy. The effects from non-flow and centrality fluctuations are minimized, respectively, via a subevent cumulant method and event activity selection based on particle production in the very forward rapidity. The results show strong dependences on centrality, harmonic number $n$, $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and pseudorapidity range. Current models describe qualitatively the overall centrality- and system-dependent trends but fail to quantitatively reproduce all the data. In the central collisions, where models generally show good agreement, the $v_2$-$[p_\mathrm{T}]$ correlations are sensitive to the triaxiality of the quadruple deformation. The comparison of model to the Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe data suggests that the $^{129}$Xe nucleus is a highly deformed triaxial ellipsoid that is neither a prolate nor an oblate shape. This provides strong evidence for a triaxial deformation of $^{129}$Xe nucleus using high-energy heavy-ion collision.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV
$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
We report the first measurement of the differential cross section on $\phi$-meson photoproduction from deuterium near the production threshold for a proton using the CLAS detector and a tagged-photon beam in Hall B at Jefferson Lab. The measurement was carried out by a triple coincidence detection of a proton, $K^+$ and $K^-$ near the theoretical production threshold of 1.57 GeV. The extracted differential cross sections $\frac{d\sigma}{dt}$ for the initial photon energy from 1.65-1.75 GeV are consistent with predictions based on a quasifree mechanism. This experiment establishes a baseline for a future experimental search for an exotic $\phi$-N bound state from heavier nuclear targets utilizing subthreshold/near-threshold production of $\phi$ mesons.
Differential cross section as a function of ABS(T-TMIN).
High-statistics measurements of differential cross sections and recoil polarizations for the reaction $\gamma p \rightarrow K^+ \Sigma^0$ have been obtained using the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab. We cover center-of-mass energies ($\sqrt{s}$) from 1.69 to 2.84 GeV, with an extensive coverage in the $K^+$ production angle. Independent measurements were made using the $K^{+}p\pi^{-}$($\gamma$) and $K^{+}p$($\pi^-, \gamma$) final-state topologies, and were found to exhibit good agreement. Our differential cross sections show good agreement with earlier CLAS, SAPHIR and LEPS results, while offering better statistical precision and a 300-MeV increase in $\sqrt{s}$ coverage. Above $\sqrt{s} \approx 2.5$ GeV, $t$- and $u$-channel Regge scaling behavior can be seen at forward- and backward-angles, respectively. Our recoil polarization ($P_\Sigma$) measurements represent a substantial increase in kinematic coverage and enhanced precision over previous world data. At forward angles we find that $P_\Sigma$ is of the same magnitude but opposite sign as $P_\Lambda$, in agreement with the static SU(6) quark model prediction of $P_\Sigma \approx -P_\Lambda$. This expectation is violated in some mid- and backward-angle kinematic regimes, where $P_\Sigma$ and $P_\Lambda$ are of similar magnitudes but also have the same signs. In conjunction with several other meson photoproduction results recently published by CLAS, the present data will help constrain the partial wave analyses being performed to search for missing baryon resonances.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.69 to 1.7 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.7 to 1.71 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.71 to 1.72 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.72 to 1.73 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.73 to 1.74 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.74 to 1.75 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.75 to 1.76 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.76 to 1.77 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.77 to 1.78 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.78 to 1.79 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.79 to 1.8 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.8 to 1.81 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.81 to 1.82 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.82 to 1.83 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.83 to 1.84 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.84 to 1.85 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.85 to 1.86 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.86 to 1.87 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.87 to 1.88 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.88 to 1.89 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.89 to 1.9 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.9 to 1.91 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.91 to 1.92 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.99 to 2 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2 to 2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.09 to 2.1 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.1 to 2.11 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.11 to 2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.12 to 2.13 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.13 to 2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.14 to 2.15 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.15 to 2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.16 to 2.17 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.17 to 2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.18 to 2.19 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.19 to 2.2 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.2 to 2.21 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.21 to 2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.22 to 2.23 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.23 to 2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.24 to 2.25 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.25 to 2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.26 to 2.27 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.27 to 2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.28 to 2.29 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.29 to 2.3 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.3 to 2.31 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.31 to 2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.32 to 2.33 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.33 to 2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.34 to 2.35 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.35 to 2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.36 to 2.37 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.37 to 2.38 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.38 to 2.39 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.39 to 2.4 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.4 to 2.41 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.41 to 2.42 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.42 to 2.43 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.43 to 2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.44 to 2.45 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.45 to 2.46 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.46 to 2.47 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.47 to 2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.48 to 2.49 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.49 to 2.5 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.5 to 2.51 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.51 to 2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.52 to 2.53 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.53 to 2.54 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.54 to 2.55 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.55 to 2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.56 to 2.57 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.57 to 2.58 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.58 to 2.59 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.59 to 2.6 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.6 to 2.61 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.61 to 2.62 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.62 to 2.63 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.63 to 2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.64 to 2.65 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.65 to 2.66 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.66 to 2.67 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.67 to 2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.68 to 2.69 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.69 to 2.7 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.7 to 2.71 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.71 to 2.72 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.72 to 2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.75 to 2.76 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.76 to 2.77 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.77 to 2.78 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.78 to 2.79 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.79 to 2.8 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.8 to 2.81 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.81 to 2.82 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.82 to 2.83 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.83 to 2.84 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.95 to -0.85.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.85 to -0.75.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.75 to -0.65.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.65 to -0.55.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.55 to -0.45.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.45 to -0.35.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.35 to -0.25.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.25 to -0.15.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.15 to -0.05.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.05 to 0.05.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.05 to 0.15.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.15 to 0.25.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.25 to 0.35.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.35 to 0.45.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.45 to 0.55.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.55 to 0.65.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.65 to 0.75.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.75 to 0.85.
Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.85 to 0.95.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.85 to -0.75.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.75 to -0.65.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.65 to -0.55.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.55 to -0.45.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.45 to -0.35.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.35 to -0.25.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.25 to -0.15.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.15 to -0.05.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.05 to 0.05.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.05 to 0.15.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.15 to 0.25.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.25 to 0.35.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.35 to 0.45.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.45 to 0.55.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.55 to 0.65.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.65 to 0.75.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.75 to 0.85.
Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.85 to 0.95.
We report on the measurement of inclusive electron scattering off a carbon target performed with CLAS at Jefferson Laboratory. A combination of three different beam energies 1.161, 2.261 and 4.461 GeV allowed us to reach an invariant mass of the final-state hadronic system W~2.4 GeV with four-momentum transfers Q2 ranging from 0.2 to 5 GeV2. These data, together with previous measurements of the inclusive electron scattering off proton and deuteron, which cover a similar continuous two-dimensional region of Q2 and Bjorken variable x, permit the study of nuclear modifications of the nucleon structure. By using these, as well as other world data, we evaluated the F2 structure function and its moments. Using an OPE-based twist expansion, we studied the Q2-evolution of the moments, obtaining a separation of the leading-twist and the total higher-twist terms. The carbon-to-deuteron ratio of the leading-twist contributions to the F2 moments exhibits the well known EMC effect, compatible with that discovered previously in x-space. The total higher-twist term in the carbon nucleus appears, although with large systematic uncertainites, to be smaller with respect to the deuteron case for n<7, suggesting partial parton deconfinement in nuclear matter. We speculate that the spatial extension of the nucleon is changed when it is immersed in the nuclear medium.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.175 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.225 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.275 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.325 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.375 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.425 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.475 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.525 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.575 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.625 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.675 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.725 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.775 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.825 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.875 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.925 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.975 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.050 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.150 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.250 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.350 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.450 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.550 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.650 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.750 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.850 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.950 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.050 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.150 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.250 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.350 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.450 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.550 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.650 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.750 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.850 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.950 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.050 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.150 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.250 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.350 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.450 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.550 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.650 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.750 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.850 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.950 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.050 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.150 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.250 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.350 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.450 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.550 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.650 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.750 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.850 GeV**2.
F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.950 GeV**2.
Differential cross sections of the reaction gamma d to K+ Sigma- (p) have been measured with the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab using incident photons with energies between 1.1 and 3.6 GeV. This is the first complete set of strangeness photoproduction data on the neutron covering a broad angular range. At energies close to threshold and up to E_gamma ~ 1.8 GeV, the shape of the angular distribution is suggestive of the presence of s-channel production mechanisms. For E_gamma > 1.8 GeV, a clear forward peak appears and becomes more prominent as the photon energy increases, suggesting contributions from t-channel production mechanisms. These data can be used to constrain future analysis of this reaction.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.65 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.75 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.85 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.95 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.05 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.65 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.75 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.85 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.95 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.05 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
We present measurements of the differential cross section and Lambda recoil polarization for the gamma p to K+ Lambda reaction made using the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab. These measurements cover the center-of-mass energy range from 1.62 to 2.84 GeV and a wide range of center-of-mass K+ production angles. Independent analyses were performed using the K+ p pi- and K+ p (missing pi -) final-state topologies/ results from these analyses were found to exhibit good agreement. These differential cross section measurements show excellent agreement with previous CLAS and LEPS results and offer increased precision and a 300 MeV increase in energy coverage. The recoil polarization data agree well with previous results and offer a large increase in precision and a 500 MeV extension in energy range. The increased center-of-mass energy range that these data represent will allow for independent study of non-resonant K+ Lambda photoproduction mechanisms at all production angles.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.62-1.63 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.63-1.64 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.64-1.65 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.65-1.66 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.66-1.67 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.67-1.68 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.68-1.69 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.69-1.7 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.7-1.71 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.71-1.72 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.72-1.73 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.73-1.74 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.74-1.75 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.75-1.76 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.76-1.77 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.77-1.78 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.78-1.79 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.79-1.8 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.8-1.81 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.81-1.82 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.82-1.83 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.83-1.84 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.84-1.85 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.85-1.86 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.86-1.87 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.87-1.88 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.88-1.89 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.89-1.9 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.9-1.91 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.91-1.92 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.92-1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.93-1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.94-1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.96-1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.97-1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.98-1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.99-2 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2-2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.01-2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.02-2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.03-2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.04-2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.05-2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.06-2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.07-2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.08-2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.09-2.1 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.1-2.11 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.11-2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.12-2.13 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.13-2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.14-2.15 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.15-2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.16-2.17 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.17-2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.18-2.19 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.19-2.2 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.2-2.21 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.21-2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.22-2.23 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.23-2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.24-2.25 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.25-2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.26-2.27 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.27-2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.28-2.29 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.29-2.3 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.3-2.31 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.31-2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.32-2.33 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.33-2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.34-2.35 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.35-2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.36-2.37 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.37-2.38 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.38-2.39 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.39-2.4 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.4-2.41 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.41-2.42 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.42-2.43 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.43-2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.44-2.45 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.45-2.46 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.46-2.47 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.47-2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.48-2.49 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.49-2.5 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.5-2.51 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.51-2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.52-2.53 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.53-2.54 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.54-2.55 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.55-2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.56-2.57 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.57-2.58 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.58-2.59 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.59-2.6 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.6-2.61 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.61-2.62 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.62-2.63 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.63-2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.64-2.65 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.65-2.66 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.66-2.67 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.67-2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.68-2.69 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.69-2.7 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.7-2.71 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.71-2.72 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.72-2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.75-2.76 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.76-2.77 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.77-2.78 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.78-2.79 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.79-2.8 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.8-2.81 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.81-2.82 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.82-2.83 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.83-2.84 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.62-1.63 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.63-1.64 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.64-1.65 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.65-1.66 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.66-1.67 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.67-1.68 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.68-1.69 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.69-1.7 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.7-1.71 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.71-1.72 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.72-1.73 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.73-1.74 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.74-1.75 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.75-1.76 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.76-1.77 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.77-1.78 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.78-1.79 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.79-1.8 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.8-1.81 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.81-1.82 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.82-1.83 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.83-1.84 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.84-1.85 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.85-1.86 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.86-1.87 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.87-1.88 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.88-1.89 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.89-1.9 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.9-1.91 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.91-1.92 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.92-1.93 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.93-1.94 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.94-1.95 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.95-1.96 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.96-1.97 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.97-1.98 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.98-1.99 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.99-2 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2-2.01 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.01-2.02 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.02-2.03 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.03-2.04 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.04-2.05 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.05-2.06 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.06-2.07 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.07-2.08 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.08-2.09 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.09-2.1 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.1-2.11 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.11-2.12 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.12-2.13 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.13-2.14 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.14-2.15 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.15-2.16 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.16-2.17 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.17-2.18 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.18-2.19 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.19-2.2 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.2-2.21 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.21-2.22 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.22-2.23 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.23-2.24 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.24-2.25 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.25-2.26 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.26-2.27 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.27-2.28 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.28-2.29 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.29-2.3 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.3-2.31 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.31-2.32 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.32-2.33 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.33-2.34 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.34-2.35 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.35-2.36 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.36-2.37 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.37-2.38 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.38-2.39 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.39-2.4 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.4-2.41 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.41-2.42 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.42-2.43 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.43-2.44 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.44-2.45 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.45-2.46 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.46-2.47 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.47-2.48 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.48-2.49 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.49-2.5 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.5-2.51 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.51-2.52 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.52-2.53 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.53-2.54 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.54-2.55 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.55-2.56 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.56-2.57 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.57-2.58 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.58-2.59 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.59-2.6 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.6-2.61 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.61-2.62 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.62-2.63 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.63-2.64 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.64-2.65 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.65-2.66 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.66-2.67 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.67-2.68 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.68-2.69 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.69-2.7 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.7-2.71 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.71-2.72 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.72-2.73 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.73-2.74 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.74-2.75 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.75-2.76 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.76-2.77 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.77-2.78 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.78-2.79 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.79-2.8 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.8-2.81 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.81-2.82 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.82-2.83 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.83-2.84 GeV.
High-statistics differential cross sections for the reactions gamma p -> p eta and gamma p -> p eta-prime have been measured using the CLAS at Jefferson Lab for center-of-mass energies from near threshold up to 2.84 GeV. The eta-prime results are the most precise to date and provide the largest energy and angular coverage. The eta measurements extend the energy range of the world's large-angle results by approximately 300 MeV. These new data, in particular the eta-prime measurements, are likely to help constrain the analyses being performed to search for new baryon resonance states.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.68 to 1.69 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.69 to 1.70 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.70 to 1.71 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.71 to 1.72 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.72 to 1.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.73 to 1.74 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.74 to 1.75 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.75 to 1.76 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.76 to 1.77 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.77 to 1.78 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.78 to 1.79 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.79 to 1.80 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.80 to 1.81 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.81 to 1.82 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.82 to 1.83 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.83 to 1.84 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.84 to 1.85 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.85 to 1.86 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.86 to 1.87 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.87 to 1.88 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.88 to 1.89 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.89 to 1.90 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.90 to 1.91 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.91 to 1.92 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.10 to 2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.12 to 2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.14 to 2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.16 to 2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.18 to 2.20 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.20 to 2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.22 to 2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.24 to 2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.26 to 2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.28 to 2.30 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.30 to 2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.32 to 2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.34 to 2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.36 to 2.40 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.40 to 2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.44 to 2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.48 to 2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.52 to 2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.56 to 2.60 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.60 to 2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.64 to 2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.68 to 2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.75 to 2.84 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.10 to 2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.12 to 2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.14 to 2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.16 to 2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.18 to 2.20 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.20 to 2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.22 to 2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.24 to 2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.26 to 2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.28 to 2.30 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.30 to 2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.32 to 2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.34 to 2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.36 to 2.40 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.40 to 2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.44 to 2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.48 to 2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.52 to 2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.56 to 2.60 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.60 to 2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.64 to 2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.68 to 2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.75 to 2.84 GeV.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status Email Forum Twitter GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.