CHI distribution for mass bin > 1200 GeV.

Centrality Ratio.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions from Lattice QCD Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations for net-baryon.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations for net-proton (No Decay).

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are STAR data.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from UrQMD net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from AMPT default net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from AMPT String Melting net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from Therminator net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from Hijing net-proton.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Ratio K+/PI+ in 8.9 GeV proton and PI+ interactions with Beryllium.

Ratio of deuteron to proton production in P BE interactions at 8.9 GeV.

Ratio of deuteron to proton production in PI+ BE interactions at 8.9 GeV.

Ratio of deuteron to proton production in PI- BE interactions at 8.0 GeV.

e+e- production cross section at mid rapidity for ultra peripheral Au+Au reactions.The results are given for 3 intervals of masses of the electron pair : 2.0 to 2.3, 2.3 to 2.8 and 2.0 to 2.8 Gev/c2.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the completed data samples. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the 'Dir' domain. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the 'SR' domain. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the 'DR' domain. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Observed distribution of the charged particle multiplicity.

Observed distribution of the charged particle invariant mass.

Observed distribution of the mean of X(C=GAMMA-PLUS) and X(GAMMA-MINUS).

Observed mean number of particles in the reconstructed jets.

The integrated number of LAMBDA/C+'s per UPSILON(4S) event at cm energy 10.58 GeV.

Number of observed events per 5 GeV bin for the >=3Jet sample. Data read from plots.

Spectrum in transverse momentum of electrons created in open heavy flavor decays, for 0-10% centrality.

Spectrum in transverse momentum of electrons created in open heavy flavor decays, for 10-20% centrality.

Spectrum in transverse momentum of electrons created in open heavy flavor decays, for 20-40% centrality.

Spectrum in transverse momentum of electrons created in open heavy flavor decays, for 40-60% centrality.

Spectra in transverse momentum of electrons created in open heavy flavor decays, for 60-92% centrality.

Non photonic electrons differential yield scaled by the number of collisions, as a function of centrality. PT belongs to 0.8-4.0 GeV/c.

Non photonic electrons differential yield scaled by the number of collisions, for minimum bias collisions. PT belongs to 0.8-4.0 GeV/c.

Number of collisions as a fonction of centrality There are only systematic errors due to the calculation of Ncoll.

Number of collisions for minimum bias events There are only systematic errors due to the calculation of Ncoll.

Nuclear overlap function TAA as a function of centrality The axis is labelled with 1/SIG, because the unit of the nuclear overlap function is barn-1 There are only systematic errors due to the calculation of TAA.

Nuclear overlap function TAA for minimum bias events The axis is labelled with 1/SIG, as the unit of the nuclear overlap function is barn-1 There are only systematic errors due to the calculation of TAA.

Differential charm cross section scaled by the number of collisions, at mid rapidity, as a function of centrality The differential cross section per number of collisions D(SIG)/Ncoll is calculated as following : D(SIG)/Ncoll = D(N(cc_bar))/TAA.

Differential charm cross section scaled by the number of collisions, at mid rapidity, for minimum bias events The differential cross section per number of collisions D(SIG)/Ncoll is calculated as following : D(SIG)/Ncoll = D(N(cc_bar))/TAA.

Total charm cross section scaled by the number of collisions, as a function of centrality The total cross section per number of collisions SIG/Ncoll is calculated as following : SIG/Ncoll = N(cc_bar)/TAA.

Total charm cross section scaled by the number of collisions, for minimum bias events The total cross section per number of collisions SIG/Ncoll is calculated as following : SIG/Ncoll = N(cc_bar)/TAA.