Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 13 TeV data in fb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Correction factors for an assumed angular dependence $\propto 1+\lambda_{\theta} \cos^2\theta $ in the helicity frame, for several values of the parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$. The correction factors were found to be the same (within 1% - 2%) for $J\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, for prompt and non-prompt production mechanisms, and for the three rapidity intervals considered in this paper.

Correlation matrix of all the parameters including nuisance parameters used in the profile likelihood unfolding fit on $A_{C}$.

Measured cross section in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j}1}$.

Measured fractions in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{H}}$.

Measured fractions in bins of $|y^{\rm{H}}|$.

Measured fractions in bins of $N_{\rm{jets}}$.

Measured fractions in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j1}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{H}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $|y^{\rm{H}}|$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $N_{\rm{jets}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j1}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{H}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $|y^{\rm{H}}|$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $N_{\rm{jets}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j1}}$.

The total $pp\to H$ cross section in the $H\to\gamma\gamma$ and $H\to ZZ^*\to 4\ell$ channels and their combination.

Inclusive J/psi production cross-section as a function of J/psi pT in the J/psi rapidity (|y|) bin 1.5<|y|<2. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third encapsulates any possible variation due to spin-alignment from the unpolarised central value.

Inclusive J/psi production cross-section as a function of J/psi pT in the J/psi rapidity (|y|) bin 0.75<|y|<1.5. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third encapsulates any possible variation due to spin-alignment from the unpolarised central value.

Inclusive J/psi production cross-section as a function of J/psi pT in the J/psi rapidity (|y|) bin |y|<0.75. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third encapsulates any possible variation due to spin-alignment from the unpolarised central value.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity |y|<0.75 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.}.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 0.75<|y|<1.5 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/-0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 1.5<|y|<2 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/-0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.

Non-prompt to inclusive production cross-section fraction fB as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 2<|y|<2.4 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0). The spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses, plus the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta =+/-0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, the third number is the uncertainty due to spin-alignment.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity |y|<0.75 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 0.75<|y|<1.5 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 1.5<|y|<2 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Non-prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 2<|y|<2.4 under the assumption that prompt and non-prompt J/psi production is unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0), and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of non-prompt cross-sections within lambda_theta = +/- 0.1. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to FONLL predictions.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity |y|<0.75. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 0.75<|y|<1.5. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 1.5<|y|<2. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Prompt J/psi production cross-sections as a function of J/psi pT for J/psi rapidity 2<|y|<2.4. The central value assumes unpolarised (lambda_theta = 0) prompt and non-prompt production, and the spin-alignment envelope spans the range of possible prompt cross-sections under various polarisation hypotheses. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic. Comparison is made to the Colour Evaporation Model prediction.

Unweighted J/psi candidate yields in bins of $J/psi transverse momentum and rapidity. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute J/psi rapidities within 2<|y|<2.4. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J\psi.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute J/psi rapidities within 1.5<|y|<2. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J/psi.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute J/psi rapidities within 0.75<|y|<1.5. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J/psi.

Summary table of all sources of considered systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty (as a percentage) on the corrected inclusive J/psi production cross-section, for absolute rapidities within |y|<0.75. The sources of systematic error shown are, in order, Acceptance, Muon recognition, Trigger, Fitting and the Total systematics. Also shown in the last error is the possible envelope of variation the central result due to uncertainty on spin-alignment of the J/psi.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin |y|<0.75, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin 0.75<|y|<1.5, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin 1.75<|y|<2.0, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Breakdown of sources of systematic uncertainty on the non-prompt J/psi fraction measurements, for the bin 2.0<|y|<2.4, as a function of the J/psi pT.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ pT intervals in the B+ rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.25 The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ pt intervals in the B+ rapidity (y) range 0<|y|<2.25. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ rapidity intervals in the B+ pT range 9 GeV - 120 GeV. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Double differential cross sections for charged particle jets as a function of the jet PT in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9, shown separately for the two R values. The first (sys) errors is the correlated efficiency uncertainty and the second (sys) error is the correlated vetex splitting uncertainty. The third (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle number density RHO in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Correlated Systematic Uncertainties for W- production.

Cross sections for W+ production from the combined electron and muon data sets in the defined fiducial regions. The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Correlated Systematic Uncertainties for W+ production.

Combined lepton charge asymmetry from W boson decays.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W+- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of W- versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in W- W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W+- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of W- versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in W- W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Factors to correct the measured cross-sections for different treatments of photon final-state radiation (QED FSR) to: - dressed leptons, recombined with FSR photons in a cone of DeltaR < 0.1 and - bare leptons, defined after FSR. These correction factors are found to be (pseudo)-rapidity independent.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for fiducial Z0 production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for total Z0 production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for fiducial W+ + W- production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for total W+ + W- production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 1.2-2.1 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.1-2.8 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.8-3.6 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 3.6-4.4 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.0-0.3 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.3-0.8 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.8-1.2 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 1.2-2.1 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.1-2.8 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.8-3.6 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 3.6-4.4 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.0-0.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.5-1.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.0-1.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.5-2.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.0-2.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.5-3.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.0-3.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.5-4.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 4.0-4.4 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.0-0.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.5-1.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.0-1.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.5-2.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.0-2.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.5-3.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.0-3.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.5-4.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 4.0-4.4 and R=0.6.

Cross section dsigma/dpt as a function of the leading jet pt corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Cross section dsigma/dpt as a function of the second-leading jet pt corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Inclusive jet differential cross section dsigma/dy corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Jet differential cross section dsigma/dy as a function of the leading jet y corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Jet differential cross section dsigma/dy as a function of the second-leading jet y corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/dmjj as a function of the dijet invariant mass mjj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/d DeltaYjj as a function of the dijet rapidity separation DeltaYjj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/d DeltaPhijj as a function of the dijet azimuthal separation DeltaPhijj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Differential cross section dsigma/d DeltaRjj as a function of the dijet angular separation DeltaRjj corrected to the lepton common fiducial region and for QED radiation effects.

Cross section for Inclusive Jet Multiplicity for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Ratio of cross sections for N/N-1 inclusive jet multiplicities for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized inclusive jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dpt for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dpt for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized second-leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dpt for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized inclusive jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dy for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dy for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized second leading jet differential cross section 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dy for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet invariant mass 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dmjj for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet rapidity separation 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dDeltaYjj for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dDeltaPhijj (1/rad.) for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.

Measured normalized differential cross section as a function of dijet angular separation 1/sigma_DY dsigma/dDeltaRjj for the electron channel and the muon channel in the individual lepton fiducial regions and uncorrected for QED effects.