Showing 6 of 6 results
Measurements of the charge-dependent two-particle angular correlation function in proton-lead (pPb) collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV and lead-lead (PbPb) collisions at$\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV are reported. The pPb and PbPb datasets correspond to integrated luminosities of 186\nbinv and 0.607 nb$^{-1}$, respectively, and were collected using the CMS detector at the CERN LHC. The charge-dependent correlations are characterized by balance functions of same- and opposite-sign particle pairs. The balance functions, which contain information about the creation time of charged particle pairs and the development of collectivity, are studied as functions of relative pseudorapidity ($\Delta \eta$) and relative azimuthal angle ($\Delta \phi$), for various multiplicity and transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) intervals. A multiplicity dependence of the balance function is observed in $\Delta \eta$ and $\Delta \phi$ for both systems. The width of the balance functions decreases towards high-multiplicity collisions in the momentum region $\lt$2 GeV, for pPb and PbPb results. No multiplicity dependence is observed at higher transverse momentum. The data are compared with HYDJET, HIJING and AMPT generator predictions, none of which capture completely the multiplicity dependence seen in the data.
$\Delta\eta$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 0-10% centrality
$\Delta\eta$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 30-40% centrality
$\Delta\eta$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 70-80% centrality
$\Delta\phi$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 0-10% centrality
$\Delta\phi$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 30-40% centrality
1D $\Delta\eta$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 70-80% centrality
$\Delta\eta$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 0-40 $N_{trk}$
$\Delta\eta$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 120-150 $N_{trk}$
$\Delta\eta$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 270-300 $N_{trk}$
$\Delta\phi$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 0-40 $N_{trk}$
$\Delta\phi$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 120-150 $N_{trk}$
$\Delta\phi$ projection of balance function in low $p_{T}$ in 270-300 $N_{trk}$
The width of balance function in $<|\Delta\eta|>$ in low $p_{T}$ for PbPb collisions
Balance function width in low $p_{T}$ PbPb relative $<|\Delta\eta|>/<|\Delta\eta|>_{N_{ch}<65}$
The width of balance function in $<|\Delta\eta|>$ in low $p_{T}$ for pPb collisions
Balance function width in low $p_{T}$ in pPb relative $<|\Delta\eta|>/<|\Delta\eta|>_{N_{ch}<24}$
The width of the balance function in $<|\Delta\phi|>$ in low $p_{T}$ for PbPb collisions
Balance function width in low $p_{T}$ in PbPb for relative $<|\Delta\phi|>/<|\Delta\phi|>_{N_{ch}<65}$
The width of the balance function in $<|\Delta\phi|>$ in low $p_{T}$ for pPb collisions
Balance function width in low $p_{T}$ in pPb for relative $|\Delta\phi|/<|\Delta\phi|>_{N_{ch}<24}$
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 0-10% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 30-40% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 70-80% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 0-10% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 30-40% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 70-80% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in pPb for 0-40 $N_{trk}$
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in pPb for 120-150 $N_{trk}$
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in pPb for 270-300 $N_{trk}$
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in pPb for $N_{trk}$ 0-40
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in pPb for $N_{trk}$ 120-150
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in intermediate $p_{T}$ in pPb for $N_{trk}$ 270-300
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 0-10% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 30-40% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 70-80% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 0-10% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 30-40% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for 70-80% centrality
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in high $p_{T}$ in pPb for $N_{trk}$ 0-40
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in high $p_{T}$ in pPb for $N_{trk}$ 120-150
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in high $p_{T}$ in pPb for $N_{trk}$ 270-300
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for $N_{trk}$ 0-40
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for $N_{trk}$ 120-150
Balance function projection as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in high $p_{T}$ in PbPb for $N_{trk}$ 270-300
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \eta$ with $N_{ch}$ for low $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \eta$ with $N_{ch}$ for intermediate $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \eta$ with $N_{ch}$ for high $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \phi$ with $p_{T}$ for low $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \phi$ with $N_{ch}$ for intermediate $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \phi$ with $N_{ch}$ for high $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \eta$ with $N_{ch}$ for low $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \eta$ with $N_{ch}$ for intermediate $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \phi$ with $N_{ch}$ for high $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \phi$ with $N_{ch}$ for low $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \phi$ with $N_{ch}$ for intermediate $p_{T}$
Average width of the balance function in $\Delta \phi$ with $N_{ch}$ for high $p_{T}$
The hydrodynamic flow-like behavior of charged hadrons in high-energy lead-lead collisions is studied through multiparticle correlations. The elliptic anisotropy values based on different orders of multiparticle cumulants, $v_{2}\{2k\}$, are measured up to the tenth order ($k$ = 5) as functions of the collision centrality at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 0.607 nb$^{-1}$. A hierarchy is observed between the coefficients, with $v_{2}\{2\} > v_{2}\{4\} \gtrsim v_{2}\{6\} \gtrsim v_{2}\{8\} \gtrsim v_{2}\{10\}$. Based on these results, centrality-dependent moments for the fluctuation-driven event-by-event $v_{2}$ distribution are determined, including the skewness, kurtosis and, for the first time, superskewness. Assuming a hydrodynamic expansion of the produced medium, these moments directly probe the initial-state geometry in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions.
The $v_2\{2k\}$ ($k = 1, ..., 5$) values as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
The relative differences $(v_2\{2k\}-v_2\{10\})/v_2\{10\}$ ($k = 1, ..., 4$) as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
The $h_1$ and the $h_2$ hydrodynamic probes as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
The ratios between the hydrodynamic probes and their Taylor expansions. The ratios are plotted as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
The ratios between the hydrodynamic probes and their Taylor expansions. The ratios are plotted as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
The magnitudes of the measured skewness $\gamma_1^\textrm{exp}$ and "corrected" skewness $\gamma_{1,\textrm{corr}}^\textrm{exp}$ as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
The magnitudes of the measured kurtosis $\gamma_2^\textrm{exp}$ and "corrected" kurtosis $\gamma_{2,\textrm{corr}}^\textrm{exp}$ as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
The magnitudes of the measured superskewness $\gamma_3^\textrm{exp}$ and "corrected" superskewness $\gamma_{3,\textrm{corr}}^\textrm{exp}$ as functions of centrality in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02~\textrm{Te}\textrm{V}$. The measurement is performed with charged particles within the acceptance region.
Two-particle Bose-Einstein momentum correlation functions are studied for charged-hadron pairs in lead-lead collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The data sample, containing 4.27 $\times$$10^{9}$ minimum bias events corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 0.607 nb$^{-1}$, was collected by the CMS experiment in 2018. The experimental results are discussed in terms of a Lévy-type source distribution. The parameters of this distribution are extracted as functions of particle pair average transverse mass and collision centrality. These parameters include the Lévy index or shape parameter ($\alpha$), the Lévy scale parameter ($R$), and the correlation strength parameter ($\lambda$). The source shape, characterized by $\alpha$, is found to be neither Cauchy nor Gaussian, implying the need for a full Lévy analysis. Similarly to what was previously found for systems characterized by Gaussian source radii, a hydrodynamical scaling is observed for the Lévy $R$ parameter. The $\lambda$ parameter is studied in terms of the core-halo model.
The correlation function $C_2(q)$ of negatively charged hadron pairs with $1.00<K_{\mathrm{T}}<1.05$ GeV/$c$ in the 10-20% centrality bin.
The double-ratio correlation function $DR(q)$ of negatively charged hadron pairs with $1.30<K_{\mathrm{T}}<1.35$ GeV/$c$ in the 20-30% centrality bin.
The two-particle correlation function of negatively charged hadron pairs with $0.9<K_{\mathrm{T}}<1.3$ GeV/$c$ in the 0-100% centrality range, calculated using MC events with (Reco) and without (Gen) detector reconstruction.
The Levy scale parameter $R$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ in different centrality classes for negatively and positively charged hadron pairs.
The $1/R^2$ distribution vs. transverse mass $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ in different centrality classes for negatively and positively charged hadron pairs.
The linear-fit parameter $A$ versus $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle$ for positively and negatively charged hadron pairs. The bin range on $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle$ represents the 68% confidence interval associated to its uncertainty.
The linear-fit parameter $B$ versus $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle$ for positively and negatively charged hadron pairs. The bin range on $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle$ represents the 68% confidence interval associated to its uncertainty.
The Levy scale parameter $R$ versus $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle^{1/3}$ in different $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ classes for negatively and positively charged hadron pairs. The bin range on $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle^{1/3}$ represents the 68% confidence interval associated to its uncertainty.
The Levy stability index $\alpha$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ in different centrality classes for negatively and positively charged hadron pairs.
The average Levy stability index $\langle \alpha \rangle$ versus $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle$ for both positively and negatively charged hadron pairs. The bin range on $\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle$ represents the 68% confidence interval associated to its uncertainty.
The correlation strength $\lambda$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ in different centrality classes for negatively and positively charged hadron pairs.
The correlation strength (re-scaled with the square of the pion fraction) $\lambda ^*$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ in different centrality classes for positively and negatively charged hadron pairs.
This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a> <br><i>p+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a> <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a> <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 40-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 60-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 0-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a> <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV are presented using a data sample corresponding to 0.49 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ integrated luminosity collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2015. The recorded minimum-bias sample is enhanced by triggers for "ultra-central" collisions, providing an opportunity to perform detailed study of flow harmonics in the regime where the initial state is dominated by fluctuations. The anisotropy of the charged-particle azimuthal angle distributions is characterized by the Fourier coefficients, $v_{2}-v_{7}$, which are measured using the two-particle correlation, scalar-product and event-plane methods. The goal of the paper is to provide measurements of the differential as well as integrated flow harmonics $v_{n}$ over wide ranges of the transverse momentum, 0.5 $
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
Measurements of two-particle correlation functions and the first five azimuthal harmonics, $v_1$ to $v_5$, are presented, using 28 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Significant long-range "ridge-like" correlations are observed for pairs with small relative azimuthal angle ($|\Delta\phi|<\pi/3$) and back-to-back pairs ($|\Delta\phi| > 2\pi/3$) over the transverse momentum range $0.4 < p_{\rm T} < 12$ GeV and in different intervals of event activity. The event activity is defined by either the number of reconstructed tracks or the total transverse energy on the Pb-fragmentation side. The azimuthal structure of such long-range correlations is Fourier decomposed to obtain the harmonics $v_n$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ and event activity. The extracted $v_n$ values for $n=2$ to 5 decrease with $n$. The $v_2$ and $v_3$ values are found to be positive in the measured $p_{\rm T}$ range. The $v_1$ is also measured as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ and is observed to change sign around $p_{\rm T}\approx 1.5$-2.0 GeV and then increase to about 0.1 for $p_{\rm T}>4$ GeV. The $v_2(p_{\rm T})$, $v_3(p_{\rm T})$ and $v_4(p_{\rm T})$ are compared to the $v_n$ coefficients in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} =2.76$ TeV with similar event multiplicities. Reasonable agreement is observed after accounting for the difference in the average $p_{\rm T}$ of particles produced in the two collision systems.
The distributions of $N_{ch}^{rec}$ for MB and MB+HMT after applying an event-by-event weight, errors are statistical.
The distributions of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ [GeV] for MB and MB+HMT after applying an event-by-event weight, errors are statistical.
Per-trigger yield in 2D, $Y$($\Delta\phi$,$\Delta\eta$), for events with $E_{T}^{Pb} <$ 10 GeV and $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 200 and recoil-subtracted per-trigger yield, $Y^{sub}$($\Delta\phi$,$\Delta\eta$) for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 200. Errors are statistical.
$v_{2,2}^{unsub}$ and $v_{2,2}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
$v_{3,3}^{unsub}$ and $v_{3,3}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
$v_{4,4}^{unsub}$ and $v_{4,4}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.
The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{3}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{4}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{3}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{4}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The $v_{2}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ obtained indirectly by mapping from the $N_{ch}^{rec}-dependence of $v_{2}$ using the correlation data shown in Fig. 2(b).
The $v_{3}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ obtained indirectly by mapping from the $N_{ch}^{rec}-dependence of $v_{3}$ using the correlation data shown in Fig. 2(b).
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
$v_{2}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.
$v_{2}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.
$v_{3}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.
$v_{3}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.
$v_{4}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.
$v_{4}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.
Correlation between $E_{T}^{FCal}$ and $N_{ch}^{rec}$ for MB events (without weighting) and MB+HMT events (with weighting), errors are statistical.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.