No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{13}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{23}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{14}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{24}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{12}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{13}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{23}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{14}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{24}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{12}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{34}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{13}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{23}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{14}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{24}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\phi_{1+2} - \phi_{3+4}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\phi_{1+3} - \phi_{2+4}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\phi_{1+4} - \phi_{2+3}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ integrated over rapidity range $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for the 0--90% centrality interval for the three geometric models: (a) Glauber, (b) Glauber-Gribov with $\omega_{\sigma}=0.11$ and (c) Glauber-Gribov with $\omega_{\sigma}=0.2$.

$R_{pPb}$ values as a function of $p_{T}$ in the 0--90% centrality interval averaged over $|y*|<0.5$.The $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$ value for the ATLAS centrality correction is calculated with the Glauber model. The total systematic uncertainties, which include the uncertainty in $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$, are indicated by lines of the same colour. Strict quantitative agreement is not expected as each measurement uses different rapidity intervals for the centrality determination and apply different event selection criteria to reject diffractive collisions.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $|\eta|<2.3$ for seven centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $|\eta|<2.3$ for seven centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $|\eta|<2.3$ for seven centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

Normalized differential distribution in CHI(dijet) for two-jet mass 500 to 600 GeV and the non perturbative correction factor.

Normalized differential distribution in CHI(dijet) for two-jet mass 600 to 700 GeV and the non perturbative correction factor.

Normalized differential distribution in CHI(dijet) for two-jet mass 700 to 800 GeV and the non perturbative correction factor.

Normalized differential distribution in CHI(dijet) for two-jet mass 800 to 900 GeV and the non perturbative correction factor.

Normalized differential distribution in CHI(dijet) for two-jet mass 900 to 1000 GeV and the non perturbative correction factor.

Normalized differential distribution in CHI(dijet) for two-jet mass 1000 to1100 GeV and the non perturbative correction factor.

Normalized differential distribution in CHI(dijet) for two-jet mass > 1100 GeV and the non perturbative correction factor.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Differential cross section for (GAMMA CJET X) production in the region YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.

Measured cross section as a function of the Z0 rapidity.

Integrated cross section.. The second DSYS error is from the muon identification and the third from the luminosity measurement.

Measurement of the cross section for inclusive Z0/GAMMA* production. The second DSYS error is from the muon identification and the third from the luminosity measurement.

Differential cross section for the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 to 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.

Measured inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet transverse momentum for absolute values of the jet rapidity from 1.2 to 1.6 for cone radius R = 0.7.

Measured inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet transverse momentum for absolute values of the jet rapidity from 1.6 to 2.0 for cone radius R = 0.7.

Measured inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet transverse momentum for absolute values of the jet rapidity from 2.0 to 2.4 for cone radius R = 0.7.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Measured transverse momentum distribution for K*0 production in the accessible phase space.

Measured transverse momentum distribution for K*BAR0 production in the accessible phase space.

Measured transverse momentum distribution for PHI production in the accessible phase space.

Cross sections for K*0 and K*BAR0 production integrated over the accessiblephase space.

Cross sections for K*0 and K*BAR0 production extrapolated to full phase space.

Cross sections for PHI production integrated over the accessible phase space.

Cross sections for PHI production extrapolated to full phase space.

Measured A dependence of K*0 production in the accessible phase space.

Measured A dependence of K*BAR0 production in the accessible phase space.

Measured A dependence of PHI production in the accessible phase space.