Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 13 TeV data in fb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Correction factors for an assumed angular dependence $\propto 1+\lambda_{\theta} \cos^2\theta $ in the helicity frame, for several values of the parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$. The correction factors were found to be the same (within 1% - 2%) for $J\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, for prompt and non-prompt production mechanisms, and for the three rapidity intervals considered in this paper.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Final state radiation correction used in the $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-p_{T}^{Z}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Measured total $Z$-boson cross-section for different datasets. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Fraction of nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons (in \%) in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-0.2$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=+1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Nuclear modification factor for prompt charged particles at 5TeV with respect to pseudorapidity and transverse momentum in the forward region region. The pseudorapidity is expressed in the nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass system. First uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is from the luminosity. Luminosity uncertainty is fully correlated among the different kinematic ranges.

Nuclear modification factor for prompt charged particles at 5TeV with respect to pseudorapidity and transverse momentum in the backward region region. The pseudorapidity is expressed in the nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass system. First uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is from the luminosity. Luminosity uncertainty is fully correlated among the different kinematic ranges.

Differential production cross-sections of $\eta_c$ for production in $b$-hadron inclusive decays. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and due to the $\eta_c\to p \bar{p}$ and $J/\psi\to p \bar{p}$ branching fractions and $J/\psi$ production cross-section.

$^3\overline{\mathrm{H}} /\,^3\mathrm{H}$ ratio in $\mathrm{INEL}>0$ p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Transverse momentum spectra obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for $\mathrm{INEL}>0$ events in p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Transverse momentum spectra obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 0$-$10% multiplicity class in p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Transverse momentum spectra obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 10$-$20% multiplicity class in p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Transverse momentum spectra obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 20$-$40% multiplicity class in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Transverse momentum spectra obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 40$-$100% multiplicity class in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Mean transverse momentum obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ as a function of the mean charged-particle multiplicity density in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV

$(^3\mathrm{He} +\,^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}) / (\mathrm{p} + \overline{\mathrm{p}})$ ratio in p$-$Pb as a function of the mean charged-particle multiplicity density

$(^3\mathrm{H} +\,^3\overline{\mathrm{H}}) / (\mathrm{p} + \overline{\mathrm{p}})$ ratio in p$-$Pb as a function of the mean charged-particle multiplicity density

Coalescence parameter $B_3$ calculated using the average of $\mathrm{INEL}>0$ $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ yields

Coalescence parameter $B_3$ calculated using the average of $\mathrm{INEL}>0$ $^3\mathrm{H}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{H}}$ yields

Ratio of (anti-)$^3$H and (anti-)$^3$He yields

Coalescence parameter $B_3$ calculated using the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for $\mathrm{INEL}>0$ events in p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Coalescence parameter $B_3$ calculated using the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 0$-$10% multiplicity class in p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Coalescence parameter $B_3$ calculated using the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 10$-$20% multiplicity class in p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Coalescence parameter $B_3$ calculated using the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 20$-$40% multiplicity class in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Coalescence parameter $B_3$ calculated using the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for events in 40$-$100% multiplicity class in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Integrated production yield obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ corrected for the spin degeneracy factor $(2J +1)$ for minimum-bias p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Upper limit on the integrated production yield of $^4\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ at 90$\%$ confidence level corrected for the spin degeneracy factor $(2J +1)$ for minimum-bias p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Integrated production yield obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for the different multiplicity classes and $\mathrm{INEL} > 0$ p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

Integrated production yield obtained from the average of $^3\mathrm{H}$ and $^3\overline{\mathrm{H}}$ for $\mathrm{INEL} > 0$ p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$

$p_{T}$-distributions of kaons ($K^{+}+K^{-}$) measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-distributions of protons ($p+pbar$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-distributions of protons ($p+pbar$) measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-distributions of kaons ($K^{+}+K^{-}$)/pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-distributions of kaons ($K^{+}+K^{-}$)/pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-distributions of protons ($p+pbar$)/pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-distributions of protons ($p+pbar$)/pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV.

Integrated yield ratios of kaons ($K^{+}+K^{-}$) to pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

Integrated yield ratios of kaons ($K^{+}+K^{-}$) to pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV.

Integrated yield ratios of protons ($p+pbar$) to pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

Integrated yield ratios of protons ($p+pbar$) to pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-dependent nuclear modification factor of pions ($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-dependent nuclear modification factor of kaons ($K^{+}+K^{-}$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$p_{T}$-dependent nuclear modification factor of protons ($p+pbar$) measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

$\Upsilon(1S)$ production cross-section in $p$Pb and Pb$p$, as a function of $y^*$. The uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(2S)$ production cross-section in $p$Pb and Pb$p$, as a function of $p_{T}$. The uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(2S)$ production cross-section in $p$Pb and Pb$p$, as a function of $y^*$. The uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

Scaled $pp$ differential cross-section in $p_{T}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=8.16$ TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, which includes the systematic uncertainty from the $pp$ measurement and that estimated by changing the interpolation function.

Scaled $pp$ differential cross-section in $y$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=8.16$ TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, which includes the systematic uncertainty from the $pp$ measurement and that estimated by changing the interpolation function.

$\Upsilon(1S)$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{p{\rm Pb}}^{\Upsilon(1S)}$, in $p$Pb and Pb$p$ as a function of $p_{T}$ integrated over $y^*$ in the range $1.5 < y^* < 4.0$ for $p$Pb and $-5.0 < y^* < -2.5$ for Pb$p$. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(1S)$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{p{\rm Pb}}^{\Upsilon(1S)}$, in $p$Pb and Pb$p$ as a function of $y^*$ integrated over $p_{T}$ in the range $0 < p_{T} < 25$ GeV$/c$. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(2S)$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{p{\rm Pb}}^{\Upsilon(2S)}$, in $p$Pb and Pb$p$ as a function of $p_{T}$ integrated over $y^*$ in the range $1.5 < y^* < 4.0$ for $p$Pb and $-5.0 < y^* < -2.5$ for Pb$p$. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(2S)$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{p{\rm Pb}}^{\Upsilon(2S)}$, in $p$Pb and Pb$p$ as a function of $y^*$ integrated over $p_{T}$ in the range $0 < p_{T} < 25$ GeV$/c$. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(1S)$ forward-to-backward ratio, $R_{{\rm FB}}^{\Upsilon(1S)}$, as a function of $p_{T}$ integrated over $\vert y^* \vert$ in the range $2.5 < \vert y^* \vert < 4.0$. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(1S)$ forward-to-backward ratio, $R_{{\rm FB}}^{\Upsilon(1S)}$, as a function of $\vert y^* \vert$ integrated over $p_{T}$ in the range $0 < p_{T} < 25$ GeV/c. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(2S)$ to $\Upsilon(1S)$ ratio, in $p$Pb and Pb$p$ as a function of $p_{T}$ integrated over $y^*$ in the range $1.5 < y^* < 4.0$ for $p$Pb and $-5.0 < y^* < -2.5$ for Pb$p$. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(2S)$ to $\Upsilon(1S)$ ratio, in $p$Pb and Pb$p$ as a function of $y^*$ integrated over $p_{T}$ in the range $0 < p_{T} < 25$ GeV/c. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

$\Upsilon(1S)$ to non-prompt $J/\psi$, in $p$Pb and Pb$p$ as a function of $y^*$ integrated over $p_{T}$ in the range $0 < p_{T} < 25$ GeV/c. The quoted uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic components.

Measured charged jet differential cross section ratios for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV for $15<p_{T}^{ch jet}<20$ GeV/$c$.

The covariance matrix for the kinematic bins matrix of the $D_s^+$ production asymmetry measured using the combined $\sqrt{s} =7$ and 8 TeV data sets (corresponding to Table 1). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined. The kinematic bins are indexed as follows: the three rapidity bins, y, in the range from 2.0 to 4.5 are indexed with $i_y$ ranging from 0 to 2 with the following bin edges: 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.5. The four $p_{\rm T}$ bins in the range from 2.5 to 25.0 GeV/c are indexed with $i_{p_T}$ from 0 to 3 with the following bin edges: 2.5, 4.7, 6.5, 8.5, 25.0 GeV/c. The index of a kinematic bins is then given by: $i_{\rm bin} = 4 \times i_y + i_{p_T}$.

The covariance matrix for the kinematic bins matrix of the $D_s^+$ production asymmetry measured using the $\sqrt{s} =7$ TeV data set (corresponding to Table 2). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined. The kinematic bins are indexed as follows: the three rapidity bins, y, in the range from 2.0 to 4.5 are indexed with $i_y$ ranging from 0 to 2 with the following bin edges: 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.5. The four $p_{\rm T}$ bins in the range from 2.5 to 25.0 GeV/c are indexed with $i_{p_T}$ from 0 to 3 with the following bin edges: 2.5, 4.7, 6.5, 8.5, 25.0 GeV/c. The index of a kinematic bins is then given by: $i_{\rm bin} = 4 \times i_y + i_{p_T}$.

The covariance matrix for the kinematic bins matrix of the $D_s^+$ production asymmetry measured using the $\sqrt{s} =8$ TeV data set (corresponding to Table 3). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined. The kinematic bins are indexed as follows: the three rapidity bins, y, in the range from 2.0 to 4.5 are indexed with $i_y$ ranging from 0 to 2 with the following bin edges: 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.5. The four $p_{\rm T}$ bins in the range from 2.5 to 25.0 GeV/c are indexed with $i_{p_T}$ from 0 to 3 with the following bin edges: 2.5, 4.7, 6.5, 8.5, 25.0 GeV/c. The index of a kinematic bins is then given by: $i_{\rm bin} = 4 \times i_y + i_{p_T}$.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

$\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle$ of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{1/3}$. The uncertainty 'syst,uncorrelated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions common to all centrality classes

$\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to $\Lambda$ (defined as 2 $\Lambda$) $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yield ratio at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{1/3}$. The uncertainty 'syst,uncorrelated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions common to all centrality classes

Invariant yields of the $\eta$ meson in the centrality class 20-50% in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 2.76 TeV at mid-rapidity.

Nuclear modification factor R_AA of $\pi^{0}$ produced in 0-10% central Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 2.76 TeV at mid-rapidity, T_AA uncertainty of 3.25% and uncertainty of \sigma_{inel} of 3.9% included in systematic uncertainties.

Nuclear modification factor R_AA of $\pi^{0}$ produced in 20-50% central Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 2.76 TeV at mid-rapidity, T_AA uncertainty of 3.3% and uncertainty of \sigma_{inel} of 3.9% included in systematic uncertainties.

Nuclear modification factor R_AA of $\eta$ produced in 0-10% central Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 2.76 TeV at mid-rapidity, T_AA uncertainty of 3.25% and uncertainty of \sigma_{inel} of 3.9% included in systematic uncertainties.

Nuclear modification factor R_AA of $\eta$ produced in 20-50% central Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 2.76 TeV at mid-rapidity, T_AA uncertainty of 3.3% and uncertainty of \sigma_{inel} of 3.9% included in systematic uncertainties.

Ratio of the $\eta$ to $\pi^{0}$ invariant yields in 0-10% central Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 2.76 TeV at mid-rapidity.

Ratio of the $\eta$ to $\pi^{0}$ invariant yields in 20-50% central Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 2.76 TeV at mid-rapidity.

Double-differential cross section times the dimuon branching fraction of the Y(2S) meson for different ranges of pT in bins of |y| and for the full |y| < 1.2 range, for the unpolarized decay hypothesis. The global uncertainty in the integrated luminosity of 2.3% is not included in the systematic uncertainties.

Double-differential cross section times the dimuon branching fraction of the Y(3S) meson for different ranges of pT in bins of |y| and for the full |y| < 1.2 range, for the unpolarized decay hypothesis. The global uncertainty in the integrated luminosity of 2.3% is not included in the systematic uncertainties.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the J/psi differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, +0.10, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 1.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the psi(2S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, +0.03, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 2.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the Y(1S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, k, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 3. The parameter k corresponds to a linear interpolation of the CMS measured value as a function of pT for pT < 50 GeV. For pT > 50 GeV, where no measurements exist, k is taken as the average of all the measured values for pT < 50 GeV.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the Y(2S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, k, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 3. The parameter k corresponds to a linear interpolation of the CMS measured value as a function of pT for pT < 50 GeV. For pT > 50 GeV, where no measurements exist, k is taken as the average of all the measured values for pT < 50 GeV.

Multiplicative scaling factors to obtain the Y(3S) differential cross sections for different polarization scenarios (Lambda_{Theta} = +1, k, -1) from the unpolarized cross section measurements given in Table 3. The parameter k corresponds to a linear interpolation of the CMS measured value as a function of pT for pT < 50 GeV. For pT > 50 GeV, where no measurements exist, k is taken as the average of all the measured values for pT < 50 GeV.

Ratio of differential cross section times branching fractions of the prompt psi(2S) to J/psi mesons assuming unpolarized productions as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.

Ratios of differential cross section times branching fractions of the prompt Y(2S) to Y(1S) and Y(3S) to Y(1S) mesons assuming unpolarized productions as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.

Measured $\gamma+c$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$.

Measured $\gamma+c$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$.

Measured ratio of the $\gamma+b$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$ to that for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$.

Measured ratio of the $\gamma+c$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$ to that for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$.

Statistical correlation between the $\gamma+b$ and the $\gamma+c$ cross sections in a given $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ bin and $|\eta^\gamma|$ region. The two cross sections are correlated as the heavy flavour fractions are extracted simultaneously from a template fit, performed in each $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ bin and separately for the two $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+b$ cross section for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+b$ cross section for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+c$ cross section for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+c$ cross section for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\phi$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\phi$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\phi$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_\phi$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(2S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Collins-Soper frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

The polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

The frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ state in different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$ and three rapidity ranges using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=8\,\mathrm{TeV}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second represents the systematic uncertainty.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the polarization parameter $\lambda_{\phi}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Values of the frame-invariant polarization parameter $\tilde{\lambda}$ measured in the helicity(SH), Collins-Soper(CS) and Gottfried-Jackson(TH) frames for the $\Upsilon(3S)$ produced at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in the rapidity range $2.2 < y^\Upsilon < 4.5$ and different bins of $p_{T}^{\Upsilon}$. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Covariance matrix of the relative cross-section as function of the top quark pT, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix for the absolute cross-section as function of the hadronic top-quark top quark pT, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix for the absolute cross-section as function of the hadronic top-quark top quark pT, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix for the relative cross-section as function of the hadronic top-quark top quark pT, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix for the relative cross-section as function of the hadronic top-quark top quark pT, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the relative cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the relative cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix for the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix for the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix for the relative cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix for the relative cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the top quark, accounting for the statistic and systematic uncertainties in the boosted topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the mass of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the mass of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the relative cross-section as function of the mass of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the relative cross-section as function of the mass of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the tt̄ system pT, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the tt̄ system pT, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the relative cross-section as function of the tt̄ system pT, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the relative cross-section as function of the tt̄ system pT, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Covariance matrix of the absolute cross-section as function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the tt̄ system, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the resolved topology.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the rapidity of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with one or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the first leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the second leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the third leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the fourth leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of DeltaR separation between the muon and the closest jet for events with one or more jets.

The measured differential cross-section normalized to the bin width in values of the angle between the leptons in the leading reconstructed lepton pair for the 4 lepton channel. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties.

The measured differential cross-section normalized to the bin width in values of the rapidity difference between the reconstructed lepton pairs for the 4 lepton channel. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties.

The measured differential cross-section normalized to the bin width in values of the leading reconstructed dilepton pT for the 2 lepton, 2 neutrino channel. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties.

The measured differential cross-section normalized to the bin width in values of the angle between the dilepton pair for the 2 lepton, 2 neutrino channel. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties.

The measured differential cross-section normalized to the bin width in values of the transverse mass of the reconstructed diboson pair for the 2 lepton, 2 neutrino channel. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Normalized cross section at particle level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at particle level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Absolute cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of absolute cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Normalized cross section at parton level.

Covariance matrix of normalized cross section at parton level.

The cross section measurement as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity, for jet multiplicities of up to 7.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with one or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with one or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of jets (HT) for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the transverse momentum of the dijet system of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the dijet invariant mass of the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the first leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the second leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the third leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the fourth leading jet.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the first and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the first and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the second and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the second and the third highest pT jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with three or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with four or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of DeltaR separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of DeltaR separation between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the first leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the first leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the second leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the second leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the third leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the third leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the fourth leading jet and the muon.

The differential cross section measurement as a function of the azimuthal angle separation between the fourth leading jet and the muon.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with one or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with one or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of HT for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two highest pT jets for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

Average number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the most forward and the most backward jets for events with two or more jets.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D^{+} + D^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{0} + \bar{D}^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{0} + \bar{D}^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{+} + D^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{+} + D^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{*+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{*+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

Differential cross section as a function of the transverse momentum PT of the leading other jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the transverse momentum PT of the subleading other jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity ETA of the leading b-jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity ETA of the subleading b-jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity ETA of the leading other jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity ETA of the subleading other jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle DeltaPhi between the two other jets, normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the normalized PT balance DELTARELPT between the third and the fourth jet, normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two dijet planes (leading-subleading b- and leading-subleading other jets), normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, sample purity, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Ratios of B+ differential production cross sections at 13 TeV and at 7 TeV as a function of |yB| for 10 < ptB < 100 GeV or 17 < ptB < 100 GeV. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided as well.

B+ differential production cross sections DSIG/DPT for |yB|< 1.45 or |yB|< 2.1, at 13 TeV. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided.

B+ differential production cross sections DSIG/DETARAP for 10 < ptB < 100 GeV or 17 < ptB < 100 GeV, at 13 TeV. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided.

B+ production cross section for the phase-space region of 10 <= pTB < 17 GeV and |yB| < 1.45, and 17 <= pTB < 100 GeV and |yB| < 2.1. The calculations from FONLL and PYTHIA are provided.