No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

D(N)/D(PT**2) HAS BEEN FITTED WITH THE FORMULA A*EXP(-SLOPE(C=1)*PT**2)+C*EXP(-SLOPE(C=2)PT**2).

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 40 to 60 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 60 to 100 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 100 to 140 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 140 to 180 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 180 to 240 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 240 to 300 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 300 to 360 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 360 to 420 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 0 to 20 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 20 to 40 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 40 to 60 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 60 to 100 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 100 to 140 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 140 to 180 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 180 to 240 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 240 to 300 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 300 to 360 mrad.

The differential PI+ PI- production cross section in the lab. system for the angular range 360 to 420 mrad.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0003 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0003 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=60.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=90.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=60.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=90.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=200.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=400.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=60.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=90.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=200.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=400.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=800.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=1600.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N N system.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N PI system.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N N PI system.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N PI PI system.

Distribution of the PI+ angle in the centre-of-mass system.

Distribution of the angle of the N-N system in the centre-of-mass system.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=9 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=12 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=17 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=24 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=32 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=45 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=60 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=80 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=110 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and R at nine Q^2 points.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

The product of the electronic width of the PHI(1020) and its branching fraction to KS KL.

Cross section measurement for PHI(1680).

Mass measurement for PHI(1680).

Measurement of the PHI(1680) width.

The product of the electronic width of the PHI(1680) and its branching fraction to KS KL.

The measured E+ E- --> KS KL cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.

The measured E+ E- --> KS KL PI+ PI- cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.

The measured E+ E- --> KS KS PI+ PI- cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.

The measured E+ E- --> KS KS K+ K- cross section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> KS KL PI+ PI-) and the J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> KS KS PI+ PI-) and the J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> KS KS K+ K-) and the J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> K*(892) KS PI) * BR(K*(892) --> KS PI) and the J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> K2*(1430) KS PI) * BR(K2*(1430) --> KS PI) and the J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> K*(892)+ K*(892)-) * (BR(K*(892) --> KS PI))**2 and the 90% C.L. J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> K2*(1430) K*(892)) * BR(K2*(1430) --> KS PI) * BR(K*(892) --> KS PI) and the 90% C.L. J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> KS KS PHI(1020)) * BR(PHI --> K+ K-) and the J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> F2PRIME(1525) PHI(1020)) * BR(PHI --> K+ K-} * BR(F2PRIME(1525) --> KS KS) and the J/PSI branching fraction.

The product WIDTH(E+ E- --> J/PSI) * BR(J/PSI --> F2PRIME(1525) K+ K-) * BR(F2PRIME(1525) --> KS KS) and the J/PSI branching fraction.