Showing 10 of 63 results
We report on the first measurement of the triangular $v_3$, quadrangular $v_4$, and pentagonal $v_5$ charged particle flow in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV measured with the ALICE detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. We show that the triangular flow can be described in terms of the initial spatial anisotropy and its fluctuations, which provides strong constraints on its origin. In the most central events, where the elliptic flow $v_2$ and $v_3$ have similar magnitude, a double peaked structure in the two-particle azimuthal correlations is observed, which is often interpreted as a Mach cone response to fast partons. We show that this structure can be naturally explained from the measured anisotropic flow Fourier coefficients.
v2{SP} (red filled circles).
v3{SP} (blue filled squares).
v4{SP} (purprle stars).
v3{4} (blue open squares).
v3{ZDC} (green filled circles).
v3{QC5} (black filled diamonds).
v2{SP}/epsilon(CGC) (red filled circles).
v2{SP}/epsilon(W) (purple open circles).
v3{SP}/epsilon(CGC) (blue filled squares).
v3{SP}/epsilon(W) (purple open squares).
v2{SP} (red filled circles).
v3{SP} (blue filled squares).
v2{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (blue filled circles).
v2{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (blue open circles).
v3{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (green filled triangles).
v3{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (green open triangles).
v4{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (red filled squares).
v4{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (red open squares).
v5{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (black filled diamonds).
v5{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (black open diamonds).
v2{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (blue filled circles).
v2{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (blue open circles).
v3{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (green filled triangles).
v3{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (green open triangles).
v4{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (red filled squares).
v4{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (red open squares).
v5{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (black filled diamonds).
v5{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (black open diamonds).
v2{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (blue filled circles).
v2{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (blue open circles).
v3{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (green filled triangles).
v3{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (green open triangles).
v4{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (red filled squares).
v4{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (red open squares).
v5{SP,Deltaeta=0.2} (black filled diamonds).
v5{SP,Deltaeta=1.0} (black open diamonds).
We report the first measurement of charged particle elliptic flow in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV with the ALICE detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The measurement is performed in the central pseudorapidity region (|$\eta$|<0.8) and transverse momentum range 0.2< $p_{\rm T}$< 5.0 GeV/$c$. The elliptic flow signal v$_2$, measured using the 4-particle correlation method, averaged over transverse momentum and pseudorapidity is 0.087 $\pm$ 0.002 (stat) $\pm$ 0.004 (syst) in the 40-50% centrality class. The differential elliptic flow v$_2(p_{\rm T})$ reaches a maximum of 0.2 near $p_{\rm T}$ = 3 GeV/$c$. Compared to RHIC Au-Au collisions at 200 GeV, the elliptic flow increases by about 30%. Some hydrodynamic model predictions which include viscous corrections are in agreement with the observed increase.
Transverse momentum dependence of v2 for centrality 40-50% from the 2- and 4-particle cumulant methods.
Transverse momentum dependence of v2{4} for centralities 10-20%, 20-30% and 30-40%.
Centrality dependence of elliptic flow, integrated over the pT range 0.2 < pT < 5.0 GeV, estimated with two- and multi-particle correlation techniques.
Integrated elliptic flow at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 20-30%.
Uncorrected multiplicity distribution of charged particles in the Time Projection Chamber (|eta| < 0.8).
A measurement of the transverse momentum spectra of jets in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76$ TeV is reported. Jets are reconstructed from charged particles using the anti-$k_{\rm T}$ jet algorithm with jet resolution parameters $R$ of $0.2$ and $0.3$ in pseudo-rapidity $|\eta|<0.5$. The transverse momentum $p_{\rm T}$ of charged particles is measured down to $0.15$ GeV/$c$ which gives access to the low $p_{\rm T}$ fragments of the jet. Jets found in heavy-ion collisions are corrected event-by-event for average background density and on an inclusive basis (via unfolding) for residual background fluctuations and detector effects. A strong suppression of jet production in central events with respect to peripheral events is observed. The suppression is found to be similar to the suppression of charged hadrons, which suggests that substantial energy is radiated at angles larger than the jet resolution parameter $R=0.3$ considered in the analysis. The fragmentation bias introduced by selecting jets with a high $p_{\rm T}$ leading particle, which rejects jets with a soft fragmentation pattern, has a similar effect on the jet yield for central and peripheral events. The ratio of jet spectra with $R=0.2$ and $R=0.3$ is found to be similar in Pb-Pb and simulated PYTHIA pp events, indicating no strong broadening of the radial jet structure in the reconstructed jets with $R<0.3$.
Average values of the number of participating nucleons (Npart), number of binary collisions (Ncoll), and the nuclear overlap function (TAA) for the centrality intervals used in the jet analysis.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Ratio of charged jet pT-spectra with radius parameter R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV, for two centrality classes 0-10% and 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.
Inclusive transverse momentum spectra of primary charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}$ = 2.76 TeV have been measured by the ALICE Collaboration at the LHC. The data are presented for central and peripheral collisions, corresponding to 0-5% and 70-80% of the hadronic Pb-Pb cross section. The measured charged particle spectra in $|\eta|<0.8$ and $0.3 < p_T < 20$ GeV/$c$ are compared to the expectation in pp collisions at the same $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$, scaled by the number of underlying nucleon-nucleon collisions. The comparison is expressed in terms of the nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$. The result indicates only weak medium effects ($R_{\rm AA} \approx $ 0.7) in peripheral collisions. In central collisions, $R_{\rm AA}$ reaches a minimum of about 0.14 at $p_{\rm T}=6$-7GeV/$c$ and increases significantly at larger $p_{\rm T}$. The measured suppression of high-$p_{\rm T}$ particles is stronger than that observed at lower collision energies, indicating that a very dense medium is formed in central Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC.
PT distributions of primary charged particles at mid-rapidity in central and peripheral PB-PB collisions.
PT distributions of primary charged particles at mid-rapidity in central and peripheral PB-PB collisions estimated from scaled PP data as described in the text of the paper.
Measurments of RAA, the nuclear modification factor (rate of PB-PB to P P cross section) in the central region.
Measurments of RAA, the nuclear modification factor (rate of PB-PB to P P cross section) in the peripheral region.
RAA for central collisions using the two alternate pp references as described in the text of the paper.
The yield of charged particles associated with high-$p_{\rm T}$ trigger particles ($8 < p_{\rm T} < 15$ GeV/$c$) is measured with the ALICE detector in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV relative to proton-proton collisions at the same energy. The conditional per-trigger yields are extracted from the narrow jet-like correlation peaks in azimuthal di-hadron correlations. In the 5% most central collisions, we observe that the yield of associated charged particles with transverse momenta $p_{\rm T}> 3$ GeV/$c$ on the away-side drops to about 60% of that observed in pp collisions, while on the near-side a moderate enhancement of 20-30% is found.
The ratio of near-side yields in Lead-Lead/Proton-Proton collisions in the central region.
The ratio of near-side yields in Lead-Lead/Proton-Proton collisions in the peripheral region.
The ratio of away-side yields in Lead-Lead/Proton-Proton collisions in the central region.
The ratio of away-side yields in Lead-Lead/Proton-Proton collisions in the peripheral region.
The ratio between near-side central/peripheral yields in Lead-Lead collisions.
The ratio between away-side central/peripheral yields in Lead-Lead collisions.
We report on results obtained with the Event Shape Engineering technique applied to Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\rm{NN}}=2.76$ TeV. By selecting events in the same centrality interval, but with very different average flow, different initial state conditions can be studied. We find the effect of the event-shape selection on the elliptic flow coefficient $v_2$ to be almost independent of transverse momentum $p_\rm{T}$, as expected if this effect is due to fluctuations in the initial geometry of the system. Charged hadron, pion, kaon, and proton transverse momentum distributions are found to be harder in events with higher-than-average elliptic flow, indicating an interplay between radial and elliptic flow.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$.
Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$.
Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$.
Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.
Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.
Measurements of multi-particle azimuthal correlations (cumulants) for charged particles in p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions are presented. They help address the question of whether there is evidence for global, flow-like, azimuthal correlations in the p-Pb system. Comparisons are made to measurements from the larger Pb-Pb system, where such evidence is established. In particular, the second harmonic two-particle cumulants are found to decrease with multiplicity, characteristic of a dominance of few-particle correlations in p-Pb collisions. However, when a $|\Delta \eta|$ gap is placed to suppress such correlations, the two-particle cumulants begin to rise at high-multiplicity, indicating the presence of global azimuthal correlations. The Pb-Pb values are higher than the p-Pb values at similar multiplicities. In both systems, the second harmonic four-particle cumulants exhibit a transition from positive to negative values when the multiplicity increases. The negative values allow for a measurement of $v_{2}\{4\}$ to be made, which is found to be higher in Pb-Pb collisions at similar multiplicities. The second harmonic six-particle cumulants are also found to be higher in Pb-Pb collisions. In Pb-Pb collisions, we generally find $v_{2}\{4\} \simeq v_{2}\{6\}\neq 0$ which is indicative of a Bessel-Gaussian function for the $v_{2}$ distribution. For very high-multiplicity Pb-Pb collisions, we observe that the four- and six-particle cumulants become consistent with 0. Finally, third harmonic two-particle cumulants in p-Pb and Pb-Pb are measured. These are found to be similar for overlapping multiplicities, when a $|\Delta\eta| > 1.4$ gap is placed.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Correlations between the elliptic or triangular flow coefficients $v_m$ ($m$=2 or 3) and other flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$=2 to 5) are measured using $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV Pb+Pb collision data collected in 2010 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated lumonisity of 7 $\mu$b$^{-1}$. The $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations are measured in midrapidity as a function of centrality, and, for events within the same centrality interval, as a function of event ellipticity or triangularity defined in a forward rapidity region. For events within the same centrality interval, $v_3$ is found to be anticorrelated with $v_2$ and this anticorrelation is consistent with similar anticorrelations between the corresponding eccentricities $\epsilon_2$ and $\epsilon_3$. On the other hand, it is observed that $v_4$ increases strongly with $v_2$, and $v_5$ increases strongly with both $v_2$ and $v_3$. The trend and strength of the $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations for $n$=4 and 5 are found to disagree with $\epsilon_m$-$\epsilon_n$ correlations predicted by initial-geometry models. Instead, these correlations are found to be consistent with the combined effects of a linear contribution to $v_n$ and a nonlinear term that is a function of $v_2^2$ or of $v_2v_3$, as predicted by hydrodynamic models. A simple two-component fit is used to separate these two contributions. The extracted linear and nonlinear contributions to $v_4$ and $v_5$ are found to be consistent with previously measured event-plane correlations.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
Measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV are presented using a data sample corresponding to 0.49 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ integrated luminosity collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2015. The recorded minimum-bias sample is enhanced by triggers for "ultra-central" collisions, providing an opportunity to perform detailed study of flow harmonics in the regime where the initial state is dominated by fluctuations. The anisotropy of the charged-particle azimuthal angle distributions is characterized by the Fourier coefficients, $v_{2}-v_{7}$, which are measured using the two-particle correlation, scalar-product and event-plane methods. The goal of the paper is to provide measurements of the differential as well as integrated flow harmonics $v_{n}$ over wide ranges of the transverse momentum, 0.5 $
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a> <br><i>p+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a> <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a> <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 40-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 60-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 0-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a> <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.