Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 13 TeV data in fb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Correction factors for an assumed angular dependence $\propto 1+\lambda_{\theta} \cos^2\theta $ in the helicity frame, for several values of the parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$. The correction factors were found to be the same (within 1% - 2%) for $J\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, for prompt and non-prompt production mechanisms, and for the three rapidity intervals considered in this paper.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

The extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) average charged-particle muliplicity per unit of rapidity for ETARAP=0 as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.

Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Charged-particle multiplicity distribution in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Charged-particle multiplicity distribution in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicity distributions in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicity distributions in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.

Mean $p_T$ values of the $\Upsilon(1$S$)$, $\Upsilon(2$S$)$, and $\Upsilon(3$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,0\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $0<p_T<5\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $5<p_T<7\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $7<p_T<9\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $9<p_T<11\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $11<p_T<15\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $15<p_T<20\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $20<p_T<50\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $0<p_T<5\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $5<p_T<7\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $7<p_T<9\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $9<p_T<11\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $11<p_T<15\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $15<p_T<20\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $20<p_T<50\,$GeV range

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "forward" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Forward tracks are those with momentum direction in $\Delta\phi\,<\,\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "transverse" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Transverse tracks are those with momentum direction in $\pi/3\,<\,\Delta\phi\,<\,2\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "backward" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Backward tracks are those with momentum direction in $\Delta\phi\,>\,2\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,0$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,1$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,2$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,>\,2$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.00\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.55$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.55\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.70$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.70\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.85$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.85\,<\,S_T\,<\,1.00$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Efficiency-corrected multiplicity bins used in the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ ratio analysis and the corresponding mean number of charged particle tracks.

Final state radiation correction used in the $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-p_{T}^{Z}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Measured total $Z$-boson cross-section for different datasets. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

$K^-$ (a), invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\phi$ meson (b) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\Xi^-$ (c) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 10--40\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$K^-$ (a), invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 40--60\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

$\phi$ meson (b) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 40--60\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.

Rapidity density distributions of $K^-$ (squares), $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

Rapidity density distributions of $\phi$ meson (circles) $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

Rapidity density distributions of $\Xi^-$ (diamonds) $p_T$-integrated yields $dN/dy$ in 0--10\% (a), 10--40\% (b) and 40--60\% central (c) Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. %The full symbols show the measured data, while the open ones are data reflected with respect to $y=0$ in the center-of-mass frame. Solid lines depict Gaussian function fits to the data points.

$\phi/K^-$ (a) and $\phi/\Xi^-$ (b) ratio as a function of collision energy, $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$. The solid black circles show the measurements presented here in 0-10\% centrality bin, while empty markers in black or grey are used for data from various other energies and/or collision systems. The grey solid line represents a THERMUS calculation based on the Grand Canonical Ensemble (GCE) while the dotted lines depict calculations based on the Canonical Ensemble (CE) with different parameters of strangeness correlation radius ($r_c$). The green dashed line, green shaded band and the solid red line show transport model calculations from the public versions $\mathrm{UrQMD}^{1}$, modified $\mathrm{UrQMD}^{2}$ and SMASH, respectively.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 20--40\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 40--60\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 60--100\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to charged $\pi$ ($\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$) at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to charged $\pi$ ($\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$) as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to K$^{-}$ at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to K$^{-}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to its ground state particle $\Lambda$ ($\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$) at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to its ground state particle $\Lambda$ ($\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$) as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Fraction of nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons (in \%) in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-0.2$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=+1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

No description provided.

Mean K0 multiplicity as a function of Q**2.

Ratio of mean K0 multiplicity to mean charged particle multiplicity.

Differential K0 multiplicity in non-rapidity gap (NRG) data.

Differential K0 multiplicity in large-rapidity gap (LRG) data.

Differential K0 multiplicity in non-rapidity gap (NRG) data.

Differential K0 multiplicity in large-rapidity gap (LRG) data.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Differential cross sections as function of transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.

Differential cross sections as function of transverse momentum imbalance between leading and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.

Area normalized distribution as function of Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.

Area normalized distribution as function of transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.

Area normalized distribution as function of Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.

Area normalized distribution as function of transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.

Area normalized distribution as function of transverse momentum imbalance between leading and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events

Response matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.

Response matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.

Response matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.

Response matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.

Response matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between the leading jet and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.

Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between the leading jet and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).

Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between the leading jet and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).

J/psi-->e+e- invariant yield in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of p_T at mid-rapidity for the 20-40 centrality range. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

J/PSI yield versus transverse momentum PT, at mid rapidity : -0.35<y<0.35, for a centrality range of 40-60%.

J/psi-->e+e- invariant yield in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of p_T at mid-rapidity for the 40-60 centrality range. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

J/PSI yield versus transverse momentum PT, at mid rapidity : -0.35<y<0.35, for a centrality range of 60-94%.

J/psi-->e+e- invariant yield in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of p_T at mid-rapidity for the 60-94 centrality range. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

J/PSI yield versus transverse momentum PT, at forward rapidity : absolute value of y belongs to [1.22.2], for a centrality range of 0-20%.

J/psi-->mu+mu- invariant yield in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of p_T at forward rapidity for the 0-20, 20-40, 40-60 and 60-94 centrality ranges. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

J/PSI yield versus transverse momentum PT, at forward rapidity : absolute value of y belongs to [1.22.2], for a centrality range of 20-40%.

J/psi-->e+e- average momentum squared in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of N_part at forward rapidity (p_T integrated). The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value.

J/PSI yield versus transverse momentum PT, at forward rapidity : absolute value of y belongs to [1.22.2], for a centrality range of 40-60%.

J/psi-->mu+mu- average momentum squared in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of N_part at forward rapidity (p_T integrated). The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value.

J/PSI yield versus transverse momentum PT, at forward rapidity : absolute value of y belongs to [1.22.2], for a centrality range of 60-94%.

J/psi-->mu+mu- and J/psi-->e+e- nuclear modification in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of p_T at forward and mid-rapidity for the 0-20 centrality range. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

Mean PT^2 versus Npart, number of participants, at mid rapidity : -0.35<y<0.35.

J/psi-->mu+mu- and J/psi-->e+e- nuclear modification in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of y at forward and mid-rapidity for the 0-20 centrality range. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

Mean PT^2 versus Npart, number of participants, at forward rapidity : absolute value of y belongs to [1.22.2].

J/psi-->e+e- nuclear modification in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of N_part at mid-rapidity for the 0-20 centrality range. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

Nuclear modification factor RAA versus transverse momentum PT at mid rapidity : -0.35<y<0.35, for the 0-20% most central events.

J/psi-->mu+mu- nuclear modification in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of N_part at forward rapidity for the 0-20 centrality range. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

Nuclear modification factor RAA versus transverse momentum PT at forward rapidity : absolute value of y belongs to [1.22.2], for the 0-20% most central events.

J/psi-->mu+mu- in Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $N_{part}$ at forward rapidity expressed as a ratio with respect to J/psi-->e+e- nuclear modification at mid-rapidity. The statistical and systematic uncertainties vary point-to-point and are listed for each measured value. An additional global systematic uncertainty is provided in each column heading, which applies to all data points per column.

Nuclear modification factor RAA versus rapidity, for the 0-20% most central events.

Nuclear modification factor RAA versus number of participants, at mid rapidity : -0.35<y<0.35.

Nuclear modification factor RAA versus number of participants, at forward rapidity : absolute value of y belongs to [1.22.2].

Non photonic electron yield in minimum bias D+AU collisions versus $p_{T}$.

Non photonic electron yield in AU+AU collisions versus PT, for a centrality range of 40-80% To obtain a differential cross-section in mb/(GeV2), multiply listed data by 30 Note that, in addition to the statistical and systematical errors, there is a normalization error on the value, given in the second column.

Non photonic electron yield in Au+Au collisions versus $p_{T}$, for a centrality range of 40-80%.

Non photonic electron yield in AU+AU collisions versus PT, for a centrality range of 10-40% To obtain a differential cross-section in mb/(GeV2), multiply listed data by 30 Note that, in addition to the statistical and systematical errors, there is a normalization error on the value, given in the second column.

Non photonic electron yield in Au+Au collisions versus $p_{T}$, for a centrality range of 10-40%.

Non photonic electron yield in AU+AU collisions versus PT, for a centrality range of 0-5% To obtain a differential cross-section in mb/(GeV2), multiply listed data by 30 Note that, in addition to the statistical and systematical errors, there is a normalization error on the value, given in the second column.

Non photonic electron yield in Au+Au collisions versus $p_{T}$, for a centrality range of 0-5%.

Nuclear modification factor for non-photonic electrons in minimum bias D+AU reactions Note that, in addition to the statistical and systematical errors, there is a normalization error on the value, given in the second column.

Nuclear modification factor for non-photonic electrons in minimum bias d+Au reactions.

Nuclear modification factor for non-photonic electrons in AU+AU reactions in the centrality range of 0-5% Note that, in addition to the statistical and systematical errors, there is a normalization error on the value, given in the second column.

Nuclear modification factor for non-photonic electrons in Au+Au reactions in the centrality range of 0-5%.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty on the measured values of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, $R_t$, and $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. The evaluation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\,\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $1.0\,\%$ are marked with "$<1$" in the paper. To provide numerical values for this table in HEPdata, these uncertainties are approximated with $\pm 0.5\,\%$. This approximation is applied to all measurements for the following uncertainties$:$ JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by-jets, JES pileup, $b$-JES, jet vertex fraction, mistag efficiency and $W+\;$jets shape variation. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq)$ the approximation is applied in addition to the following uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $R_t$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES detector, $b$-tagging efficiency, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance and $tq$ scale variations. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(T)).

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(TBAR)).

Parametrization factors for the $m_{t}$ dependence [see Eq. (4) in the paper] of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar tq)$, and $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$.

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

The value of $|V_{tb}|^{2}$ is extracted by dividing the measured value of $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$ by the prediction of the approximate NNLO calculation. The experimental and theoretical uncertainties are added in quadrature.

Event yields for the 2-jet-$\ell^{+}$ and 2-jet-$\ell^{-}$ HPR channels. The expectation for the signal and background yields correspond to the result of the binned maximum-likelihood fit described in Sec. $\mathrm{VI~D}$ in the paper. The uncertainty of the expectations is the normalization uncertainty of each process after the fit, as described in Sec. $\mathrm{VII~F}$ in the paper.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $|y|$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(\bar t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $|y|$ distribution.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Comparison between the measured differential cross sections and the predictions from the NLO calculation using the MSTW2008 PDF set. For each variable and prediction a $\chi^{2}$ value is calculated with HERAfitter using the covariance matrix of each measured spectrum. The theory uncertainties of the predictions are treated as uncorrelated. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is equal to the number of bins in the measured spectrum.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, mistag efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The JES $\eta$ intercalibration uncertainty has a sign switch from the first to the second bin. For the $tq$ generator $+$ parton shower uncertainty a sign switch is denoted with $\mp$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $c-$tagging efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content $:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet energy resolution, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$ tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential fiducial cross section (without the acceptance correction) for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Integrated fiducial cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of dimuon invariant mass. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Differential cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Integrated cross section for the DY process measured in the muon channel. The quoted error is the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is listed separately.

Forward-backward ratios for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV. Quoted uncertainties are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Forward-backward ratios for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV. Quoted uncertainties are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of dimuon invariant mass.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $\phi^*$ for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV.

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame, putting together low and high masses. Each bin is labeled lm_i or hm_i, where lm stands for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV, hm stands for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV, and i is the corresponding bin number in rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is not included. Data from Figure [3, 4, 4].

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $p_{\textrm{T}}$, putting together low and high masses. Each bin is labeled lm_i or hm_i, where lm stands for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV, hm stands for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV, and i is the corresponding bin number in $p_{\textrm{T}}$. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is not included. Data from Figure [3, 4, 4].

Correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties, excluding integrated luminosity, as a function of $\phi^*$, putting together low and high masses. Each bin is labeled lm_i or hm_i, where lm stands for $15<m_{\mu\mu}<60$ GeV, hm stands for $60<m_{\mu\mu}<120$ GeV, and i is the corresponding bin number in $\phi^*$. The global normalisation uncertainty of 3.5% is not included. Data from Figure [3, 4, 4].

Symmetrized pair-density net ratios $\widehat{r}[X(p_{t1}),X(p_{t2})]-1$ for all nonidentified charged primary particles for peripheral Au-Au collision events at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=130$ GeV.

The $y_{cm}$ dependences of $v_{1}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $y_{cm}$ dependences of $v_{3}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $y_{cm}$ dependences of $v_{5}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $p_{t}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons in the rapidity interval $|y_{cm}| < 0.05$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $p_{t}$ dependence of $v_{4}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons in the rapidity interval $|y_{cm}| < 0.05$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $p_{t}$ dependence of $v_{6}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons in the rapidity interval $|y_{cm}| < 0.05$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $y_{cm}$ dependences of $v_{2}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $y_{cm}$ dependences of $v_{4}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The $y_{cm}$ dependences of $v_{6}$ for protons, deuterons and tritons averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ in semi-central ($20 - 30$ %) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV.

The ratio $v_{4}/v_{2}^{2}$ for protons in $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV as a function of $p_{t}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y_{cm}| < 0.05$) for three different centralities.

The ratio $v_{4}/v_{2}^{2}$ for deuterons in $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV as a function of $p_{t}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y_{cm}| < 0.05$) for three different centralities.

The ratio $v_{4}/v_{2}^{2}$ for tritons in $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV as a function of $p_{t}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y_{cm}| < 0.05$) for three different centralities.

The ratio $v_{4}/v_{2}^{2}$ for tritons in Au+Au collisions $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ for three different centralities.

The ratio $v_{4}/v_{2}^{2}$ for tritons in Au+Au collisions $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ for three different centralities.

The ratio $v_{4}/v_{2}^{2}$ for tritons in Au+Au collisions $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.4$ GeV averaged over the $p_{t}$ interval $1.0 < p_{t} < 1.5$ GeV$/c$ for three different centralities.

Example of $\Lambda$ signal for 0-40% most central events, over mixed-event background for the bin $-0.05 < y_{cm} < 0.05$ and reduced transverse masses between $100-150 MeV/c^{2}$.

Reduced transverse mass ($m_{t}-m_{0}$) spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for the 0-40% most central events.

Reduced transverse mass ($m_{t}-m_{0}$) spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for the 0-40% most central events. NOTE: The spectra are not scaled by $1/N_{Events}$! To compare the data, divide by $N_{Events} = 2.1997626 x 10^{9}$

Reduced transverse mass ($m_{t}-m_{0}$) spectra of $\Lambda$ for the 0-40% most central events.

Reduced transverse mass ($m_{t}-m_{0}$) spectra of $\Lambda$ for the 0-40% most central events. NOTE: The spectra are not scaled by $1/N_{Events}$! To compare the data, divide by $N_{Events} = 2.1997626 x 10^{9}$

Rapidity distribution of $K^{0}_{S}$

Rapidity distribution of $K^{0}_{S}$

Rapidity distribution of $\Lambda$

Rapidity distribution of $\Lambda$

Compilation of mid-rapidity yields for central Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ of $K^{0}_{S}$ and $\Lambda$.

Compilation of mid-rapidity yields for central Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ of $K^{0}_{S}$ and $\Lambda$.

Multiplicities per mean number of participants $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ as a function of $\langle A_{Part}\rangle$

Multiplicities per mean number of participants $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ as a function of $\langle A_{Part}\rangle$

Multiplicities per mean number of participants $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ as a function of $\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ for $K^{0}_{S}$

Multiplicities per mean number of participants $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ as a function of $\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ for $K^{0}_{S}$

Multiplicities per mean number of participants $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ as a function of $\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ for $\Lambda$

Multiplicities per mean number of participants $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ as a function of $\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ for $\Lambda$

Comparison of the shape of the rapidity distribution of $K^{0}_{S}$ to various transport model versions.

Comparison of the shape of the rapidity distribution of $K^{0}_{S}$ to various transport model versions.

Comparison of the shape of the rapidity distribution of $\Lambda$ to various transport model versions.

Comparison of the shape of the rapidity distribution of $\Lambda$ to various transport model versions.

Comparison of the shape of the $p_{t}$-spectra for $\pm0.15$ rapidity units around mid-rapidity of $K^{0}_{S}$ to various transport model versions.

Comparison of the shape of the $p_{t}$-spectra for $\pm0.15$ rapidity units around mid-rapidity of $K^{0}_{S}$ to various transport model versions.

Comparison of the shape of the $p_{t}$-spectra for $\pm0.15$ rapidity units around mid-rapidity of $\Lambda$ to various transport model versions.

Comparison of the shape of the $p_{t}$-spectra for $\pm0.15$ rapidity units around mid-rapidity of $\Lambda$ to various transport model versions.

Differential yield of $K^{0}_{S}$ as function of rapdidity and reduced transverse mass for the four centrality classes.

Differential yield of $K^{0}_{S}$ as function of rapdidity and reduced transverse mass for the four centrality classes. NOTE: The spectra are not scaled by $1/N_{Events}$! To compare the data, divide by $N_{Events} = 5.64247975 x 10^{8} (0 - 10\%)$, $5.85743394 x 10^{8} (10 - 20\%)$, $5.76369451 x 10^{8} (20 - 30\%)$ or $4.73401752 x 10^{8} (30 - 40\%)$

Differential yield of $\Lambda$ as function of rapdidity and reduced transverse mass for the four centrality classes.

Differential yield of $\Lambda$ as function of rapdidity and reduced transverse mass for the four centrality classes. NOTE: The spectra are not scaled by $1/N_{Events}$! To compare the data, divide by $N_{Events} = 5.64247975 x 10^{8} (0 - 10\%)$, $5.85743394 x 10^{8} (10 - 20\%)$, $5.76369451 x 10^{8} (20 - 30\%)$ or $4.73401752 x 10^{8} (30 - 40\%)$

$K^{0}_{S}$ and $\Lambda$ multiplicities in full phase space and inverse slopes at mid-rapidity $T_{Eff}$ for a given centrality.

$K^{0}_{S}$ and $\Lambda$ multiplicities in full phase space and inverse slopes at mid-rapidity $T_{Eff}$ for a given centrality.

Value of the parameter $\alpha$ extracted for $K^{+}$, $K^{-}$, $K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda$ and $\Phi$, as displayed in Figure 5 - Global $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ Fit

Value of the parameter $\alpha$ extracted for $K^{+}$, $K^{-}$, $K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda$ and $\Phi$, as displayed in Figure 5 - Global $Mult/\langle A_{Part}\rangle$ Fit

Ratio of differential cross section of AK1 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK2 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK2 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK2 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK2 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK3 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK3 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK3 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK3 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK4 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK4 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK4 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK4 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK5 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK5 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK5 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK5 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK6 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK6 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK6 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK6 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK7 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK7 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK7 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK7 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK8 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK8 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK8 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK8 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK9 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK9 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK9 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK9 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK10 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK10 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK10 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK10 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK11 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK11 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK11 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK11 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK12 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range |y|<0.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK12 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK12 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of differential cross section of AK12 jets with respect to AK4 jets a function of jet PT in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 84 < p_{T} < 97 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 97 < p_{T} < 133 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 133 < p_{T} < 196 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 196 < p_{T} < 272 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 272 < p_{T} < 330 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 330 < p_{T} < 395 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 395 < p_{T} < 468 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 468 < p_{T} < 548 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 548 < p_{T} < 638 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range |y|<0.5 and PT 638 < p_{T} < 1588 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 84 < p_{T} < 97 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 97 < p_{T} < 133 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 133 < p_{T} < 196 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 196 < p_{T} < 272 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 272 < p_{T} < 330 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 330 < p_{T} < 395 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 395 < p_{T} < 468 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 468 < p_{T} < 548 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 548 < p_{T} < 638 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 0.5<|y|<1.0 and PT 638 < p_{T} < 1588 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 84 < p_{T} < 97 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 97 < p_{T} < 133 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 133 < p_{T} < 196 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 196 < p_{T} < 272 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 272 < p_{T} < 330 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 330 < p_{T} < 395 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 395 < p_{T} < 468 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 468 < p_{T} < 548 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 548 < p_{T} < 638 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.0<|y|<1.5 and PT 638 < p_{T} < 1588 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 84 < p_{T} < 97 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 97 < p_{T} < 133 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 133 < p_{T} < 196 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 196 < p_{T} < 272 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 272 < p_{T} < 330 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 330 < p_{T} < 395 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 395 < p_{T} < 468 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 468 < p_{T} < 548 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 548 < p_{T} < 638 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Ratio of cross section of inclusive anti-KT jets with respect to AK4 jets as a function of jet size in the rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.0 and PT 638 < p_{T} < 1588 GeV. The nonperturbative correction can be used to scale fixed-order theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Double-differential cross section times the dimuon branching fraction of the Y(2S) meson for different ranges of pT in bins of |y| and for the full |y| < 1.2 range, for the unpolarized decay hypothesis. The global uncertainty in the integrated luminosity of 2.3% is not included in the systematic uncertainties.

Double-differential cross section times the dimuon branching fraction of the Y(3S) meson for different ranges of pT in bins of |y| and for the full |y| < 1.2 range, for the unpolarized decay hypothesis. The global uncertainty in the integrated luminosity of 2.3% is not included in the systematic uncertainties.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the J/psi differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, +0.10, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 1.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the psi(2S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, +0.03, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 2.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the Y(1S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, k, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 3. The parameter k corresponds to a linear interpolation of the CMS measured value as a function of pT for pT < 50 GeV. For pT > 50 GeV, where no measurements exist, k is taken as the average of all the measured values for pT < 50 GeV.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the Y(2S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, k, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 3. The parameter k corresponds to a linear interpolation of the CMS measured value as a function of pT for pT < 50 GeV. For pT > 50 GeV, where no measurements exist, k is taken as the average of all the measured values for pT < 50 GeV.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the Y(3S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, k, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 3. The parameter k corresponds to a linear interpolation of the CMS measured value as a function of pT for pT < 50 GeV. For pT > 50 GeV, where no measurements exist, k is taken as the average of all the measured values for pT < 50 GeV.

Ratio of differential cross section times branching fractions of the prompt psi(2S) to J/psi mesons assuming unpolarized productions as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.

Ratios of differential cross section times branching fractions of the prompt Y(2S) to Y(1S) and Y(3S) to Y(1S) mesons assuming unpolarized productions as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.

Ratios of B+ differential production cross sections at 13 TeV and at 7 TeV as a function of |yB| for 10 < ptB < 100 GeV or 17 < ptB < 100 GeV. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided as well.

B+ differential production cross sections DSIG/DPT for |yB|< 1.45 or |yB|< 2.1, at 13 TeV. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided.

B+ differential production cross sections DSIG/DETARAP for 10 < ptB < 100 GeV or 17 < ptB < 100 GeV, at 13 TeV. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided.

B+ production cross section for the phase-space region of 10 <= pTB < 17 GeV and |yB| < 1.45, and 17 <= pTB < 100 GeV and |yB| < 2.1. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided.

The cross section measurement as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity, for jet multiplicities of up to 7.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with one or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with one or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the first and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the first and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the second and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the second and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of DeltaR separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of DeltaR separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the first leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the first leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the second leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the second leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the third leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the third leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the fourth leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the fourth leading jet and the muon.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with one or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with one or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

Differential cross section for prompt D+ production.

Differential cross section for prompt D*+ production.

Differential cross section for prompt D*+ production.

Integrated cross sections for prompt charm particle production extraplated to PT=0. The second (sys) error is the uncertainty in the branching ratio The third (sys) error is the uncertainty in the extrapolation procedure.

Integrated cross sections for prompt charm particle production extraplated to PT=0. The second (sys) error is the uncertainty in the branching ratio The third (sys) error is the uncertainty in the extrapolation procedure.

Transverse momentum distribution for $\pi^+$ production in d+Au collisions with centrality 20-40% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for $\pi^+$ production in d+Au collisions with centrality 40-100% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for $\pi^-$ production in d+Au minbias events in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for $\pi^-$ production in p+p NSD events in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for $\pi^-$ production in d+Au collisions with centrality 0-20% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for $\pi^-$ production in d+Au collisions with centrality 20-40% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for $\pi^-$ production in d+Au collisions with centrality 40-100% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for proton production in d+Au minbias events in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for proton production in p+p NSD events in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for proton production in d+Au collisions with centrality 0-20% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for proton production in d+Au collisions with centrality 20-40% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for proton production in d+Au collisions with centrality 40-100% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for pbar production in d+Au minbias events in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for pbar production in p+p NSD events in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for pbar production in d+Au collisions with centrality 0-20% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for pbar production in d+Au collisions with centrality 20-40% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Transverse momentum distribution for pbar production in d+Au collisions with centrality 40-100% in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$.

Nuclear modification factors $R_{dAu}$ for $\pi^+$ + $\pi^-$ production in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$. There is an overall additional normalization uncertainty of the order of 17%. For the measurement of $R_{dAu}$ there is an additional uncertainty of 5% due to uncertainty on $N_{bin}$ for minbias collisions.

Nuclear modification factors $R_{dAu}$ for $p + \bar{p}$ production in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$. There is an overall additional normalization uncertainty of the order of 17%. For the measurement of $R_{dAu}$ there is an additional uncertainty of 5% due to uncertainty on $N_{bin}$ for minbias collisions.

Ratios of $ \pi^-/\pi^+ $ in DEUT AU and P P minbias collisions in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$. In addition there are approximately 7% correlated errors for the ratios in P P collisions and about 10% in the DEUT AU collisions.

Ratios of $ \bar{p}/p $ in DEUT AU and P P minbias collisions in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$. In addition there are approximately 7% correlated errors for the ratios in P P collisions and about 10% in the DEUT AU collisions.

Ratios of $ p/\pi^+ $ in DEUT AU and P P minbias collisions in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$. In addition there are approximately 7% correlated errors for the ratios in P P collisions and about 10% in the DEUT AU collisions.

Ratios of $ \bar{p}/\pi^- $ in DEUT AU and P P minbias collisions in the mid rapidity region, $|y|<0.5$. In addition there are approximately 7% correlated errors for the ratios in P P collisions and about 10% in the DEUT AU collisions.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the ratio of the hadronic W and the hadronic top transverse momenta $R_{Wt}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the ratio of the hadronic W and the hadronic top transverse momenta $R_{Wt}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the ratio of the hadronic W and the hadronic top transverse momenta $R_{Wt}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the fiducial phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the ratio of the hadronic W and the hadronic top transverse momenta $R_{Wt}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the longitudinal boost $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative statistics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Absolute systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Relative systematics-only correlation matrix of the full phase-space differential cross-section as a function of the production angle $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$.

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15]

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5] Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5] Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5] Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from absolute spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15]

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between |$p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}$| (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-40, 40-80, 80-120, 120-170, 170-230, 230-600] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [1-1.4, 1.4-1.9, 1.9-2.5, 2.5-3.2, 3.2-4.2, 4.2-5.5, 5.5-7.2, 7.2-9.3, 9.3-12, 12-20] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0.0-2.0, 2.0-2.75, 2.75-3.0, 3.0-3.15] Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $H_T^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-90, 90-140, 140-195, 195-255, 255-320, 320-385, 385-455, 455-530, 530-610, 610-695, 695-780, 780-865, 865-950, 950-1041, 1041-1500] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $y_{boost}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $y_{boost}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, 0.4-0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.7-0.8, 0.8-0.9, 0.9-1, 1-1.1, 1.1-1.2, 1.2-1.3, 1.3-1.4, 1.4-1.5, 1.5-2] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t,had}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t,had}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.5] Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t,had}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-60, 60-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-260, 260-320, 320-400, 400-500] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5] Columns: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5]

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5] Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.9, 0.9-1.3, 1.3-2.5] Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV Columns: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $m^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [345-400, 400-470, 470-550, 550-650, 650-800, 800-1100, 1100-1600] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV

Statistical correlation matrix between $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (rows) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration and $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ (columns) in the 4-jet inclusive configuration, obtained at parton level from relative spectra through the Bootstrap Method. The binning is the following: Rows: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV Columns: [0-20, 20-45, 45-75, 75-120, 120-190, 190-300] GeV