Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 13 TeV data in fb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Correction factors for an assumed angular dependence $\propto 1+\lambda_{\theta} \cos^2\theta $ in the helicity frame, for several values of the parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$. The correction factors were found to be the same (within 1% - 2%) for $J\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, for prompt and non-prompt production mechanisms, and for the three rapidity intervals considered in this paper.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Measured differential photoproduction cross sections as a function of the squared transverse momentum of the J/PSI in 4 bins of elasticity.

Measured differential photoproduction cross sections as a function of the elasticity of the J/PSI in 4 bins of transverse momentum.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of Q**2.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the squared transverse momentum of the J/PSI in the GAMMA* P frame.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the elasticity of the J/PSI.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the photon-proton centre of mass energy W.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the squared transverse momentum of the J/PSI in the GAMMA* P rest frame.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the squared transverse momentum of the J/PSI in the GAMMA* P rest frame.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the squared transverse momentum of the J/PSI in the GAMMA* P rest frame.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the elasticity of the J/PSI.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the elasticity of the J/PSI.

Measured differential electroproduction cross section as a function of the elasticity of the J/PSI.

Measured polarization parameter in the Helicity Frame. Here ALPHA is given by DSIG/DCOS(THETA) ~ 1+ ALPHA COS(THETA)**2 and NU is given by DSIG/DPHI ~ 1+ ALPHA/3 + (NU/3)*COS(2THETA).

Measured polarization parameter in the Collins-Soper Frame. Here ALPHA is given by DSIG/DCOS(THETA) ~ 1+ ALPHA COS(THETA)**2 and NU is given by DSIG/DPHI ~ 1+ ALPHA/3 + (NU/3)*COS(2THETA).

Measured polarization parameter in the Helicity Frame. Here ALPHA is given by DSIG/DCOS(THETA) ~ 1+ ALPHA COS(THETA)**2 and NU is given by DSIG/DPHI ~ 1+ ALPHA/3 + (NU/3)*COS(2THETA).

Measured polarization parameter in the Collins-Soper Frame. Here ALPHA is given by DSIG/DCOS(THETA) ~ 1+ ALPHA COS(THETA)**2 and NU is given by DSIG/DPHI ~ 1+ ALPHA/3 + (NU/3)*COS(2THETA).

Inclusive Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{jet}}{dP_T}}$.

2-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{2-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

3-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{3-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{jet}}{dQ^2dP_T}}$.

2-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

2-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2d\xi}}$.

3-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{3-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

3-Jet to 2-Jet Cross Sections Ratio ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{3-jet}}{dQ^2}/\frac{d\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2}}$.

3-Jet to 2-Jet Cross Sections Ratio ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{3-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}/\frac{d\sigma_{2-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

3-Jet to 2-Jet Cross Sections Ratio ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{3-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}/\frac{d^2\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

Bin averaged differential cross section as a function of ET in the defined phase space.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range -1.00 to -0.57.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range -0.57 to 0.20.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range 0.20 to 0.94.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range 0.94 to 1.42.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range 1.42 to 2.43.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the photon transverse energy.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the photon pseudorapidity.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the jet transverse energy.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the jet pseudorapidity.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of X(C=GAMMA,LO) thelongitudinal momentum fraction of the partons in the photon in LO approximation.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of X(C=P,LO) thelongitudinal momentum fraction of the partons in the proton in LO approximation.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the photons transverse momentum perpendicular to the jet direction separated into two regions of X(C=GAMMA,LO).

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle between the photon and the jet separated into two regions of X(C=GAMMA,LO).

Single differential cross section DSIG/DZ for D*+- production. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Single differential cross section DSIG/DLOG(Q**2) for D*+- production. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Single differential cross section DSIG/DX for D*+- production. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production in the LOG(Q**2) binfrom 2.0 to 2.2. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production in the LOG(Q**2) binfrom 2.2 to 2.4. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production in the LOG(Q**2) binfrom 2.4 to 3.0. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Measured values of the charm contributions to F2 for a mean Q**2 of 120GeV. The third DSYS error is the model uncertainty.

Measured values of the charm contributions to F2 for a mean Q**2 of 200GeV. The third DSYS error is the model uncertainty.

Measured values of the charm contributions to F2 for a mean Q**2 of 400GeV. The third DSYS error is the model uncertainty.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of Q**2 in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of X in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of ETARAP in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of Q**2 in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of X in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of ETARAP in the laboratoryframe.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the currenthemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of Q**2.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of ETARAP.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of Q**2.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of ETARAP.

Inclusive non-diffractive photoproduction single differential cross sections as a function of rapidity in the specified kinematic range.

3-jet cross section normalised to 2-jet cross section in bins of $Q^{2}$.

Normalised inclusive jet cross section in bins of $Q^{2}$ and $P_{T}$.

Normalised 2-jet cross section in bins of $Q^{2}$ and $\langle P_{T} \rangle$.

Normalised 2-jet cross sections in bins of $Q^2$ and $\xi$.

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of the pseudorapidity of each jet.

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of the pseudorapidity of each jet.

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of X1.

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of X2.

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of the three jet angle THETA (see text of article).

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of the three jet angle PHI (see text of article).

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of the PT of the leading jet in GAMMA P centre of mass frame.

Differential cross section for events with at least 3-jets as a function of the pseudorapidity difference between the two leading.

Differential cross section as a function of x for events with at least 3 jets with one forward jet and two central jets.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the leading jet for events with at least 3 jets with one forward jet and two central jets.

Differential cross section as a function of the PT of the leading jet in the GAMMA* P rest frame for events with at least 3 jets with one forward jet and two central jets.

Differential cross section as a function of X for events with at least 3 jets with two forward jets and one central jet.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the leading jet for events with at least 3 jets with two forward jets and one central jet.

Differential cross section as a function of the PT of the leading jet in the GAMMA* P rest frame for events with at least 3 jets with two forward jets and one central jet.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the leading jet for events with at least 3 jets and the PT of the leading jet in the GAMMA* P rest frame > 20 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of X for events with at least 3 jets and the PT of the leading jet in the GAMMA* P rest frame > 20 GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of the difference in the pseudorapidity of the leading and fourth jets for events with at least 4 jets.

Differential cross section as a function X2 for events with at least 4 jets.

Differential cross section as a function the jet angle THETA for events with at least 4 jets.

Differential cross section as a function the PT of the leading jet in GAMMA* P rest frame for events with at least 4 jets.

Differential cross section per nucleon as a function of transverse momentum for UPSILON production on the P target.

Bin averaged differential cross sections of diffractive di-jet production as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON).

Bin averaged differential cross sections of diffractive di-jet production as a function centre of mass PT of the leading jet.

Bin averaged differential cross sections of diffractive di-jet production as a function of the pseudorapidity difference.

Bin averaged double differential cross sections of diffractive di-jet production as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) in the (Q**2 + PT(LEADING JET)**2) range 29 to 50 GeV.

Bin averaged double differential cross sections of diffractive di-jet production as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) in the (Q**2 + PT(LEADING JET)**2) range 50 to 70 GeV.

Bin averaged double differential cross sections of diffractive di-jet production as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) in the (Q**2 + PT(LEADING JET)**2) range 70 to 100 GeV.

Bin averaged double differential cross sections of diffractive di-jet production as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) in the (Q**2 + PT(LEADING JET)**2) range 100 to 200 GeV.

V0 V0 cross section for PI- on C target.

V0 V0 cross section for SIGMA- on CU target.

V0 V0 cross section for SIGMA- on C target.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first K0s in K0S K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second K0s in K0S K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first K0s in K0S K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second K0s in K0S K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first K0s in K0S K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second K0s in K0S K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first K0S in K0S K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second K0S in K0S K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first K0S in K0S K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second K0S in K0S K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first K0S in K0S K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second K0S in K0S K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDA production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDA) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDA production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDA) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDA production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDA) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for K0S K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first K0S) and the slow (P=4,second K0S) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for K0S K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first K0S) and the slow (P=4,second K0S) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for K0S K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first K0S) and the slow (P=4,second K0S) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Cross section as a function of Feynman X for F2PRIME(1525) production with SIGMA- on CU and C targets.

Cross section as a function of transverse momentum for F2PRIME(1525) production with SIGMA- on CU and C targets.

Visible cross section for inclusive D*+- production with two jets.

Ratio of visible cross sections of inclusive D*+- production with and without the two jets.

Ratio of visible cross sections of inclusive D*+- production with and without the two jets.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of X.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of X.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of W.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of W.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of PT.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of PT.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of ETARAP.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of ETARAP.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Z.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Z.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of Q**2 with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of Q**2 with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of X with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of X with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of PT with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of PT with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of ETARAP with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtualphoton-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of ETARAP with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtualphoton-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of ET(C=JET1).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of ET(C=JET1).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of M(C=JET2).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of M(C=JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the jet containing D*.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the jet containing D*.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the other jet.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the other jet.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of the pseudorapidity difference of the two jets.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of the pseudorapidity difference of the two jets.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of the inelasticity Y.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON).

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of BETA.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the Photoproduction region as a function of PT of the D*.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the Photoproduction region as a function of ETARAP of the D*.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the Photoproduction region as a function of the inlasticity Y.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the Photoproduction region as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the Photoproduction region as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON).

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of PT of the D* for the region X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of ETARAP of the D*.for the region X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for the region X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production in the DIS region as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for the region X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Reduced cross section for diffractive D*+- production measured in the DIS region from the displaced track analysis.

Differential cross section for diffractive D*+- production measured in the Q**2 region 15 to 100 GeV**2 region as a function of M(X).

Fractional charm contribution to the diffractive cross section obtained from the displaced track method.

Bin averaged differential cross section for inclusive D* production in bins of PT(D*).

Bin averaged differential cross section for inclusive D* production in bins of ETARAP(D*).

Bin averaged differential cross section for inclusive D* production in bins of Z(D*).

Bin averaged differential cross section for inclusive D* production in bins of W.

Bin averaged differential cross section for inclusive D* production in bins of ETARAP for different PT ranges.

Bin averaged differential cross section for D*+ other jet production where 'other' jet does not contain D*.

Bin averaged differential cross section for D*+ other jet production where 'other' jet does not contain D*.

Bin averaged differential cross section for D*+ other jet production where 'other' jet does not contain D*.

Bin averaged differential cross section for D*+ other jet production where 'other' jet does not contain D*.

Bin averaged differential cross section for D*+ other jet production where 'other' jet does not contain D*.

Bin averaged differential cross section for D* tagged dijet production in bins of X(C=GAMMA), the fraction of the longitudinal photon momentum entering the hard scattering process.

Bin averaged differential cross section for D*+ other jet data sample as a function of the difference in the azimuthal angle of the D* and the jet.

Measured CHARM cross section as a function of ETARAP.

Measured CHARM cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA).

Ratio of CHARM to inclusive cross sections.

Ratio of CHARM to inclusive cross sections.

Ratio of CHARM to inclusive cross sections.

Measured BOTTOM cross section as a function of PT.

Measured BOTTOM cross section as a function of ETARAP.

Measured BOTTOM cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA).

Ratio of BOTTOM to inclusive cross sections.

Ratio of BOTTOM to inclusive cross sections.

Ratio of BOTTOM to inclusive cross sections.

Measured CHARM cross section as a function of PT.

Measured CHARM cross section as a function of ETARAP.

Ratio of CHARM to inclusive cross sections.

Ratio of CHARM to inclusive cross sections.

Measured BOTTOM cross section as a function of PT.

Measured BOTTOM cross section as a function of ETARAP.

Ratio of BOTTOM to inclusive cross sections.

Ratio of BOTTOM to inclusive cross sections.

Triple differential cross section.

Cross sections for di-jet and forward jet data.. The jets are ordered such that:-. ETARAP(P=4) > ETARAP(P=5) > ETARAP(P=6).. The first jet (P=4) is the forward jet.

Cross sections for di-jet and forward jet data.. The jets are ordered such that:-. ETARAP(P=4) > ETARAP(P=5) > ETARAP(P=6).. The first jet (P=4) is the forward jet.

Cross sections for di-jet and forward jet data.. The jets are ordered such that:-. ETARAP(P=4) > ETARAP(P=5) > ETARAP(P=6).. The first jet (P=4) is the forward jet.

Cross section as a function of the jet transverse energy for INCLUSIVE events containing at least one D* meson in different jet pseudorapidity regions.

Cross section as a function of the jet transverse energy for INCLUSIVE events containing at least one D* meson in different jet pseudorapidity regions.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity for INCLUSIVE events containing at least one D* meson in different jet transverse energy regions.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity for INCLUSIVE events containing at least one D* meson in different jet transverse energy regions.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity for INCLUSIVE events containing at least one D* meson in different jet transverse energy regions.

Cross section as a function of the jet transverse energy for D*-TAGGED and UNTAGGED jets in the jet pseudorapidity region -1.5 TO 2.4.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity for D*-TAGGED and UNTAGGED jets in 3 regions of jet transverse energy.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity for D*-TAGGED and UNTAGGED jets in 3 regions of jet transverse energy.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity for D*-TAGGED and UNTAGGED jets in 3 regions of jet transverse energy.

Cross section as a function of the jet transverse energy in 3 regions of transverse momentum of the D*.

Cross section as a function of the jet transverse energy in 3 regions of transverse momentum of the D*.

Cross section as a function of the jet transverse energy in 3 regions of transverse momentum of the D*.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity in 3 regions of transverse momentum of the D*.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity in 3 regions of transverse momentum of the D*.

Cross section as a function of the jet pseudorapidity in 3 regions of transverse momentum of the D*.

Cross section as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA,D*,JET) where the jet here is the UNTAGGED jet with the lightest ET.

The dijet cross section as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA) for events containing at least one D* meson.

The dijet cross section as a function of the PHI angle difference in JET1 and JET2 for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the PHI angle difference in JET1 and JET2 for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the PHI angle difference in JET1 and JET2 for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the 2-jet transverse momentum for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the 2-jet transverse momentum for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the 2-jet transverse momentum for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the the 2-jet mass for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the the 2-jet mass for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

The dijet cross section as a function of the the 2-jet mass for events containing at least one D* meson in different XOBS(C=GAMMA) regions.

Differential cross section as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section as a function of PT**2, the transverse momentum in the photon-photon centre of mass frame.

Differential cross section as a function of Y*, the rapidity of the J/PSI in the photon-photon centre of mass frame.

Differential cross section as a function of the mass of the hadronic systemX.

Differential cross section as a function of the rapidity of the hadronic system X.

Differential cross section in modified kinematic region as a function of Z.

Differential cross section in modified kinematic region as a function of PT**2, the transverse momentum in the photon-photon centre of mass frame.

Differential cross section in modified kinematic region as a function of Y*, the rapidity of the J/PSI in the photon-photon centre of mass frame.

Inclusive D*+- electroproduction cross section.

The measured bin averaged PT cross section for single D+- production.

The measured bin averaged ETARAP cross section for single D+- production.

The measured bin averaged Q**2 cross section for single D+- production.

The measured bin averaged PT cross section for single D0 production.

The measured bin averaged ETARAP cross section for single D0 production.

The measured bin averaged Q**2 cross section for single D0 production.

The measured bin averaged PT cross section for single D/S+- production.

The measured bin averaged ETARAP cross section for single D/S+- production.

The measured bin averaged Q**2 cross section for single D/S+- production.

The measured bin averaged PT cross section for single D*+- production.

The measured bin averaged ETARAP cross section for single D*+- production.

The measured bin averaged Q**2 cross section for single D*+- production.

Prompt photon cross section as a function of the photon pseudorapidity with an additional jet requirement.

Prompt photon cross section with an additional jet requirement as a function of the ET of the jet.

Prompt photon cross section with an additional jet requirement as a function of the pseudorapidity of the jet.

Prompt photon cross section with an additional jet requirement as a function of X(C=GAMMA,LO) the estimate of the fraction of the incident photon momentum participating in the hard process.

Prompt photon cross section with an additional jet requirement as a function of X(C=PROTON,LO) the estimate of the fraction of the incident proton momentum participating in the hard process.

Normalized photon PT distributions (perpendicular to the jet direction in the transverse plane) in two regions of X(C=GAMMA,LO).