Normalized differential distributions of the $\Delta R (\gamma,\mathrm{tt})$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process.

Absolute differential distributions of the min. $\Delta R (\gamma,\mathrm{t})$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process.

Normalized differential distributions of the min. $\Delta R (\gamma,\mathrm{t})$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process.

Absolute differential distributions of the $m(\mathrm{tt})$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process.

Normalized differential distributions of the $m(\mathrm{tt})$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process.

Absolute differential distributions of the leading lepton $p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The theory predictions are computed at fixed order, at NLO in QCD, as described in Section 9.2 of the paper.

Normalized differential distributions of the leading lepton $p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The theory predictions are computed at fixed order, at NLO in QCD, as described in Section 9.2 of the paper.

Absolute differential distributions of the photon $p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The theory predictions are computed at fixed order, at NLO in QCD, as described in Section 9.2 of the paper.

Normalized differential distributions of the photon $p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The theory predictions are computed at fixed order, at NLO in QCD, as described in Section 9.2 of the paper.

Absolute differential distributions of the $\Delta \phi (\ell,\ell)$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The theory predictions are computed at fixed order, at NLO in QCD, as described in Section 9.2 of the paper.

Normalized differential distributions of the $\Delta \phi (\ell,\ell)$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The theory predictions are computed at fixed order, at NLO in QCD, as described in Section 9.2 of the paper.

Absolute differential distributions of the ratio between the cross sections of $\mathrm{tt\gamma}$ and $\mathrm{tt}$, as a function of the leading top quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process.

Absolute differential distributions of the ratio between the cross sections of $\mathrm{tt\gamma}$ and $\mathrm{tt}$, as a function of the leading lepton $p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The nominal MC prediction used to compare the experimental results to is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and Madgraph5 at LO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The alternative prediction is obtained with Madgraph5 at NLO in QCD for photons from the production part of the process and a POWHEG+Pythia $\mathrm{tt}$ simulation at NLO in QCD for photons from the decay part of the process. The theory predictions are computed at fixed order, at NLO in QCD, as described in Section 9.2 of the paper.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the leading top quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the leading top quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the $\Delta R (\gamma,\mathrm{tt})$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the $\Delta R (\gamma,\mathrm{tt})$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the min. $\Delta R (\gamma,\mathrm{t})$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the min. $\Delta R (\gamma,\mathrm{t})$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the $m(\mathrm{tt})$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the $m(\mathrm{tt})$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the leading lepton $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the leading lepton $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the photon $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the photon $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the $\Delta \phi (\ell,\ell)$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of the $\Delta \phi (\ell,\ell)$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential $\mathrm{tt\gamma}$ / $\mathrm{tt}$ cross section ratio as a function of the leading top $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential $\mathrm{tt\gamma}$ / $\mathrm{tt}$ cross section ratio as a function of the leading top $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the total uncertainty in the absolute differential $\mathrm{tt\gamma}$ / $\mathrm{tt}$ cross section ratio as a function of the leading lepton $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential $\mathrm{tt\gamma}$ / $\mathrm{tt}$ cross section ratio as a function of the leading lepton $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (both nominal and 'global') for all nuisance parameters in the W-like Z boson mass fit (flip odd/even events to choose muon charge), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (both nominal and 'global') for all nuisance parameters in the W-like Z boson mass fit (charge difference), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (only nominal) for all nuisance parameters in the Z boson mass fit (using dimuon mass), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (only nominal) for all nuisance parameters in the W boson mass fit (helicity cross section fit), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

$d\sigma^{W}/d\mathit{p}_{T}\ (pb\,/\,GeV)$: Generator-level $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ distribution and uncertainty. The last column reports the result of a simultaneous fit to the single muon $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μ}, \mathit{\eta}^{μ}, \mathit{q}^{μ})$ distribution in $W$ boson decays and the dimuon $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μμ},\mathit{y}^{μμ})$ distribution in $Z$ boson events. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{Z}/d|\mathit{y}|\ (pb)$: Unfolded measured $\mathit{y}^{Z}$ distribution compared with the generator-level predictions before the likelihood fit or after the W-like $\mathit{m}_{Z}$ fit or from the direct fit to the $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μμ},\mathit{y}^{μμ})$ distribution. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{Z}/d\mathit{p}_{T}\ (pb\,/\,GeV)$: Unfolded measured $\mathit{p}_{T}^{Z}$ distribution compared with the generator-level predictions before the likelihood fit or after the W-like $\mathit{m}_{Z}$ fit or from the direct fit to the $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μμ},\mathit{y}^{μμ})$ distribution. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{W}/d\mathit{p}_{T}\ (pb\,/\,GeV)$: Generator-level $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ distribution and uncertainty, before and after running the helicity fit. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{W}/d|\mathit{y}|\ (pb)$: Generator-level $\mathit{y}^{Z}$ distribution and uncertainty, before and after running the helicity fit. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

Comparison of the nominal $\mathit{m}_{W}$ measurement and its uncertainty (total or only from $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ modeling), with the alternative measurements using different approaches to the $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ modeling and its uncertainty. The first column reports the measured mass for each configuration, while the second one shows the difference between the measurement and the main result.

Comparison of the nominal $\mathit{m}_{W}$ measurement and its uncertainty (total or only from the CT18Z PDF set), with the alternative measurements using different PDFs and their uncertainty before the scaling procedure described in the paper text. The measured mass values are those reported in Table A.7 of the paper. The first column reports the measured mass for each configuration, while the second one shows the difference between the measurement and the main result.

Comparison of the nominal $\mathit{m}_{W}$ measurement and its uncertainty (total or only from the CT18Z PDF set), with the alternative measurements using different PDFs and their uncertainty after the scaling procedure described in the paper text. The measured mass values are those reported in Table A.7 of the paper. The scale factors for the PDF uncertainties from each set are reported in Table A.3 of the paper. The first column reports the measured mass for each configuration, while the second one shows the difference between the measurement and the main result.

Correlations of the ttH signal-strength modifiers in the different Higgs pT bins of the STXS measurement.

Observed and expected upper 95% CL limit on the tH signal strength modifier $\mu_{tH}$ with $\mu_{ttH}=1$ for different channels and years, where the uncertainties are uncorrelated between the channels and years, and in their combination. The one and two standard deviation confidence intervals on the expected limit are also listed (sigma).

Likelihood-ratio test statistic as a function of the ttH and tH signal strength modifiers $\mu_{ttH}$ and $\mu_{tH}$. The observed best fit point is $(\mu_{tH}, \mu_{ttH}) = (-3.83, +0.35)$.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $\kappa_{t}$ and $\kappa_{V}$. The observed best fit point is $(\kappa_{t}, \kappa_{V}) = (+0.59, +1.40)$.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $\kappa_{t}$ for $\kappa_{V}=1$. The observed best fit point is $\kappa_{t} = +0.54$.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $\kappa_{t}$ and $\tilde{\kappa}_{t}$ with $\kappa_{V}=1$. The observed best fit point is $(\kappa_{t}, \tilde{\kappa}_{t}) = (+0.53, 0.00)$.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $f_{CP}$. The overall modifier of the top-Higgs coupling strength is profiled such that the likelihood attains its minimum at each point in the plane, and $\kappa_{V}$ is set to 1. The observed best fit point is $f_{CP} = 0.00$.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $\cos(\alpha)$. The overall modifier of the top-Higgs coupling strength is profiled such that the likelihood attains its minimum at each point in the plane, and $\kappa_{V}$ is set to 1. The observed best fit point is $\cos(\alpha) = +1.00$.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $\kappa_{t}$ and $\tilde{\kappa}_{t}$ with $\kappa_{V}=1$, in the $H \rightarrow bb$, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, $H\rightarrow ZZ$, $H\rightarrow WW$, and $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ decay channels and in their combination.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $f_{CP}$, in the $H \rightarrow bb$, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, $H\rightarrow ZZ$, $H\rightarrow WW$, and $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ decay channel and in their combination. The overall modifier of the top-Higgs coupling strength is profiled such that the likelihood attains its minimum at each point in the plane, and $\kappa_{V}$ is set to 1.

Observed and expected likelihood ratio test statistic as a function of $\cos(\alpha)$, in the $H \rightarrow bb$, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, $H\rightarrow ZZ$, $H\rightarrow WW$, and $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ decay channels and in their combination. The overall modifier of the top-Higgs coupling strength is profiled such that the likelihood attains its minimum at each point in the plane, and $\kappa_{V}$ is set to 1.

Normalised fiducial cross section in bins of the leading lepton PT. Leading Lepton is the lepton in the final state with highest PT.

Correlations in the leading Lepton PT distribution.

Cross section dsigma/dpt as a function of the leading jet pt corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Cross section dsigma/dpt as a function of the second-leading jet pt corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Inclusive jet differential cross section dsigma/dy corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Jet differential cross section dsigma/dy as a function of the leading jet y corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Jet differential cross section dsigma/dy as a function of the second-leading jet y corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/dmjj as a function of the dijet invariant mass mjj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/d DeltaYjj as a function of the dijet rapidity separation DeltaYjj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/d DeltaPhijj as a function of the dijet azimuthal separation DeltaPhijj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/d DeltaRjj as a function of the dijet angular separation DeltaRjj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Cross section for Inclusive Jet Multiplicity for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Ratio of cross sections for N/N-1 inclusive jet multiplicities for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized inclusive jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dpt for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dpt for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized second-leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dpt for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized inclusive jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dy for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dy for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized second leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dy for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet invariant mass 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dmjj for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet rapidity separation 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dDeltaYjj for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dDeltaPhijj (1/rad.) for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet angular separation 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dDeltaRjj for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Charged particle fragmentation function in the jet-Pt range 80 TO 110 GeV.

Charged particle fragmentation function in the jet-Pt range 110 TO 160 GeV.

Charged particle fragmentation function in the jet-Pt range 160 TO 210 GeV.

Charged particle fragmentation function in the jet-Pt range 210 TO 260 GeV.

Charged particle fragmentation function in the jet-Pt range 260 TO 310 GeV.

Charged particle fragmentation function in the jet-Pt range 310 TO 400 GeV.

Charged particle fragmentation function in the jet-Pt range 400 TO 500 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 25 TO 40 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 40 TO 60 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 60 TO 80 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 80 TO 110 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 110 TO 160 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 160 TO 210 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 210 TO 260 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 260 TO 310 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 310 TO 400 GeV.

Charged particle Rho distribution in the jet-Pt range 400 TO 500 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 25 TO 40 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 40 TO 60 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 60 TO 80 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 80 TO 110 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 110 TO 160 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 160 TO 210 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 210 TO 260 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 260 TO 310 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 310 TO 400 GeV.

Charged particle ptRel distribution in the jet-Pt range 400 TO 500 GeV.

Inclusive muon cross section from W+->mu+nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from W-->mu-nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from Z->mu+mu- simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV (the Z is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll > 60 GeV): the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from backgrounds: Z->tau tau, ttbar, Drell-Yan->mu+mu- (Drell-Yan is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll < 60 GeV) simulated with Pythia with MRSTLO* pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar production and decays simulated with FONLL with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is the uncertainty due to scale variation, alpha_s+pdf using CTEQ6.6 error set and the heavy quark masses.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar simulated with FONLL removing the resummation term with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV?.

Inclusive muon cross section for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: (stat) statistical error, (sys) systematic error. The first systematic error is the intrinsic error of the measurement, the second is the error due to the luminosity.

Inclusive muon cross section after subtraction of W,Z, Drell-Yan and top background for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: (stat): statistical error, (sys): systematic error. The first systematic error is the intrinsic error of the measurement, the second the error due to the luminosity, the third is due to the subtraction of the background and is dominated by the error on the W, Z inclusive cross sections.

Inclusive muon cross section from W+->mu+nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from W-->mu-nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from Z->mu+mu- simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV (the Z is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll > 60 GeV): the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from backgrounds: Z->tau tau, ttbar, Drell-Yan->mu+mu- (Drell-Yan is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll < 60 GeV) simulated with Pythia with MRSTLO* pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar production and decays simulated with FONLL with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is the uncertainty due to scale variation, alpha_s+pdf using CTEQ6.6 error set and the heavy quark masses.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar simulated with FONLL removing the resummation term with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV.