Showing 50 of 664 results
A measurement of the top quark pole mass $m_\mathrm{t}^\text{pole}$ in events where a top quark-antiquark pair ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) is produced in association with at least one additional jet ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$+jet) is presented. This analysis is performed using proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 36.3 fb$^{-1}$. Events with two opposite-sign leptons in the final state (e$^+$e$^-$, $\mu^+\mu^-$, e$^\pm\mu^\mp$) are analyzed. The reconstruction of the main observable and the event classification are optimized using multivariate analysis techniques based on machine learning. The production cross section is measured as a function of the inverse of the invariant mass of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$+jet system at the parton level using a maximum likelihood unfolding. Given a reference parton distribution function (PDF), the top quark pole mass is extracted using the theoretical predictions at next-to-leading order. For the ABMP16NLO PDF, this results in $m_\mathrm{t}^\text{pole}$ = 172.93 $\pm$ 1.36 GeV.
This Letter presents a search for direct production of charginos and neutralinos via electroweak interactions. The results are based on data from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. The search considers final states with large missing transverse momentum and pairs of hadronically decaying bosons WW, WZ, and WH, where H is the Higgs boson. These bosons are identified using novel algorithms. No significant excess of events is observed relative to the expectations from the standard model. Limits at the 95% confidence level are placed on the cross section for production of mass-degenerate wino-like supersymmetric particles $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0$, and mass-degenerate higgsino-like supersymmetric particles $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$, $\tilde{\chi}_2^0$, and $\tilde{\chi}_3^0$. In the limit of a nearly-massless lightest supersymmetric particle $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$, wino-like particles with masses up to 870 and 960 GeV are excluded in the cases of $\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\to$ Z$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\to$ H$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$, respectively, and higgsino-like particles are excluded between 300 and 650 GeV.
Differential cross sections are measured for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with vector bosons (W, Z) and decaying to a pair of b quarks. Measurements are performed within the framework of the simplified template cross sections. The analysis relies on the leptonic decays of the W and Z bosons, resulting in final states with 0, 1, or 2 electrons or muons. The Higgs boson candidates are either reconstructed from pairs of resolved b-tagged jets, or from single large distance parameter jets containing the particles arising from two b quarks. Proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment in 2016-2018 and corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$, are analyzed. The inclusive signal strength, defined as the product of the observed production cross section and branching fraction relative to the standard model expectation, combining all analysis categories, is found to be $\mu$ = 1.15$^{+0.22}_{-0.20}$. This corresponds to an observed (expected) significance of 6.3 (5.6) standard deviations.
A search is reported for near-threshold structures in the J/$\psi$J/$\psi$ invariant mass spectrum produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV from data collected by the CMS experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 135 fb$^{-1}$. Three structures are found, and a model with quantum interference among these structures provides a good description of the data. A new structure is observed with a significance above 5 standard deviations at a mass of 6638 $^{+43}_{-38}$ (stat) $^{+16}_{-31}$ (syst) MeV. Another structure with even higher significance is found at a mass of 6847 $^{+44}_{-28}$ (stat) $^{+48}_{-20}$ (syst) MeV, which is consistent with the X(6900) resonance reported by the LHCb experiment and confirmed by the ATLAS experiment. Evidence for another new structure, with a local significance of 4.7 standard deviations, is found at a mass of 7134 $^{+48}_{-25}$ (stat) $^{+41}_{-15}$ (syst) MeV. Results are also reported for a model without interference, which does not fit the data as well and shows mass shifts up to 150 MeV relative to the model with interference.
A measurement of the jet mass distribution in hadronic decays of Lorentz-boosted top quarks is presented. The measurement is performed in the lepton+jets channel of top quark pair production ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) events, where the lepton is an electron or muon. The products of the hadronic top quark decay are reconstructed using a single large-radius jet with transverse momentum greater than 400 GeV. The data were collected with the CMS detector at the LHC in proton-proton collisions and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The differential $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production cross section as a function of the jet mass is unfolded to the particle level and is used to extract the top quark mass. The jet mass scale is calibrated using the hadronic W boson decay within the large-radius jet. The uncertainties in the modelling of the final state radiation are reduced by studying angular correlations in the jet substructure. These developments lead to a significant increase in precision, and a top quark mass of 173.06 $\pm$ 0.84 GeV.
The dependence of the ratio between the B$_\mathrm{s}^0$ and B$^+$ hadron production fractions, $f_\mathrm{s} / f_\mathrm{u}$, on the transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) and rapidity of the B mesons is studied using the decay channels B$_\mathrm{s}^0$$\to$ J$/\psi\,\phi$ and B$^+$$\to$ J$/\psi$ K$^+$. The analysis uses a data sample of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment in 2018 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 61.6 fb$^{-1}$. The $f_\mathrm{s} / f_\mathrm{u}$ ratio is observed to depend on the B $p_\mathrm{T}$ and to be consistent with becoming asymptotically constant at large $p_\mathrm{T}$. No rapidity dependence is observed. The ratio of the B$^0$ to B$^+$ hadron production fractions, $f_\mathrm{d} / f_\mathrm{u}$, measured using the B$^0$$\to$ J$/\psi$ K$^{*0}$ decay channel, is found to be consistent with unity and independent of $p_\mathrm{T}$ and rapidity, as expected from isospin invariance.
The $\mathrm{J/\psi \phi}$, $\mathrm{J/\psi K}$, and $\mathrm{J/\psi} \mathrm{K}^{*0}$ invariant mass distributions, for $\mathrm{B}$ meson candidates with $20 < p_T < 23$ GeV, and asociated fits as described in the text.
The $\mathrm{J/\psi \phi}$, $\mathrm{J/\psi K}$, and $\mathrm{J/\psi} \mathrm{K}^{*0}$ invariant mass distributions, for $\mathrm{B}$ meson candidates with $20 < p_T < 23$ GeV, and asociated fits as described in the text.
Left pannel. The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 2.3%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average for $p_T > 18$ GeV. For comparison, the LHCb measurement [10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.122002] is also shown. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (2.3%)
Left pannel. The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 2.3%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average for $p_T > 18$ GeV. For comparison, the LHCb measurement [10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.122002] is also shown. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (2.3%)
Right pannel. The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 2.3%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average for $p_T > 18$ GeV. For comparison, the LHCb measurement [10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.122002] is also shown. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (2.3%)
Right pannel. The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 2.3%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average for $p_T > 18$ GeV. For comparison, the LHCb measurement [10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.122002] is also shown. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (2.3%)
Left panel.The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 4.9\%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average of all the points. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (4.9%)
Left panel.The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 5.7%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average of all the points. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (5.7%)
Right panel.The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 4.9\%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average of all the points. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (4.9%)
Right panel.The vertical bars (boxes) represent the statistical (bin-to-bin systematic) uncertainties, while the horizontal bars give the bin widths. The global uncertainty (of 5.7%) is not graphically represented. The blue line represents the average of all the points. $ 12 < \mathrm{B} \, p_T < 70$ GeV and $ 0 < |y| < 2.4 $. Global uncertanties are not included in the table (5.7%)
Electroweak symmetry breaking explains the origin of the masses of elementary particles through their interactions with the Higgs field. Besides the measurements of the Higgs boson properties, the study of the scattering of massive vector bosons with spin one allows the nature of electroweak symmetry breaking to be probed. Among all processes related to vector-boson scattering, the electroweak production of two jets and a $Z$-boson pair is a rare and important one. Here we report the observation of this process from proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139/fb recorded at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. We consider two different final states originating from the decays of the $Z$-boson pair - one containing four charged leptons and the other containing two charged leptons and two neutrinos. The hypothesis of no electroweak production is rejected with a statistical significance of 5.7 $\sigma$, and the measured cross-section for electroweak production is consistent with the standard model prediction. In addition, we report cross-sections for inclusive production of a $Z$-boson pair and two jets for the two final states.
Measured and predicted fiducial cross-sections in both the lllljj and ll$\nu\nu$jj channels for the inclusive ZZjj processes. Uncertainties due to different sources are presented
Signal strength and significance of EW ZZjj processes
Signal strength and significance of EW ZZjj processes
Measured and predicted fiducial cross-sections in both the lllljj and ll$\nu\nu$jj channels for the inclusive ZZjj processes. Uncertainties due to different sources are presented.
Measured and predicted fiducial cross-sections in both the lllljj and ll$\nu\nu$jj channels for the inclusive ZZjj processes. Uncertainties due to different sources are presented.
Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ QCD CR.
Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ QCD CR.
Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ SR.
Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ SR.
Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\nu\nu jj$ SR.
Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\nu\nu jj$ SR.
The $t\bar{t}$ production cross-section is measured in the lepton+jets channel using proton$-$proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. Events with exactly one charged lepton and four or more jets in the final state, with at least one jet containing $b$-hadrons, are used to determine the $t\bar{t}$ production cross-section through a profile-likelihood fit. The inclusive cross-section is measured to be ${\sigma_{\text{inc}} = 830 \pm 0.4~ \text{(stat.)}\pm 36~\text{(syst.)}\pm 14~\text{(lumi.)}~\mathrm{pb}}$ with a relative uncertainty of 4.6 %. The result is consistent with theoretical calculations at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD. The fiducial $t\bar{t}$ cross-section within the experimental acceptance is also measured.
The results of fitted inclusive and fiducial ${t\bar{t}}$ cross-sections
The results of fitted inclusive and fiducial ${t\bar{t}}$ cross-sections
Ranking of the systematic uncertainties on the measured cross-section, normalised to the predicted value, in the inclusive fit to data. The impact of each nuisance parameter, $\Delta \sigma_{\text{inc}}/\sigma^{\text{pred.}}_{\text{inc}}$, is computed by comparing the nominal best-fit value of $\sigma_{\text{inc}}/\sigma^{\text{pred}}_{\text{inc}}$ with the result of the fit when fixing the considered nuisance parameter to its best-fit value, $\theta$, shifted by its pre-fit (post-fit) uncertainties $\pm \Delta \theta$ ($\pm \Delta \hat{\theta}$). The figure shows the effect of the ten most significant uncertainties.
Ranking of the systematic uncertainties on the measured cross-section, normalised to the predicted value, in the inclusive fit to data. The impact of each nuisance parameter, $\Delta \sigma_{\text{inc}}/\sigma^{\text{pred.}}_{\text{inc}}$, is computed by comparing the nominal best-fit value of $\sigma_{\text{inc}}/\sigma^{\text{pred}}_{\text{inc}}$ with the result of the fit when fixing the considered nuisance parameter to its best-fit value, $\theta$, shifted by its pre-fit (post-fit) uncertainties $\pm \Delta \theta$ ($\pm \Delta \hat{\theta}$). The figure shows the effect of the ten most significant uncertainties.
Ranking of the systematic uncertainties on the measured cross-section, normalised to the predicted value, in the fiducial fit to data. The impact of each nuisance parameter, $\Delta \sigma_{\text{fid}}/\sigma^{\text{pred.}}_{\text{fid}}$, is computed by comparing the nominal best-fit value of $\sigma_{\text{fid}}/\sigma^{\text{pred}}_{\text{fid}}$ with the result of the fit when fixing the considered nuisance parameter to its best-fit value, $\theta$, shifted by its pre-fit (post-fit) uncertainties $\pm \Delta \theta$ ($\pm \Delta \hat{\theta}$). The figure shows the effect of the ten most significant uncertainties.
Ranking of the systematic uncertainties on the measured cross-section, normalised to the predicted value, in the fiducial fit to data. The impact of each nuisance parameter, $\Delta \sigma_{\text{fid}}/\sigma^{\text{pred.}}_{\text{fid}}$, is computed by comparing the nominal best-fit value of $\sigma_{\text{fid}}/\sigma^{\text{pred}}_{\text{fid}}$ with the result of the fit when fixing the considered nuisance parameter to its best-fit value, $\theta$, shifted by its pre-fit (post-fit) uncertainties $\pm \Delta \theta$ ($\pm \Delta \hat{\theta}$). The figure shows the effect of the ten most significant uncertainties.
Impact of different categories of systematic uncertainties on the fiducial and inclusive measurements. The quoted values are obtained by repeating the fit, fixing a set of nuisance parameters of the sources corresponding to the considered category, and subtracting in quadrature the resulting uncertainty from the total uncertainty of the nominal fit. The total uncertainty is different from the sum in quadrature of the different components due to correlations between nuisance parameters built by the fit.
Impact of different categories of systematic uncertainties on the fiducial and inclusive measurements. The quoted values are obtained by repeating the fit, fixing a set of nuisance parameters of the sources corresponding to the considered category, and subtracting in quadrature the resulting uncertainty from the total uncertainty of the nominal fit. The total uncertainty is different from the sum in quadrature of the different components due to correlations between nuisance parameters built by the fit.
Fiducial region definition
Fiducial region definition
Multijet events at large transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) are measured at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV using data recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.3 fb$^{-1}$. The multiplicity of jets with $p_\mathrm{T}$$>$ 50 GeV that are produced in association with a high-$p_\mathrm{T}$ dijet system is measured in various ranges of the $p_\mathrm{T}$ of the jet with the highest transverse momentum and as a function of the azimuthal angle difference $\Delta\phi_{1,2}$ between the two highest $p_\mathrm{T}$ jets in the dijet system. The differential production cross sections are measured as a function of the transverse momenta of the four highest $p_\mathrm{T}$ jets. The measurements are compared with leading and next-to-leading order matrix element calculations supplemented with simulations of parton shower, hadronization, and multiparton interactions. In addition, the measurements are compared with next-to-leading order matrix element calculations combined with transverse-momentum dependent parton densities and transverse-momentum dependent parton shower.
Measurements of distributions of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions with a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV are presented. The data were recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 151 $\mu$b$^{-1}$. The particles are required to have a transverse momentum greater than 100 MeV and an absolute pseudorapidity less than 2.5. The charged-particle multiplicity, its dependence on transverse momentum and pseudorapidity and the dependence of the mean transverse momentum on multiplicity are measured in events containing at least two charged particles satisfying the above kinematic criteria. The results are corrected for detector effects and compared to the predictions from several Monte Carlo event generators.
The average charged-particle muliplicity per unit of rapidity for ETARAP=0 as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.
The average charged-particle muliplicity per unit of rapidity for ETARAP=0 as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.
The extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) average charged-particle muliplicity per unit of rapidity for ETARAP=0 as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.
The extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) average charged-particle muliplicity per unit of rapidity for ETARAP=0 as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.
Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of pseudorapidity for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicity distributions in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) charged-particle multiplicity distributions in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
Extrapolated ($\tau > 30$ ps) average transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of mass energy of 13000 GeV as a function of the number of charged particles in the event for events with the number of charged particles >=2 having transverse momentum >100 MeV and absolute(pseudorapidity) <2.5.
This paper presents studies of Bose-Einstein correlations (BEC) in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, using data from the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Data were collected in a special low-luminosity configuration with a minimum-bias trigger and a high-multiplicity track trigger, accumulating integrated luminosities of 151 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ and 8.4 nb$^{-1}$ respectively. The BEC are measured for pairs of like-sign charged particles, each with $|\eta|$ < 2.5, for two kinematic ranges: the first with particle $p_T$ > 100 MeV and the second with particle $p_T$ > 500 MeV. The BEC parameters, characterizing the source radius and particle correlation strength, are investigated as functions of charged-particle multiplicity (up to 300) and average transverse momentum of the pair (up to 1.5 GeV). The double-differential dependence on charged-particle multiplicity and average transverse momentum of the pair is also studied. The BEC radius is found to be independent of the charged-particle multiplicity for high charged-particle multiplicity (above 100), confirming a previous observation at lower energy. This saturation occurs independent of the transverse momentum of the pair.
This paper presents results of searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in models with compressed mass spectra. The searches use 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV proton-proton collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. Events with missing transverse momentum and two same-flavor, oppositely charged, low transverse momentum leptons are selected, and are further categorized by the presence of hadronic activity from initial-state radiation or a topology compatible with vector-boson fusion processes. The data are found to be consistent with predictions from the Standard Model. The results are interpreted using simplified models of $R$-parity-conserving supersymmetry in which the lightest supersymmetric partner is a neutralino with a mass similar to the lightest chargino, the second-to-lightest neutralino or the slepton. Lower limits on the masses of charginos in different simplified models range from 193 GeV to 240 GeV for moderate mass splittings, and extend down to mass splittings of 1.5 GeV to 2.4 GeV at the LEP chargino bounds (92.4 GeV). Similar lower limits on degenerate light-flavor sleptons extend up to masses of 251 GeV and down to mass splittings of 550 MeV. Constraints on vector-boson fusion production of electroweak SUSY states are also presented.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct higgsino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of VBF wino-bino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of VBF wino-bino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of VBF wino-bino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of VBF wino-bino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of VBF wino-bino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct wino-bino production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH slepton production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH slepton production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH slepton production.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH smuon production.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH smuon production.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct LH selectron production.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Observed 95% CL exclusion sensitivity for simplified models of direct RH selectron production.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-med region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m higgsino process in the SR-E-1l1T region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [0.5,60] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-high region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-3}$) for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Efficiency for the slepton process in the SR-S-low region. Truth stransverse mass is constrained to be within the range [100,140] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the C1C1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2N1 VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1p VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios, assuming VBF production..
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios, assuming VBF production..
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-high region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct slepton scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct slepton scenarios.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH slepton scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH slepton scenarios.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF-low region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH slepton scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH slepton scenarios.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Acceptance (note the $z$-axis is in units of $10^{-4}$) for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct smuon scenarios.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Efficiency for the N2C1m VBF higgsino process in the SR-VBF region. Truth dilepton invariant mass is constrained to be within the range [1,40] GeV.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})>0$.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for wino-bino scenarios, assuming $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}) \times m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})<0$.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios, assuming VBF production..
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for higgsino scenarios, assuming VBF production..
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct slepton scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct slepton scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-E-1L1T for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-1L1T for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH slepton scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH slepton scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-E-high for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-high for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH slepton scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH slepton scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-E-low for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-low for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct smuon scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-E-med for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-med for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH smuon scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-S-high for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-S-high for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH smuon scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH smuon scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-S-low for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-S-low for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct selectron scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-VBF for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (100 GeV, 95 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-VBF for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (100 GeV, 95 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct LH selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH selectron scenarios.
Observed and Expected upper cross-section limits for direct RH selectron scenarios.
Number of signal events in SR-E-1L1T for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-1L1T for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-high for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-high for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-low for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-low for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-med for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-E-med for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (155 GeV, 150 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-S-high for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-S-high for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-S-low for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-S-low for the (m($\tilde{\ell}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (150 GeV, 140 GeV) Slepton signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-VBF for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (100 GeV, 95 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
Number of signal events in SR-VBF for the (m($\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$),m($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$)) = (100 GeV, 95 GeV) Higgsino signal model at different stages of selection before and after weighting events to correspond to 140/fb.
The ratios of the production cross sections between the excited $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons and the $\Upsilon$(1S) ground state, detected via their decay into two muons, are studied as a function of the number of charged particles in the event. The data are from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 7 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.8 fb$^{-1}$, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. Evidence of a decrease in these ratios as a function of the particle multiplicity is observed, more pronounced at low transverse momentum $p_\mathrm{T}^{\mu\mu}$. For $\Upsilon$(nS) mesons with $p_\mathrm{T}^{\mu\mu}$ $\gt$ 7 GeV, where most of the data were collected, the correlation with multiplicity is studied as a function of the underlying event transverse sphericity and the number of particles in a cone around the $\Upsilon$(nS) direction. The ratios are found to be multiplicity independent for jet-like events. The mean $p_\mathrm{T}^{\mu\mu}$ values for the $\Upsilon$(nS) states as a function of particle multiplicity are also measured and found to grow more steeply as their mass increases.
The measured ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $p_T(\Upsilon(n$S$))>7\,GeV$ and $|y(\Upsilon(n$S$))| < 1.2$, as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$
The measured ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $p_T(\Upsilon(n$S$))>0\,GeV$ and $|y(\Upsilon(n$S$))| < 1.93$, as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$.
Mean $p_T$ values of the $\Upsilon(1$S$)$, $\Upsilon(2$S$)$, and $\Upsilon(3S)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$
Mean $p_T$ values of the $\Upsilon(1$S$)$, $\Upsilon(2$S$)$, and $\Upsilon(3$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,0\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$
Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $0<p_T<5\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $5<p_T<7\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $7<p_T<9\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $9<p_T<11\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $11<p_T<15\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $15<p_T<20\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $20<p_T<50\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $0<p_T<5\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $5<p_T<7\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $7<p_T<9\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $9<p_T<11\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $11<p_T<15\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $15<p_T<20\,$GeV range
Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $20<p_T<50\,$GeV range
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "forward" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Forward tracks are those with momentum direction in $\Delta\phi\,<\,\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "transverse" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Transverse tracks are those with momentum direction in $\pi/3\,<\,\Delta\phi\,<\,2\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "backward" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Backward tracks are those with momentum direction in $\Delta\phi\,>\,2\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,0$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,1$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,2$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,>\,2$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.00\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.55$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.55\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.70$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.70\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.85$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.
Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.85\,<\,S_T\,<\,1.00$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.
Efficiency-corrected multiplicity bins used in the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ ratio analysis and the corresponding mean number of charged particle tracks.
Three searches are presented for signatures of physics beyond the standard model (SM) in $\tau\tau$ final states in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, using a data sample collected with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) are set on the products of the branching fraction for the decay into $\tau$ leptons and the cross sections for the production of a new boson $\phi$, in addition to the H(125) boson, via gluon fusion (gg$\phi$) or in association with b quarks, ranging from $\mathcal{O}$(10 pb) for a mass of 60 GeV to 0.3 fb for a mass of 3.5 TeV each. The data reveal two excesses for gg$\phi$ production with local $p$-values equivalent to about three standard deviations at $m_\phi$ = 0.1 and 1.2 TeV. In a search for $t$-channel exchange of a vector leptoquark U$_1$, 95% CL upper limits are set on the dimensionless U$_1$ leptoquark coupling to quarks and $\tau$ leptons ranging from 1 for a mass of 1 TeV to 6 for a mass of 5 TeV, depending on the scenario. In the interpretations of the $M_\mathrm{h}^{125}$ and $M_\mathrm{h, EFT}^{125}$ minimal supersymmetric SM benchmark scenarios, additional Higgs bosons with masses below 350 GeV are excluded at 95% CL.
A search for the electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two electrons or muons is presented. The analysis is based on 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. Three $R$-parity-conserving scenarios where the lightest neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle are considered: the production of chargino pairs with decays via either $W$ bosons or sleptons, and the direct production of slepton pairs. The analysis is optimised for the first of these scenarios, but the results are also interpreted in the others. No significant deviations from the Standard Model expectations are observed and limits at 95 % confidence level are set on the masses of relevant supersymmetric particles in each of the scenarios. For a massless lightest neutralino, masses up to 420 GeV are excluded for the production of the lightest-chargino pairs assuming $W$-boson-mediated decays and up to 1 TeV for slepton-mediated decays, whereas for slepton-pair production masses up to 700 GeV are excluded assuming three generations of mass-degenerate sleptons.
- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> <b>Background Fit results:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit1">CRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit2">VRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit5">inclusive DF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit6">inclusive DF-1J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit3">inclusive SF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit4">inclusive SF-1J SRs</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions in VRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics1">$m_{T2}$ in VR-top-low</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics2">$m_{T2}$ in VR-top-high</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics3">$E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics4">$E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-1J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics5">$E_T^{miss}$ sig in VR-VZ</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics6">$E_T^{miss}$ sig in VR-top-WW</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions in SRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics1">$m_{T2}$ in SR-SF-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics2">$m_{T2}$ in SR-SF-1J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics3">$m_{T2}$ in SR-DF-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics4">$m_{T2}$ in SR-DF-1J</a> </ul> <b>Systematic uncertaities:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Systematic uncertainties">dominant systematic uncertainties in the inclusive SRs</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)1">expected exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)1">observed exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)2">expected exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)2">observed exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)3">expected exclusion contour direct slepton-pair production grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)3">observed exclusion contour direct slepton-pair production grid</a> </ul> <br/><br/><b>AUXILIARY MATERIAL</b><br/> <b>Background Fit in binned SRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit7">binned DF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit8">binned DF-1J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit9">binned SF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit10">binned SF-1J SRs</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)4">expected exclusion contour left-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)4">observed exclusion contour left-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)5">expected exclusion contour right-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)5">observed exclusion contour right-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)6">expected exclusion contour selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)6">observed exclusion contour selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)7">expected exclusion contour left-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)7">observed exclusion contour left-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)8">expected exclusion contour right-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)8">observed exclusion contour right-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)9">expected exclusion contour smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)9">observed exclusion contour smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)10">expected exclusion contour left-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)10">observed exclusion contour left-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)11">expected exclusion contour right-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)11">observed exclusion contour right-handed smuon-pair production</a> </ul> <b>Cross section upper limits:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=xsecupperlimits1">upper limits on signal cross section for direct chargino-pair production via W decay</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=xsecupperlimits2">upper limits on signal cross section for direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=xsecupperlimits3">upper limits on signal cross section for direct slepton-pair production</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies for direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid </b> <ul> <li> <b>Acceptance</b> <br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <li> <b>Efficiency</b> <br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> </ul> <b>Cutflow:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Cutflow1">Cutflow for direct chargino-pair production via W decay $m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(300,50) GeV$</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Cutflow1">Cutflow for direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay $m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1,\tilde{l},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(600,300,1) GeV$</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Cutflow1">Cutflow for direct slepton-pair production $m(\tilde{l},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(400,200) GeV$</a> </ul> <b>Truth Code snippets</b> are available under "Resources" (purple button on the left)
- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> <b>Background Fit results:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit1">CRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit2">VRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit5">inclusive DF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit6">inclusive DF-1J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit3">inclusive SF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit4">inclusive SF-1J SRs</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions in VRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics1">$m_{T2}$ in VR-top-low</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics2">$m_{T2}$ in VR-top-high</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics3">$E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics4">$E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-1J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics5">$E_T^{miss}$ sig in VR-VZ</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=VRkinematics6">$E_T^{miss}$ sig in VR-top-WW</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions in SRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics1">$m_{T2}$ in SR-SF-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics2">$m_{T2}$ in SR-SF-1J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics3">$m_{T2}$ in SR-DF-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=SRkinematics4">$m_{T2}$ in SR-DF-1J</a> </ul> <b>Systematic uncertaities:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Systematic uncertainties">dominant systematic uncertainties in the inclusive SRs</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)1">expected exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)1">observed exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)2">expected exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)2">observed exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)3">expected exclusion contour direct slepton-pair production grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)3">observed exclusion contour direct slepton-pair production grid</a> </ul> <br/><br/><b>AUXILIARY MATERIAL</b><br/> <b>Background Fit in binned SRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit7">binned DF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit8">binned DF-1J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit9">binned SF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Backgroundfit10">binned SF-1J SRs</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)4">expected exclusion contour left-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)4">observed exclusion contour left-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)5">expected exclusion contour right-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)5">observed exclusion contour right-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)6">expected exclusion contour selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)6">observed exclusion contour selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)7">expected exclusion contour left-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)7">observed exclusion contour left-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)8">expected exclusion contour right-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)8">observed exclusion contour right-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)9">expected exclusion contour smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)9">observed exclusion contour smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)10">expected exclusion contour left-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)10">observed exclusion contour left-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(obs)11">expected exclusion contour right-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Exclusioncontour(exp)11">observed exclusion contour right-handed smuon-pair production</a> </ul> <b>Cross section upper limits:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=xsecupperlimits1">upper limits on signal cross section for direct chargino-pair production via W decay</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=xsecupperlimits2">upper limits on signal cross section for direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=xsecupperlimits3">upper limits on signal cross section for direct slepton-pair production</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies for direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid </b> <ul> <li> <b>Acceptance</b> <br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-DF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=AcceptanceSR-SF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <li> <b>Efficiency</b> <br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-DF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-0J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[100,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[160,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[100,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[120,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[100,105)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[105,110)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[110,120)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[120,140)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[140,160)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[160,180)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[180,220)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[220,260)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=1&table=EfficiencySR-SF-1J-[260,inf)forC1C1WWgrid">SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> </ul> <b>Cutflow:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Cutflow1">Cutflow for direct chargino-pair production via W decay $m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(300,50) GeV$</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Cutflow1">Cutflow for direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay $m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1,\tilde{l},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(600,300,1) GeV$</a> <li><a href="89413?version=1&table=Cutflow1">Cutflow for direct slepton-pair production $m(\tilde{l},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(400,200) GeV$</a> </ul> <b>SimpleAnalysis framework implementation</b> of the search SRs is available under "Resources" (purple button on the left)
- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> <b>Background Fit results:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 1">CRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 2">VRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 5">inclusive DF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 6">inclusive DF-1J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 3">inclusive SF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 4">inclusive SF-1J SRs</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions in VRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=VR kinematics 1">$m_{T2}$ in VR-top-low</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=VR kinematics 2">$m_{T2}$ in VR-top-high</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=VR kinematics 3">$E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=VR kinematics 4">$E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-1J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=VR kinematics 5">$E_T^{miss}$ sig in VR-VZ</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=VR kinematics 6">$E_T^{miss}$ sig in VR-top-WW</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions in SRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=SR kinematics 1">$m_{T2}$ in SR-SF-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=SR kinematics 2">$m_{T2}$ in SR-SF-1J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=SR kinematics 3">$m_{T2}$ in SR-DF-0J</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=SR kinematics 4">$m_{T2}$ in SR-DF-1J</a> </ul> <b>Systematic uncertaities:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Systematic uncertainties">dominant systematic uncertainties in the inclusive SRs</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 1">expected exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 1">observed exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 2">expected exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 2">observed exclusion contour direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 3">expected exclusion contour direct slepton-pair production grid</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 3">observed exclusion contour direct slepton-pair production grid</a> </ul> <br/><br/><b>AUXILIARY MATERIAL</b><br/> <b>Background Fit in binned SRs:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 7">binned DF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 8">binned DF-1J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 9">binned SF-0J SRs</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Background fit 10">binned SF-1J SRs</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 4">expected exclusion contour left-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 4">observed exclusion contour left-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 5">expected exclusion contour right-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 5">observed exclusion contour right-handed slepton-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 6">expected exclusion contour selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 6">observed exclusion contour selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 7">expected exclusion contour left-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 7">observed exclusion contour left-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 8">expected exclusion contour right-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 8">observed exclusion contour right-handed selectron-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 9">expected exclusion contour smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 9">observed exclusion contour smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 10">expected exclusion contour left-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 10">observed exclusion contour left-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (exp) 11">expected exclusion contour right-handed smuon-pair production</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Exclusion contour (obs) 11">observed exclusion contour right-handed smuon-pair production</a> </ul> <b>Cross section upper limits:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=xsec upper limits 1">upper limits on signal cross section for direct chargino-pair production via W decay</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=xsec upper limits 2">upper limits on signal cross section for direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=xsec upper limits 3">upper limits on signal cross section for direct slepton-pair production</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies for direct chargino-pair production via W decay grid </b> <ul> <li> <b>Acceptance</b> <br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Acceptance SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <li> <b>Efficiency</b> <br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-DF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-0J-[260,inf) </a><br/> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[100,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[160,inf) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[100,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[100,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[120,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[120,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[100,105) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[100,105) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[105,110) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[105,110) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[110,120) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[110,120) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[120,140) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[120,140) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[140,160) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[140,160) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[160,180) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[160,180) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[180,220) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[180,220) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[220,260) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[220,260) </a> <a href="89413?version=3&table=Efficiency SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) for C1C1WW grid">SR-SF-1J-[260,inf) </a><br/> </ul> <b>Cutflow:</b> <ul> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Cutflow 1">Cutflow for direct chargino-pair production via W decay $m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(300,50) GeV$</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Cutflow 2">Cutflow for direct chargino-pair production via slepton decay $m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1,\tilde{l},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(600,300,1) GeV$</a> <li><a href="89413?version=3&table=Cutflow 3">Cutflow for direct slepton-pair production $m(\tilde{l},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)=(400,200) GeV$</a> </ul> <b>SimpleAnalysis framework implementation</b> of the search SRs is available under "Resources" (purple button on the left)
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit for the CRs. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit for the CRs. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit for the CRs. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields in the VRs. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields in the VRs. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields in the VRs. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in VR-top-low for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in VR-top-low for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in VR-top-low for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in VR-top-high for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in VR-top-high for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in VR-top-high for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ in VR-WW-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ significance in VR-VZ for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ significance in VR-VZ for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ significance in VR-VZ for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ significance in VR-top-WW for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ significance in VR-top-WW for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Distributions of $E_T^{miss}$ significance in VR-top-WW for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow.
Breakdown of the dominant systematic uncertainties on background estimates in the inclusive SRs requiring $m_{T2}$>100 GeV after performing the profile likelihood fit. Note that the individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up quadratically to the total background uncertainty. The percentages show the size of the uncertainty relative to the total expected background. "Top theoretical uncertainties" refers to $t\bar t$ theoretical uncertainties and the uncertainty associated to $Wt-t\bar t$ interference added quadratically.
Breakdown of the dominant systematic uncertainties on background estimates in the inclusive SRs requiring $m_{T2}$>100 GeV after performing the profile likelihood fit. Note that the individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up quadratically to the total background uncertainty. The percentages show the size of the uncertainty relative to the total expected background. "Top theoretical uncertainties" refers to $t\bar t$ theoretical uncertainties and the uncertainty associated to $Wt-t\bar t$ interference added quadratically.
Breakdown of the dominant systematic uncertainties on background estimates in the inclusive SRs requiring $m_{T2}$>100 GeV after performing the profile likelihood fit. Note that the individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up quadratically to the total background uncertainty. The percentages show the size of the uncertainty relative to the total expected background. "Top theoretical uncertainties" refers to $t\bar t$ theoretical uncertainties and the uncertainty associated to $Wt-t\bar t$ interference added quadratically.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the DF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the DF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the DF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the DF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the DF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the DF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the SF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the SF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the SF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the SF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the SF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted post-fit background yields for the SF inclusive SRs. The model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the observed and expected number of beyond the SM events $S^{0.95}_{obs/exp}$ and the effective beyond the SM cross-section $\sigma^{0.95}_{obs}$ are also reported. The last row reports the $p_0$-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the $p$-value is truncated at 0.50. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$+V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRSF-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRSF-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRSF-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRSF-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRSF-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRSF-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRDF-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRDF-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRDF-0J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRDF-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRDF-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in SRDF-1J for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the $t\bar t$, single top, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The fake and non-prompt leptons background (FNP) is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. The uncertainty band includes all sources of systematic and statistical errors and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with $W$ boson mediated decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with $W$ boson mediated decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with $W$ boson mediated decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with $W$ boson mediated decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with $W$ boson mediated decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with $W$ boson mediated decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino mediated mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino mediated mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino mediated mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino mediated mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino mediated mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino mediated mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for selectron-pair production, with left and right handed selectron production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for selectron-pair production, with left and right handed selectron production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for selectron-pair production, with left and right handed selectron production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for selectron-pair production, with left and right handed selectron production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for selectron-pair production, with left and right handed selectron production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for selectron-pair production, with left and right handed selectron production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed selectron-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for smuon-pair production, with left and right handed smuon production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for smuon-pair production, with left and right handed smuon production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for smuon-pair production, with left and right handed smuon production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for smuon-pair production, with left and right handed smuon production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for smuon-pair production, with left and right handed smuon production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for smuon-pair production, with left and right handed smuon production combined. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed smuon-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned DF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=0$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned DF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=0$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned DF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=0$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned DF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=1$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned DF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=1$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned DF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=1$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned SF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=0$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned SF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=0$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned SF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=0$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned SF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=1$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned SF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=1$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed events and predicted background yields from the fit in the binned SF SRs with $n_{non-b-tagged jets}=1$. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. The background denoted as "Other" in the Table includes the non-dominant background sources for this analysis, i.e. Z+jets, $t\bar t$ +V, Higgs and Drell-Yan events. A "–" symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for left-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for right-handed slepton-pair production. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for chargino-pair production with W -boson-mediated decays.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for chargino-pair production with W -boson-mediated decays.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for chargino-pair production with W -boson-mediated decays.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for chargino-pair production with slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays. The mass relation $m(\tilde{l}_L)=\frac{1}{2}[m(\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 + m(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_1)]$ is assumed.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for slepton-pair production.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for slepton-pair production.
Upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) for slepton-pair production.
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[100,105).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[105,110).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[110,120).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[120,140).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[140,160).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[160,180).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[180,220).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[220,260).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-SF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-0J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Acceptance for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[260,inf).
Signal Efficiency for direct chargino-pair production with W-boson mediated decays in SR-DF-1J-[260,inf).
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_1^{\mp}$ decay via $W^{\pm}W^{\mp}$. The masses of the two charginos are 300 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 50 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_1^{\mp}$ decay via $W^{\pm}W^{\mp}$. The masses of the two charginos are 300 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 50 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_1^{\mp}$ decay via $W^{\pm}W^{\mp}$. The masses of the two charginos are 300 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 50 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_1^{\mp}$ decay via slepton-neutrino/sneutrino-lepton pair. The masses of the two charginos are 600 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 1 GeV. The slepton/sneutrino masses are 300 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_1^{\mp}$ decay via slepton-neutrino/sneutrino-lepton pair. The masses of the two charginos are 600 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 1 GeV. The slepton/sneutrino masses are 300 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_1^{\mp}$ decay via slepton-neutrino/sneutrino-lepton pair. The masses of the two charginos are 600 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 1 GeV. The slepton/sneutrino masses are 300 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde\ell\tilde\ell$ are produced. Only $\tilde{e}$ and $\tilde{\mu}$ are considered in this model. The masses of the two sleptons are 400 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 200 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde\ell\tilde\ell$ are produced. Only $\tilde{e}$ and $\tilde{\mu}$ are considered in this model. The masses of the two sleptons are 400 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 200 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow for supersymmetric model where $\tilde\ell\tilde\ell$ are produced. Only $\tilde{e}$ and $\tilde{\mu}$ are considered in this model. The masses of the two sleptons are 400 GeV, while the mass of $\tilde{\chi}_1^{0}$ is 200 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139~fb$^{-1}$.
A measurement is presented of the production of Z bosons that decay into two electrons or muons in association with jets, in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data were recorded by the CMS Collaboration at the LHC with an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The differential cross sections are measured as a function of the transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) of the Z boson and the transverse momentum and rapidities of the five jets with largest $p_\mathrm{T}$. The jet multiplicity distribution is measured for up to eight jets. The hadronic activity in the events is estimated using the scalar sum of the $p_\mathrm{T}$ of all the jets. All measurements are unfolded to the stable particle-level and compared with predictions from various Monte Carlo event generators, as well as with expectations at leading and next-to-leading orders in perturbative quantum chromodynamics.
The production cross section of a top quark pair in association with a photon is measured in proton-proton collisions in the decay channel with two oppositely charged leptons (e$^\pm\mu^\mp$, e$^+$e$^-$, or $\mu^+\mu^-$). The measurement is performed using 138 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV during the 2016-2018 data-taking period of the CERN LHC. A fiducial phase space is defined such that photons radiated by initial-state particles, top quarks, or any of their decay products are included. An inclusive cross section of 175.2 $\pm$ 2.5 (stat) $\pm$ 6.3 (syst) fb is measured in a signal region with at least one jet coming from the hadronization of a bottom quark and exactly one photon with transverse momentum above 20 GeV. Differential cross sections are measured as functions of several kinematic observables of the photon, leptons, and jets, and compared to standard model predictions. The measurements are also interpreted in the standard model effective field theory framework, and limits are found on the relevant Wilson coefficients from these results alone and in combination with a previous CMS measurement of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\gamma$ production process using the lepton+jets final state.
Observed and predicted event yields as a function of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ in the $e\mu$ channel, after the fit to the data.
Observed and predicted event yields as a function of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ in the $ee$ channel, after the fit to the data.
Observed and predicted event yields as a function of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ in the $\mu\mu$ channel, after the fit to the data.
Measured inclusive fiducial $tt\gamma$ production cross section in the dilepton final state for the different dilepton-flavour channels and combined.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ . The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $|\eta |(\gamma)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{1})$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{2})$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, b)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $|\Delta\eta(\ell\ell)|$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $\Delta \phi(\ell\ell)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell\ell) $. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell_{1})+p_{T}(\ell_{2})$ . The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\ell, j)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Absolute differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(j_{1})$ .
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ . The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $|\eta |(\gamma)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{1})$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{2})$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, b)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $|\Delta\eta(\ell\ell)|$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $\Delta \phi(\ell\ell)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell\ell) $. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell_{1})+p_{T}(\ell_{2})$ . The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\ell, j)$. The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Normalized differential $tt\gamma$ production cross section as a function of $p_{T}(j_{1})$ . The values provided in the table are not divided by the bin width.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ .
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ .
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $|\eta |(\gamma)$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $|\eta |(\gamma)$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell)$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell)$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{1})$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{1})$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{2})$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $\Delta R(\gamma, \ell_{2})$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, b)$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\gamma, b)$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $|\Delta\eta(\ell\ell)|$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $|\Delta\eta(\ell\ell)|$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $\Delta \phi(\ell\ell)$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $\Delta \phi(\ell\ell)$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell\ell) $.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell\ell) $.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell_{1})+p_{T}(\ell_{2})$ .
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(\ell_{1})+p_{T}(\ell_{2})$ .
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\ell, j)$.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of min $\Delta R(\ell, j)$.
Correlation matrix of the systematic uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(j_{1})$ .
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainty in the absolute differential cross section as a function of $p_{T}(j_{1})$ .
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value as a function of Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$ and $c^{I}_{tZ}$ from the interpretation of the dilepton measurement.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value as a function of Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$ and $c^{I}_{tZ}$ from the interpretation of the dilepton and lepton+jets measurements combined.
One-dimensional 68 and 95% CL intervals obtained for the Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$ and $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the photon $p_{T}$ distribution from the dilepton analysis, or the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses.
Comparison of observed $95\%$ CL intervals for the Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$ and $c^{I}_{tZ}$. Results are shown from a CMS ttZ measurement [JHEP 03 (2020) 056], from a CMS ttZ & tZq interpretation [arXiv:2107.13896], from a CMS ttG (lepton+jets) measurement [arXiv:2107.01508], from this measurement, and from a global fit by J. Ellis et al. [JHEP 04 (2021) 279].
The ALICE collaboration at the LHC reports measurement of the inclusive production cross section of electrons from semi-leptonic decays of beauty hadrons with rapidity $|y|<0.8$ and transverse momentum $1<p_{\mathrm{T}}<10$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 2.76 TeV. Electrons not originating from semi-electronic decay of beauty hadrons are suppressed using the impact parameter of the corresponding tracks. The production cross section of beauty decay electrons is compared to the result obtained with an alternative method which uses the distribution of the azimuthal angle between heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged hadrons. Perturbative QCD calculations agree with the measured cross section within the experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The integrated visible cross section, $\sigma_{\mathrm{b} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}} = 3.47\pm0.40(\mathrm{stat})^{+1.12}_{-1.33}(\mathrm{sys})\pm0.07(\mathrm{norm}) \mu$b, was extrapolated to full phase space using Fixed Order plus Next-to-Leading Log (FONLL) predictions to obtain the total b$\bar{\mathrm{b}}$ production cross section, $\sigma_{\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} = 130\pm15.1(\mathrm{stat})^{+42.1}_{-49.8}(\mathrm{sys})^{+3.4}_{-3.1}(\mathrm{extr})\pm2.5(\mathrm{norm})\pm4.4(\mathrm{BR}) \mu$b.
Azimuthal correlation distribution between heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged hadrons, scaled by the number of electrons in minimum bias triggered events in the electron transverse momentum range 1.5-2.5 GeV/$c$.
Azimuthal correlation distribution between heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged hadrons, scaled by the number of electrons in minimum bias triggered events in the electron transverse momentum range 1.5-2.5 GeV/c.
Azimuthal correlation distribution between heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged hadrons, scaled by the number of electrons in EMCal triggered events in the electron transverse momentum range 4.5-6 GeV/$c$.
Azimuthal correlation distribution between heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged hadrons, scaled by the number of electrons in EMCal triggered events in the electron transverse momentum range 4.5-6 GeV/c.
Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained with the method based on the track impact parameter.
Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained with the method based on the track impact parameter.
Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained from the method based on the azimuthal correlation of heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged tracks.
Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained from the method based on the azimuthal correlation of heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged tracks.
The $p_{\rm T}$-differential inclusive cross section of electrons (multiplied by $10^3$ for readability) from beauty hadron decays using the electron-hadron azimuthal correlation method.
The pT-differential inclusive cross section of electrons from beauty hadron decays using the electron-hadron azimuthal correlation method.
The $p_{\rm T}$-differential inclusive cross section of electrons (multiplied by $10^3$ for readability) from beauty hadron decays. A 1.9% normalization uncertainty not shown.
The pT-differential inclusive cross section of electrons from beauty hadron decays. A 1.9% normalization uncertainty not shown.
Inclusive bbbar production cross section per rapidity unit measured in mid-rapidity.
Inclusive bbbar production cross section per rapidity unit measured.
Total bbbar production cross section.
Total bbbar production cross section.
The production cross section of electrons from semileptonic decays of beauty hadrons was measured at mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.8) in the transverse momentum range $1 < p_{\rm T} < 8$ Gev/$c$ with the ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC in pp collisions at a center of mass energy $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV using an integrated luminosity of 2.2 nb$^{-1}$. Electrons from beauty hadron decays were selected based on the displacement of the decay vertex from the collision vertex. A perturbative QCD calculation agrees with the measurement within uncertainties. The data were extrapolated to the full phase space to determine the total cross section for the production of beauty quark-antiquark pairs.
Cross sections for the production of a Z boson in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s) = 8 TeV are measured using a data sample collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC corresponding to 19.6 inverse femtobarns. Differential cross sections are presented as functions of up to three observables that describe the jet kinematics and the jet activity. Correlations between the azimuthal directions and the rapidities of the jets and the Z boson are studied in detail. The predictions of a number of multileg generators with leading or next-to-leading order accuracy are compared with the measurements. The comparison shows the importance of including multi-parton contributions in the matrix elements and the improvement in the predictions when next-to-leading order terms are included.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_4)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_4)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_5)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_5)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_4)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_4)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_5)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_5)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$, for events with at least one jet and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$, for events with at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least one jet and $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least one jet and $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least one jet, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least four jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least four jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least five jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least five jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least ine jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least two jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least two jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least one jet, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_2,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_2,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the mass of the system made of the two leading jets, $m_{\text{j}_1\text{j}_1}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the mass of the system made of the two leading jets, $m_{\text{j}_1\text{j}_1}$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the leading jet transverse momentum and rapidity
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the leading jet transverse momentum and rapidity
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the Z boson and leading jet rapidities
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the Z boson and leading jet rapidities
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the rapidities of the Z boson and leading jet, and of the transverse momentum of the jet for the same configuration.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the rapidities of the Z boson and leading jet, and of the transverse momentum of the jet for the same configuration.
Production cross sections of $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) states decaying into $\mu^+\mu^-$ in proton-lead (pPb) collisions are reported using data collected by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV. A comparison is made with corresponding cross sections obtained with pp data measured at the same collision energy and scaled by the Pb nucleus mass number. The nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S) is found to be $R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(1S))$ = 0.806 $\pm$ 0.024 (stat) $\pm$ 0.059 (syst). Similar results for the excited states indicate a sequential suppression pattern, such that $R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(1S))$$\gt$$R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(2S))$$\gt$$R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(3S))$. The suppression is much less pronounced in pPb than in PbPb collisions, and independent of transverse momentum $p_\mathrm{T}^\Upsilon$ and center-of-mass rapidity $y_\mathrm{CM}^\Upsilon$ of the individual $\Upsilon$ state in the studied range $p_\mathrm{T}^\Upsilon$$\lt$ 30 GeV$/c$ and $\vert y_\mathrm{CM}^\Upsilon\vert$$\lt$ 1.93. Models that incorporate sequential suppression of bottomonia in pPb collisions are in better agreement with the data than those which only assume initial-state modifications.
The observation of forward proton scattering in association with lepton pairs ($e^+e^-+p$ or $\mu^+\mu^-+p$) produced via photon fusion is presented. The scattered proton is detected by the ATLAS Forward Proton spectrometer while the leptons are reconstructed by the central ATLAS detector. Proton-proton collision data recorded in 2017 at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV are analyzed, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 14.6 fb$^{-1}$. A total of 57 (123) candidates in the $ee+p$ ($\mu\mu+p$) final state are selected, allowing the background-only hypothesis to be rejected with a significance exceeding five standard deviations in each channel. Proton-tagging techniques are introduced for cross-section measurements in the fiducial detector acceptance, corresponding to $\sigma_{ee+p}$ = 11.0 $\pm$ 2.6 (stat.) $\pm$ 1.2 (syst.) $\pm$ 0.3 (lumi.) fb and $\sigma_{\mu\mu+p}$ = 7.2 $\pm$ 1.6 (stat.) $\pm$ 0.9 (syst.) $\pm$ 0.2 (lumi.) fb in the dielectron and dimuon channel, respectively.
A measurement of event-shape variables in proton$-$proton collisions at large momentum transfer is presented using data collected at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Six event-shape variables calculated using hadronic jets are studied in inclusive multijet events using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. Measurements are performed in bins of jet multiplicity and in different ranges of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of the two leading jets, reaching scales beyond 2 TeV. These measurements are compared with predictions from Monte Carlo event generators containing leading-order or next-to-leading order matrix elements matched to parton showers simulated to leading-logarithm accuracy. At low jet multiplicities, shape discrepancies between the measurements and the Monte Carlo predictions are observed. At high jet multiplicities, the shapes are better described but discrepancies in the normalisation are observed.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ = 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured total cross section for multijet production as a function of $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ for 1.0 < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV. The total cross-sections are measured in the same fiducial phase-space region than the measured relative cross-sections as functions of event-shape variables for the corresponding $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ interval. The measurement in the last bin corresponds to $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 6.
Measured total cross section for multijet production as a function of $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ for 1.0 < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV. The total cross-sections are measured in the same fiducial phase-space region than the measured relative cross-sections as functions of event-shape variables for the corresponding $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ interval. The measurement in the last bin corresponds to $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 6.
Measured total cross section for multijet production as a function of $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ for 1.5 < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV. The total cross-sections are measured in the same fiducial phase-space region than the measured relative cross-sections as functions of event-shape variables for the corresponding $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ interval. The measurement in the last bin corresponds to $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 6.
Measured total cross section for multijet production as a function of $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ for 1.5 < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV. The total cross-sections are measured in the same fiducial phase-space region than the measured relative cross-sections as functions of event-shape variables for the corresponding $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ interval. The measurement in the last bin corresponds to $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 6.
Measured total cross section for multijet production as a function of $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ for $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV. The total cross-sections are measured in the same fiducial phase-space region than the measured relative cross-sections as functions of event-shape variables for the corresponding $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ interval. The measurement in the last bin corresponds to $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 6.
Measured total cross section for multijet production as a function of $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ for $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV. The total cross-sections are measured in the same fiducial phase-space region than the measured relative cross-sections as functions of event-shape variables for the corresponding $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ interval. The measurement in the last bin corresponds to $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 6.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $\tau_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of T$_{\textrm{m}}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of S$_{\perp}$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $A$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $C$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 1.5 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and 1.5 TeV < $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ < 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 3 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 4 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}\geq$ 5 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
Measured relative cross sections for multijet production as a function of $D$ for $n^{\textrm{jet}}$ $\geq$ 6 and $H_{\textrm{T2}}$ > 2.0 TeV.
A search for resonances decaying into a W boson and a radion, where the radion decays into two W bosons, is presented. The data analyzed correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ recorded in proton-proton collisions with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. One isolated charged lepton is required, together with missing transverse momentum and one or two massive large-radius jets, containing the decay products of either two or one W bosons, respectively. No excess over the background estimation is observed. The results are combined with those from a complementary channel with an all-hadronic final state, described in an accompanying paper. Limits are set on parameters of an extended warped extra-dimensional model. These searches are the first of their kind at the LHC.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed $\ell\nu$+jets system ($m_{\mathrm{j}\ell\nu}$, $m_{\mathrm{jj}\ell\nu}$) in data and simulation for SR4.
Observed upper limits at 95\% \CL on the signal cross section $\times$ branching fraction as functions of the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ resonance masses after combinign with an analysis of the all-hadronic final state.
Expected median lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane after combinign with an analysis of the all-hadronic final state.
Expected $+ 1$ s.d. lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane after combinign with an analysis of the all-hadronic final state.
Expected - 1 s.d. lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane after combinign with an analysis of the all-hadronic final state.
Observed lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane after combinign with an analysis of the all-hadronic final state.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed $\ell\nu$+jets system ($m_{\mathrm{j}\ell\nu}$, $m_{\mathrm{jj}\ell\nu}$) in data and simulation for SR1.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed $\ell\nu$+jets system ($m_{\mathrm{j}\ell\nu}$, $m_{\mathrm{jj}\ell\nu}$) in data and simulation for SR2.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed $\ell\nu$+jets system ($m_{\mathrm{j}\ell\nu}$, $m_{\mathrm{jj}\ell\nu}$) in data and simulation for SR3.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed $\ell\nu$+jets system ($m_{\mathrm{j}\ell\nu}$, $m_{\mathrm{jj}\ell\nu}$) in data and simulation for SR5.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed $\ell\nu$+jets system ($m_{\mathrm{j}\ell\nu}$, $m_{\mathrm{jj}\ell\nu}$) in data and simulation for SR6.
A search for Kaluza-Klein excited vector boson resonances, $W_\mathrm{KK}$, decaying in cascade to three W bosons via a scalar radion $R, W_\mathrm{KK}\to WR \to WWW$, with two or three massive jets is presented. The search is performed with proton-proton collision data recorded at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, during 2016-2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Two final states are simultaneously probed, one where the two W bosons produced by the R decay are reconstructed as separate, large-radius, massive jets, and one where they are merged in a single large-radius jet. The observed data are in agreement with the standard model expectations. Limits are set on the product of the $W_\mathrm{KK}$ resonance cross section and branching fraction to three W bosons in an extended warped extra-dimensional model and are the first of their kind at the LHC.
Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$ for preselected events with $\mathrm{N}_{j}$ = 2
Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{j}}$ for preselected events with $\mathrm{N}_{j}$ = 2
Distribution of the deep-WH value of the highest-mass jet with $m_{\mathrm{j}}$ > 100 GeV for preselected events with $\mathrm{N}_{j}$ = 2
Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{jjj}}$ for preselected events with $\mathrm{N}_{j}$ = 3
Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{j}}$ for preselected events with $\mathrm{N}_{j}$ = 3
Distribution of the deep-WH value of the highest-mass jet with 60 < $m_{\mathrm{j}}$ < 100 GeV for preselected events with $\mathrm{N}_{j}$ = 3
scale factors (SFs) for W, $t^{2}$, and q/g matched jets in the low-$m_{\mathrm{j}}$ and low-$p_{\mathrm{T}}$ (LL) bin, as functions of the deep-W discriminant value.
scale factors (SFs) for W, $t^{2}$, and q/g matched jets in the low-$m_{\mathrm{j}}$ and high-$p_{\mathrm{T}}$ (LH) bin, as functions of the deep-W discriminant value.
scale factors (SFs) for $t^{2}$, $t^{3,4}$, and q/g matched jets in the high-$m_{\mathrm{j}}$ and low-$p_{\mathrm{T}}$ (HL) bin, as functions of the deep-WH discriminant value.
scale factors (SFs) for $t^{2}$, $t^{3,4}$, and q/g matched jets in the high-$m_{\mathrm{j}}$ and high-$p_{\mathrm{T}}$ (HH) bin, as functions of the deep-WH discriminant value.
The deep-W discriminant of the jet with highest mass in the single-lepton sideband for LL samples.
The deep-W discriminant of the jet with highest mass in the single-lepton sideband for LH samples.
The deep-WH discriminant of the jet with highest mass in the single-lepton sideband for HL samples.
The deep-WH discriminant of the jet with highest mass in the single-lepton sideband for HH samples.
Comparison of the distribution of data and simulated backgrounds, as a function of the deep-W discriminant value for the highest-mass jet in CR1, after the scale factors have been applied.
Comparison of the distribution of data and simulated backgrounds, as a function of the deep-WH discriminant value for the highest-mass jet in CR2, after the scale factors have been applied.
Comparison of the distribution of data and simulated backgrounds, as a function of the deep-WH discriminant value for the highest-mass jet in CR3, after the scale factors have been applied.
Comparison of the distribution of data and simulated backgrounds, as a function of the deep-W discriminant value for the highest-mass jet in CR45, after the scale factors have been applied.
Comparison of the distribution of data and simulated backgrounds, as a function of the deep-W discriminant value for the highest-mass jet in CR6, after the scale factors have been applied.
The $m_{\mathrm{j}^{\mathrm{max}}}$ distributions for different jet types for SR1–3 events of the signal with $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ = 2.5 TeV, $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ = 0.2 TeV$ without deep-W (WH) constraints.
The deep-W distribution normalized to unity for the shown components of of the signal with $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ = 2.5 TeV, $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ = 0.2 TeV. The $t^{3,4}$ jets from the preselected sample, normalized to unity, are superimposed to compare shapes with the $R^{3q}$ and $R^{4q}$ distributions.
The deep-WH distribution normalized to unity for the shown components of of the signal with $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ = 2.5 TeV, $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ = 0.2 TeV. The $t^{3,4}$ jets from the preselected sample, normalized to unity, are superimposed to compare shapes with the $R^{3q}$ and $R^{4q}$ distributions.
The $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$ distribution for CR1 for data and simulation.
The $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$ distribution for CR2 for data and simulation.
The $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$ distribution for CR3 for data and simulation.
The $m_{\mathrm{jjj}}$ distribution for CR45 for data and simulation.
The $m_{\mathrm{jjj}}$ distribution for CR6 for data and simulation.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed triboson system ($m_{\mathrm{jj}}$) in data and simulation for SR1.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed triboson system ($m_{\mathrm{jj}}$) in data and simulation for SR2.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed triboson system ($m_{\mathrm{jj}}$) in data and simulation for SR3.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed triboson system ($m_{\mathrm{jjj}}$) in data and simulation for SR4.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed triboson system ($m_{\mathrm{jjj}}$) in data and simulation for SR5.
Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed triboson system ($m_{\mathrm{jjj}}$) in data and simulation for SR6.
Observed upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the signal cross section $\times$ branching fraction as functions of the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ resonance masses.
Expected median lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane.
Expected $+ 1$ s.d. lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane.
Expected - 1 s.d. lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane.
Observed lower limit contour on the $m_{\mathrm{W}_{\mathrm{KK}}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{R}}$ plane.
The production cross section of a top quark pair in association with a photon is measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data set, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, was recorded by the CMS experiment during the 2016-2018 data taking of the LHC. The measurements are performed in a fiducial volume defined at the particle level. Events with an isolated, highly energetic lepton, at least three jets from the hadronization of quarks, among which at least one is b tagged, and one isolated photon are selected. The inclusive fiducial $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}\gamma$ cross section, for a photon with transverse momentum greater than 20 GeV and pseudorapidity $\lvert \eta\rvert$$\lt$ 1.4442, is measured to be 798 $\pm$ 7 (stat) $\pm$ 48 (syst) fb, in good agreement with the prediction from the standard model at next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics. The differential cross sections are also measured as a function of several kinematic observables and interpreted in the framework of the standard model effective field theory (EFT), leading to the most stringent direct limits to date on anomalous electromagnetic dipole moment interactions of the top quark and the photon.
Distribution of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $m_{T}(W)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $m_{T}(W)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $M_{3}$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $M_{3}$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $m(l,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $m(l,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $\Delta R(j,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $\Delta R(j,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution with isolated leptons in the $N_{jet}=2$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for electrons.
Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution with isolated leptons in the $N_{jet}=2$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for electrons.
Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution with isolated leptons in the $N_{jet}=2$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for muons.
Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution with isolated leptons in the $N_{jet}=2$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for muons.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for the e channel.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for the e channel.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for the $\mu$ channel.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for the $\mu$ channel.
Extracted scale factors for the contribution from misidentified electrons for the three data-taking periods, and the Z$\gamma$, W$\gamma$ simulations.
Extracted scale factors for the contribution from misidentified electrons for the three data-taking periods, and the Z$\gamma$, W$\gamma$ simulations.
Predicted and observed yields in the control regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters.
Predicted and observed yields in the control regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters.
Predicted and observed yields in the signal regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters.
Predicted and observed yields in the signal regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters.
The measured inclusive ttgamma cross section in the fiducial phase space compared to the prediction from simulation using Madgraph_aMC@NLO at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV.
The measured inclusive ttgamma cross section in the fiducial phase space compared to the prediction from simulation using Madgraph_aMC@NLO at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV.
Summary of the measured cross section ratios with respect to the NLO cross section prediction for signal regions binned in the electron channel, muon channel and the combined single lepton measurement.
Summary of the measured cross section ratios with respect to the NLO cross section prediction for signal regions binned in the electron channel, muon channel and the combined single lepton measurement.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $p_{T}(\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $p_{T}(\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $|\eta(\gamma)|$ and the comparison to simulations.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $|\eta(\gamma)|$ and the comparison to simulations.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.
The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\eta(\gamma)|$.
The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$.
Summary of the one-dimensional intervals at 68 and 95% CL.
Summary of the one-dimensional intervals at 68 and 95% CL.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the electron channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the electron channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the muon channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the muon channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the electron channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the electron channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the muon channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the muon channel.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional profiled scan for the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional profiled scan for the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional profiled scan for the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional profiled scan for the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the two-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$ and $c^{I}_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the two-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$ and $c^{I}_{tZ}$.
Inclusive and differential cross sections of single top quark production in association with a Z boson are measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the CMS experiment. Events are selected based on the presence of three leptons, electrons or muons, associated with leptonic Z boson and top quark decays. The measurement yields an inclusive cross section of 87.9 $_{-7.3}^{+7.5}$ (stat) $_{-6.0}^{+7.3}$ (syst) fb for a dilepton invariant mass greater than 30 GeV, in agreement with standard model (SM) calculations and the most precise determination to date. The ratio between the cross sections for the top quark and the top antiquark production in association with a Z boson is measured as 2.37 $_{-0.42}^{+0.56}$ (stat) ${}_{-0.13}^{+0.27}$ (syst). Differential measurements at parton and particle levels are performed for the first time. Several kinematic observables are considered to study the modeling of the process. Results are compared to theoretical predictions with different assumptions on the source of the initial-state b quark and found to be in agreement, within the uncertainties. Additionally, the spin asymmetry, which is sensitive to the top quark polarization, is determined from the differential distribution of the polarization angle at parton level to be 0.54 $\pm$ 0.16 (stat) $\pm$ 0.06 (syst), in agreement with SM predictions.
Numerical results of inclusive cross section measurements. Each row represents a measurement: "tZq" for fully inclusive, "tZq_top" for the top quark channel, "tZq_antitop" for the top antiquark channel, "ratio" for the ratio measurement. The columns are the central value, statistical error up/down, systematic error up/down. All values are in fb, except for the ratio (dimensionless).
Numerical representation of impact plot.
Simulated signal, total background, and observed data in the signal category with exactly 1 b jet and 2-3 jets for the three data-taking years combined. For the uncertainty on the signal and background, both the total (systematic+statistical) and statistical uncertainties are provided. The uncertainty on the data is the (statistical) Poisson uncertainty. Note that this is the prefit version.
Simulated signal, total background, and observed data in the signal category with exactly 1 b jet and 4 or more jets for the three data-taking years combined. For the uncertainty on the signal and background, both the total (systematic+statistical) and statistical uncertainties are provided. The uncertainty on the data is the (statistical) Poisson uncertainty. Note that this is the prefit version.
Simulated signal, total background, and observed data in the signal category with 2 or more b jets for the three data-taking years combined. For the uncertainty on the signal and background, both the total (systematic+statistical) and statistical uncertainties are provided. The uncertainty on the data is the (statistical) Poisson uncertainty. Note that this is the prefit version.
Simulated signal, total background, and observed data in the signal category with exactly 1 b jet and 2-3 jets for the three data-taking years combined. For the uncertainty on the signal and background, both the total (systematic+statistical) and statistical uncertainties are provided. The uncertainty on the data is the (statistical) Poisson uncertainty. Note that this is the postfit version.
Simulated signal, total background, and observed data in the signal category with exactly 1 b jet and 4 or more jets for the three data-taking years combined. For the uncertainty on the signal and background, both the total (systematic+statistical) and statistical uncertainties are provided. The uncertainty on the data is the (statistical) Poisson uncertainty. Note that this is the postfit version.
Simulated signal, total background, and observed data in the signal category with 2 or more b jets for the three data-taking years combined. For the uncertainty on the signal and background, both the total (systematic+statistical) and statistical uncertainties are provided. The uncertainty on the data is the (statistical) Poisson uncertainty. Note that this is the postfit version.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Likelihood scan of the top quark spin asymmetry.
This paper describes precision measurements of the transverse momentum $p_\mathrm{T}^{\ell\ell}$ ($\ell=e,\mu$) and of the angular variable $\phi^{*}_{\eta}$ distributions of Drell-Yan lepton pairs in a mass range of 66-116 GeV. The analysis uses data from 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2015 and 2016. Measurements in electron-pair and muon-pair final states are performed in the same fiducial volumes, corrected for detector effects, and combined. Compared to previous measurements in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$7 and 8 TeV, these new measurements probe perturbative QCD at a higher centre-of-mass energy with a different composition of initial states. They reach a precision of 0.2% for the normalized spectra at low values of $p_\mathrm{T}^{\ell\ell}$. The data are compared with different QCD predictions, where it is found that predictions based on resummation approaches can describe the full spectrum within uncertainties.
Selected signal candidate events in data for both decay channels as well as the expected background contributions including their total uncertainties.
Selected signal candidate events in data for both decay channels as well as the expected background contributions including their total uncertainties.
Selected signal candidate events in data for both decay channels as well as the expected background contributions including their total uncertainties.
Overview of the detector efficiency correction factors, $C_{Z}$ , for the electron and muon channels and their systematic uncertainty contributions.
Overview of the detector efficiency correction factors, $C_{Z}$ , for the electron and muon channels and their systematic uncertainty contributions.
Overview of the detector efficiency correction factors, $C_{Z}$ , for the electron and muon channels and their systematic uncertainty contributions.
Measured inclusive cross-section in the fiducial volume in the electron and muon decay channels at Born level and their combination as well as the theory prediction at NNLO in $\alpha_{s}$ using the CT14 PDF set.
Measured inclusive cross-section in the fiducial volume in the electron and muon decay channels at Born level and their combination as well as the theory prediction at NNLO in $\alpha_{s}$ using the CT14 PDF set.
Measured inclusive cross-section in the fiducial volume in the electron and muon decay channels at Born level and their combination as well as the theory prediction at NNLO in $\alpha_{s}$ using the CT14 PDF set.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle level.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle level.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle level.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle level.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle level.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle level.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow ee$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) and Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. for the electron momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Elec. (Reco), Elec. (ID), Isolation, Trigger and Charge-ID denote the correlated uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the electron reconstruction, identification, isolation, trigger and charge-identification efficiencies; The uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow ee$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) and Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. for the electron momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Elec. (Reco), Elec. (ID), Isolation, Trigger and Charge-ID denote the correlated uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the electron reconstruction, identification, isolation, trigger and charge-identification efficiencies; The uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid}\times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow ee$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) and Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. for the electron momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Elec. (Reco), Elec. (ID), Isolation, Trigger and Charge-ID denote the correlated uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the electron reconstruction, identification, isolation, trigger and charge-identification efficiencies; The uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow ee$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) and Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. for the electron momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Elec. (Reco), Elec. (ID), Isolation, Trigger and Charge-ID denote the correlated uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the electron reconstruction, identification, isolation, trigger and charge-identification efficiencies; The uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow ee$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) and Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. for the electron momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Elec. (Reco), Elec. (ID), Isolation, Trigger and Charge-ID denote the correlated uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the electron reconstruction, identification, isolation, trigger and charge-identification efficiencies; The uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on born level for the $Z\rightarrow ee$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) and Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. for the electron momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Elec. (Reco), Elec. (ID), Isolation, Trigger and Charge-ID denote the correlated uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the electron reconstruction, identification, isolation, trigger and charge-identification efficiencies; The uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on bare level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on bare level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}p_{T}^{ll}$ measured on bare level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on bare level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on bare level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Results of the normalized differential cross-section $1/\sigma_\mathrm{fid} \times \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathrm{fid}/\mathrm{d}\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measured on bare level for the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ decay channel. The following naming convention is used: Stat.(Data), Stat.(MC) an Eff.(Uncor.), denote the statistical uncertainties due limited data and MC as well as the uncorrelated lepton efficiency uncertainties; Scale and Res. denote the muon momentum scale and resolution uncertainties; Muon Sag. denotes the uncertainty due to the muon sagitta bias; Eff. (Cor.), Isolation, Trigger and TTVA denote the uncertainties of the data/MC scale-factors for the correlated muon reconstruction, isolation, trigger and track-to-vertex matching efficiencies; the uncertainties due to the primary vertex z-distribution and pile-up reweighting are denoted as Z-Pos and Pile-Up, while the model and background uncertainties are summarized under Model and Bkg.. The sign-information is kept to track bin-to-bin changes.
Measured combined normalized differential cross-section in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle.
Measured combined normalized differential cross-section in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle.
Measured combined normalized differential cross-section in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle.
Measured combined normalized differential cross-section in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle.
Measured combined normalized differential cross-section in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle.
Measured combined normalized differential cross-section in the fiducial volume at Born level as well as a factor $k_{dressed}$ to translate from the Born particle level to the dressed particle.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of dilepton invariant mass $m_{ll}$ , the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of dilepton invariant mass $m_{ll}$ , the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of dilepton invariant mass $m_{ll}$ , the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of dilepton invariant mass $m_{ll}$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of dilepton invariant mass $m_{ll}$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of dilepton invariant mass $m_{ll}$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of lepton pseudorapidity $\eta$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of lepton pseudorapidity $\eta$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of lepton pseudorapidity $\eta$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of lepton pseudorapidity $\eta$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of lepton pseudorapidity $\eta$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of lepton pseudorapidity $\eta$, the latter with one entry for each lepton per event. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions of the MC signal sample together with the MC background samples are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of dilepton transverse momentum. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of dilepton transverse momentum. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of dilepton transverse momentum. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of dilepton transverse momentum. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of dilepton transverse momentum. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of dilepton transverse momentum. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The distribution of events passing the selection requirements in the muon channel as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The MC signal sample is simulated using Powheg+Pythia8. The predictions are normalized to the integral of the data and the total experimental uncertainty of the predicted values is shown as a grey band in the ratio of the prediction to data.
The measured normalized cross section as a function of $p_{ll}$ for the electron and muon channels and the combined result as well as their ratio together with the total uncertainties, shown as a blue band. The pull distribution between the electron and muon channels, defined as the difference between the two channels divided by the combined uncorrelated uncertainty, is also shown. The $p_{ll}$ distribution is split into linear and logarithmic scales at 30 GeV.
The measured normalized cross section as a function of $p_{ll}$ for the electron and muon channels and the combined result as well as their ratio together with the total uncertainties, shown as a blue band. The pull distribution between the electron and muon channels, defined as the difference between the two channels divided by the combined uncorrelated uncertainty, is also shown. The $p_{ll}$ distribution is split into linear and logarithmic scales at 30 GeV.
The measured normalized cross section as a function of $p_{ll}$ for the electron and muon channels and the combined result as well as their ratio together with the total uncertainties, shown as a blue band. The pull distribution between the electron and muon channels, defined as the difference between the two channels divided by the combined uncorrelated uncertainty, is also shown. The $p_{ll}$ distribution is split into linear and logarithmic scales at 30 GeV.
The measured normalized cross section as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ for the electron and muon channels and the combined result as well as their ratio together with the total uncertainties, shown as a blue band. The pull distribution between the electron and muon channels, defined as the difference between the two channels divided by the combined uncorrelated uncertainty, is also shown.
The measured normalized cross section as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ for the electron and muon channels and the combined result as well as their ratio together with the total uncertainties, shown as a blue band. The pull distribution between the electron and muon channels, defined as the difference between the two channels divided by the combined uncorrelated uncertainty, is also shown.
The measured normalized cross section as a function of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ for the electron and muon channels and the combined result as well as their ratio together with the total uncertainties, shown as a blue band. The pull distribution between the electron and muon channels, defined as the difference between the two channels divided by the combined uncorrelated uncertainty, is also shown.
Comparison of the normalized $p_{ll}$ distributions predicted by different computations: Pythia8 with the AZ tune, Powheg+Pythia8 with the AZNLO tune, Sherpa v2.2.1 and RadISH with the Born level combined measurement. The uncertainties of the measurement are shown as vertical bars and uncertainties of the Sherpa and RadISH predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $p_{ll}$ distributions predicted by different computations: Pythia8 with the AZ tune, Powheg+Pythia8 with the AZNLO tune, Sherpa v2.2.1 and RadISH with the Born level combined measurement. The uncertainties of the measurement are shown as vertical bars and uncertainties of the Sherpa and RadISH predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $p_{ll}$ distributions predicted by different computations: Pythia8 with the AZ tune, Powheg+Pythia8 with the AZNLO tune, Sherpa v2.2.1 and RadISH with the Born level combined measurement. The uncertainties of the measurement are shown as vertical bars and uncertainties of the Sherpa and RadISH predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ distributions predicted by different computations: Pythia8 with the AZ tune, Powheg+Pythia8 with the AZNLO tune, Sherpa v2.2.1 and RadISH with the Born level combined measurement. The uncertainties of the measurement are shown as vertical bars and uncertainties of the Sherpa and RadISH predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ distributions predicted by different computations: Pythia8 with the AZ tune, Powheg+Pythia8 with the AZNLO tune, Sherpa v2.2.1 and RadISH with the Born level combined measurement. The uncertainties of the measurement are shown as vertical bars and uncertainties of the Sherpa and RadISH predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ distributions predicted by different computations: Pythia8 with the AZ tune, Powheg+Pythia8 with the AZNLO tune, Sherpa v2.2.1 and RadISH with the Born level combined measurement. The uncertainties of the measurement are shown as vertical bars and uncertainties of the Sherpa and RadISH predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $p_{ll}$ distribution in the range $p_{ll}$ > 10 GeV. The Born level combined measurement is compared with predictions by Sherpa v2.2.1, fixed-order NNLOjet and NNLOjet supplied with NLO electroweak corrections. The uncertainties in the measurement are shown as vertical bars and the uncertainties in the predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $p_{ll}$ distribution in the range $p_{ll}$ > 10 GeV. The Born level combined measurement is compared with predictions by Sherpa v2.2.1, fixed-order NNLOjet and NNLOjet supplied with NLO electroweak corrections. The uncertainties in the measurement are shown as vertical bars and the uncertainties in the predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
Comparison of the normalized $p_{ll}$ distribution in the range $p_{ll}$ > 10 GeV. The Born level combined measurement is compared with predictions by Sherpa v2.2.1, fixed-order NNLOjet and NNLOjet supplied with NLO electroweak corrections. The uncertainties in the measurement are shown as vertical bars and the uncertainties in the predictions are indicated by the coloured bands.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at dressed level.
The measured combined normalized differential cross-sections, divided by the bin-width, in the fiducial volume at dressed level.
A measurement of the cross section of the associated production of a single top quark and a W boson in final states with a muon or electron and jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV is presented. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb$^{-1}$ collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC in 2016. A boosted decision tree is used to separate the tW signal from the dominant $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ background, whilst the subleading W+jets and multijet backgrounds are constrained using data-based estimates. This result is the first observation of the tW process in final states containing a muon or electron and jets, with a significance exceeding 5 standard deviations. The cross section is determined to be 89 $\pm$ 4 (stat) $\pm$ 12 (syst) pb, consistent with the standard model.
The observed and theoretical cross section. In the observed, the first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertianty is the systematic. In the expected, the first uncertainty is due to scale variations, the second due to the choice of PDF.
The systematic sources considered in the analysis and their relative contribution to the observed uncertainty. The uncertainties are divided by normalization, experimental, theoretical and statistical uncertainties, with each section ordered by their contribution to the total uncertainty.
Measurements of differential and double-differential cross sections of top quark pair ($\text{t}\overline{\text{t}}$) production are presented in the lepton+jets channels with a single electron or muon and jets in the final state. The analysis combines for the first time signatures of top quarks with low transverse momentum $p_\text{T}$, where the top quark decay products can be identified as separated jets and isolated leptons, and with high $p_\text{T}$, where the decay products are collimated and overlap. The measurements are based on proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. The cross sections are presented at the parton and particle levels, where the latter minimizes extrapolations based on theoretical assumptions. Most of the measured differential cross sections are well described by standard model predictions with the exception of some double-differential distributions. The inclusive $\text{t}\overline{\text{t}}$ production cross section is measured to be $\sigma_{\text{t}\overline{\text{t}}} = $ 791 $\pm$ 25 pb, which constitutes the most precise measurement in the lepton+jets channel to date.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
differential cross sections.
A search for pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks decaying into a top quark and a $\tau$-lepton is presented. The search is based on a dataset of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. Events are selected if they have one light lepton (electron or muon) and at least one hadronically decaying $\tau$-lepton, or at least two light leptons. In addition, two or more jets, at least one of which must be identified as containing $b$-hadrons, are required. Six final states, defined by the multiplicity and flavour of lepton candidates, are considered in the analysis. Each of them is split into multiple event categories to simultaneously search for the signal and constrain several leading backgrounds. The signal-rich event categories require at least one hadronically decaying $\tau$-lepton candidate and exploit the presence of energetic final-state objects, which is characteristic of signal events. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed in any of the considered event categories, and 95% CL upper limits are set on the production cross section as a function of the leptoquark mass, for different assumptions about the branching fractions into $t\tau$ and $b\nu$. Scalar leptoquarks decaying exclusively into $t\tau$ are excluded up to masses of 1.43 TeV while, for a branching fraction of 50% into $t\tau$, the lower mass limit is 1.22 TeV.
Selection efficiency times acceptance summed over the seven signal regions as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$, assuming B = 1.
Selection efficiency times acceptance summed over the seven signal regions as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$, assuming B = 1.
Summary of the observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ pair production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$ under the assumptions of B=1.
Summary of the observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ pair production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$ under the assumptions of B=1.
Summary of the observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on B as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$.
Summary of the observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on B as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$.
Cutflow of the preselection requirements (see Section 5) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow of the preselection requirements (see Section 5) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow of the signal region requirements in 1$\ell+\geq 1\tau$ channel (see Table 3) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. Events that satisfy the preselection requirements are considered. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow of the signal region requirements in 1$\ell+\geq 1\tau$ channel (see Table 3) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. Events that satisfy the preselection requirements are considered. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow of the signal region requirements in the 2$\ell$OS+$\geq 1\tau$ channel (see Table 4) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. Events that satisfy the preselection requirements are considered. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow of the signal region requirements in the 2$\ell$OS+$\geq 1\tau$ channel (see Table 4) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. Events that satisfy the preselection requirements are considered. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow of the signal region requirements in the $2\ell$SS/$3\ell+\geq 1\tau$ channel (see Table 5) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. Events that satisfy the preselection requirements are considered. In this channel, two signal regions (SR-L and SR-H) are defined based on $p_{\mathrm{T}, 1}^{\tau}$, with SR-L and SR-H requiring $125< p_{\mathrm{T}, 1}^{\tau} < 225$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}, 1}^{\tau}>225$ GeV, respectively. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cutflow of the signal region requirements in the $2\ell$SS/$3\ell+\geq 1\tau$ channel (see Table 5) for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ signals with $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$=0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 TeV, assuming B=1. Events that satisfy the preselection requirements are considered. In this channel, two signal regions (SR-L and SR-H) are defined based on $p_{\mathrm{T}, 1}^{\tau}$, with SR-L and SR-H requiring $125< p_{\mathrm{T}, 1}^{\tau} < 225$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}, 1}^{\tau}>225$ GeV, respectively. The yields correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
The first observation of the electroweak (EW) production of a Z boson, a photon, and two forward jets (Z$\gamma$jj) in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV is presented. A data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016-2018 is used. The measured fiducial cross section for EW Z$\gamma$jj is $\sigma_{\mathrm{EW}}$ = 5.21 $\pm$ 0.52 (stat) $\pm$ 0.56 (syst) fb = 5.21 $\pm$ 0.76 fb. Single-differential cross sections in photon, leading lepton, and leading jet transverse momenta, and double-differential cross sections in $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$ and $\lvert\Delta\eta_{\mathrm{jj}}\rvert$ are also measured. Exclusion limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings are derived at 95% confidence level in terms of the effective field theory operators $\mathrm{M}_{0}$ to $\mathrm{M}_{5}$, $\mathrm{M}_{7}$, $\mathrm{T}_{0}$ to $\mathrm{T}_{2}$, and $\mathrm{T}_{5}$ to $\mathrm{T}_{9}$.
The measured inclusive fiducial cross section for the pure electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The uncertainty of the observed results includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
The measured inclusive fiducial cross section for the combined QCD-induced and electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The uncertainty of the observed results includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
The measured single-differential cross sections in photon transverse momenta for the pure electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty of the observed results includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The measured single-differential cross sections in leading jet transverse momenta for the pure electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The measured single-differential cross sections in leading lepton transverse momenta for the pure electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The measured double-differential cross sections as functions of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$ and $|\Delta\eta_{\mathrm{jj}}|$ for the pure electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The measured single-differential cross sections in photon transverse momenta for the combined QCD-induced and electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The measured single-differential cross sections in leading jet transverse momenta for the combined QCD-induced and electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The measured single-differential cross sections in leading lepton transverse momenta for the combined QCD-induced and electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The measured double-differential cross sections as functions of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$ and $|\Delta\eta_{\mathrm{jj}}|$ for the combined QCD-induced and electroweak Z$\gamma$jj production. The total uncertainty includes the stastical uncertianty and the systematic uncertainty, while the uncertainty of the predicted results is the theoretical uncertainty from the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The last bin includes overflow events.
The expected and observed limits on the aQGC parameters at 95% confidence level. The last column presents the scattering energy values for which the amplitude would violate unitarity for the observed value of the aQGC parameter. All coupling parameter limits are set in TeV$^{-4}$, whereas the unitarity bounds are in TeV.
A search for production of the supersymmetric partners of the top quark, top squarks, is presented. The search is based on proton-proton collision events containing multiple jets, no leptons, and large transverse momentum imbalance. The data were collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. The targeted signal production scenarios are direct and gluino-mediated top squark production, including scenarios in which the top squark and neutralino masses are nearly degenerate. The search utilizes novel algorithms based on deep neural networks that identify hadronically decaying top quarks and W bosons, which are expected in many of the targeted signal models. No statistically significant excess of events is observed relative to the expectation from the standard model, and limits on the top squark production cross section are obtained in the context of simplified supersymmetric models for various production and decay modes. Exclusion limits as high as 1310 GeV are established at the 95% confidence level on the mass of the top squark for direct top squark production models, and as high as 2260 GeV on the mass of the gluino for gluino-mediated top squark production models. These results represent a significant improvement over the results of previous searches for supersymmetry by CMS in the same final state.
Top quark tagging efficiencies are shown as a function of the generator-level top quark $p_T$ for the merged tagging algorithm and resolved tagging algorithm described in the paper. This plot shows the efficiencies as calculated in a sample of simulated $t\bar{t}$ events in which one top quark decays leptonically, while the other decays hadronically. In addition to the individual algorithms shown as orange squares (boosted top quarks) and green inverted triangles (resolved top quarks), the total top quark tagging efficiency (blue dots) is also shown.
W boson tagging efficiencies are shown as a function of the generator-level W boson $p_T$ for the merged tagging algorithm described in the paper. This plot shows the W boson tagging efficiency when calculated in a sample of simulated WW events.
Comparison between data and simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $p_T^{miss}$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data. The hatched region indicates the total shape uncertainty in the simulation.
The ratio between the observed data and the simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $p_T^{miss}$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data.
Comparison between data and simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $N_t$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data. The hatched region indicates the total shape uncertainty in the simulation.
The ratio between the observed data and the simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $N_t$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data.
Comparison between data and simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $N_W$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data. The hatched region indicates the total shape uncertainty in the simulation.
The ratio between the observed data and the simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $N_W$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data.
Comparison between data and simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $N_{\text{res}}$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data. The hatched region indicates the total shape uncertainty in the simulation.
The ratio between the observed data and the simulation in the high $\Delta$m portion of the $\ell+\text{jets}$ control region as a function of $N_{\text{res}}$ after scaling the simulation to match the total yield in data.
Observed event yields in data (black points) and predicted SM background (filled histograms) for the low $\Delta$m search bins 0--52. The signal models are denoted in the legend with the masses in GeV of the SUSY particles in parentheses: $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ or $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ for the T2 or T1 signal models, respectively. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The (unstacked) distributions for two example signal models are also shown.
The ratio of the data to the total background prediction for the low $\Delta$m search bins 0--52. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Observed event yields in data (black points) and predicted SM background (filled histograms) for the high $\Delta$m search bins 53--104. The signal models are denoted in the legend with the masses in GeV of the SUSY particles in parentheses: $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ or $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ for the T2 or T1 signal models, respectively. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The (unstacked) distributions for two example signal models are also shown.
The ratio of the data to the total background prediction for the high $\Delta$m search bins 53--104. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Observed event yields in data (black points) and predicted SM background (filled histograms) for the high $\Delta$m search bins 105--152 with ${N_b = 2}$. The signal models are denoted in the legend with the masses in GeV of the SUSY particles in parentheses: $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ or $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ for the T2 or T1 signal models, respectively. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The (unstacked) distributions for two example signal models are also shown.
The ratio of the data to the total background prediction for the high $\Delta$m search bins 105--152 with ${N_b = 2}$. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Observed event yields in data (black points) and predicted SM background (filled histograms) for the high $\Delta$m search bins 153--182 with ${N_b \geq 3}$. The signal models are denoted in the legend with the masses in GeV of the SUSY particles in parentheses: $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ or $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ for the T2 or T1 signal models, respectively. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The (unstacked) distributions for two example signal models are also shown.
The ratio of the data to the total background prediction for the high $\Delta$m search bins 153--182 with ${N_b \geq 3}$. The hatched bands correspond to the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2tt simplified model as a function of the top squark and LSP masses. No interpretation is provided for signal models for which ${|{m_{\tilde{t}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} - m_t}| < 25 GeV}$ and ${m_{\tilde{t}} < 275 GeV}$ as described in the text.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2tt simplified model as a function of the top squark and LSP masses. No interpretation is provided for signal models for which ${|{m_{\tilde{t}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} - m_t}| < 25 GeV}$ and ${m_{\tilde{t}} < 275 GeV}$ as described in the text.
The observed exclusion contour of the T2tt simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$). No interpretation is provided for signal models for which ${|{m_{\tilde{t}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} - m_t}| < 25 GeV}$ and ${m_{\tilde{t}} < 275 GeV}$ as described in the text.
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T2tt simplified model and the region containing 68 and 95\% ($\pm 1$ and $2\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis. No interpretation is provided for signal models for which ${|{m_{\tilde{t}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} - m_t}| < 25 GeV}$ and ${m_{\tilde{t}} < 275 GeV}$ as described in the text.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2bW simplified model as a function of the top squark and LSP masses.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2bW simplified model as a function of the top squark and LSP masses.
The observed exclusion contour of the T2bW simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$).
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T2bW simplified model and the region containing 68 and 95\% ($\pm 1$ and $2\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2tb simplified model as a function of the top squark and LSP masses.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2tb simplified model as a function of the top squark and LSP masses.
The observed exclusion contour of the T2tb simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$).
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T2tb simplified model and the region containing 68 and 95\% ($\pm 1$ and $2\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2ttC simplified model as a function of the top squark mass and the difference between the top squark and LSP masses.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2ttC simplified model as a function of the top squark mass and the difference between the top squark and LSP masses.
The observed exclusion contour of the T2ttC simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$).
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T2ttC simplified model and the region containing 68\% ($\pm 1\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2bWC simplified model as a function of the top squark mass and the difference between the top squark and LSP masses.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2bWC simplified model as a function of the top squark mass and the difference between the top squark and LSP masses.
The observed exclusion contour of the T2bWC simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$).
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T2bWC simplified model and the region containing 68\% ($\pm 1\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2cc simplified model as a function of the top squark mass and the difference between the top squark and LSP masses.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T2cc simplified model as a function of the top squark mass and the difference between the top squark and LSP masses.
The observed exclusion contour of the T2cc simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$).
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T2cc simplified model and the region containing 68\% ($\pm 1\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T1tttt simplified model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T1tttt simplified model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.
The observed exclusion contour of the T1tttt simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$).
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T1tttt simplified model and the region containing 68 and 95\% ($\pm 1$ and $2\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T1ttbb simplified model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T1ttbb simplified model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.
The observed exclusion contour of the T1ttbb simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$).
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T1ttbb simplified model and the region containing 68 and 95\% ($\pm 1$ and $2\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis.
The observed 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T5ttcc simplified model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses. The upper limits do not take into account contributions from direct top squark pair production; however, its effect is small for $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} > 600 GeV$, which corresponds to the phase space beyond the exclusions based on direct top squark pair production. The excluded regions based on direct top squark pair production from this search and earlier searches are indicated by the hatched areas.
The expected 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section of the T5ttcc simplified model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses. The uppser limits do not take into account contributions from direct top squark pair production; however, its effect is small for $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} > 600 GeV$, which corresponds to the phase space beyond the exclusions based on direct top squark pair production. The excluded regions based on direct top squark pair production from this search and earlier searches are indicated by the hatched areas.
The observed exclusion contour of the T5ttcc simplified model with respect to approximate NNLO+NNLL signal cross sections and the change in this contour due to variation of these cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties ($\sigma_{\text{theory}}$). The expected and observed upper limits do not take into account contributions from direct top squark pair production; however, its effect is small for $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} > 600 GeV$, which corresponds to the phase space beyond the exclusions based on direct top squark pair production. The excluded regions based on direct top squark pair production from this search and earlier searches are indicated by the hatched areas.
The mean expected exclusion contour of the T5ttcc simplified model and the region containing 68% and 95% ($\pm 1$ and $2\,\sigma_{\text{experiment}}$) of the distribution of expected exclusion limits under the background-only hypothesis. The expected and observed upper limits do not take into account contributions from direct top squark pair production; however, its effect is small for $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} > 600 GeV$, which corresponds to the phase space beyond the exclusions based on direct top squark pair production. The excluded regions based on direct top squark pair production from this search and earlier searches are indicated by the hatched areas.
A search is performed for the electroweak pair production of charginos and associated production of a chargino and neutralino, each of which decays through an $R$-parity-violating coupling into a lepton and a $W$, $Z$, or Higgs boson. The trilepton invariant-mass spectrum is constructed from events with three or more leptons, targeting chargino decays that include an electron or muon and a leptonically decaying $Z$ boson. The analyzed dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data produced by the Large Hadron Collider at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and collected by the ATLAS experiment between 2015 and 2018. The data are found to be consistent with predictions from the Standard Model. The results are interpreted as limits at 95% confidence level on model-independent cross sections for processes beyond the Standard Model. Limits are also set on the production of charginos and neutralinos for a Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with an approximate $B$-$L$ symmetry. Charginos and neutralinos with masses between 100 GeV and 1100 GeV are excluded depending on the assumed decay branching fractions into a lepton (electron, muon, or $\tau$-lepton) plus a boson ($W$, $Z$, or Higgs).
This is the HEPData space for the trilepton resonance wino search, the full resolution figures can be found here https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2018-36/. The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' buttun above where they can then be found in the 'Common Resources' area. A detailed README for how to use the likelihoods is also included in this download. <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Obs.%20data%20vs%20SM%20bkg.%20exp.%20in%20CRs%20and%20VRs">Obs. data vs SM bkg. exp. in CRs and VRs</a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down </a> </ul> <b>Triangle Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$E^{miss}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $E^{miss}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$m^{min}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $m^{min}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR4$\ell$,%20$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR4$\ell$, $E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SRFR,%20$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$%20">N-1 for SRFR, $m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$L_{T}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$L_{T}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Yields%20Table">Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SRFR">Model-Independent Results Table, SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR4$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR3$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR3$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Cutflow%20Table">Cutflow Table</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SRFR">Acceptance by Final State in SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR4$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR3$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR3$\ell$</a> </ul>
This is the HEPData space for the trilepton resonance wino search, the full resolution figures can be found here https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2018-36/. The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' buttun above where they can then be found in the 'Common Resources' area. A detailed README for how to use the likelihoods is also included in this download. <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Obs.%20data%20vs%20SM%20bkg.%20exp.%20in%20CRs%20and%20VRs">Obs. data vs SM bkg. exp. in CRs and VRs</a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down </a> </ul> <b>Triangle Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$E^{miss}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $E^{miss}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$m^{min}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $m^{min}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR4$\ell$,%20$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR4$\ell$, $E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SRFR,%20$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$%20">N-1 for SRFR, $m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$L_{T}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$L_{T}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Yields%20Table">Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SRFR">Model-Independent Results Table, SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR4$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR3$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR3$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Cutflow%20Table">Cutflow Table</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SRFR">Acceptance by Final State in SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR4$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR3$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR3$\ell$</a> </ul>
The observed data and the SM background expectation in the CRs (pre-fit) and VRs (post-fit). The ''Other'' category mostly consists of tW Z, ttW, and tZ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the fractional difference between the observed data and expected yields for the CRs and the significance of the difference for the VRs, computed following the profile likelihood method described in Ref. [arXiv: physics/0702156].
The observed data and the SM background expectation in the CRs (pre-fit) and VRs (post-fit). The ''Other'' category mostly consists of tW Z, ttW, and tZ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the fractional difference between the observed data and expected yields for the CRs and the significance of the difference for the VRs, computed following the profile likelihood method described in Ref. [arXiv: physics/0702156].
The observed yields and post-fit background expectations in SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$, shown inclusively and when the direct lepton from a $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ decay is required to be an electron or muon. The Other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. Uncertainties on the background expectation include combined statistical and systematic uncertainties. The individual uncertainties may be correlated and do not necessarily add in quadrature to equal the total background uncertainty.
The observed yields and post-fit background expectations in SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$, shown inclusively and when the direct lepton from a $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ decay is required to be an electron or muon. The Other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. Uncertainties on the background expectation include combined statistical and systematic uncertainties. The individual uncertainties may be correlated and do not necessarily add in quadrature to equal the total background uncertainty.
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
$E^{miss}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$E^{miss}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{min}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{min}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and pre-fit SM background expectation as a function of $L_{T}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. Only statistical uncertainties on the data and background expecation are shown.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the background prediction
The observed data and pre-fit SM background expectation as a function of $L_{T}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. Only statistical uncertainties on the data and background expecation are shown.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the background prediction
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Summary of event selections for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 200, 500, and 800 GeV, shown separately for the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1}$ and $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ processes. The yields are normalized to a luminosity of $139 fb^{-1}$, and MC-to-data efficiency weights from triggering and from the reconstruction and identification of individual physics objects are applied at the end. After the initial selections, the yields are separated into SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$ regions, and then further separated into the $e$ and $\mu$ channels. Democratic branching fractions into bosons (W, Z, and Higgs) and leptons ($e$, $\mu$, and $\tau$ are used, with no branching fraction reweighting performed. The generator filters are discussed in detail in Section 3. The computing preselection requires at least two electrons or muons of uncalibrated pT > 9 GeV and |$\eta$| < 2.6.
Summary of event selections for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 200, 500, and 800 GeV, shown separately for the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1}$ and $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ processes. The yields are normalized to a luminosity of $139 fb^{-1}$, and MC-to-data efficiency weights from triggering and from the reconstruction and identification of individual physics objects are applied at the end. After the initial selections, the yields are separated into SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$ regions, and then further separated into the $e$ and $\mu$ channels. Democratic branching fractions into bosons (W, Z, and Higgs) and leptons ($e$, $\mu$, and $\tau$ are used, with no branching fraction reweighting performed. The generator filters are discussed in detail in Section 3. The computing preselection requires at least two electrons or muons of uncalibrated pT > 9 GeV and |$\eta$| < 2.6.
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
Double-parton scattering is investigated using events with a Z boson and jets. The Z boson is reconstructed using only the dimuon channel. The measurements are performed with proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected in the year 2016. Differential cross sections of Z + $\geq$ 1 jet and Z + $\geq$ 2 jets are measured with transverse momentum of the jets above 20 GeV and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$$\lt$ 2.4. Several distributions with sensitivity to double-parton scattering effects are measured as functions of the angle and the transverse momentum imbalance between the Z boson and the jets. The measured distributions are compared with predictions from several event generators with different hadronization models and different parameter settings for multiparton interactions. The measured distributions show a dependence on the hadronization and multiparton interaction simulation parameters, and are important input for future improvements of the simulations.
Differential cross sections as function of Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.
Differential cross sections as function of transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.
Differential cross sections as function of Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Differential cross sections as function of transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Differential cross sections as function of transverse momentum imbalance between leading and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Area normalized distribution as function of Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.
Area normalized distribution as function of transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.
Area normalized distribution as function of Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Area normalized distribution as function of transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Area normalized distribution as function of transverse momentum imbalance between leading and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events
Response matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.
Response matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events.
Response matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Response matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Response matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between the leading jet and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events.
Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between the leading jet and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for absolute differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and the leading jet for Z+ ≥ 1 jet events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for Delta Phi between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between Z boson and dijet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).
Correlation matrix for transverse momentum imbalance between the leading jet and subleading jet for Z+ ≥ 2 jets events (for normalized differential cross section measurements).
A measurement of the production cross section of top quark pairs in association with two b jets ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}$) is presented using data collected in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV by the CMS detector at the LHC corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The cross section is measured in the all-jet decay channel of the top quark pair by selecting events containing at least eight jets, of which at least two are identified as originating from the hadronization of b quarks. A combination of multivariate analysis techniques is used to reduce the large background from multijet events not containing a top quark pair, and to help discriminate between jets originating from top quark decays and other additional jets. The cross section is determined for the total phase space to be 5.5 $\pm$ 0.3 (stat)${}^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ (syst) pb and also measured for two fiducial $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}$ definitions. The measured cross sections are found to be larger than theoretical predictions by a factor of 1.5-2.4, corresponding to 1-2 standard deviations.
The measured cross sections. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertianty is the systematic.
The measured cross sections. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertianty is the systematic.
A search for the supersymmetric partners of quarks and gluons (squarks and gluinos) in final states containing jets and missing transverse momentum, but no electrons or muons, is presented. The data used in this search were recorded by the ATLAS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The results are interpreted in the context of various $R$-parity-conserving models where squarks and gluinos are produced in pairs or in association and a neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle. An exclusion limit at the 95% confidence level on the mass of the gluino is set at 2.30 TeV for a simplified model containing only a gluino and the lightest neutralino, assuming the latter is massless. For a simplified model involving the strong production of mass-degenerate first- and second-generation squarks, squark masses below 1.85 TeV are excluded if the lightest neutralino is massless. These limits extend substantially beyond the region of supersymmetric parameter space excluded previously by similar searches with the ATLAS detector.
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGd1 score distributions in signal regions GGd1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGd1 score distributions in signal regions GGd1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGo1 score distributions in signal regions GGo1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGo1 score distributions in signal regions GGo1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with direct decays.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with direct decays.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with direct decays
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with direct decays
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60~GeV and exclusio limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60~GeV and exclusio limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks for SS direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks for SS direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting gluinos for GG direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting gluinos for GG direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks and gluinos in models with one-step decay. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks and gluinos in models with one-step decay. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with one-step decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with one-step decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with direct decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with direct decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
The results of a search for direct pair production of top squarks and for dark matter in events with two opposite-charge leptons (electrons or muons), jets and missing transverse momentum are reported, using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider during Run 2 (2015-2018). This search considers the pair production of top squarks and is sensitive across a wide range of mass differences between the top squark and the lightest neutralino. Additionally, spin-0 mediator dark-matter models are considered, in which the mediator is produced in association with a pair of top quarks. The mediator subsequently decays to a pair of dark-matter particles. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background, and limits are set at 95% confidence level. The results exclude top squark masses up to about 1 TeV, and masses of the lightest neutralino up to about 500 GeV. Limits on dark-matter production are set for scalar (pseudoscalar) mediator masses up to about 250 (300) GeV.
Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference dark-matter signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference dark-matter signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Four-body selection. (a) distributions of $E_{T}^{miss}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Small\,\Delta m}$ and (b) distribution of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Large\,\Delta m}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panel indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Four-body selection. (a) distributions of $E_{T}^{miss}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Small\,\Delta m}$ and (b) distribution of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Large\,\Delta m}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panel indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the Observed limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}Z}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}, DF}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}, SF}$ and $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t} Z}$. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Three-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}Z}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{VR(1)}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$ and $\mathrm{VR(2)}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Four-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$,$\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $VR^{4-body}_{VV}$ and $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{VV,lll}$. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for the different-flavour leptons binned SRs. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for the same-flavour leptons binned SRs. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Three-body selection. Observed event yields and background fit results for the three-body selection SRs. The ''Others'' category contains contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Four-body selection. Observed event yields and background fit results for SR$^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{\mathrm{Small}\,\Delta m}$ and SR$^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{\mathrm{Large}\,\Delta m}$. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Exclusion limits contours (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio in $\tilde{t}_1--\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ masses planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The exclusion limits contours for the two-body, three-body and four-body selections are respectively shown in blue, green and red.
Exclusion limits contours (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio in $\tilde{t}_1--\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ masses planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The exclusion limits contours for the two-body, three-body and four-body selections are respectively shown in blue, green and red.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm 1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty.The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty.The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection Efficiency (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection Efficiency (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta\ m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection acceptance (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection acceptance (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Three-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal strenght for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Four-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal strenght for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Three-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Four-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for the $inclusive$ SRs. The Others category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Note that the individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up quadratically to the total background uncertainty.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=600~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=400~ GeV$ in the SRs for the two-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the scalar signal model $t\bar{t} + \phi $ with $m(\phi)=150~ GeV$ and $m(\chi)=1~ GeV$ in the SRs for the two-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the pseudoscalar signal model $t\bar{t} + a $ with $m(a)=150~ GeV$ and $m(\chi)=1~ GeV$ in the SRs for the two-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=385~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=400~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=430~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=460~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=400~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=380~ GeV$ in the SRs for the four-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=460~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=415~ GeV$ in the SRs for the four-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=400~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=320~ GeV$ in the SRs for the four-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
The results of a search for gluino and squark pair production with the pairs decaying via the lightest charginos into a final state consisting of two $W$ bosons, the lightest neutralinos ($\tilde\chi^0_1$), and quarks, are presented. The signal is characterised by the presence of a single charged lepton ($e^{\pm}$ or $\mu^{\pm}$) from a $W$ boson decay, jets, and missing transverse momentum. The analysis is performed using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data taken at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV delivered by the Large Hadron Collider and recorded by the ATLAS experiment. No statistically significant excess of events above the Standard Model expectation is found. Limits are set on the direct production of squarks and gluinos in simplified models. Masses of gluino (squark) up to 2.2 TeV (1.4 TeV) are excluded at 95% confidence level for a light $\tilde\chi^0_1$.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 2J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 2J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 2J b-tag N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 2J b-tag N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 4J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 4J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 4J b-tag N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 4J b-tag N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 6J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 6J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 6J b-tag N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 6J b-tag N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Pre-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the TR6J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties (added in quadrature). The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Pre-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the WR6J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties (added in quadrature). The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the TR6J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J low-x b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the WR6J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J low-x b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J high-x b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J high-x b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J low-x b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J low-x b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J high-x b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step x = 1/2 model.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J high-x b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step x = 1/2 model. space.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-tag signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step variable-x
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-veto signal region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. Including exemplary signal points. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step variable-x
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step x = 1/2 model.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step x = 1/2 model.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step x = 1/2 model. space.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step x = 1/2 model.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step variable-x
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for one-flavour schemes in one-step x = 1/2 model.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the gluino one-step variable-x
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for one-flavour schemes in one-step x = 1/2 model.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step x = 1/2 model.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step variable-x
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step x = 1/2 model.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step variable-x
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for one-flavour schemes in one-step x = 1/2 model.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-flavour schemes in variable-x
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours for one-flavour schemes in one-step x = 1/2 model.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-flavour schemes in variable-x
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step variable-x
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model gluino one-step x = 1/2
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-step variable-x
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model gluino one-step variable-x
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-flavour schemes in variable-x
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step x = 1/2
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours for the squark one-flavour schemes in variable-x
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step variable-x
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model gluino one-step x = 1/2
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step x=1/2 in one-flavour schemes
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model gluino one-step variable-x
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step variable-x in one-flavour schemes
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step x = 1/2
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-tag validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step variable-x
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-veto validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step x=1/2 in one-flavour schemes
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J b-tag validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Upper limits on the signal cross section for simplified model squark one-step variable-x in one-flavour schemes
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J b-veto validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the TR2J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-tag validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the WR2J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-veto validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the TR4J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR2JBT. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the WR4J control region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR2JBV. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-tag validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR4JBT. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 2J b-veto validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR4JBV. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J b-tag validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR6JBT. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 4J b-veto validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR6JBV. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-tag validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Post-fit $m_{eff}$ distribution in the 6J b-veto validation region. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR2JBT. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR2JBV. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR4JBT. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR4JBV. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR6JBT. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Event selection cutflow for two representative signal samples for the SR6JBV. The gluino, squark, chargino and neutralino masses are reported. Weighted events including statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal acceptance in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal acceptance in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for gluino production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step x = 1/2 simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR2J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jhx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx discovery region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR4Jlx b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Tag bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin1 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin2 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin3 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J b-Veto bin4 region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery high region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
Signal efficiency in SR6J discovery low region for squark production one-step variable-x simplified models. The -1 value indicates the truth yields for this point is 0 but the reco yields is not 0
The dynamics of isolated-photon plus two-jet production in $pp$ collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV are studied with the ATLAS detector at the LHC using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$. Cross sections are measured as functions of a variety of observables, including angular correlations and invariant masses of the objects in the final state, $\gamma+jet+jet$. Measurements are also performed in phase-space regions enriched in each of the two underlying physical mechanisms, namely direct and fragmentation processes. The measurements cover the range of photon (jet) transverse momenta from 150 GeV (100 GeV) to 2 TeV. The tree-level plus parton-shower predictions from SHERPA and PYTHIA as well as the next-to-leading-order QCD predictions from SHERPA are compared with the measurements. The next-to-leading-order QCD predictions describe the data adequately in shape and normalisation except for regions of phase space such as those with high values of the invariant mass or rapidity separation of the two jets, where the predictions overestimate the data.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $|y^{\textrm{jet}}|$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $|y^{\textrm{jet}}|$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $|y^{\textrm{jet}}|$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
A search for long-lived particles decaying into hadrons and at least one muon is presented. The analysis selects events that pass a muon or missing-transverse-momentum trigger and contain a displaced muon track and a displaced vertex. The analyzed dataset of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV was collected with the ATLAS detector and corresponds to 136 fb$^{-1}$. The search employs dedicated reconstruction techniques that significantly increase the sensitivity to long-lived particle decays that occur in the ATLAS inner detector. Background estimates for Standard Model processes and instrumental effects are extracted from data. The observed event yields are compatible with those expected from background processes. The results are presented as limits at 95% confidence level on model-independent cross sections for processes beyond the Standard Model, and interpreted as exclusion limits in scenarios with pair-production of long-lived top squarks that decay via a small $R$-parity-violating coupling into a quark and a muon. Top squarks with masses up to 1.7 TeV are excluded for a lifetime of 0.1 ns, and masses below 1.3 TeV are excluded for lifetimes between 0.01 ns and 30 ns.
Vertex selection acceptance for the $\tilde{t}$ $R$-hadron benchmark model as a function of the transverse decay distance $r_{DV}$.
Vertex selection acceptance for the $\tilde{t}$ $R$-hadron benchmark model as a function of the transverse decay distance $r_{DV}$.
Vertex selection efficiency for the $\tilde{t}$ $R$-hadron benchmark model as a function of the transverse decay distance $r_{DV}$.
Vertex selection efficiency for the $\tilde{t}$ $R$-hadron benchmark model as a function of the transverse decay distance $r_{DV}$.
Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.
The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the MET Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the MET Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the Muon Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the Muon Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Expected (1 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Expected (1 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Expected (2 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Expected (2 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Observed (+1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Observed (+1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Observed (-1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Observed (-1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.
Exclusion limits on the production cross section as a function of m($\tilde{t}$) are shown for several values of $\tau(\tilde{t})$ along with the nominal signal production cross section and its theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limits on the production cross section as a function of m($\tilde{t}$) are shown for several values of $\tau(\tilde{t})$ along with the nominal signal production cross section and its theoretical uncertainty.
Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.
Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.
Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the Muon Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.
Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the Muon Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.
Parameterized muon-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the muon $p_{T}$ and $d_{0}$. The muon-level efficiencies are extracted using muons passing the muon acceptance criteria.
Parameterized muon-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the muon $p_{T}$ and $d_{0}$. The muon-level efficiencies are extracted using muons passing the muon acceptance criteria.
Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated independent of the muons originating from this truth vertex.
Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated independent of the muons originating from this truth vertex.
Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated only for truth vertices which have a muon originating from them which is matched to a reconstructed muon.
Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated only for truth vertices which have a muon originating from them which is matched to a reconstructed muon.
The $p_{T}$ distribution of all muons originating from LLP decays in the samples used to calculate and validate the efficiencies.
The $p_{T}$ distribution of all muons originating from LLP decays in the samples used to calculate and validate the efficiencies.
The invariant mass and multiplicity of selected decay products of all truth vertices used in the calculation and validation of the reconstructed efficiencies.
The invariant mass and multiplicity of selected decay products of all truth vertices used in the calculation and validation of the reconstructed efficiencies.
This article presents measurements of the $t$-channel single top-quark ($t$) and top-antiquark ($\bar{t}$) total production cross sections $\sigma(tq)$ and $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, their ratio $R_{t}=\sigma(tq)/\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, and a measurement of the inclusive production cross section $\sigma(tq + \bar{t}q)$ in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV at the LHC. Differential cross sections for the $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ processes are measured as a function of the transverse momentum and the absolute value of the rapidity of $t$ and $\bar{t}$, respectively. The analyzed data set was recorded with the ATLAS detector and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 4.59 fb$^{-1}$. Selected events contain one charged lepton, large missing transverse momentum, and two or three jets. The cross sections are measured by performing a binned maximum-likelihood fit to the output distributions of neural networks. The resulting measurements are $\sigma(tq)= 46\pm 6\; \mathrm{pb}$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)= 23 \pm 4\; \mathrm{pb}$, $R_{t}=2.04\pm 0.18$, and $\sigma(tq + \bar{t}q)= 68 \pm 8\; \mathrm{pb}$, consistent with the Standard Model expectation. The uncertainty on the measured cross sections is dominated by systematic uncertainties, while the uncertainty on $R_{t}$ is mainly statistical. Using the ratio of $\sigma(tq + \bar{t}q)$ to its theoretical prediction, and assuming that the top-quark-related CKM matrix elements obey the relation $|V_{tb}|\gg |V_{ts}|, |V_{td}|$, we determine $|V_{tb}|=1.02 \pm 0.07$.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of PT(TOP).
Predicted and observed events yields for the 2-jet and 3-jet channels considered in this measurement. The multijet background is estimated using data-driven techniques (see Sec. VB); an uncertainty of $50\%$ is applied. All the other expectations are derived using theoretical cross sections and their uncertainties (see Secs. VA and VC in the paper).
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of PT(TOPBAR).
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty on the measured values of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, $R_t$, and $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. The evaluation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\,\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $1.0\,\%$ are marked with "$<1$" in the paper. To provide numerical values for this table in HEPdata, these uncertainties are approximated with $\pm 0.5\,\%$. This approximation is applied to all measurements for the following uncertainties$:$ JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by-jets, JES pileup, $b$-JES, jet vertex fraction, mistag efficiency and $W+\;$jets shape variation. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq)$ the approximation is applied in addition to the following uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $R_t$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES detector, $b$-tagging efficiency, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance and $tq$ scale variations. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(T)).
The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(TBAR)).
Parametrization factors for the $m_{t}$ dependence [see Eq. (4) in the paper] of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar tq)$, and $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$.
The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.
The value of $|V_{tb}|^{2}$ is extracted by dividing the measured value of $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$ by the prediction of the approximate NNLO calculation. The experimental and theoretical uncertainties are added in quadrature.
Event yields for the 2-jet-$\ell^{+}$ and 2-jet-$\ell^{-}$ HPR channels. The expectation for the signal and background yields correspond to the result of the binned maximum-likelihood fit described in Sec. $\mathrm{VI~D}$ in the paper. The uncertainty of the expectations is the normalization uncertainty of each process after the fit, as described in Sec. $\mathrm{VII~F}$ in the paper.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $|y|$ distribution.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(\bar t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $|y|$ distribution.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Comparison between the measured differential cross sections and the predictions from the NLO calculation using the MSTW2008 PDF set. For each variable and prediction a $\chi^{2}$ value is calculated with HERAfitter using the covariance matrix of each measured spectrum. The theory uncertainties of the predictions are treated as uncorrelated. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is equal to the number of bins in the measured spectrum.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, mistag efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The JES $\eta$ intercalibration uncertainty has a sign switch from the first to the second bin. For the $tq$ generator $+$ parton shower uncertainty a sign switch is denoted with $\mp$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $c-$tagging efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content $:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet energy resolution, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$ tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.
Measurements of both the inclusive and differential production cross sections of a top-quark-antiquark pair in association with a $Z$ boson ($t\bar{t}Z$) are presented. The measurements are performed by targeting final states with three or four isolated leptons (electrons or muons) and are based on $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collision data with an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$, recorded from 2015 to 2018 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The inclusive cross section is measured to be $\sigma_{t\bar{t}Z} = 0.99 \pm 0.05$ (stat.) $\pm 0.08$ (syst.) pb, in agreement with the most precise theoretical predictions. The differential measurements are presented as a function of a number of kinematic variables which probe the kinematics of the $t\bar{t}Z$ system. Both absolute and normalised differential cross-section measurements are performed at particle and parton levels for specific fiducial volumes and are compared with theoretical predictions at different levels of precision, based on a $\chi^{2}/$ndf and $p$-value computation. Overall, good agreement is observed between the unfolded data and the predictions.
The measured $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross-section value and its uncertainty based on the fit results from the combined trilepton and tetralepton channels. The value corresponds to the phase-space region where the difermion mass from the Z boson decay lies in the range $70 < m_{f\bar{f}} < 110$ GeV.
The measured $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross-section value and its uncertainty based on the fit results from the combined trilepton and tetralepton channels. The value corresponds to the phase-space region where the difermion mass from the Z boson decay lies in the range $70 < m_{f\bar{f}} < 110$ GeV.
List of relative uncertainties of the measured inclusive $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross section from the combined fit. The uncertainties are symmetrised for presentation and grouped into the categories described in the text. The quadratic sum of the individual uncertainties is not equal to the total uncertainty due to correlations introduced by the fit.
List of relative uncertainties of the measured inclusive $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross section from the combined fit. The uncertainties are symmetrised for presentation and grouped into the categories described in the text. The quadratic sum of the individual uncertainties is not equal to the total uncertainty due to correlations introduced by the fit.
The definitions of the trilepton signal regions: for the inclusive measurement, a combination of the regions with pseudo-continuous $b$-tagging 3$\ell$-Z-1$b$4$j$-PCBT and 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$-PCBT is used, whereas for the differential measurement, only the region 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$, with a fixed $b$-tagging WP is employed.
The definitions of the trilepton signal regions: for the inclusive measurement, a combination of the regions with pseudo-continuous $b$-tagging 3$\ell$-Z-1$b$4$j$-PCBT and 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$-PCBT is used, whereas for the differential measurement, only the region 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$, with a fixed $b$-tagging WP is employed.
The definitions of the four tetralepton signal regions. The regions are defined to target different $b$-jet multiplicities and flavour combinations of the non-Z leptons.
The definitions of the four tetralepton signal regions. The regions are defined to target different $b$-jet multiplicities and flavour combinations of the non-Z leptons.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.
The production of a Z boson, decaying to two charged leptons, in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV is measured. Data recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC are used that correspond to an integrated luminosity of 2.19 fb$^{-1}$. The cross section is measured as a function of the jet multiplicity and its dependence on the transverse momentum of the Z boson, the jet kinematic variables (transverse momentum and rapidity), the scalar sum of the jet momenta, which quantifies the hadronic activity, and the balance in transverse momentum between the reconstructed jet recoil and the Z boson. The measurements are compared with predictions from four different calculations. The first two merge matrix elements with different parton multiplicities in the final state and parton showering, one of which includes one-loop corrections. The third is a fixed-order calculation with next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy for the process with a Z boson and one parton in the final state. The fourth combines the fully differential next-to-next-to-leading order calculation with next-to-next-to-leading logarithm resummation and parton showering.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of inclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}^{\text{min}}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of inclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}^{\text{min}}$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momementum of the Z boson, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})$, for events with at least one jet and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momementum of the Z boson, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})$, for events with at least one jet.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momenum of the first jet, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momenum of the first jet, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momenum of the second jet, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momenum of the second jet, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momenum of the third jet, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momenum of the third jet, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the absolute rapidity of the first jet, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the absolute rapidity of the first jet, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the absolute rapidity of the second jet, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the absolute rapidity of the second jet, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the absolute rapidity of the third jet, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the absolute rapidity of the third jet, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the $H_{\text{T}}$ observable for event with at least one jet and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the $H_{\text{T}}$ observable for event with at least one jet.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the $H_{\text{T}}$ observable for event with at least two jets and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the $H_{\text{T}}$ observable for event with at least two jets.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the $H_{\text{T}}$ observable for event with at least three jets and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the $H_{\text{T}}$ observable for event with at least three jets.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momentum balance between the Z boson and the accompanying jets, $p_{\text{T}}^{\text{bal}}$, for events with at least one jet and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momentum balance between the Z boson and the accompanying jets, $p_{\text{T}}^{\text{bal}}$, for events with at least one jet.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momentum balance between the Z boson and the accompanying jets, $p_{\text{T}}^{\text{bal}}$, for events with at least two jets and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momentum balance between the Z boson and the accompanying jets, $p_{\text{T}}^{\text{bal}}$, for events with at least two jets.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momentum balance between the Z boson and the accompanying jets, $p_{\text{T}}^{\text{bal}}$, for events with at least three jets and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the transverse momentum balance between the Z boson and the accompanying jets, $p_{\text{T}}^{\text{bal}}$, for events with at least three jets.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the JZB variable with no restriction on $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})$ and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the JZB variable with no restriction on $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})$.
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the JZB variable for $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})\leq50\,$GeV) and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the JZB variable for $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})\leq50\,$GeV).
Measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the JZB variable for $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>50\,$GeV and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the measured cross section for Z+jets as a function of the JZB variable for $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>50\,$GeV.
A search is performed for W' bosons decaying to a top and a bottom quark in the all-hadronic final state, in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The analyzed data were collected by the CMS experiment between 2016 and 2018 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. Deep neural network algorithms are used to identify the jet initiated by the bottom quark and the jet containing the decay products of the top quark when the W boson from the top quark decays hadronically. No excess above the estimated standard model background is observed. Upper limits on the production cross sections of W' bosons decaying to a top and a bottom quark are set. Both left- and right-handed W' bosons with masses below 3.4 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level, and the most stringent limits to date on W' bosons decaying to a top and a bottom quark in the all-hadronic final state are obtained.
The reconstructed m$_{tb}$ distributions in data and expected background in signal region for the data taking period of 2016. Yield in each bin is divided by the corresponding bin width.
The reconstructed m$_{tb}$ distributions in data and expected background in validation region for the data taking period of 2016. Yield in each bin is divided by the corresponding bin width.
The reconstructed m$_{tb}$ distributions in data and expected background in signal region for the data taking period of 2017. Yield in each bin is divided by the corresponding bin width.
The reconstructed m$_{tb}$ distributions in data and expected background in validation region for the data taking period of 2017. Yield in each bin is divided by the corresponding bin width.
The reconstructed m$_{tb}$ distributions in data and expected background in signal region for the data taking period of 2018. Yield in each bin is divided by the corresponding bin width.
The reconstructed m$_{tb}$ distributions in data and expected background in validation region for the data taking period of 2018. Yield in each bin is divided by the corresponding bin width.
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section for the production of right-handed W' boson using data and backgrounds in three years combined. Theory prediction is also shown.
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section for the production of left-handed W' boson using data and backgrounds in three years combined. Theory prediction is also shown.
In this paper, a new technique for reconstructing and identifying hadronically decaying $\tau^+\tau^-$ pairs with a large Lorentz boost, referred to as the di-$\tau$ tagger, is developed and used for the first time in the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. A benchmark di-$\tau$ tagging selection is employed in the search for resonant Higgs boson pair production, where one Higgs boson decays into a boosted $b\bar{b}$ pair and the other into a boosted $\tau^+\tau^-$ pair, with two hadronically decaying $\tau$-leptons in the final state. Using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton$-$proton collision data recorded at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, the efficiency of the di-$\tau$ tagger is determined and the background with quark- or gluon-initiated jets misidentified as di-$\tau$ objects is estimated. The search for a heavy, narrow, scalar resonance produced via gluon$-$gluon fusion and decaying into two Higgs bosons is carried out in the mass range 1$-$3 TeV using the same dataset. No deviations from the Standard Model predictions are observed, and 95% confidence-level exclusion limits are set on this model.
Signal acceptance times selection efficiency as a function of the resonance mass, at various stages of the event selection. From top to bottom: an event pre-selection (trigger, object definitions and $E_{T}^{miss}>10$ GeV) is performed first; the requirements on the di-$\tau$ object and large-$R$ jet detailed in the text are then applied; finally, the $HH$ SR definition must be satisfied.
Signal acceptance times selection efficiency as a function of the resonance mass, at various stages of the event selection. From top to bottom: an event pre-selection (trigger, object definitions and $E_{T}^{miss}>10$ GeV) is performed first; the requirements on the di-$\tau$ object and large-$R$ jet detailed in the text are then applied; finally, the $HH$ SR definition must be satisfied.
Distribution of $m^{vis}_{HH}$ after applying all the event selection that define the $HH$ SR, except the requirement on $m^{vis}_{HH}$. The background labelled as "Others" contains $W$+jets, diboson, $t\bar{t}$ and single-top-quark processes. The $X\rightarrow HH \rightarrow b\bar{b}\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ signal is overlaid for two resonance mass hypotheses with a cross-section set to the expected limit, while all backgrounds are pre-fit. The first and the last bins contains the under-flow and over-flow bin entries, respectively. The hatched bands represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Distribution of $m^{vis}_{HH}$ after applying all the event selection that define the $HH$ SR, except the requirement on $m^{vis}_{HH}$. The background labelled as "Others" contains $W$+jets, diboson, $t\bar{t}$ and single-top-quark processes. The $X\rightarrow HH \rightarrow b\bar{b}\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ signal is overlaid for two resonance mass hypotheses with a cross-section set to the expected limit, while all backgrounds are pre-fit. The first and the last bins contains the under-flow and over-flow bin entries, respectively. The hatched bands represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Event yields of the various estimated backgrounds and data, computed in the signal region of the search for $X\rightarrow HH \rightarrow b\bar{b}\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$. The background labelled as "Others" contains $W$+jets, diboson, $t\bar{t}$ and single-top-quark processes. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are quoted. The background yields and uncertainties are pre-fit and are found to be similar to those post-fit.
Event yields of the various estimated backgrounds and data, computed in the signal region of the search for $X\rightarrow HH \rightarrow b\bar{b}\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$. The background labelled as "Others" contains $W$+jets, diboson, $t\bar{t}$ and single-top-quark processes. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are quoted. The background yields and uncertainties are pre-fit and are found to be similar to those post-fit.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production of a heavy, narrow-width, scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Higgs bosons ($X\rightarrow HH$). The final state used in the search consists of a boosted $b\bar{b}$ pair and a boosted hadronically decaying $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ pair, and the SM braching ratio of the Higgs boson are assumed. The $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ variations about the expected limit are indicated by the error bands. Two different requirements are applied on the visible mass of the two boosted Higgs boson candidates for the resonance mass hypotheses of 1.6 TeV and 2.5 TeV, leading to discontinuities in the limits (at 1.6 TeV, the difference between imposing no requirement and $m^{vis}_{HH}>900$ GeV is less than 1% though).
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production of a heavy, narrow-width, scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Higgs bosons ($X\rightarrow HH$). The final state used in the search consists of a boosted $b\bar{b}$ pair and a boosted hadronically decaying $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ pair, and the SM braching ratio of the Higgs boson are assumed. The $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ variations about the expected limit are indicated by the error bands. Two different requirements are applied on the visible mass of the two boosted Higgs boson candidates for the resonance mass hypotheses of 1.6 TeV and 2.5 TeV, leading to discontinuities in the limits (at 1.6 TeV, the difference between imposing no requirement and $m^{vis}_{HH}>900$ GeV is less than 1% though).
Differential cross-sections are measured for top-quark pair production in the all-hadronic decay mode, using proton$-$proton collision events collected by the ATLAS experiment in which all six decay jets are separately resolved. Absolute and normalised single- and double-differential cross-sections are measured at particle and parton level as a function of various kinematic variables. Emphasis is placed on well-measured observables in fully reconstructed final states, as well as on the study of correlations between the top-quark pair system and additional jet radiation identified in the event. The study is performed using data from proton$-$proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13~\mbox{TeV}$ collected by the ATLAS detector at CERN's Large Hadron Collider in 2015 and 2016, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $\mbox{36.1 fb}^{-1}$. The rapidities of the individual top quarks and of the top-quark pair are well modelled by several independent event generators. Significant mismodelling is observed in the transverse momenta of the leading three jet emissions, while the leading top-quark transverse momentum and top-quark pair transverse momentum are both found to be incompatible with several theoretical predictions.
- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> <b>Fiducial phase space definition:</b><br/> <ul> <li> NLEP = 0, either E or MU, PT > 15 GeV, ABS ETA < 1.37 <li> NJETS >= 6, PT > 25 GeV, ABS ETA < 2.5 <li> NBJETS >= 2 </ul><br/> <b>Particle level:</b><br/> <u>1D:</u><br/> Spectra: <ul> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 1">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E1J1</a> (Table 1) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 3">DSIG/DDR_E1J1</a> (Table 3) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 5">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 5) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 7">DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 7) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 9">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 9) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 11">DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 11) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 13">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 13) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 15">DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 15) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 17">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 17) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 19">DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 19) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 21">1/SIG*DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 21) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 23">DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 23) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 25">1/SIG*DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 25) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 27">DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 27) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 29">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 29) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 31">DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 31) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 33">1/SIG*DSIG/DN_JETS</a> (Table 33) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 35">DSIG/DN_JETS</a> (Table 35) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 37">1/SIG*DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 37) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 39">DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 39) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 41">1/SIG*DSIG/DABSPOUT</a> (Table 41) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 43">DSIG/DABSPOUT</a> (Table 43) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 45">1/SIG*DSIG/DABSPCROSS</a> (Table 45) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 47">DSIG/DABSPCROSS</a> (Table 47) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 49">1/SIG*DSIG/DZ_TT</a> (Table 49) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 51">DSIG/DZ_TT</a> (Table 51) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 53">1/SIG*DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 53) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 55">DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 55) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 57">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST </a> (Table 57) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 59">DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST </a> (Table 59) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 61">1/SIG*DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 61) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 63">DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 63) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 65">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWT1</a> (Table 65) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 67">DSIG/DRWT1</a> (Table 67) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 69">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWT2</a> (Table 69) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 71">DSIG/DRWT2</a> (Table 71) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 73">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWB1</a> (Table 73) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 75">DSIG/DRWB1</a> (Table 75) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 77">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWB2</a> (Table 77) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 79">DSIG/DRWB2</a> (Table 79) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 81">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E1TC</a> (Table 81) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 83">DSIG/DDR_E1TC</a> (Table 83) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 85">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E2TC</a> (Table 85) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 87">DSIG/DDR_E2TC</a> (Table 87) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 89">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E3TC</a> (Table 89) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 91">DSIG/DDR_E3TC</a> (Table 91) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 93">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E1T1</a> (Table 93) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 95">DSIG/DRPT_E1T1</a> (Table 95) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 97">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E2T1</a> (Table 97) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 99">DSIG/DRPT_E2T1</a> (Table 99) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 101">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E3T1</a> (Table 101) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 103">DSIG/DRPT_E3T1</a> (Table 103) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 105">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_TTE1</a> (Table 105) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 107">DSIG/DRPT_TTE1</a> (Table 107) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 109">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E1J1</a> (Table 109) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 111">DSIG/DRPT_E1J1</a> (Table 111) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 113">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E2J1</a> (Table 113) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 115">DSIG/DRPT_E2J1</a> (Table 115) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 117">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E3J1</a> (Table 117) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 119">DSIG/DRPT_E3J1</a> (Table 119) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 121">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E2E1</a> (Table 121) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 123">DSIG/DDR_E2E1</a> (Table 123) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 125">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E3E1</a> (Table 125) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 127">DSIG/DDR_E3E1</a> (Table 127) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 129">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E2E1</a> (Table 129) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 131">DSIG/DRPT_E2E1</a> (Table 131) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 133">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E3E1</a> (Table 133) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 135">DSIG/DRPT_E3E1</a> (Table 135) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 137">SIG</a> (Table 137) </ul><br/> Covariances: <ul> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 2">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E1J1</a> (Table 2) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 4">DSIG/DDR_E1J1</a> (Table 4) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 6">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 6) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 8">DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 8) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 10">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 10) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 12">DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 12) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 14">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 14) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 16">DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 16) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 18">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 18) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 20">DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 20) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 22">1/SIG*DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 22) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 24">DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 24) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 26">1/SIG*DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 26) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 28">DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 28) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 30">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 30) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 32">DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 32) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 34">1/SIG*DSIG/DN_JETS</a> (Table 34) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 36">DSIG/DN_JETS</a> (Table 36) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 38">1/SIG*DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 38) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 40">DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 40) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 42">1/SIG*DSIG/DABSPOUT</a> (Table 42) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 44">DSIG/DABSPOUT</a> (Table 44) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 46">1/SIG*DSIG/DABSPCROSS</a> (Table 46) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 48">DSIG/DABSPCROSS</a> (Table 48) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 50">1/SIG*DSIG/DZ_TT</a> (Table 50) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 52">DSIG/DZ_TT</a> (Table 52) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 54">1/SIG*DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 54) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 56">DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 56) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 58">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST </a> (Table 58) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 60">DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST </a> (Table 60) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 62">1/SIG*DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 62) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 64">DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 64) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 66">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWT1</a> (Table 66) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 68">DSIG/DRWT1</a> (Table 68) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 70">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWT2</a> (Table 70) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 72">DSIG/DRWT2</a> (Table 72) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 74">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWB1</a> (Table 74) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 76">DSIG/DRWB1</a> (Table 76) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 78">1/SIG*DSIG/DRWB2</a> (Table 78) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 80">DSIG/DRWB2</a> (Table 80) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 82">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E1TC</a> (Table 82) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 84">DSIG/DDR_E1TC</a> (Table 84) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 86">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E2TC</a> (Table 86) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 88">DSIG/DDR_E2TC</a> (Table 88) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 90">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E3TC</a> (Table 90) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 92">DSIG/DDR_E3TC</a> (Table 92) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 94">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E1T1</a> (Table 94) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 96">DSIG/DRPT_E1T1</a> (Table 96) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 98">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E2T1</a> (Table 98) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 100">DSIG/DRPT_E2T1</a> (Table 100) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 102">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E3T1</a> (Table 102) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 104">DSIG/DRPT_E3T1</a> (Table 104) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 106">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_TTE1</a> (Table 106) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 108">DSIG/DRPT_TTE1</a> (Table 108) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 110">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E1J1</a> (Table 110) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 112">DSIG/DRPT_E1J1</a> (Table 112) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 114">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E2J1</a> (Table 114) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 116">DSIG/DRPT_E2J1</a> (Table 116) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 118">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E3J1</a> (Table 118) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 120">DSIG/DRPT_E3J1</a> (Table 120) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 122">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E2E1</a> (Table 122) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 124">DSIG/DDR_E2E1</a> (Table 124) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 126">1/SIG*DSIG/DDR_E3E1</a> (Table 126) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 128">DSIG/DDR_E3E1</a> (Table 128) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 130">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E2E1</a> (Table 130) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 132">DSIG/DRPT_E2E1</a> (Table 132) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 134">1/SIG*DSIG/DRPT_E3E1</a> (Table 134) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 136">DSIG/DRPT_E3E1</a> (Table 136) </ul><br/> <u>2D:</u><br/> Spectra: <ul> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 138">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 138) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 139">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 139) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 140">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 140) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 141">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 141) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 152">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 152) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 153">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 153) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 154">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 154) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 155">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 155) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 166">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 166) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 167">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 167) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 168">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 168) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 169">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 169) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 180">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 180) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 181">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 181) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 182">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 182) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 183">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 183) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 194">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 194) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 195">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 195) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 196">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 196) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 197">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 197) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 208">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 208) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 209">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 209) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 210">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 210) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 211">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 211) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 222">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 222) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 223">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 223) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 224">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 224) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 225">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 225) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 236">D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 236) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 237">D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 237) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 238">D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 238) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 239">D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 239) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 250">1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 250) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 251">1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 251) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 252">1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 252) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 253">1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 253) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 264">D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 264) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 265">D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 265) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 266">D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 266) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 267">D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 267) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 278">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 278) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 279">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 279) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 280">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 280) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 281">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 281) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 292">D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 6)</a> (Table 292) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 293">D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 7)</a> (Table 293) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 294">D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS = 8)</a> (Table 294) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 295">D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS (N_JETS > 8)</a> (Table 295) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 306">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 620.0 GeV)</a> (Table 306) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 307">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 620.0 GeV < TT_M < 835.0 GeV)</a> (Table 307) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 308">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 835.0 GeV < TT_M < 1050.0 GeV)</a> (Table 308) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 309">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 1050.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 309) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 320">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 620.0 GeV)</a> (Table 320) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 321">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 620.0 GeV < TT_M < 835.0 GeV)</a> (Table 321) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 322">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 835.0 GeV < TT_M < 1050.0 GeV)</a> (Table 322) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 323">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M ( 1050.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 323) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 334">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 620.0 GeV)</a> (Table 334) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 335">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 620.0 GeV < TT_M < 835.0 GeV)</a> (Table 335) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 336">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 835.0 GeV < TT_M < 1050.0 GeV)</a> (Table 336) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 337">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 1050.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 337) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 348">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 620.0 GeV)</a> (Table 348) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 349">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 620.0 GeV < TT_M < 835.0 GeV)</a> (Table 349) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 350">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 835.0 GeV < TT_M < 1050.0 GeV)</a> (Table 350) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 351">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 1050.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 351) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 362">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 620.0 GeV)</a> (Table 362) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 363">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 620.0 GeV < TT_M < 835.0 GeV)</a> (Table 363) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 364">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 835.0 GeV < TT_M < 1050.0 GeV)</a> (Table 364) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 365">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 1050.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 365) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 376">D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 620.0 GeV)</a> (Table 376) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 377">D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 620.0 GeV < TT_M < 835.0 GeV)</a> (Table 377) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 378">D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 835.0 GeV < TT_M < 1050.0 GeV)</a> (Table 378) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 379">D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 1050.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 379) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 390">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 0.0 GeV < T2_PT < 175.0 GeV)</a> (Table 390) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 391">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 175.0 GeV < T2_PT < 275.0 GeV)</a> (Table 391) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 392">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 275.0 GeV < T2_PT < 385.0 GeV)</a> (Table 392) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 393">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 385.0 GeV < T2_PT < 1000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 393) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 404">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 0.0 GeV < T2_PT < 175.0 GeV)</a> (Table 404) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 405">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 175.0 GeV < T2_PT < 275.0 GeV)</a> (Table 405) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 406">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 275.0 GeV < T2_PT < 385.0 GeV)</a> (Table 406) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 407">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 385.0 GeV < T2_PT < 1000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 407) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 418">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 645.0 GeV)</a> (Table 418) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 419">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 645.0 GeV < TT_M < 795.0 GeV)</a> (Table 419) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 420">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 795.0 GeV < TT_M < 1080.0 GeV)</a> (Table 420) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 421">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 1080.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 421) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 432">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 645.0 GeV)</a> (Table 432) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 433">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 645.0 GeV < TT_M < 795.0 GeV)</a> (Table 433) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 434">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 795.0 GeV < TT_M < 1080.0 GeV)</a> (Table 434) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 435">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 1080.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 435) </ul><br/> Covariances:<br/><ul> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 142">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 142) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 143">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 143) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 144">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 144) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 145">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 145) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 146">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 146) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 147">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 147) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 148">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 148) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 149">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 149) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 150">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 150) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 151">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 151) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 156">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 156) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 157">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 157) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 158">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 158) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 159">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 159) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 160">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 160) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 161">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 161) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 162">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 162) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 163">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 163) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 164">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 164) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 165">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 165) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 170">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 170) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 171">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 171) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 172">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 172) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 173">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 173) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 174">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 174) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 175">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 175) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 176">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 176) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 177">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 177) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 178">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 178) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 179">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 179) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 184">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 184) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 185">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 185) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 186">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 186) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 187">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 187) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 188">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 188) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 189">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 189) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 190">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 190) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 191">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 191) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 192">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 192) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 193">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 193) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 198">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 198) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 199">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 199) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 200">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 200) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 201">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 201) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 202">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 202) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 203">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 203) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 204">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 204) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 205">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 205) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 206">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 206) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 207">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 207) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 212">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 212) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 213">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 213) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 214">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 214) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 215">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 215) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 216">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 216) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 217">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 217) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 218">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 218) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 219">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 219) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 220">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 220) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 221">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 221) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 226">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 226) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 227">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 227) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 228">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 228) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 229">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 229) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 230">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 230) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 231">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 231) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 232">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 232) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 233">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 233) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 234">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 234) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 235">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 235) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 240">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 240) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 241">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 241) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 242">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 242) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 243">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 243) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 244">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 244) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 245">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 245) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 246">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 246) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 247">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 247) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 248">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 248) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 249">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPOUT/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 249) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 254">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 254) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 255">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 255) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 256">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 256) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 257">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 257) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 258">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 258) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 259">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 259) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 260">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 260) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 261">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 261) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 262">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 262) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 263">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 263) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 268">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 268) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 269">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 269) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 270">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 270) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 271">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 271) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 272">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 272) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 273">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 273) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 274">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 274) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 275">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 275) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 276">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 276) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 277">Matrix for D2SIG/DDELTAPHI/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 277) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 282">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 282) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 283">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 283) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 284">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 284) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 285">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 285) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 286">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 286) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 287">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 287) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 288">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 288) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 289">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 289) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 290">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 290) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 291">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 291) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 296">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 1th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 296) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 297">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 2th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 297) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 298">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 2th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 298) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 299">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 3th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 299) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 300">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 3th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 300) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 301">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 3th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 301) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 302">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 1th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 302) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 303">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 2th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 303) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 304">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 3th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 304) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 305">Matrix for D2SIG/DABSPCROSS/DN_JETS between the 4th and 4th bins of N_JETS</a> (Table 305) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 310">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 310) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 311">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 311) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 312">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 312) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 313">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 313) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 314">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 314) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 315">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 315) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 316">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 316) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 317">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 317) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 318">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 318) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 319">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 319) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 324">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 324) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 325">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 325) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 326">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 326) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 327">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 327) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 328">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 328) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 329">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 329) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 330">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 330) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 331">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 331) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 332">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 332) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 333">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 333) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 338">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 338) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 339">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 339) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 340">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 340) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 341">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 341) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 342">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 342) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 343">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 343) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 344">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 344) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 345">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 345) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 346">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 346) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 347">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 347) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 352">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 352) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 353">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 353) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 354">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 354) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 355">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 355) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 356">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 356) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 357">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 357) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 358">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 358) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 359">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 359) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 360">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 360) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 361">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 361) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 366">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 366) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 367">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 367) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 368">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 368) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 369">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 369) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 370">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 370) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 371">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 371) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 372">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 372) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 373">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 373) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 374">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 374) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 375">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 375) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 380">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 380) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 381">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 381) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 382">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 382) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 383">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 383) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 384">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 384) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 385">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 385) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 386">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 386) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 387">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 387) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 388">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 388) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 389">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 389) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 394">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 1th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 394) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 395">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 395) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 396">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 396) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 397">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 397) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 398">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 398) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 399">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 399) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 400">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 400) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 401">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 401) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 402">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 402) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 403">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 4th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 403) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 408">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 1th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 408) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 409">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 409) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 410">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 410) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 411">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 411) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 412">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 412) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 413">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 413) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 414">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 414) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 415">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 415) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 416">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 416) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 417">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 4th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 417) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 422">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 422) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 423">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 423) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 424">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 424) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 425">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 425) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 426">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 426) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 427">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 427) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 428">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 428) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 429">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 429) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 430">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 430) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 431">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 431) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 436">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 436) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 437">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 437) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 438">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 438) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 439">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 439) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 440">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 440) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 441">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 441) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 442">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 442) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 443">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 443) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 444">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 444) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 445">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 445) </ul><br/> <b>Parton level:</b><br/> <u>1D:</u><br/> Spectra:<br/> <ul><br/> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 446">1/SIG*DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 446) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 448">DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 448) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 450">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 450) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 452">DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 452) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 454">1/SIG*DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 454) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 456">DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 456) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 458">1/SIG*DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 458) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 460">DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 460) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 462">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 462) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 464">DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 464) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 466">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST</a> (Table 466) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 468">DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST</a> (Table 468) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 470">1/SIG*DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 470) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 472">DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 472) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 474">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 474) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 476">DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 476) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 478">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 478) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 480">DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 480) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 482">1/SIG*DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 482) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 484">DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 484) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 486">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 486) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 488">DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 488) </ul><br/> Covariances:<br/> <ul><br/> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 447">1/SIG*DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 447) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 449">DSIG/DCHI_TT</a> (Table 449) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 451">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 451) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 453">DSIG/DTT_PT</a> (Table 453) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 455">1/SIG*DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 455) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 457">DSIG/DDELTAPHI</a> (Table 457) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 459">1/SIG*DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 459) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 461">DSIG/DT2_PT</a> (Table 461) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 463">1/SIG*DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 463) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 465">DSIG/DTT_M</a> (Table 465) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 467">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST</a> (Table 467) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 469">DSIG/DABS_Y_BOOST</a> (Table 469) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 471">1/SIG*DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 471) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 473">DSIG/DT1_PT</a> (Table 473) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 475">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 475) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 477">DSIG/DABS_TT_Y</a> (Table 477) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 479">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 479) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 481">DSIG/DABS_T2_Y</a> (Table 481) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 483">1/SIG*DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 483) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 485">DSIG/DHT_TT</a> (Table 485) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 487">1/SIG*DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 487) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 489">DSIG/DABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 489) </ul><br/> <u>2D:</u><br/> Spectra:<br/> <ul><br/> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 490">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 490) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 491">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 491) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 492">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 492) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 499">D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 499) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 500">D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 500) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 501">D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 501) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 508">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 0.0 < ABS_T1_Y < 0.5 )</a> (Table 508) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 509">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 0.5 < ABS_T1_Y < 1.0 )</a> (Table 509) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 510">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 1.0 < ABS_T1_Y < 1.5 )</a> (Table 510) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 511">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 1.5 < ABS_T1_Y < 2.5 )</a> (Table 511) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 522">D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 0.0 < ABS_T1_Y < 0.5 )</a> (Table 522) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 523">D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 0.5 < ABS_T1_Y < 1.0 )</a> (Table 523) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 524">D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 1.0 < ABS_T1_Y < 1.5 )</a> (Table 524) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 525">D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y ( 1.5 < ABS_T1_Y < 2.5 )</a> (Table 525) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 536">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 0.0 GeV < M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 536) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 537">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 700.0 GeV < M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 537) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 538">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 970.0 GeV < M < 1315.0 GeV)</a> (Table 538) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 539">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 1315.0 GeV < M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 539) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 550">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 0.0 GeV < M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 550) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 551">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 700.0 GeV < M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 551) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 552">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 970.0 GeV < M < 1315.0 GeV)</a> (Table 552) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 553">D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM ( 1315.0 GeV < M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 553) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 564">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 564) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 565">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 565) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 566">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 566) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 573">D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 573) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 574">D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 574) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 575">D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 575) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 582">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 582) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 583">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 583) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 584">1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 584) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 591">D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 591) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 592">D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 592) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 593">D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 593) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 600">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 600) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 601">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 601) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 602">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 1315.0 GeV)</a> (Table 602) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 603">1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 1315.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 603) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 614">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 614) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 615">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 615) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 616">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 1315.0 GeV)</a> (Table 616) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 617">D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M ( 1315.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 617) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 628">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 628) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 629">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 629) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 630">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 630) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 637">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 0.0 GeV < TT_M < 700.0 GeV)</a> (Table 637) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 638">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 700.0 GeV < TT_M < 970.0 GeV)</a> (Table 638) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 639">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M ( 970.0 GeV < TT_M < 3000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 639) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 646">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 0.0 GeV < T2_PT < 170.0 GeV)</a> (Table 646) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 647">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 170.0 GeV < T2_PT < 290.0 GeV)</a> (Table 647) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 648">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 290.0 GeV < T2_PT < 450.0 GeV)</a> (Table 648) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 649">1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 450.0 GeV < T2_PT < 1000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 649) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 660">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 0.0 GeV < T2_PT < 170.0 GeV)</a> (Table 660) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 661">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 170.0 GeV < T2_PT < 290.0 GeV)</a> (Table 661) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 662">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 290.0 GeV < T2_PT < 450.0 GeV)</a> (Table 662) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 663">D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT ( 450.0 GeV < T2_PT < 1000.0 GeV)</a> (Table 663) </ul><br/> Covariances:<br/> <ul><br/> <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 493">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 493) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 494">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 494) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 495">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 495) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 496">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 496) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 497">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 497) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 498">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 498) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 502">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 502) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 503">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 503) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 504">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 504) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 505">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 505) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 506">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 506) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 507">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_TT_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 507) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 512">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 1th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 512) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 513">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 2th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 513) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 514">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 2th and 2th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 514) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 515">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 3th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 515) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 516">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 3th and 2th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 516) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 517">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 3th and 3th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 517) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 518">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 518) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 519">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 2th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 519) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 520">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 3th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 520) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 521">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 4th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 521) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 526">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 1th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 526) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 527">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 2th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 527) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 528">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 2th and 2th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 528) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 529">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 3th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 529) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 530">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 3th and 2th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 530) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 531">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 3th and 3th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 531) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 532">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 1th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 532) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 533">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 2th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 533) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 534">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 3th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 534) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 535">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DABS_T1_Y between the 4th and 4th bins of ABS_T1_Y</a> (Table 535) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 540">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 1th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 540) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 541">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 2th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 541) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 542">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 2th and 2th bins of M</a> (Table 542) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 543">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 3th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 543) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 544">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 3th and 2th bins of M</a> (Table 544) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 545">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 3th and 3th bins of M</a> (Table 545) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 546">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 546) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 547">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 2th bins of M</a> (Table 547) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 548">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 3th bins of M</a> (Table 548) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 549">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 4th bins of M</a> (Table 549) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 554">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 1th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 554) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 555">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 2th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 555) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 556">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 2th and 2th bins of M</a> (Table 556) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 557">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 3th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 557) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 558">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 3th and 2th bins of M</a> (Table 558) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 559">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 3th and 3th bins of M</a> (Table 559) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 560">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 1th bins of M</a> (Table 560) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 561">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 2th bins of M</a> (Table 561) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 562">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 3th bins of M</a> (Table 562) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 563">Matrix for D2SIG/DT2_PT/DM between the 4th and 4th bins of M</a> (Table 563) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 567">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 567) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 568">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 568) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 569">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 569) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 570">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 570) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 571">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 571) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 572">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 572) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 576">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 576) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 577">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 577) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 578">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 578) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 579">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 579) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 580">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 580) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 581">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T1_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 581) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 585">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 585) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 586">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 586) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 587">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 587) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 588">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 588) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 589">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 589) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 590">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 590) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 594">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 594) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 595">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 595) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 596">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 596) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 597">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 597) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 598">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 598) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 599">Matrix for D2SIG/DABS_T2_Y/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 599) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 604">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 604) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 605">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 605) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 606">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 606) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 607">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 607) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 608">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 608) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 609">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 609) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 610">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 610) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 611">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 611) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 612">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 612) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 613">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 613) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 618">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 618) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 619">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 619) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 620">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 620) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 621">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 621) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 622">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 622) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 623">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 623) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 624">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 624) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 625">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 625) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 626">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 626) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 627">Matrix for D2SIG/DTT_PT/DTT_M between the 4th and 4th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 627) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 631">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 631) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 632">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 632) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 633">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 633) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 634">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 634) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 635">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 635) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 636">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 636) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 640">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 1th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 640) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 641">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 641) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 642">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 2th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 642) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 643">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 1th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 643) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 644">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 2th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 644) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 645">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DTT_M between the 3th and 3th bins of TT_M</a> (Table 645) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 650">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 1th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 650) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 651">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 651) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 652">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 652) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 653">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 653) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 654">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 654) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 655">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 655) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 656">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 656) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 657">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 657) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 658">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 658) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 659">Matrix for 1/SIG*D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 4th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 659) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 664">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 1th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 664) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 665">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 665) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 666">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 2th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 666) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 667">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 667) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 668">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 668) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 669">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 3th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 669) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 670">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 1th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 670) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 671">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 2th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 671) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 672">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 3th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 672) <li><a href="103063?version=1&table=Table 673">Matrix for D2SIG/DT1_PT/DT2_PT between the 4th and 4th bins of T2_PT</a> (Table 673) </ul><br/>
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $Z^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $Z^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $Z^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $Z^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wt}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wt}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wt}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wt}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wt}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wt}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wt}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wt}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wb}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wb}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wb}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wb}^{leading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wb}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wb}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R_{Wb}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R_{Wb}^{subleading}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra1}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{t,close}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{t,1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, t\bar{t}}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, t\bar{t}}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, t\bar{t}}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, t\bar{t}}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra1}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{jet1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta R^{extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra2}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $R^{pT, extra3}_{extra1}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Total cross-section at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{out}^{t,1}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 6. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 7. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ = 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in $N_{jets}$ > 8. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 6 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 7 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ = 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|P_{cross}|$ vs $N_{jets}$ in $N_{jets}$ > 8 at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 620.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 620.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 835.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 835.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1050.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1050.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 175.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 175.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 275.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 275.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 385.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 385.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 645.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 645.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 795.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 795.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1080.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1080.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.0 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $|y^{t,1}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t,1}|$ < 2.5 at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,1}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,2}|$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1315.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1315.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 970.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 970.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 170.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 170.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 290.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 290.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 450.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ vs $p_{T}^{t,2}$ in 450.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,2}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the all hadronic resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
A search is presented for four-top-quark production using an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Events are selected if they contain a same-sign lepton pair or at least three leptons (electrons or muons). Jet multiplicity, jet flavour and event kinematics are used to separate signal from the background through a multivariate discriminant, and dedicated control regions are used to constrain the dominant backgrounds. The four-top-quark production cross section is measured to be 24$^{+7}_{-6}$ fb. This corresponds to an observed (expected) significance with respect to the background-only hypothesis of 4.3 (2.4) standard deviations and provides evidence for this process.
The results of fitted inclusive ${t\bar{t}t\bar{t}}$ cross-section
The results of the fitted signal strength $\mu$
List of the uncertainties in the signal strength $\mu$, grouped in categories. The quoted values are obtained by repeating the fit, fixing a set of nuisance parameters of the sources corresponding to the considered category, and subtracting in quadrature the resulting uncertainty from the total uncertainty of the nominal fit presented in the last line. The total uncertainty is different from the sum in quadrature of the components due to correlations between nuisance parameters.
Post-fit background and signal yields in the full signal region. The total systematic uncertainty differs from the sum in quadrature of the different uncertainties due to correlations. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair. HF $e$ (HF $\mu$) refers to events with one non-prompt electron (muon) from heavy-flavour hadron decay, LF refers to events with a lepton originating from light-meson decay, and 'Other $t\bar{t}X$' includes events coming from $t\bar{t}WZ$, $t\bar{t}Z$+jets, $t\bar{t}WH$, $t\bar{t}HH$.
Ranking of the nuisance parameters included in the fit according to their impact on the signal strength $\mu$. Only the 20 most highly ranked nuisance parameters are shown in the thumbnail figure. The empty blue rectangles correspond to the pre-fit impact on $\mu$ and the filled blue ones to the post-fit impact on $\mu$, both referring to the upper $x$-axis scale. The impact of each nuisance parameter, $\Delta\mu$, is computed by comparing the nominal best-fit value of $\mu$ with the result of the fit when fixing the nuisance parameter to its best-fit value, $\hat{\theta}$, shifted by its pre-fit (post-fit) uncertainties $\pm \Delta\theta$ ($\pm \Delta\hat{\theta}$). The black points show the pulls of the parameter relative to their nominal values, $\theta_0$. The nominal value for all parameters is $\theta_0 = 0$. The pulls of the most impactful parameters and their relative post-fit errors, $\Delta\hat{\theta}/\Delta\theta$, are referenced to the lower $x$-axis scale. In the table, POI means Parameter of Interest.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the 'HF e' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the 'HF mu' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the $m_{ee}^{PV}$ variable in the 'Conv.' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the $\Sigma p_{T}^{l}$ variable in the 'ttW' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the 'HF e' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the 'HF mu' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the $m_{ee}^{PV}$ variable in the 'Conv.' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the $\Sigma p_{T}^{l}$ variable in the in 'ttW' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the BDT score in the signal region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the BDT score in the signal region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
A search is performed for the rare decay W$^\pm\to\pi^\pm\gamma$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. Data corresponding to an on W integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$ were collected during 2016 to 2018 with the CMS detector. This analysis exploits a novel search strategy based on W boson production in top quark pair events. An inclusive search for the W$^\pm\to\pi^\pm\gamma$ decay is not optimal at the LHC because of the high trigger thresholds. Instead, a trigger selection is exploited in which the W boson originating from one of the top quarks is used to tag the event in a leptonic decay. The W boson emerging from the other top quark is used to search for the W$^\pm\to\pi^\pm\gamma$ signature. Such decays are characterized by an isolated track pointing to a large energy deposit, and by an isolated photon of large transverse momentum. The presence of b quark jets reduces the background from the hadronization of light-flavor quarks and gluons. The W$^\pm\to\pi^\pm\gamma$ decay is not observed. An upper exclusion limit is set to this branching fraction, corresponding to 1.50 $\times$ 10$^{-5}$ at 95% confidence level, whereas the expected upper limit exclusion limit is 0.85 $^{+0.52}_{-0.29}$ $\times$ 10$^{-5}$.
The product of signal efficiency and acceptance per year and per lepton channel (muon or electron).
Expected and observed upper exclusion limits on the branching fraction of the decay of a W boson into a pion and a photon, using 2016 to 2018 data.
The results of a search for electroweakino pair production $pp \rightarrow \tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2$ in which the chargino ($\tilde\chi^\pm_1$) decays into a $W$ boson and the lightest neutralino ($\tilde\chi^0_1$), while the heavier neutralino ($\tilde\chi^0_2$) decays into the Standard Model 125 GeV Higgs boson and a second $\tilde\chi^0_1$ are presented. The signal selection requires a pair of $b$-tagged jets consistent with those from a Higgs boson decay, and either an electron or a muon from the $W$ boson decay, together with missing transverse momentum from the corresponding neutrino and the stable neutralinos. The analysis is based on data corresponding to 139 $\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions provided by the Large Hadron Collider and recorded by the ATLAS detector. No statistically significant evidence of an excess of events above the Standard Model expectation is found. Limits are set on the direct production of the electroweakinos in simplified models, assuming pure wino cross-sections. Masses of $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{2}$ up to 740 GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level for a massless $\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-onHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-HM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-HM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-HM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-HM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-MM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-MM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-MM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-MM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-LM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-LM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-LM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-LM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-HM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection.The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-HM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection.The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-HM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection.The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-HM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection.The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-MM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-MM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-MM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-MM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-LM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-LM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-LM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-LM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.
The observed exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion up limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion up limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion up limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion up limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion down limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion down limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion down limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The observed exclusion down limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The expected exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The expected exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The expected exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
The expected exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.
Upper limits on the cross sections for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Upper limits on the cross sections for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Upper limits on the cross sections for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Upper limits on the cross sections for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. 1lb\bar{b}$ production
Signal acceptance in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. 1lb\bar{b}$ production
Signal acceptance in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. 1lb\bar{b}$ production
Signal acceptance in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. 1lb\bar{b}$ production
Signal acceptance in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal acceptance in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Signal efficiency in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-LM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-LM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-LM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-LM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-MM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-MM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-MM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-MM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-HM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-HM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-HM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-HM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.