Showing 25 of 62 results
Studies of the correlations of the two highest transverse momentum (leading) jets in individual Pb+Pb collision events can provide information about the mechanism of jet quenching by the hot and dense matter created in such collisions. In Pb+Pb and pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV, measurements of the leading dijet transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) correlations are presented. Additionally, measurements in Pb+Pb collisions of the dijet pair nuclear modification factors projected along leading and subleading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ are made. The measurements are performed using the ATLAS detector at the LHC with 260 pb$^{-1}$ of pp data collected in 2017 and 2.2 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb data collected in 2015 and 2018. An unfolding procedure is applied to the two-dimensional leading and subleading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions to account for experimental effects in the measurement of both jets. Results are provided for dijets with leading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ greater than 100 GeV. Measurements of the dijet-yield-normalized $x_{\mathrm{J}}$ distributions in Pb+Pb collisions show an increased fraction of imbalanced jets compared to pp collisions; these measurements are in agreement with previous measurements of the same quantity at 2.76 TeV in the overlapping kinematic range. Measurements of the absolutely-normalized dijet rate in Pb+Pb and pp collisions are also presented, and show that balanced dijets are significantly more suppressed than imbalanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions. It is observed in the measurements of the pair nuclear modification factors that the subleading jets are significantly suppressed relative to leading jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ between 100 and 316 GeV for all centralities in Pb+Pb collisions.
Measurements of the suppression and correlations of dijets is performed using 3 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ of Xe+Xe data at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.44$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Dijets with jets reconstructed using the $R=0.4$ anti-$k_t$ algorithm are measured differentially in jet $p_{\text{T}}$ over the range of 32 GeV to 398 GeV and the centrality of the collisions. Significant dijet momentum imbalance is found in the most central Xe+Xe collisions, which decreases in more peripheral collisions. Results from the measurement of per-pair normalized and absolutely normalized dijet $p_{\text{T}}$ balance are compared with previous Pb+Pb measurements at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} =5.02$ TeV. The differences between the dijet suppression in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb are further quantified by the ratio of pair nuclear-modification factors. The results are found to be consistent with those measured in Pb+Pb data when compared in classes of the same event activity and when taking into account the difference between the center-of-mass energies of the initial parton scattering process in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions. These results should provide input for a better understanding of the role of energy density, system size, path length, and fluctuations in the parton energy loss.
We present results on strange and multi-strange particle production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV as measured with the STAR detector at RHIC. Mid-rapidity transverse momentum spectra and integrated yields of $K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda$, $\Xi$, $\Omega$ and their anti-particles are presented for different centrality classes. The particle yields and ratios follow a smooth energy dependence. Chemical freeze-out parameters, temperature, baryon chemical potential and strangeness saturation factor obtained from the particle yields are presented. Intermediate transverse momentum ($p_T$) phenomena are discussed based on the ratio of the measured baryon-to-meson spectra and nuclear modification factor. The centrality dependence of various measurements presented show a similar behavior as seen in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.
Correction factors (acceptance × efficiency) for the most central events ( 0−5% for KS0, Λ and Ξ; 0−20% for Ω) at mid-rapidity (|y| < 1) as a function of pT for the different particle species as obtained via embedding. The branching ratio of the measured decay channel is not factored into this plot.
Correction factors (acceptance × efficiency) for the most central events ( 0−5% for KS0, Λ and Ξ; 0−20% for Ω) at mid-rapidity (|y| < 1) as a function of pT for the different particle species as obtained via embedding. The branching ratio of the measured decay channel is not factored into this plot.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Efficiency corrected pT spectra for the different centrality bins and for the various particles. Note that 7 centrality bins have been used for the KS0 and the Λ while only 6 and 3 have been used for the Ξ and Ω, respectively. Errors are statistical only. The Λ spectra are corrected for the feed-down of the Ξ decay.
Extrapolated average transverse momenta ⟨pT ⟩ as a function of dNch/dy for different particle species in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. Statistical uncertainties are represented by the error bars at the points while the systematic uncertainties are represented by the gray bars. The π, charged K and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Extrapolated average transverse momenta ⟨pT ⟩ as a function of dNch/dy for different particle species in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. Statistical uncertainties are represented by the error bars at the points while the systematic uncertainties are represented by the gray bars. The π, charged K and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
KS0 dN/dpT spectra compared to the charged Kaon spectra for the event centrality of 0-5% and 30-40%. The charged Kaons data points are for rapidity range of |y| < 0.1 and were extracted from Ref. [14].
KS0 dN/dpT spectra compared to the charged Kaon spectra for the event centrality of 0-5% and 30-40%. The charged Kaons data points are for rapidity range of |y| < 0.1 and were extracted from Ref. [14].
KS0 dN/dpT spectra compared to the charged Kaon spectra for the event centrality of 0-5% and 30-40%. The charged Kaons data points are for rapidity range of |y| < 0.1 and were extracted from Ref. [14].
KS0 dN/dpT spectra compared to the charged Kaon spectra for the event centrality of 0-5% and 30-40%. The charged Kaons data points are for rapidity range of |y| < 0.1 and were extracted from Ref. [14].
Strange particle production yields at mid-rapidity in central Au+Au and Pb+Pb collisions versus the center of mass energy √sNN. The top panel shows results for K0S and Λ. The AGS values are from E896 [1] (centrality 0 − 5 %). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0 − 7 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0 − 5 %). For the multi-strange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom panel), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0 − 11 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0 − 20 %).
Strange particle production yields at mid-rapidity in central Au+Au and Pb+Pb collisions versus the center of mass energy √sNN. The top panel shows results for K0S and Λ. The AGS values are from E896 [1] (centrality 0 − 5 %). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0 − 7 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0 − 5 %). For the multi-strange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom panel), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0 − 11 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0 − 20 %).
Strange particle production yields at mid-rapidity in central Au+Au and Pb+Pb collisions versus the center of mass energy √sNN. The top panel shows results for K0S and Λ. The AGS values are from E896 [1] (centrality 0 − 5 %). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0 − 7 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0 − 5 %). For the multi-strange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom panel), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0 − 11 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0 − 20 %).
Strange particle production yields at mid-rapidity in central Au+Au and Pb+Pb collisions versus the center of mass energy √sNN. The top panel shows results for K0S and Λ. The AGS values are from E896 [1] (centrality 0 − 5 %). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0 − 7 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0 − 5 %). For the multi-strange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom panel), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0 − 11 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0 − 20 %).
Anti-baryon to baryon yield ratios for strange baryons versus the center of mass energy √sNN. Λ/Λ is shown in the top panel while the multi-strange baryons are on the bottom panel. The data from AGS are not corrected for the weak decay feed-down from the multistrange baryons while the data from SPS and RHIC are corrected. The lines are the results of a thermal model calculation (see text section IV A). The AGS values are from E896 [1] (centrality 0 − 5 %). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0 − 7 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0 − 5 %). For the multi- strange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom panel), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0 − 11 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0 − 20 %).
Anti-baryon to baryon yield ratios for strange baryons versus the center of mass energy √sNN. Λ/Λ is shown in the top panel while the multi-strange baryons are on the bottom panel. The data from AGS are not corrected for the weak decay feed-down from the multistrange baryons while the data from SPS and RHIC are corrected. The lines are the results of a thermal model calculation (see text section IV A). The AGS values are from E896 [1] (centrality 0 − 5 %). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0 − 7 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0 − 5 %). For the multi- strange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom panel), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0 − 11 %) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0 − 20 %).
Antibaryon-to-baryon yield ratios for strange particles and protons as a function of dNch/dy at √sNN=62.4 and 200 GeV. The p data were extracted from Ref. [14]. The √sNN=200 GeV strange hadron data were extracted from Ref. [15].
Antibaryon-to-baryon yield ratios for strange particles and protons as a function of dNch/dy at √sNN=62.4 and 200 GeV. The p data were extracted from Ref. [14]. The √sNN=200 GeV strange hadron data were extracted from Ref. [15].
Particle-yield ratios as obtained by measurements (black dots) for the most central (0–5%) Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV and statistical model predictions (lines). The ratios indicated by the dashed lines (blue) were obtained by using only π, K, and protons, whereas the ratios indicated by the full lines (green) were obtained by also using the hyperons in the fit.
Particle-yield ratios as obtained by measurements (black dots) for the most central (0–5%) Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV and statistical model predictions (lines). The ratios indicated by the dashed lines (blue) were obtained by using only π, K, and protons, whereas the ratios indicated by the full lines (green) were obtained by also using the hyperons in the fit.
Chemical freeze-out temperature Tch (a) and strangeness saturation factor γs (b) as a function of the mean number of participants.
Chemical freeze-out temperature Tch (a) and strangeness saturation factor γs (b) as a function of the mean number of participants.
Chemical freeze-out temperature Tch (a) and strangeness saturation factor γs (b) as a function of the mean number of participants.
Chemical freeze-out temperature Tch (a) and strangeness saturation factor γs (b) as a function of the mean number of participants.
Temperature and baryon chemical potential obtained from thermal model fits as a function of √sNN (see Ref. [22]). The dashed lines correspond to the parametrizations given in Ref. [22]. The solid stars show the result for √sNN=62.4 and 200 GeV.
Temperature and baryon chemical potential obtained from thermal model fits as a function of √sNN (see Ref. [22]). The dashed lines correspond to the parametrizations given in Ref. [22]. The solid stars show the result for √sNN=62.4 and 200 GeV.
Temperature and baryon chemical potential obtained from thermal model fits as a function of √sNN (see Ref. [22]). The dashed lines correspond to the parametrizations given in Ref. [22]. The solid stars show the result for √sNN=62.4 and 200 GeV.
Temperature and baryon chemical potential obtained from thermal model fits as a function of √sNN (see Ref. [22]). The dashed lines correspond to the parametrizations given in Ref. [22]. The solid stars show the result for √sNN=62.4 and 200 GeV.
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π+ as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π- as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π+ as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π- as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π+ as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π- as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π+ as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π- as a function of dNch/dy for √sNN=62.4 GeV (left) and √sNN=200 GeV (right). The π and p data were extracted from Ref. [14].
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π− as a function of √sNN. The lines are the results of the thermal model calculation (see text Sec. 4a). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0–7%) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0–5%). For the multistrange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0–11%) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0–20%).
Ratio of baryon (solid symbols) and antibaryon (open symbols) to π− as a function of √sNN. The lines are the results of the thermal model calculation (see text Sec. 4a). The SPS values are from NA49 [20] (centrality 0–7%) and the RHIC values are from STAR [4, 15] (centrality 0–5%). For the multistrange baryons Ξ and Ω (bottom), the SPS results are from NA57 [2] (centrality 0–11%) and the RHIC values are from STAR [15, 21] (centrality 0–20%).
Nuclear modification factor RCP, calculated as the ratio between 0–10% central spectra and 40–80% peripheral spectra, for π, K0S, Λ, and Ξ particles in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The π RCP values were extracted from Ref. [10]. The gray band on the right side of the plot shows the uncertainties on the estimation of the number of binary collisions and the gray band on the lower left side indicates the uncertainties on the number of participants.
Nuclear modification factor RCP, calculated as the ratio between 0–10% central spectra and 40–80% peripheral spectra, for π, K0S, Λ, and Ξ particles in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The π RCP values were extracted from Ref. [10]. The gray band on the right side of the plot shows the uncertainties on the estimation of the number of binary collisions and the gray band on the lower left side indicates the uncertainties on the number of participants.
Nuclear modification factor RCP, calculated as the ratio between 0–5% central spectra and 40–60% peripheral spectra, for Λ and Ξ particles measured in Au + Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The gray band corresponds to the equivalent RCP curve for the Λ particles measured in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV [15].
Nuclear modification factor RCP, calculated as the ratio between 0–5% central spectra and 40–60% peripheral spectra, for Λ and Ξ particles measured in Au + Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The gray band corresponds to the equivalent RCP curve for the Λ particles measured in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV [15].
Λ/K0S ratio as a function of transverse momentum for different centrality classes. 0–5% (solid circles), 40–60% (open squares), and 60–80% (solid triangles) in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV.
Λ/K0S ratio as a function of transverse momentum for different centrality classes. 0–5% (solid circles), 40–60% (open squares), and 60–80% (solid triangles) in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV.
Maximum value of the Λ/K0S ratio from Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV (solid circles) and 200 GeV (open circles) [11] as a function of ⟨Npart⟩ for different centrality classes. The lowest ⟨Npart⟩ point corresponds to p+p collisions at 200 GeV [44]. The maximum of the Λ––/K0S from Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV is shown as solid triangles.
Maximum value of the Λ/K0S ratio from Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV (solid circles) and 200 GeV (open circles) [11] as a function of ⟨Npart⟩ for different centrality classes. The lowest ⟨Npart⟩ point corresponds to p+p collisions at 200 GeV [44]. The maximum of the Λ––/K0S from Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV is shown as solid triangles.
The correlations between flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n=2$, 3 and 4 and mean transverse momentum $[p_\mathrm{T}]$ in $^{129}$Xe+$^{129}$Xe and $^{208}$Pb+$^{208}$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV and 5.02 TeV, respectively, are measured using charged particles with the ATLAS detector. The correlations are sensitive to the shape and size of the initial geometry, nuclear deformation, and initial momentum anisotropy. The effects from non-flow and centrality fluctuations are minimized, respectively, via a subevent cumulant method and event activity selection based on particle production in the very forward rapidity. The results show strong dependences on centrality, harmonic number $n$, $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and pseudorapidity range. Current models describe qualitatively the overall centrality- and system-dependent trends but fail to quantitatively reproduce all the data. In the central collisions, where models generally show good agreement, the $v_2$-$[p_\mathrm{T}]$ correlations are sensitive to the triaxiality of the quadruple deformation. The comparison of model to the Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe data suggests that the $^{129}$Xe nucleus is a highly deformed triaxial ellipsoid that is neither a prolate nor an oblate shape. This provides strong evidence for a triaxial deformation of $^{129}$Xe nucleus using high-energy heavy-ion collision.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV
$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a> <br><i>p+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a> <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a> <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 40-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 60-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 0-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a> <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
The NA61/SHINE experiment at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) studies the onset of deconfinement in hadron matter by a scan of particle production in collisions of nuclei with various sizes at a set of energies covering the SPS energy range. This paper presents results on inclusive double-differential spectra, transverse momentum and rapidity distributions and mean multiplicities of $\pi^\pm$, $K^\pm$, $p$ and $\bar{p}$ produced in the 20$\%$ most $central$$^7$Be+$^9$Be collisions at beam momenta of 19$A$, 30$A$, 40$A$, 75$A$ and 150$A$ GeV/$c$. The energy dependence of the $K^\pm$/$\pi^\pm$ ratios as well as of inverse slope parameters of the $K^\pm$ transverse mass distributions are close to those found in inelastic $p$+$p$ reactions. The new results are compared to the world data on $p$+$p$ and Pb+Pb collisions as well as to predictions of the EPOS, UrQMD, AMPT, PHSD and SMASH models.
The azimuthal variation of jet yields in heavy-ion collisions provides information about the path-length dependence of the energy loss experienced by partons passing through the hot, dense nuclear matter known as the quark-gluon plasma. This paper presents the azimuthal anisotropy coefficients $v_2$, $v_3$, and $v_4$ measured for jets in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The measurement uses data collected in 2015 and 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.2 nb$^{-1}$. The $v_n$ values are measured as a function of the transverse momentum of the jets between 71 GeV and 398 GeV and the event centrality. A nonzero value of $v_2$ is observed in all but the most central collisions. The value of $v_2$ is largest for jets with lower transverse momentum, with values up to 0.05 in mid-central collisions. A smaller, nonzero value of $v_3$ of approximately 0.01 is measured with no significant dependence on jet $p_T$ or centrality, suggesting that fluctuations in the initial state play a small but distinct role in jet energy loss. No significant deviation of $v_4$ from zero is observed in the measured kinematic region.
Jet quenching is the process of color-charged partons losing energy via interactions with quark-gluon plasma droplets created in heavy-ion collisions. The collective expansion of such droplets is well described by viscous hydrodynamics. Similar evidence of collectivity is consistently observed in smaller collision systems, including $pp$ and $p$+Pb collisions. In contrast, while jet quenching is observed in Pb+Pb collisions, no evidence has been found in these small systems to date, raising fundamental questions about the nature of the system created in these collisions. The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider has measured the yield of charged hadrons correlated with reconstructed jets in 0.36 nb$^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb and 3.6 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at 5.02 TeV. The yields of charged hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >0.5$ GeV near and opposite in azimuth to jets with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{jet} > 30$ or $60$ GeV, and the ratios of these yields between $p$+Pb and $pp$ collisions, $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$, are reported. The collision centrality of $p$+Pb events is categorized by the energy deposited by forward neutrons from the struck nucleus. The $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$ values are consistent with unity within a few percent for hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >4$ GeV at all centralities. These data provide new, strong constraints which preclude almost any parton energy loss in central $p$+Pb collisions.
We present first measurements of the evolution of the differential transverse momentum correlation function, {\it C}, with collision centrality in Au+Au interactions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. {\it C} exhibits a strong dependence on collision centrality that is qualitatively similar to that of number correlations previously reported. We use the observed longitudinal broadening of the near-side peak of {\it C} with increasing centrality to estimate the ratio of the shear viscosity to entropy density, $\eta/s$, of the matter formed in central Au+Au interactions. We obtain an upper limit estimate of $\eta/s$ that suggests that the produced medium has a small viscosity per unit entropy.
The correlation function C, C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$ and the relative azimuthal angle ∆φ in radians for 70-80% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Relative statistical errors range from 0.8% in peripheral collisions to 0.9% in the most central collisions at the peak of the distribution.
The correlation function C, C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$ and the relative azimuthal angle ∆φ in radians for 70-80% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Relative statistical errors range from 0.8% in peripheral collisions to 0.9% in the most central collisions at the peak of the distribution.
The correlation function C, C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$ and the relative azimuthal angle ∆φ in radians for 30-40% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Relative statistical errors range from 0.8% in peripheral collisions to 0.9% in the most central collisions at the peak of the distribution.
The correlation function C, C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$ and the relative azimuthal angle ∆φ in radians for 30-40% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Relative statistical errors range from 0.8% in peripheral collisions to 0.9% in the most central collisions at the peak of the distribution.
The correlation function C, C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$ and the relative azimuthal angle ∆φ in radians for 0-5% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV..Relative statistical errors range from 0.8% in peripheral collisions to 0.9% in the most central collisions at the peak of the distribution.
The correlation function C, C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$ and the relative azimuthal angle ∆φ in radians for 0-5% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV..Relative statistical errors range from 0.8% in peripheral collisions to 0.9% in the most central collisions at the peak of the distribution.
Projection of the correlation function C, for|∆φ|<1.0 radians on the ∆η axis for 70-80% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The correlation function C is plottedin units of (GeV/c)$^2$.The correlation function C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The solid line shows the fit obtained with Eq.2. The dotted line corresponds to the baseline, b, obtained in the fit and shaded band shows uncertainty in determining b.
Projection of the correlation function C, for|∆φ|<1.0 radians on the ∆η axis for 70-80% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The correlation function C is plottedin units of (GeV/c)$^2$.The correlation function C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The solid line shows the fit obtained with Eq.2. The dotted line corresponds to the baseline, b, obtained in the fit and shaded band shows uncertainty in determining b.
Projection of the correlation function C, for|∆φ|<1.0 radians on the ∆η axis for 30-40% centrality. Statistical errors at(\Deltaeta_1,Deltaeta_2~(0,0) are approximately 0.084 for Au+Au. The correlation function C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The dotted line corresponds to the baseline,b, obtained in the fit and shaded band shows uncertainty in determining b.
Projection of the correlation function C, for|∆φ|<1.0 radians on the ∆η axis for 30-40% centrality. Statistical errors at(\Deltaeta_1,Deltaeta_2~(0,0) are approximately 0.084 for Au+Au. The correlation function C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The dotted line corresponds to the baseline,b, obtained in the fit and shaded band shows uncertainty in determining b.
Projection of the correlation function C, for|∆φ|<1.0 radians on the ∆η axis for 0-5% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The correlation functionCis plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The correlation function C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The solid line shows the fit obtained with Eq.2. The dotted line corresponds to the baseline,b, obtained in the fit and shaded band shows uncertainty in determining b.
Projection of the correlation function C, for|∆φ|<1.0 radians on the ∆η axis for 0-5% centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The correlation functionCis plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The correlation function C is plotted in units of (GeV/c)$^2$. The solid line shows the fit obtained with Eq.2. The dotted line corresponds to the baseline,b, obtained in the fit and shaded band shows uncertainty in determining b.
RMS as function of the number of participating nucleons for the correlation function C, for nine centrality classes in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dotted line represents a lower limit estimate of the RMS explained in the text and the shaded band represents systematic uncertainties on the RMS.
RMS as function of the number of participating nucleons for the correlation function C, for nine centrality classes in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dotted line represents a lower limit estimate of the RMS explained in the text and the shaded band represents systematic uncertainties on the RMS.
We report on K*0 production at mid-rapidity in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 62.4 and 200 GeV collected by the Solenoid Tracker at RHIC (STAR) detector. The K*0 is reconstructed via the hadronic decays K*0 \to K+ pi- and \bar{K*0} \to K-pi+. Transverse momentum, pT, spectra are measured over a range of pT extending from 0.2 GeV/c to 5 GeV/c. The center of mass energy and system size dependence of the rapidity density, dN/dy, and the average transverse momentum, <pT>, are presented. The measured N(K*0)/N(K) and N(\phi)/N(K*0) ratios favor the dominance of re-scattering of decay daughters of K*0 over the hadronic regeneration for the K*0 production. In the intermediate pT region (2.0 < pT < 4.0 GeV/c), the elliptic flow parameter, v2, and the nuclear modification factor, RCP, agree with the expectations from the quark coalescence model of particle production.
The K$\pi$ pair invariant mass distribution integrated over the $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ =200 GeV after mixed-event background subtraction.
The K$\pi$ pair invariant mass distribution integrated over the $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ =62.4 GeV after mixed-event background subtraction.
The K$\pi$ pair invariant mass distribution integrated over the $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ =200 GeV after mixed-event background subtraction.
The K$\pi$ pair invariant mass distribution integrated over the $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ =62.4 GeV after mixed-event background subtraction.
The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (top left) pT = 0.4–0.6 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.
The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (top right) pT = 0.6–0.8 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.
The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (bottom left) pT = 0.8–1.0 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.
The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (bottom right) pT = 1.0–1.2 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.
The signal-to-background ratio for $K^{*0}$ measurements as a function of $p_T$ for different collision centrality bins (0-10%, 10-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%) in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.
$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.
$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.
$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
The $K^{*0}$ reconstruction efficiency multiplied by the detector acceptance as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au (|$\eta$| < 0.8) collisions at 200 GeV for different collision centrality bins (0-20% ,20-40% , 40-60%)
The $K^{*0}$ reconstruction efficiency multiplied by the detector acceptance as a function of $p_T$ in Cu+Cu (|$\eta$| < 1.0) collisions at 200 GeV for different collision centrality bins (0-20% ,20-40% , 40-60%)
Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%) in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%) in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV
The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
The mid-rapidity $⟨p_T⟩$ of $\pi$, K, p and $K^{*0}$ as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ in Au+Au collisions divided by $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$.
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ in Cu+Cu collisions divided by $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ in d+Au collisions divided by $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ ratio in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.
Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ in Au+Au collisions divided by $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ in Cu+Cu collisions divided by $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ in d+Au collisions divided by $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.
Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.
The $K^{*0}$ $v_2$ (Run IV) as a function of $p_T$ in minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.
The $K^{*0}$ $v_2$ (Run II) as a function of $p_T$ in minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.
The $K^{*0}$ $R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.
The $K^{*0}$ $R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.
The $K^{*0}$ $R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.
The $K^{*0}$ ~$R_{CP}$~ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.
Dihadron azimuthal correlations containing a high transverse momentum ($p_T$) trigger particle are sensitive to the properties of the nuclear medium created at RHIC through the strong interactions occurring between the traversing parton and the medium, i.e. jet-quenching. Previous measurements revealed a strong modification to dihadron azimuthal correlations in Au+Au collisions with respect to p+p and d+Au collisions. The modification increases with the collision centrality, suggesting a path-length or energy density dependence to the jet-quenching effect. This paper reports STAR measurements of dihadron azimuthal correlations in mid-central (20-60%) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}=200$ GeV as a function of the trigger particle's azimuthal angle relative to the event plane, $\phi_s=|\phi_t-\psi_{\rm EP}|$. The azimuthal correlation is studied as a function of both the trigger and associated particle $p_T$. The subtractions of the combinatorial background and anisotropic flow, assuming Zero Yield At Minimum (ZYAM), are described. The correlation results are first discussed with subtraction of the even harmonic (elliptic and quadrangular) flow backgrounds. The away-side correlation is strongly modified, and the modification varies with $\phi_s$, with a double-peak structure for out-of-plane trigger particles. The near-side ridge (long range pseudo-rapidity $\Delta\eta$ correlation) appears to drop with increasing $\phi_s$ while the jet-like component remains approximately constant. The correlation functions are further studied with subtraction of odd harmonic triangular flow background arising from fluctuations. It is found that the triangular flow, while responsible for the majority of the amplitudes, is not sufficient to explain the $\phi_s$-dependence of the ridge or the away-side double-peak structure. ...
red data points
black histogram
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.153 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=0.51 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=12 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=4590 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=0.151 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=0.153 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=0.51 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=12 GeV/c
sigma vs pt phis=045 deg
sigma vs pt phis=090 deg
sigma vs pt phis=4590 deg
background uncertainty caps in the figure
flow uncertainty curves in the figure
leadage uncertainty arrows in the figure
total uncertainty boxes in the figure
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
Previous in-plane result published in 2004
Previous out-of-plane result published in 2004
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}15^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 75^{o}90^{o}
Cone region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
one region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
i region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
Pi region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
d+Au, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<#phi_{s}<15^{o}
20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<#phi_{s}<90^{o}
20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<phi_{s}<15^{o}
20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, jet
1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, jet
0-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/, slice 0, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, ridge
1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, ridge
jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, cone region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, cone region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, jetlike
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, jetlike
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, pi region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, pi region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, ridge
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, ridge
fig17_ampl_pt_inclusive
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, cone region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, jetlike
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region ridge
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, ridge
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, cone region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, jetlike
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region ridge
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, ridge
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, cone region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, jetlike
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region ridge
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, ridge
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, cone region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, jetlike
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region ridge
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, ridge
jetlike eta sigma
cone peak phi sigma
jetlike phi sigma
ridge phi sigma
jetlike eta sigma
cone peak phi sigma
jetlike phi sigma
ridge phi sigma
dAu jetlike eta sigma
dAu jetlike phi sigma
cone peak centroid
cone peak centroid
cone peak centroid
cone peak centroid
cone peak centroid
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
v_{2} /3
v_{3}
v_{4}
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 5
background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 0
background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 1
background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 2
background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 3
background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 4
background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles
difference from default results, slice 0
difference from default results, slice 1
difference from default results, slice 2
difference from default results, slice 3
difference from default results, slice 4
difference from default results, slice 5
raw signal
bkgd <v2t*v2>
bkgd <v2t>*<v2> (previous inclusive analysis)
bkgd <v2t*v2> subtracted
bkgd <v2t>*<v2> subtracted (previous inclusive analysis)
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |#Delta#eta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
We present STAR measurements of azimuthal anisotropy by means of the two- and four-particle cumulants $v_2$ ($v_2\{2\}$ and $v_2\{4\}$) for Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at center of mass energies $\sqrt{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}} = 62.4$ and 200 GeV. The difference between $v_2\{2\}^2$ and $v_2\{4\}^2$ is related to $v_{2}$ fluctuations ($\sigma_{v_2}$) and nonflow $(\delta_{2})$. We present an upper limit to $\sigma_{v_2}/v_{2}$. Following the assumption that eccentricity fluctuations $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ dominate $v_2$ fluctuations $\frac{\sigma_{v_2}}{v_2} \approx \frac{\sigma_{\epsilon}}{\epsilon}$ we deduce the nonflow implied for several models of eccentricity fluctuations that would be required for consistency with $v_2\{2\}$ and $v_2\{4\}$. We also present results on the ratio of $v_2$ to eccentricity.
Identified charged pion, kaon, and proton spectra are used to explore the system size dependence of bulk freeze-out properties in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 and 62.4 GeV. The data are studied with hydrodynamically-motivated Blast-wave and statistical model frameworks in order to characterize the freeze-out properties of the system. The dependence of freeze-out parameters on beam energy and collision centrality is discussed. Using the existing results from Au+Au and $pp$ collisions, the dependence of freeze-out parameters on the system size is also explored. This multi-dimensional systematic study furthers our understanding of the QCD phase diagram revealing the importance of the initial geometrical overlap of the colliding ions. The analysis of Cu+Cu collisions, which expands the system size dependence studies from Au+Au data with detailed measurements in the smaller system, shows that the bulk freeze-out properties of charged particles studied here scale with the total charged particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity, suggesting the relevance of initial state effects.
Negatively charged pion spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Negatively charged pion spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Negatively charged kaon spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Negatively charged kaon spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Negatively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Negatively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Positively charged pion spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Positively charged pion spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Positively charged kaon spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Positively charged kaon spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Positively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Positively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.
Mean transverse momentum of negatively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity.
Mean transverse momentum of positively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity [figure not available in published paper].
Integrated yields of negatively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity.
Integrated yields of positively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity [figure not available in published paper].
particle Ratios -I (pbar/pi^-, k^-/pi^-) versus multiplicity.
particle ratios -II (p/pi^+, k^+/pi^+) versus multiplicity.
particle ratios -III (p+pbar/pi, k/pi) versus multiplicity.
particle Ratios -IV (pi^-/pi^+, k^-/k^+, pbar/p) versus multiplicity [only pbar/p figure available in paper].
Enhancement factors for negatively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of Npart [Ref. Phys.Rev.C 81, 044902, 2010]. pp dNdy values are from Ref [Phys.Rev.C 79, 034909, 2009].
The kinetic freeze-out temperature (Tkin) and chemical freeze-out temperature (Tch) versus multiplicity.
flow velocity versus multiplicity.
chemical potentials versus multiplicity.
strangeness suppression factor versus multiplicity.
dNch/deta values for different centrality.
The contribution of $B$ meson decays to non-photonic electrons, which are mainly produced by the semi-leptonic decays of heavy flavor mesons, in $p+p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 200 GeV has been measured using azimuthal correlations between non-photonic electrons and hadrons. The extracted $B$ decay contribution is approximately 50% at a transverse momentum of $p_{T} \geq 5$ GeV/$c$. These measurements constrain the nuclear modification factor for electrons from $B$ and $D$ meson decays. The result indicates that $B$ meson production in heavy ion collisions is also suppressed at high $p_{T}$.
Distributions of the azimuthal angle between nonphotonic electrons and charged hadrons normalized per nonphotonic electron trigger. The trigger electron has (top) $2.5 < p_{T} < 3.5$ GeV/$c$ and (bottom) $5.5 < p_{T} < 6.5$ GeV/$c$. The curves represent PYTHIA calculations for $D$ (dotted curve) and $B$ (dashed curve) decays. The fit result is shown as the black solid curve.
(a) Background-subtracted invariant mass distribution of $K$ pairs requiring at least one nonphotonic electron trigger in the event. The solid line is a Gaussian fit to the data near the peak region. (b) Distribution of the azimuthal angle between nonphotonic electron (positron) trigger particles and $D^{0}$ ($\bar{D}^{0}$). The solid (dashed) line is a fit of the correlation function from PYTHIA (MC$@$NLO) simulations to the data points.
Transverse momentum dependence of the relative contribution from $B$ mesons ($r_{B}$) to the nonphotonic electron yields. Error bars are statistical and brackets are systematic uncertainties. The solid curve is the FONLL calculation [14]. Theoretical uncertainties are indicated by the dashed curves.
We report first results from an analysis based on a new multi-hadron correlation technique, exploring jet-medium interactions and di-jet surface emission bias at RHIC. Pairs of back-to-back high transverse momentum hadrons are used for triggers to study associated hadron distributions. In contrast with two- and three-particle correlations with a single trigger with similar kinematic selections, the associated hadron distribution of both trigger sides reveals no modification in either relative pseudo-rapidity or relative azimuthal angle from d+Au to central Au+Au collisions. We determine associated hadron yields and spectra as well as production rates for such correlated back-to-back triggers to gain additional insights on medium properties.
Projections of 2+1 correlation on $\Delta\phi$ for 200 GeV top 12% central-triggered and mid-central Au+Au and minimum bias d+Au data.
Projections of 2+1 correlation on $\Delta\eta$ for 200 GeV top 12% central-triggered and mid-central Au+Au and minimum bias d+Au data.
Transverse momentum distributions per trigger pair for the same- and away-side hadrons associated with di-jet triggers (|$\Delta\phi$| < 0.5, |$\Delta\eta$| < 0.5).
Relative production rates for jets and di-jets in Au+Au collisions of different centralities with respect to d+Au data.
Calculations of the Glauber-based core/corona model that accommodates inclusive hadron suppression and single jet production rate results.
Conditional di-jet survival probability in Au+Au data compared to d+Au reference.
Conditional di-jet survival probability in Au+Au data compared to d+Au reference.
The NA61/SHINE collaboration studies at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) the onset of deconfinement in hadronic matter by the measurement of particle production in collisions of nuclei with various sizes at a set of energies covering the SPS energy range. This paper presents results on inclusive double-differential spectra and mean multiplicities of $\pi^{-}$ mesons produced in the 5\% most \textit{central} $^7$Be+$^9$Be collisions at beam momenta of 19$A$, 30$A$, 40$A$, 75$A$ and 150$A$ GeV/$c$ obtained by the so-called $h^-$ method which does not require any particle identification. The shape of the transverse mass spectra differs from the shapes measured in central Pb+Pb collisions and inelastic p+p interactions. The normalized width of the rapidity distribution decreases with increasing collision energy and is in between the results for inelastic nucleon-nucleon and central Pb+Pb collisions. The mean multiplicity of pions per wounded nucleon in \textit{central} $^7$Be+$^9$Be collisions is close to that in central Pb+Pb collisions up to 75$A$GeV/$c$. However, at the top SPS energy the result is close to the one for inelastic nucleon-nucleon interactions. The results are discussed in the context of predictions for the onset of deconfinement at the CERN SPS collision energies.
We present two-dimensional (2D) two-particle angular correlations on relative pseudorapidity $\eta$ and azimuth $\phi$ for charged particles from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 62$ and 200 GeV with transverse momentum $p_t \geq 0.15$ GeV/$c$, $|\eta| \leq 1$ and $2\pi$ azimuth. Observed correlations include a {same-side} (relative azimuth $< \pi/2$) 2D peak, a closely-related away-side azimuth dipole, and an azimuth quadrupole conventionally associated with elliptic flow. The same-side 2D peak and away-side dipole are explained by semihard parton scattering and fragmentation (minijets) in proton-proton and peripheral nucleus-nucleus collisions. Those structures follow N-N binary-collision scaling in Au-Au collisions until mid-centrality where a transition to a qualitatively different centrality trend occurs within a small centrality interval. Above the transition point the number of same-side and away-side correlated pairs increases rapidly {relative to} binary-collision scaling, the $\eta$ width of the same-side 2D peak also increases rapidly ($\eta$ elongation) and the $\phi$ width actually decreases significantly. Those centrality trends are more remarkable when contrasted with expectations of jet quenching in a dense medium. Observed centrality trends are compared to {\sc hijing} predictions and to the expected trends for semihard parton scattering and fragmentation in a thermalized opaque medium. We are unable to reconcile a semihard parton scattering and fragmentation origin for the observed correlation structure and centrality trends with heavy ion collision scenarios which invoke rapid parton thermalization. On the other hand, if the collision system is effectively opaque to few-GeV partons the observations reported here would be inconsistent with a minijet picture.
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).
FIG. 2. (Color online) Fit decomposition of the $46 \%-56 \%$ centrality data for 62 -GeV Au-Au collisions. The top panels show from left to right the corrected data, model fit, fit residuals (data - model), and same-side 2D Gaussian. The bottom panels similarly show the away-side azimuth dipole, the nonjet azimuth quadrupole, the 1D $\eta_{\Delta}$ Gaussian, and the 2D exponential. This centrality is just below the sharp transition at $v_{\text {trans }}=3$. Fit residuals (c) are scaled up eightfold relative to the data.
FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.
FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.
FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.
FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.
FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.
FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.
FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) 2D data histogram from $0 \%-5 \%$ central 200 GeV Au-Au collisions $[(0,0)$ bin suppressed]. (b) Additional model component fitted to the $2 \mathrm{D}$ histogram and consisting of an AS azimuth dipole modulated by function $F\left(\eta_{\Delta}\right)$ described in the text. (c) Fit residuals including the new model component. (d) Data histogram in the first panel minus the additional model component and fitted offset. Remaining structure is described accurately by an AS dipole and SS 2D Gaussian.
FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).
FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).
FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).
FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).
FIG. 11. (Color online) (Left) Uncorrected angular correlations from 62-GeV $37 \%-46 \%$ central Au-Au collisions showing pileup distortions, especially evident as the W-shaped nonuniformity of the AS ridge on $\eta_{\Delta}$. (Right) The same data with pileup correction applied.
Vector mesons may be photoproduced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions when a virtual photon emitted by one nucleus scatters from the other nucleus, emerging as a vector meson. The STAR Collaboration has previously presented measurements of coherent $\rho^0$ photoproduction at center of mass energies of 130 GeV and 200 GeV in AuAu collisions. Here, we present a measurement of the cross section at 62.4 GeV; we find that the cross section for coherent $\rho^0$ photoproduction with nuclear breakup is $10.5\pm1.5\pm 1.6$ mb at 62.4 GeV. The cross-section ratio between 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV is $2.8\pm0.6$, less than is predicted by most theoretical models. It is, however, proportionally much larger than the previously observed $15\pm 55$% increase between 130 GeV and 200 GeV.
The production of $\Xi(1321)^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi}(1321)^{+}$ hyperons in inelastic p+p interactions is studied in a fixed target experiment at a beam momentum of 158 GeV/textitc. Double differential distributions in rapidity y and transverse momentum $p_{T}$ are obtained from a sample of 33M inelastic events. They allow to extrapolate the spectra to full phase space and to determine the mean multiplicity of both $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi}^{+}$. The rapidity and transverse momentum spectra are compared to transport model predictions. The $\Xi^{-}$ mean multiplicity in inelastic p+p interactions at 158~\GeVc is used to quantify the strangeness enhancement in A+A collisions at the same centre-of-mass energy per nucleon pair.
This paper presents measurements of production cross sections and inelastic cross sections for the following reactions: 60 GeV/$c$ protons with C, Be, Al targets and 120 GeV/$c$ protons with C and Be targets. The analysis was performed using the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS. First measurements were obtained using protons at 120 GeV/$c$, while the results for protons at 60 GeV/$c$ were compared with previously published measurements. These interaction cross section measurements are critical inputs for neutrino flux prediction in current and future accelerator-based long-baseline neutrino experiments.
The measurement of $K^{*}(892)^0$ resonance production via its $K^{+}\pi^{-}$ decay mode in inelastic p+p collisions at beam momentum 158 GeV/$c$ ($\sqrt{s_{NN}}=17.3$ GeV) is presented. The data were recorded by the NA61/SHINE hadron spectrometer at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron. The $\textit{template}$ method was used to extract the $K^{*}(892)^0$ signal and double differential transverse momentum and rapidity spectra were obtained. The full phase-space mean multiplicity of $K^{*}(892)^0$ mesons was found to be $(78.44 \pm 0.38 \mathrm{(stat)} \pm 6.0 \mathrm{(sys)) \cdot 10^{-3}}$. The NA61/SHINE results are compared with the E$_{POS}$1.99 and Hadron Resonance Gas models as well as with world data from p+p and nucleus-nucleus collisions.
Numerical values of mass and width of $K^{∗}(892)^0$ mesons fitted in 0<y<0.5 and presented in Fig.8. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic.
Numerical values of double-differential yields $d^{2}n/dydp_{T}$ presented in Fig. 10, given in units of $10^{−3} (GeV/c)^{−1}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic
Numerical values of double-differential yields $d^{2}n/dydp_{T}$ presented in Fig. 10, given in units of $10^{−3} (GeV/c)^{−1}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic
Numerical values of double-differential yields $d^{2}n/dydp_{T}$ presented in Fig. 10, given in units of $10^{−3} (GeV/c)^{−1}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic
Numerical values of double-differential yields $1/m_T d^{2}n/dm_{T}dy$ given in units of $10^{−3}(GeV)^{−2}$ and presented in Fig. 11; the values of $m_T−m_0$ specify the bin centers. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic
Numerical values of double-differential yields $1/m_T d^{2}n/dm_{T}dy$ given in units of $10^{−3}(GeV)^{−2}$ and presented in Fig. 11; the values of $m_T−m_0$ specify the bin centers. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic
Numerical values of double-differential yields $1/m_T d^{2}n/dm_{T}dy$ given in units of $10^{−3}(GeV)^{−2}$ and presented in Fig. 11; the values of $m_T−m_0$ specify the bin centers. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic
Numerical values of the $p_T$-integrated and extrapolated $dn/dy$ distribution presented in Fig. 12. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second one is systematic. Additionally, the width of the Gaussian fit to the $dn/dy$ distribution, as well as the mean multiplicity of $K^{*}(892)^0$ mesons are shown (see the text for details)
The mean multiplicities $\langle K^{*}(892)^0\rangle$ and the widths of the rapidity distributions $\sigma_y$ obtained from $dn/dy$ distributions (see the text for details). The first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic
The mean multiplicity of $K^{*}(892)^0$ mesons for 158 GeV/$c$ inelastic p+p interactions compared to theoretical multiplicities obtained within Hadron Gas Models
The mean multiplicities of different particle species measured in nucleus-nucleus collisions at 158$A$ GeV/$c$ by NA49 and NA61/SHINE. The total uncertainties of $\langle K^{*}(892)^0\rangle$, $\langle K^{+}\rangle$ and $\langle K^{-}\rangle$ were taken as the square roots of the sums of squares of statistical and systematic uncertainties. For NA49 p+p data, the $\langle K^{+}\rangle$ and $\langle K^{-}\rangle$ results include statistical uncertainties only($\langle K^{+}\rangle$ =0.2267$\pm$0.0006 and $\langle K^{-}\rangle$=0.1303$\pm$0.0004), whereas systematic uncertainties for total yields were not reported. Therefore, NA61/SHINE $\langle K^{+}\rangle$ and $\langle K^{-}\rangle$ values were used in the $\langle K^{*}(892)^0 \rangle / \langle K^{+} \rangle$ and $\langle K^{*}(892)^{0}\rangle / \langle K^{-} \rangle$ ratios. The numbers of $\langle K^{+} \rangle$ and $\langle K^{−}\rangle$ and their uncertainties for the 5% most central Pb+Pb collisions were multiplied by a factor 262/362 in orderto estimate charged kaon multiplicities in the 23.5% most central Pb+Pb reactions
The STAR Collaboration at RHIC has measured two-pion correlation functions from p+p collisions at sqrt(s)=200 GeV. Spatial scales are extracted via a femtoscopic analysis of the correlations, though this analysis is complicated by the presence of strong non-femtoscopic effects. Our results are put into the context of the world dataset of femtoscopy in hadron-hadron collisions. We present the first direct comparison of femtoscopy in p+p and heavy ion collisions, under identical analysis and detector conditions.
Fit results from a fit to data using Eq. 11 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations (standard fit from Figure 6 in the paper).
Fit results from a fit to data using Eq. 11 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 13 for non-femtoscopic ones (delta - q fit from Figure 6 in the paper)
Fit results from a fit to data using Eq. 11 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 14 for non-femtoscopic ones (zeta - beta fit from Figure 6 in the paper)
Fit results from a fit to data using Eq. 11 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 15 for non-femtoscopic ones (EMCIC fit from Figure 6 in the paper)
Fit results from a fit to 1D correlation function using Eq. 6 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations (standard fit from Figure 7 in the paper)
Fit results from a fit to 1D correlation function using Eq. 6 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 12 for non-femtoscopic ones (delta - q fit from Figure 7 in the paper)
Fit results from a fit to 1D correlation function using Eq. 6 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 15 for non-femtoscopic ones (EMCIC fit from Figure 7 in the paper). The non-femtoscopic parameters M1−4 were not varied, but kept fixed to the values in Table IV
Multiplicity dependence of fit results to 1D correlation function for different fit parameterizations (Figure 8 in the paper).
Multiplicity dependence of fit parameters to two-dimensional correlation functions using Equations 7 and 8. To consistently compare to previous measurements, Omega was set to unity (c.f. Equation 5).
STAR measurements of dihadron azimuthal correlations ($\Delta\phi$) are reported in mid-central (20-60\%) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}=200$ GeV as a function of the trigger particle's azimuthal angle relative to the event plane, $\phi_{s}=|\phi_{t}-\psi_{\rm EP}|$. The elliptic ($v_2$), triangular ($v_3$), and quadratic ($v_4$) flow harmonic backgrounds are subtracted using the Zero Yield At Minimum (ZYAM) method. The results are compared to minimum-bias d+Au collisions. It is found that a finite near-side ($|\Delta\phi|<\pi/2$) long-range pseudorapidity correlation (ridge) is present in the in-plane direction ($\phi_{s}\sim 0$). The away-side ($|\Delta\phi|>\pi/2$) correlation shows a modification from d+Au data, varying with $\phi_{s}$. The modification may be a consequence of pathlength-dependent jet-quenching and may lead to a better understanding of high-density QCD.
raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.
background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.
background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.
background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.
background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.
background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.
d+Au background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.
This paper reports results for directed flow $v_{1}$ and elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of charged particles in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 22.4 GeV at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. The measurements are for the 0-60% most central collisions, using charged particles observed in the STAR detector. Our measurements extend to 22.4 GeV Cu+Cu collisions the prior observation that $v_1$ is independent of the system size at 62.4 and 200 GeV, and also extend the scaling of $v_1$ with $\eta/y_{\rm beam}$ to this system. The measured $v_2(p_T)$ in Cu+Cu collisions is similar for $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 22.4-200$ GeV. We also report a comparison with results from transport model (UrQMD and AMPT) calculations. The model results do not agree quantitatively with the measured $v_1(\eta), v_2(p_T)$ and $v_2(\eta)$.
The event plane resolution measured using the TPC (second order) and using the BBC (first order) are shown as a function of collision centrality for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV. Errors are statistical only.
Charged hadron $v_{1}${BBC} vs. $\eta$ for 0-60% centrality Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV. The errors shown are statistical. Systematic errors are discussed in Section III.C. Results are compared to $v_{1}$ from 0-40% centrality Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV from the PHOBOS collaboration [10].
Comparison of the measured $v_{1}${BBC} as a function of η in 0-60% Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV with model predictions. The inset shows the central $\eta$ region in more detail. The errors are statistical only.
Elliptic flow versus $p_{T}$ for charged hadrons from Cu+Cu collisions at 0–60% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV measured with the subevent method with a pseudorapidity gap of 0.3 units compared with previously published STAR results for 200 and 62.4 GeV Cu+Cu [27] measured with full TPC event plane method $v_{2}${TPC} and full FTPC event plane method $v_{2}${FTPC}. The error bars are statistical. Results are also compared to $v_{2}$($p_{T}$) model calculations.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}(\eta)$ for charged hadrons fromCu+Cu collisions at 0–60% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV. The present STAR results are compared to the measurement from the PHOBOS [29] collaboration for Cu+Cu at 22.4 GeV. The PHOBOS results include statistical and systematic errors whereas the STAR results are plotted with statistical uncertainties only, and systematic errors are discussed in Section III C. Results are also compared to $v_{2}(\eta)$ calculations from the indicated models.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}${TPC} and $v_{2}${4} as a function of centrality for charged hadrons from Cu+Cu collisions at 0 − 60% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV, compared with previously published results from the STAR collaboration at 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV.
We present the measurement of non-photonic electron production at high transverse momentum ($p_T > $ 2.5 GeV/$c$) in $p$ + $p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV using data recorded during 2005 and 2008 by the STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). The measured cross-sections from the two runs are consistent with each other despite a large difference in photonic background levels due to different detector configurations. We compare the measured non-photonic electron cross-sections with previously published RHIC data and pQCD calculations. Using the relative contributions of B and D mesons to non-photonic electrons, we determine the integrated cross sections of electrons ($\frac{e^++e^-}{2}$) at 3 GeV/$c < p_T <~$10 GeV/$c$ from bottom and charm meson decays to be ${d\sigma_{(B\to e)+(B\to D \to e)} \over dy_e}|_{y_e=0}$ = 4.0$\pm0.5$({\rm stat.})$\pm1.1$({\rm syst.}) nb and ${d\sigma_{D\to e} \over dy_e}|_{y_e=0}$ = 6.2$\pm0.7$({\rm stat.})$\pm1.5$({\rm syst.}) nb, respectively.
The electron pair invariant mass distributions for electrons at $2.5 < p_{T} < 3.0$ GeV/c
The electron pair invariant mass distributions for electrons at $8 < p_{T} < 10$ GeV/c
The simulated electron pair invariant mass distributions for electrons at $2.5 < p_{T} < 3$ GeV/c
The simulated electron pair invariant mass distributions for electrons at $8 < p_{T} < 10$ GeV/c
The distribution of the minimum distance $\Delta$Z (cm) between an electron track projection point at the Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) and all BEMC clusters along the beam direction from unlike-sign electron candidate pairs, like-sign electron candidate pairs and unlike-minus-like.
The momentum over energy $p/E_0$ distribution ($p$ - momentum, $E_0$ - the energy of the most energetic tower in a Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter cluster) from unlike-sign electron candidate pairs, like-sign electron candidate pairs and unlike-minus-like.
Electron identification efficiency of the cuts on number of TPC points, n$\sigma_e$ and Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter cuts in the Run2008 analysis. The total efficiency is the product of all individual ones.
Electron identification efficiency of the cuts on number of TPC points, n$\sigma_e$ and Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter cuts in the Run2005 analysis. The total efficiency is the product of all individual ones.
n$\sigma_e$ distribution in the Run2008 analysis for unlike-sign, like-sign and unlike-minus-like pairs at $2.5 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV after applying all the electron identification cuts except the n$\sigma_e$ cut.
n$\sigma_e$ distribution in the Run2008 analysis for unlike-sign, like-sign and unlike-minus-like pairs at $8 < p_T < 10$ GeV after applying all the electron identification cuts except the n$\sigma_e$ cut.
The mean and width of the Gaussian fitting functions for pure photonic electron (unlike - minus-like) n$\sigma_e$ distribution as shown in Fig. 4(a) and Fig 4(b) for each $p_T$ bin.
n$\sigma_e$ distribution for inclusive electrons at (a) $2.5 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c in the Run2008 analysis, (b) $2.5< p_T < 3.5$ GeV/c in the Run2005 analysis and (c) $8.0 < p_T < 10.0$ GeV/c in the Run2008 analysis after applying all electron identification cuts except the n$\sigma_e$ cut.
Purity of the inclusive electron sample as a function of $p_T$ in data from Run 2008.
Purity of the inclusive electron sample as a function of $p_T$ in data from Run 2005 with High Tower HT1 trigger.
Purity of the inclusive electron sample as a function of $p_T$ in data from Run 2005 with High Tower HT2 trigger.
Derived $p_T$ spectrum for inclusive photons and the uncertainty represented by the region between the spectra of $\pi^0$ and $\eta$ decay photons and inclusive photon with doubled direct photon yield.
Ratio of photon $p_T$ spectra from Fig. 7(a) to inclusive photons $p_T$ spectrum.
Photonic electron reconstruction efficiency as a function of $p_T$ for $\gamma$ conversion, $\pi^0$ and $\eta$ Dalitz decay for the Run2008 analysis, and for their combination for the Run2008 analysis.
Photonic electron reconstruction efficiency as a function of $p_T$ for $\gamma$ conversion for the Run2005 analysis.
The adc0 distribution for high-tower trigger events. The adc0 is the offline ADC value of a BEMC cluster’s most energetic tower which is one of the high-towers responsible for firing a high-tower trigger.
The $\chi^2$ as a function of the adc0 cut.
Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum from VPD trigger in Run2008 d+Au collisions before (open squares) and after applying the adc0 > 193 cut.
The adc0 distribution for data at $p_T$ = 4.0 − 5.0 GeV/c
The adc0 distribution for simulations at $p_T$ = 4.0 − 5.0 GeV/c
The $p_T$ dependence of high-tower trigger efficiency from VPD data for Run2008 analysis.
The $p_T$ dependence of high-tower trigger efficiency from simulation for Run2008 analysis.
The $p_T$ dependence of high-tower trigger efficiency for combined VPD data and simulation for Run2008 analysis.
Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum for minimum-bias (MB) and two high-tower triggers, i.e. HT1 and HT2 for Run2005 analysis.
Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum for high-tower trigge HT1 for Run2005 analysis.
Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum for high-tower trigge HT2 for Run2005 analysis.
The $p_T$ dependence of trigger efficiency for the high-tower trigger HT1 data for Run2005.
The $p_T$ dependence of trigger efficiency for the high-tower trigger HT2 data for Run2005.
Distribution of the calculated BBC cross section $\sigma_{BBC}$ before and after removing events at the beginning and the end of Run2008.
Invariant cross section of the electron from decays of $J/\psi$.
Invariant cross section of the electron from decays of $\varUpsilon$.
Invariant cross section of the electron from Drell-Yan decays.
Invariant cross section of the electron from decays of light vector mesons ($\rho,\omega, \phi$).
The uncertainty of the $J/\psi$ feeddown.
Ratio of non-photonic to photonic electron yield from the Run2008 analysis.
Ratio of non-photonic to photonic electron yield from the Run2005 analysis.
Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the Run2008 analysis.
Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the Run2005 analysis.
Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the combined Run2005 and 2008 analyses.
Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions (update on PRL 98 (2007) 192301).
Ratio of invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the combined Run2005 and 2008 analyses over FONLL.
Ratio of invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions (update on PRL 98 (2007) 192301) over FONLL.
Invariant cross section for electrons $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ from bottom meson decay, together with the ratio of the measurements to the FONLL predictions.
Invariant cross section for electrons $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ from charm meson decay, together with the ratio of the measurements to the FONLL predictions.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.