Corrected distributions of the normalized EEC within jets, differential in $ \left\langle p_{\rm T,jet} \right\rangle R_{L} $ at $R_{\rm jet} =$ 0.6 for one $p_{\rm T, jet}$ selection. Each distribution is normalized to integrate to one in $R_{L}$ prior to shifting.

Corrected distributions of the charge-selected EEC compared with the inclusive case for $R_{\rm jet}$ = 0.6 with a jet transverse momentum selection of 20 $ < p_{\rm T, jet} <$ 30 GeV/c.

Corrected distributions of the EEC charged ratio for $R_{\rm jet}$ = 0.6 with a jet transverse momentum selection of 20 $ < p_{\rm T, jet} <$ 30 GeV/c.

Corrected distributions of the normalized EEC differential in $R_{L}$ for $R_{\rm jet}=$ 0.4, with jet transverse momentum selections 15 $< p_{\rm T, jet} <$ 20 GeV/c and 30 $< p_{\rm T, jet} <$ 50 GeV/c

Corrected distributions of the normalized EEC within jets, differential in $ \left\langle p_{\rm T,jet} \right\rangle R_{L} $ at $R_{\rm jet} =$ 0.4 for one $p_{\rm T, jet}$ selection. Each distribution is normalized to integrate to one in $R_{L}$ prior to shifting.

Corrected distributions of the normalized EEC within jets, differential in $ \left\langle p_{\rm T,jet} \right\rangle R_{L} $ at $R_{\rm jet} =$ 0.4 for one $p_{\rm T, jet}$ selection. Each distribution is normalized to integrate to one in $R_{L}$ prior to shifting.

Corrected distributions of the normalized EEC within jets, differential in $ \left\langle p_{\rm T,jet} \right\rangle R_{L} $ at $R_{\rm jet} =$ 0.4 for one $p_{\rm T, jet}$ selection. Each distribution is normalized to integrate to one in $R_{L}$ prior to shifting.

Corrected distributions of the charge-selected EEC compared with the inclusive case for $R_{\rm jet}$ = 0.4 with a jet transverse momentum selection of 20 $ < p_{\rm T, jet} <$ 30 GeV/c.

Corrected distributions of the EEC charged ratio for $R_{\rm jet}$ = 0.4 with a jet transverse momentum selection of 20 $ < p_{\rm T, jet} <$ 30 GeV/c.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the dilepton transverse momentum $p^{ll}_{\mathrm{T}}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the the four-body transverse momentum $p^{ll\gamma\gamma}_{\mathrm{T}}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the diphoton invariant mass $m_{\gamma\gamma}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the four-body invariant mass $m_{ll\gamma\gamma}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Expected and observed $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameters $f_{T,j}/\Lambda^{4}$ of transverse dimension-8 operators. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level. No unitarity constraints are applied.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,8}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,0}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,1}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,2}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,5}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,6}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,7}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,9}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

The nuclear slope parameter C from a fit of the form exp(-Bt-Ct^2-Dt^3). The systematic uncertainty includes experimental and theoretical uncerainties.

The nuclear slope parameter D from a fit of the form exp(-Bt-Ct^2-Dt^3). The systematic uncertainty includes experimental and theoretical uncerainties.

The total elastic cross section measured inside the fiducial volume. The systematic uncertainty includes experimental uncertainties.

The total elastic cross section obtained from the fitted parameters, extrapolated to full phase space using only the nuclear amplitude.

The total inelastic cross section.

The ratio of elastic to total cross section.

The differential elastic cross section as function of t with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties are given as signed relative change for 20 sources of experimental uncertainty associated to nuisance parameters used in the fit for the extraction of physics parameters.

Statistical covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential elastic cross section as function of t.

Unfolded $\nu_\mu$ CC1$\pi^+$ differential cross section as a function of $p_\mu$ in the reduced phase-space of $p_{\pi^+} > 200$ MeV/$c$, $p_\mu > 200$ MeV/c, $\cos(\theta_{\pi^+}) > 0.3$ and $\cos(\theta_\mu) > 0.3$.

Unfolded $\nu_\mu$ CC1$\pi^+$ differential cross section as a function of $\cos\theta_\mu$ in the reduced phase-space of $p_{\pi^+} > 200$ MeV/$c$, $p_\mu > 200$ MeV/c, $\cos(\theta_{\pi^+}) > 0.3$ and $\cos(\theta_\mu) > 0.3$.

Unfolded $\nu_\mu$ CC1$\pi^+$ differential cross section as a function of $\cos\theta_{\mu,\pi}$ in the reduced phase-space of $p_{\pi^+} > 200$ MeV/$c$, $p_\mu > 200$ MeV/c, $\cos(\theta_{\pi^+}) > 0.3$ and $\cos(\theta_\mu) > 0.3$.

Unfolded $\nu_\mu$ CC1$\pi^+$ differential cross section as a function of $E_\nu^{\rm rec}$ ($\Delta$) in the reduced phase-space of $p_{\pi^+} > 200$ MeV/$c$, $p_\mu > 200$ MeV/c, $\cos(\theta_{\pi^+}) > 0.3$ and $\cos(\theta_\mu) > 0.3$.

Unfolded $\nu_\mu$ CC1$\pi^+$ differential cross section as a function of $E_\nu^{\rm rec}$ ($\mu$, $\pi$) in the reduced phase-space of $p_{\pi^+} > 200$ MeV/$c$, $p_\mu > 200$ MeV/c, $\cos(\theta_{\pi^+}) > 0.3$ and $\cos(\theta_\mu) > 0.3$.

Femtoscopic radii as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

One-dimensional femtoscopic radius $R_{\mathrm inv}$ as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential inclusive muon $v_{2}$ extracted with two-particle $Q$ cumulants method.

pT-differential inclusive muon $v_{2}$ extracted with scalar product method.

pT-differential inclusive muon $v_{2}$ extracted with two-particle cumulants method.

pT-differential inclusive muon $v_{2}$ extracted with four-particle cumulants method.

pT-differential inclusive muon $v_{2}$ extracted with Lee-Yang zeros (Sum) method.

pT-differential inclusive muon $v_{2}$ extracted with Lee-Yang zeros (Prod) method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with scalar product method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with two-particle $Q$ cumulants method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with scalar product method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with two-particle $Q$ cumulants method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with scalar product method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with two-particle cumulants method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with four-particle cumulants method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with Lee-Yang zeros (Sum) method.

pT-differential $v_{2}$ of muons from heavy-flavour decays extracted with Lee-Yang zeros (Prod) method.

Elliptic flow of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays as a function of the collision centrality extracted with scalar product method.

Elliptic flow of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays as a function of the collision centrality extracted with two-particle cumulants method.