Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV

$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.72 to 1.73 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.73 to 1.74 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.74 to 1.75 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.75 to 1.76 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.76 to 1.77 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.77 to 1.78 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.78 to 1.79 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.79 to 1.8 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.8 to 1.81 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.81 to 1.82 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.82 to 1.83 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.83 to 1.84 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.84 to 1.85 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.85 to 1.86 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.86 to 1.87 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.87 to 1.88 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.88 to 1.89 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.89 to 1.9 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.9 to 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.91 to 1.92 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 1.99 to 2 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2 to 2.01 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.09 to 2.1 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.1 to 2.11 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.11 to 2.12 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.12 to 2.13 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.13 to 2.14 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.14 to 2.15 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.15 to 2.16 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.16 to 2.17 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.17 to 2.18 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.18 to 2.19 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.19 to 2.2 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.2 to 2.21 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.21 to 2.22 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.22 to 2.23 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.23 to 2.24 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.24 to 2.25 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.25 to 2.26 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.26 to 2.27 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.27 to 2.28 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.28 to 2.29 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.29 to 2.3 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.3 to 2.31 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.31 to 2.32 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.32 to 2.33 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.33 to 2.34 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.34 to 2.35 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.35 to 2.36 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.36 to 2.37 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.37 to 2.38 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.38 to 2.39 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.39 to 2.4 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.4 to 2.41 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.41 to 2.42 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.42 to 2.43 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.43 to 2.44 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.44 to 2.45 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.45 to 2.46 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.46 to 2.47 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.47 to 2.48 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.48 to 2.49 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.49 to 2.5 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.5 to 2.51 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.51 to 2.52 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.52 to 2.53 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.53 to 2.54 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.54 to 2.55 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.55 to 2.56 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.56 to 2.57 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.57 to 2.58 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.58 to 2.59 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.59 to 2.6 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.6 to 2.61 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.61 to 2.62 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.62 to 2.63 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.63 to 2.64 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.64 to 2.65 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.65 to 2.66 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.66 to 2.67 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.67 to 2.68 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.68 to 2.69 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.69 to 2.7 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.7 to 2.71 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.71 to 2.72 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.72 to 2.73 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.75 to 2.76 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.76 to 2.77 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.77 to 2.78 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.78 to 2.79 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.79 to 2.8 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.8 to 2.81 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.81 to 2.82 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.82 to 2.83 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K+,CM)) for the centre-of mass range 2.83 to 2.84 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.95 to -0.85.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.85 to -0.75.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.75 to -0.65.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.65 to -0.55.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.55 to -0.45.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.45 to -0.35.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.35 to -0.25.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.25 to -0.15.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.15 to -0.05.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.05 to 0.05.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.05 to 0.15.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.15 to 0.25.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.25 to 0.35.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.35 to 0.45.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.45 to 0.55.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.55 to 0.65.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.65 to 0.75.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.75 to 0.85.

Differential cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.85 to 0.95.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.85 to -0.75.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.75 to -0.65.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.65 to -0.55.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.55 to -0.45.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.45 to -0.35.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.35 to -0.25.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.25 to -0.15.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.15 to -0.05.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from -0.05 to 0.05.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.05 to 0.15.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.15 to 0.25.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.25 to 0.35.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.35 to 0.45.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.45 to 0.55.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.55 to 0.65.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.65 to 0.75.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.75 to 0.85.

Recoil polarization as a function of the centre-of-mass energy for the angular range COS(THETA(K+,CM) from 0.85 to 0.95.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.325 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.375 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.425 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.475 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.525 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.575 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.625 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.675 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.725 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.775 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.825 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.875 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.925 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.975 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.950 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.950 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.950 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.950 GeV**2.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.65 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.75 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.85 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.95 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.05 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.65 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.75 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.85 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.95 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.05 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.65-1.66 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.66-1.67 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.67-1.68 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.68-1.69 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.69-1.7 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.7-1.71 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.71-1.72 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.72-1.73 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.73-1.74 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.74-1.75 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.75-1.76 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.76-1.77 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.77-1.78 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.78-1.79 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.79-1.8 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.8-1.81 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.81-1.82 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.82-1.83 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.83-1.84 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.84-1.85 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.85-1.86 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.86-1.87 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.87-1.88 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.88-1.89 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.89-1.9 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.9-1.91 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.91-1.92 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.92-1.93 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.93-1.94 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.94-1.95 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.96-1.97 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.97-1.98 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.98-1.99 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.99-2 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2-2.01 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.01-2.02 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.02-2.03 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.03-2.04 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.04-2.05 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.05-2.06 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.06-2.07 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.07-2.08 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.08-2.09 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.09-2.1 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.1-2.11 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.11-2.12 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.12-2.13 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.13-2.14 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.14-2.15 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.15-2.16 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.16-2.17 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.17-2.18 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.18-2.19 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.19-2.2 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.2-2.21 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.21-2.22 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.22-2.23 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.23-2.24 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.24-2.25 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.25-2.26 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.26-2.27 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.27-2.28 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.28-2.29 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.29-2.3 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.3-2.31 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.31-2.32 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.32-2.33 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.33-2.34 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.34-2.35 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.35-2.36 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.36-2.37 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.37-2.38 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.38-2.39 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.39-2.4 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.4-2.41 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.41-2.42 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.42-2.43 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.43-2.44 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.44-2.45 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.45-2.46 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.46-2.47 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.47-2.48 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.48-2.49 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.49-2.5 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.5-2.51 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.51-2.52 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.52-2.53 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.53-2.54 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.54-2.55 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.55-2.56 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.56-2.57 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.57-2.58 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.58-2.59 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.59-2.6 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.6-2.61 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.61-2.62 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.62-2.63 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.63-2.64 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.64-2.65 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.65-2.66 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.66-2.67 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.67-2.68 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.68-2.69 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.69-2.7 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.7-2.71 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.71-2.72 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.72-2.73 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.75-2.76 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.76-2.77 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.77-2.78 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.78-2.79 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.79-2.8 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.8-2.81 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.81-2.82 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.82-2.83 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.83-2.84 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.62-1.63 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.63-1.64 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.64-1.65 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.65-1.66 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.66-1.67 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.67-1.68 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.68-1.69 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.69-1.7 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.7-1.71 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.71-1.72 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.72-1.73 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.73-1.74 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.74-1.75 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.75-1.76 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.76-1.77 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.77-1.78 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.78-1.79 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.79-1.8 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.8-1.81 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.81-1.82 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.82-1.83 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.83-1.84 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.84-1.85 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.85-1.86 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.86-1.87 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.87-1.88 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.88-1.89 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.89-1.9 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.9-1.91 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.91-1.92 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.92-1.93 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.93-1.94 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.94-1.95 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.95-1.96 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.96-1.97 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.97-1.98 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.98-1.99 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.99-2 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2-2.01 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.01-2.02 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.02-2.03 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.03-2.04 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.04-2.05 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.05-2.06 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.06-2.07 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.07-2.08 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.08-2.09 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.09-2.1 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.1-2.11 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.11-2.12 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.12-2.13 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.13-2.14 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.14-2.15 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.15-2.16 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.16-2.17 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.17-2.18 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.18-2.19 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.19-2.2 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.2-2.21 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.21-2.22 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.22-2.23 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.23-2.24 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.24-2.25 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.25-2.26 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.26-2.27 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.27-2.28 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.28-2.29 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.29-2.3 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.3-2.31 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.31-2.32 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.32-2.33 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.33-2.34 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.34-2.35 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.35-2.36 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.36-2.37 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.37-2.38 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.38-2.39 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.39-2.4 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.4-2.41 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.41-2.42 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.42-2.43 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.43-2.44 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.44-2.45 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.45-2.46 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.46-2.47 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.47-2.48 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.48-2.49 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.49-2.5 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.5-2.51 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.51-2.52 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.52-2.53 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.53-2.54 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.54-2.55 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.55-2.56 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.56-2.57 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.57-2.58 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.58-2.59 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.59-2.6 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.6-2.61 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.61-2.62 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.62-2.63 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.63-2.64 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.64-2.65 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.65-2.66 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.66-2.67 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.67-2.68 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.68-2.69 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.69-2.7 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.7-2.71 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.71-2.72 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.72-2.73 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.73-2.74 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.74-2.75 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.75-2.76 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.76-2.77 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.77-2.78 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.78-2.79 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.79-2.8 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.8-2.81 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.81-2.82 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.82-2.83 GeV.

Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.83-2.84 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.71 to 1.72 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.72 to 1.73 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.73 to 1.74 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.74 to 1.75 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.75 to 1.76 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.76 to 1.77 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.77 to 1.78 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.78 to 1.79 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.79 to 1.80 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.80 to 1.81 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.81 to 1.82 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.82 to 1.83 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.83 to 1.84 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.84 to 1.85 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.85 to 1.86 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.86 to 1.87 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.87 to 1.88 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.88 to 1.89 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.89 to 1.90 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.90 to 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.91 to 1.92 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.10 to 2.12 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.12 to 2.14 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.14 to 2.16 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.16 to 2.18 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.18 to 2.20 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.20 to 2.22 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.22 to 2.24 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.24 to 2.26 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.26 to 2.28 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.28 to 2.30 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.30 to 2.32 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.32 to 2.34 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.34 to 2.36 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.36 to 2.40 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.40 to 2.44 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.44 to 2.48 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.48 to 2.52 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.52 to 2.56 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.56 to 2.60 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.60 to 2.64 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.64 to 2.68 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.68 to 2.73 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.75 to 2.84 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.10 to 2.12 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.12 to 2.14 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.14 to 2.16 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.16 to 2.18 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.18 to 2.20 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.20 to 2.22 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.22 to 2.24 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.24 to 2.26 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.26 to 2.28 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.28 to 2.30 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.30 to 2.32 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.32 to 2.34 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.34 to 2.36 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.36 to 2.40 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.40 to 2.44 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.44 to 2.48 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.48 to 2.52 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.52 to 2.56 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.56 to 2.60 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.60 to 2.64 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.64 to 2.68 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.68 to 2.73 GeV.

Differential cross section for the W range 2.75 to 2.84 GeV.