Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Fig. 6b: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Away and Toward regions after the subtraction of Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ distributions in the transverse region for p-Pb collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. 7a: $<p_{\rm T}>$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Toward (left) and Away (right) regions after the subtraction of transverse region for pp collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. 7b: $<p_{\rm T}>$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Toward (left) and Away (right) regions after the subtraction of transverse region for p-Pb collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A1: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.15 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A2: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 1.0 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A3: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.15 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A4: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 1.0 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{+}$ for NC $e^{+}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 225$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{+}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{-}$ for NC $e^{-}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{-}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{+}$ for CC $e^{+}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{+}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{-}$ for CC $e^{-}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{-}$.

Structure function $xF_3^{\gamma Z}$ for different values of $Q^2$ and $x_{\rm Bj}$.

Structure function $xF_3^{\gamma Z}$ averaged over $Q^2 \ge 1000$ GeV$^2$ at the scale 1000 GeV$^2$.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.200-1.250 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.250-1.300 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.300-1.350 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.350-1.400 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.400-1.450 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.450-1.500 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.500-1.550 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.550-1.600 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.600-1.650 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.650-1.700 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.700-1.800 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.800-1.900 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.900-2.000 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.125-1.150 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.150-1.175 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.175-1.20 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.200-1.250 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.250-1.300 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.300-1.350 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.350-1.400 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.400-1.450 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.450-1.500 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.500-1.550 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.550-1.600 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.600-1.650 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.650-1.700 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.700-1.800 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.800-1.900 GeV.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.900-2.000 GeV.

Total cross-section as a function of the incident photon energy for $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton obtained from exclusive and inclusive analysis$.

Slope parameter and horizontal level from the fits to the differential cross-sections $d\sigma/dt$ for $\omega$ mesons produced off the free proton.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.158-1.208 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.208-1.233 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.233-1.258 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.258-1.308 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.308-1.358 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.358-1.408 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.408-1.508 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.508-1.608 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.608-1.708 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.708-1.808 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.808-1.908 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.908-2.008 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.158-1.208 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.208-1.233 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.233-1.258 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.258-1.308 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.308-1.358 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.358-1.408 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.408-1.508 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.508-1.608 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.608-1.708 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.708-1.808 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.808-1.908 GeV.

Differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.908-2.008 GeV.

Slope parameter and horizontal level from the fits to the differential cross-sections $d\sigma/dt$ for $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton.

Slope parameter and horizontal level from the fits to the differential cross-sections $d\sigma/dt$ for $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound neutron.

Inclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.158-1.208 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.208-1.233 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.233-1.258 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.258-1.308 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.308-1.358 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.358-1.408 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.408-1.508 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.508-1.608 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.608-1.708 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.708-1.808 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.808-1.908 GeV.

Inlusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off deuterium versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.908-2.008 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.158-1.208 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.208-1.233 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.233-1.258 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.258-1.308 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.308-1.358 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.358-1.408 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.408-1.508 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.508-1.608 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.608-1.708 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.708-1.808 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.808-1.908 GeV.

Sum of the exclusive differential cross-sections of $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton and off the bound neutron versus $\cos(\theta^\omega_{\mathrm{c.m.}})$ and versus the momentum transfer to the nucleon, $t$, for incident photon energy $E_\gamma$ = 1.908-2.008 GeV.

Total cross-section as a function of the incident photon energy for $\omega$ mesons produced off the bound proton $\sigma_p^{\mathrm{bound}}$, off the bound neutron $\sigma_n^{\mathrm{bound}}$, the sum of the two exclusive cross-sections $\sigma_p^{\mathrm{bound}}+\sigma_n^{\mathrm{bound}}$, the quasi-free inclusive cross-section $\sigma_{\mathrm{incl}}$ and the cross-section off the neutron calculated by $\sigma_{\mathrm{incl}}-\sigma_p^{\mathrm{bound}}$.

The $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ for 20-30% central Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$\varepsilon$ (Glauber) as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$\varepsilon$ (CGC) as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$v_2${EtaSubs} as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

The $v_2${EP} vs. $\eta$ for 10-40% centrality in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

The $v_2${EP} vs. $\eta$ for 10-40% centrality in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for various collision energies ($\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV).

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Sample correlations in $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78) for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$ and reflected in the plot.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\eta$ ($|\Delta\phi|<$ 0.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\eta$.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu and 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu, 0-12% Au+Au and 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Inclusive energy distribution for incident photon energy 1.550 to 2.200 GeV.

Inclusive angular distribution for C12.

Inclusive angular distribution for CA40.

Inclusive angular distribution for NB93.

Inclusive angular distribution for PB.

Exclusive single ETA production cross section.

Inclusive single ETA production cross section.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 3.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 3.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7950 GeV.

The polarized structure function G1 as a function of Bjorken X for the Q**2range 0.27 to 0.50 GeV.

The polarized structure function G1 as a function of Bjorken X for the Q**2range 0.50 to 0.74 GeV.

The polarized structure function G1 as a function of Bjorken X for the Q**2range 0.74 to 1.10 GeV.

The polarized structure function G1 as a function of Bjorken X for the Q**2range 1.10 to 1.64 GeV.

G1 as a function of W and Bjorken X for a mean Q**2 = 2.047370 GeV**2.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Leading particle asymmetries defined as (SIG(LEADING)- SIG(NONLEADING))/(SIG(LEADING)+SIG(NONLEADING)).