Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 13 TeV data in fb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Correction factors for an assumed angular dependence $\propto 1+\lambda_{\theta} \cos^2\theta $ in the helicity frame, for several values of the parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$. The correction factors were found to be the same (within 1% - 2%) for $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, for prompt and non-prompt production mechanisms, and for the three rapidity intervals considered in this paper.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

Peak position in XI distribution for different c.m. energies.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

PTOUT distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

Combined results for ALPHAS.

Event shape means.

THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS4 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS5 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS6 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS7 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS8 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS4 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS5 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS6 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS7 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS8 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

Charged particle Thrust(minor) distribution.

Charged particle Two-jet resolution variable, Y3 distribution.

Charged particle Heavy Jet Mass distribution.

Charged particle C-Parameter distribution.

Charged particle Oblateness distribution.

Charged particle XP distribution.

Charged particle rapidity distribution.

Charged particle PTIN distribution.

Charged particle PTOUT distribution.

Measure n-jet rates using the Durham cluster algorithm as a function of thejet-resolution parameter YCUT.

Measure n-jet rates using the Durham cluster algorithm as a function of thejet-resolution parameter YCUT.

Measure n-jet rates using the Durham cluster algorithm as a function of thejet-resolution parameter YCUT.

Measure n-jet rates using the Durham cluster algorithm as a function of thejet-resolution parameter YCUT.

Charged particle inclusive distribution of -LN(1/X).

Unfolded charged particle multiplicity distribution giving the probability to have a hadronic Z0 decay with N charged particles.

Values of the mean values of the leading moments of the charged particle multiplicity distribution. R2 is the second binomial moment defined as MEAN(N*(N-1))/MULT**2.

Unfolded values of the the mean multiplicity and dispersion of the multiplicity distributions integaretd over the rapidity region -0.5 to 0.5.

Unfolded values of the the mean multiplicity and dispersion of the multiplicity distributions integrated over the rapidity region -1.0 to 1.0.

Unfolded values of the the mean multiplicity and dispersion of the multiplicity distributions integrated over the rapidity region -1.5 to 1.5.

Unfolded values of the the mean multiplicity and dispersion of the multiplicity distributions integrated over the rapidity region -2.0 to 2.0.

Unfolded values of the the mean multiplicity and dispersion of the multiplicity distribution integrated over the full rapidity region.

Differential cross sections for the inclusive production of PI+-. Additional 3pct systematic uncertainty.

Differential cross sections for the inclusive production of K+-. Additionalsystematic uncertainty 3% above and 5% below X = 0.010.

Differential cross sections for the inclusive production of P PBAR. Additional systematic uncertainty 3% above and 5% below X = 0.018.

Measured inclusive photon cross section. Errors contain both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Measured differential cross section for PI0 production.

Measured fragmentation function at the ETA meson. Additional 6pct systematic error.

Measured fragmentation function at the ETAPRIME meson. Additional 8pct systematic error.

Inclusive K0 spectrum. Additional 2pct normalization error.

Inclusive LAMBDA spectrum. Additional 4pct normalization error.

Fragmentation distribution for XI production.

Fragmentation distribution for SIGMA(1385) production.

Fragmentation distribution for XI(1530) production.

Differential cross section for RHO0 production.

Differential cross section for OMEGA production.

Differential cross section for K*0 production.

Differential cross section for PHI production.

Differential cross section for K*0 production as a function of the transverse momentum with respect to the Thrust axis.

Differential cross section for PHI production as a function of the transverse momentum with respect to the Thrust axis.

Fragmentation distribution for K*+- production.

Mean Multiplicities. Where a second systematic error is given, this is due to the uncertainty in the extrapolation to X = 0. Note that the ETA and ETAPRIMEvalues are for X > 0.1.

Inclusive charged particle distribution as a function of PT out of the event plane.

Mean charged particle multiplicity.

Inclusive charged particle distribution as a function of -LN(XP).

Distribution of Thrust.

Distribution of -LN(Y3).

SIG*Br(UPSI --> MU+ MU-).

The first (asymmetric) systematic error represents the uncertainty in the decay angular distribution of the form (1 + a*cos(theta*)**2) where a = +1 and -1 respectively. The second is the quadratic sum of the other systematic errors.

The first (asymmetric) systematic error represents the uncertainty in the decay angular distribution of the form (1 + a*cos(theta*)**2) where a = +1 and -1 respectively. The second is the quadratic sum of the other systematic errors.

The first (asymmetric) systematic error represents the uncertainty in the decay angular distribution of the form (1 + a*cos(theta*)**2) where a = +1 and -1 respectively. The second is the quadratic sum of the other systematic errors.

No description provided.

Errors are dominantly systematic.

Numerical values supplied by P. Reeves.

Numerical values supplied by P. Reeves.