Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 13 TeV data in fb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Correction factors for an assumed angular dependence $\propto 1+\lambda_{\theta} \cos^2\theta $ in the helicity frame, for several values of the parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$. The correction factors were found to be the same (within 1% - 2%) for $J\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, for prompt and non-prompt production mechanisms, and for the three rapidity intervals considered in this paper.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

$K^-$ (a), invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\phi$ meson (b) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\Xi^-$ (c) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$K^-$ (a), invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 40--60\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\phi$ meson (b) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 40--60\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

Rapidity density distributions of $K^-$ (squares), $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

Rapidity density distributions of $\phi$ meson (circles) $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

Rapidity density distributions of $\Xi^-$ (diamonds) $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

$\phi/K^-$ (a) and $\phi/\Xi^-$ (b) ratio as a function of collision energy, $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$. The solid black circles show the measurements presented here in 0-10\% centrality bin, while empty markers in black or grey are used for data from various other energies and/or collision systems. The grey solid line represents a THERMUS calculation based on the Grand Canonical Ensemble (GCE) while the dotted lines depict calculations based on the Canonical Ensemble (CE) with different parameters of strangeness correlation radius ($r_c$). The green dashed line, green shaded band and the solid red line show transport model calculations from the public versions $\mathrm{UrQMD}^{1}$, modified $\mathrm{UrQMD}^{2}$ and SMASH, respectively.

Transverse mass $m_T$ spectrum at midrapidity of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 158 GeV/c. $m_0$ is the PDG mass of the $\phi$ meson.

Transverse mass $m_T$ spectrum at midrapidity of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 80 GeV/c. $m_0$ is the PDG mass of the $\phi$ meson.

Dependence of the slope parameter $T$ of the transverse momentum spectrum on rapidity $y$, of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 158 GeV/c.

Dependence of the slope parameter $T$ of the transverse momentum spectrum on rapidity $y$, of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 80 GeV/c.

Dependence of the width $\sigma_y$ of the rapidity distributions on $p_T$, of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 158 GeV/c.

Dependence of the width $\sigma_y$ of the rapidity distributions on $p_T$, of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 80 GeV/c.

Rapidity spectrum of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 158 GeV/c.

Rapidity spectrum of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 80 GeV/c.

Rapidity spectrum of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at beam momentum of 40 GeV/c.

Energy dependence of ratios of total yields of $\phi$ mesons to mean total yields of pions produced in in minimum bias p+p collisions at CERN SPS energies.

Energy dependence of double ratios of total yields of $\phi$ mesons to mean total yields of pions in central Pb+Pb collisions over minimum bias p+p collisions at CERN SPS energies.

Energy dependence of total yields of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at CERN SPS energies.

Energy dependence of midrapidity yields of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at CERN SPS energies.

Widths of rapidity distributions of $\phi$ mesons produced in minimum bias p+p collisions at CERN SPS energies, as a function of beam rapidity.

Measured differential cross section as a function of the muon pseudorapidity.

Measured differential cross section as a function of the jet transverse momentum.

Measured differential cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity.

Measured cross sections for beauty production with a muon and jet for the Q**2 bin 2 to 4 GeV**2.

Measured cross sections for beauty production with a muon and jet for the Q**2 bin 4 to 20 GeV**2.

Measured cross sections for beauty production with a muon and jet for the Q**2 bin 20 to 45 GeV**2.

Measured cross sections for beauty production with a muon and jet for the Q**2 bin 45 to 100 GeV**2.

Measured cross sections for beauty production with a muon and jet for the Q**2 bin 100 to 250 GeV**2.

Measured cross sections for beauty production with a muon and jet for the Q**2 bin 250 to 3000 GeV**2.

Extracted values of F2 for B-BBAR production at an X value of 0.00013. The second systematic error is the uncertainty on the extrapolation to the full muon and jet phase space.

Extracted values of F2 for B-BBAR production at an X value of 0.0002. The second systematic error is the uncertainty on the extrapolation to the full muon and jet phase space.

Extracted values of F2 for B-BBAR production at an X value of 0.0005. The second systematic error is the uncertainty on the extrapolation to the full muon and jet phase space.

Extracted values of F2 for B-BBAR production at an X value of 0.002. The second systematic error is the uncertainty on the extrapolation to the full muon and jet phase space.

Extracted values of F2 for B-BBAR production at an X value 0.005.

Extracted values of F2 for B-BBAR production at an X value of 0.013. The second systematic error is the uncertainty on the extrapolation to the full muon and jet phase space.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of X.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the D meson.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the D meson.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of Q**2.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of X.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the D meson.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the D meson.

Measured cross section for D+- mesons in Q**2 and Y bins.

Measured cross section for D0/DBAR0 mesons in Q**2 and Y bins.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for (GAMMA CJET X) production in the region YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.50 TO 0.56. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.56 TO 0.62. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.62 TO 0.65. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.65 TO 0.68. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.68 TO 0.71. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.71 TO 0.74. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.74 TO 0.77. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.77 TO 0.80. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.80 TO 0.83. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.83 TO 0.86. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.86 TO 0.89. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.89 TO 0.92. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.92 TO 0.95. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.95 TO 0.98. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.98 TO 1.00. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL in 3 PT**2 ranges.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.6E-5 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.7E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.5E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.46E-3 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.4E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.36E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.67E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.98E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 5.1E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.84E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.66E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.03E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.86E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.68E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.33E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.54E-2 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.59E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.37E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.42E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.01E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.52E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.47E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.25E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate, averaged over X, as a function of Q**2 for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2 in two XL ranges.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.