Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Final state radiation correction used in the $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-p_{T}^{Z}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Measured total $Z$-boson cross-section for different datasets. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Fraction of nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons (in \%) in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-0.2$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=+1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Double differential cross section for UPSI(1S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.0-3.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(1S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(1S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.5-4.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(1S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(1S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 4.0-4.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(1S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.0-2.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.5-3.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.0-3.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.5-4.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 4.0-4.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.0-2.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.5-3.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.0-3.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.5-4.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 4.0-4.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Ratios of cross section with respect to the UPSI(1S) cross section as a function of PT in the rapidity range 2.0-4.4. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the three states.

Correlated Systematic Uncertainties for W- production.

Cross sections for W+ production from the combined electron and muon data sets in the defined fiducial regions. The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Correlated Systematic Uncertainties for W+ production.

Combined lepton charge asymmetry from W boson decays.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W+- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of W- versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in W- W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W+- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of W- versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in W- W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Factors to correct the measured cross-sections for different treatments of photon final-state radiation (QED FSR) to: - dressed leptons, recombined with FSR photons in a cone of DeltaR < 0.1 and - bare leptons, defined after FSR. These correction factors are found to be (pseudo)-rapidity independent.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for fiducial Z0 production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for total Z0 production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for fiducial W+ + W- production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for total W+ + W- production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Inclusive differential PHI production cross section as a function of PT in the rapidity ranges 3.16-3.34 and 3.34-3.52.

Inclusive differential PHI production cross section as a function of PT in the rapidity ranges 3.52-3.70 and 3.70-3.88.

Inclusive differential PHI production cross section as a function of PT in the rapidity range 3.88-4.06.

Inclusive differential PHI production cross section as a function of PT over the rapidity range 2.44-4.06.

Inclusive differential PHI production cross section as a function of rapidity over the PT range 0.6 to 5.0.

Double differential cross sections for charged particle jets as a function of the jet PT in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9, shown separately for the two R values. The first (sys) errors is the correlated efficiency uncertainty and the second (sys) error is the correlated vetex splitting uncertainty. The third (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Inclusive J/psi production cross-section as a function of J/psi pT in the J/psi rapidity (|y|) bin 1.5<|y|<2. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third encapsulates any possible variation due to spin-alignment from the unpolarised central value.

Inclusive J/psi production cross-section as a function of J/psi pT in the J/psi rapidity (|y|) bin 0.75<|y|<1.5. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third encapsulates any possible variation due to spin-alignment from the unpolarised central value.

Inclusive J/psi production cross-section as a function of J/psi pT in the J/psi rapidity (|y|) bin |y|<0.75. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third encapsulates any possible variation due to spin-alignment from the unpolarised central value.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity |y|<0.75 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.}.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 0.75<|y|<1.5 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/-0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 1.5<|y|<2 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/-0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 2<|y|<2.4 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta =+/-0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity |y|<0.75 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 0.75<|y|<1.5 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 1.5<|y|<2 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 2<|y|<2.4 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity |y|<0.75. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 0.75<|y|<1.5. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 1.5<|y|<2. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 2<|y|<2.4. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Unweighted J/psi candidate yields in bins of $J/psi transverse momentum and rapidity. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute J/psi rapidities within 2<|y|<2.4. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J\psi.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute J/psi rapidities within 1.5<|y|<2. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J/psi.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute J/psi rapidities within 0.75<|y|<1.5. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J/psi.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute rapidities within |y|<0.75. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J/psi.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin |y|<0.75, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin 0.75<|y|<1.5, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin 1.75<|y|<2.0, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin 2.0<|y|<2.4, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Mean PT and RMS for J/PSI production from b-hadron decay (assuming unpolarised).

DSIG/DY for prompt (unpolarised) J/PSI and from b-hadron decay integrated over PT.

Double differential cross section in PT and YRAP for prompt J/PSI production assuming no polarisation. The first systematic error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Double differential cross section in PT and YRAP for J/PSI from b-hadron decays assuming no polarisation. The first systematic error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Double differential cross section in PT and YRAP for prompt J/PSI production assuming fully transversely polarised J/PSIs The first systematic error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Double differential cross section in PT and YRAP for prompt J/PSI production assuming fully longitudinally polarised J/PSIs The first systematic error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Fraction of J/PSIs from b-hadron decay in bins of PT and YRAP assuming no polaraisation. The first systematic error is uncorrelated between bins and the second is the uncertainty due to the unknown polarisation of the prompt J/PSI.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0 to 0.3, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.3 to 0.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0 to 0.3, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.3 to 0.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.8 to 1.2, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0 to 0.3, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.3 to 0.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.8 to 1.2, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 340 to 520, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 520 to 800, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 800 to 1200, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 340 to 520, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 520 to 800, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 800 to 1200, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.