Showing 25 of 46 results
This paper describes the measurement of elliptic flow of charged particles in lead-lead collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 2.76 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The results are based on an integrated luminosity of approximately 7 ub^-1. Elliptic flow is measured over a wide region in pseudorapidity, |eta| < 2.5, and over a broad range in transverse momentum, 0.5 < p_T < 20 GeV. The elliptic flow parameter v_2 is obtained by correlating individual tracks with the event plane measured using energy deposited in the forward calorimeters. As a function of transverse momentum, v_2(p_T) reaches a maximum at p_T of about 3 GeV, then decreases and becomes weakly dependent on p_T above 7 - 8 GeV. Over the measured pseudorapidity region, v_2 is found to be approximately independent of |eta| for all collision centralities and particle transverse momenta, something not observed in lower energy collisions. The results are discussed in the context of previous measurements at lower collision energies, as well as recent results from the LHC.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
Differential measurements of charged particle azimuthal anisotropy are presented for lead-lead collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, based on an integrated luminosity of approximately 8 mb^-1. This anisotropy is characterized via a Fourier expansion of the distribution of charged particles in azimuthal angle (phi), with the coefficients v_n denoting the magnitude of the anisotropy. Significant v_2-v_6 values are obtained as a function of transverse momentum (0.5<pT<20 GeV), pseudorapidity (|eta|<2.5) and centrality using an event plane method. The v_n values for n>=3 are found to vary weakly with both eta and centrality, and their pT dependencies are found to follow an approximate scaling relation, v_n^{1/n}(pT) \propto v_2^{1/2}(pT). A Fourier analysis of the charged particle pair distribution in relative azimuthal angle (Dphi=phi_a-phi_b) is performed to extract the coefficients v_{n,n}=<cos (n Dphi)>. For pairs of charged particles with a large pseudorapidity gap (|Deta=eta_a-eta_b|>2) and one particle with pT<3 GeV, the v_{2,2}-v_{6,6} values are found to factorize as v_{n,n}(pT^a,pT^b) ~ v_n(pT^a)v_n(pT^b) in central and mid-central events. Such factorization suggests that these values of v_{2,2}-v_{6,6} are primarily due to the response of the created matter to the fluctuations in the geometry of the initial state. A detailed study shows that the v_{1,1}(pT^a,pT^b) data are consistent with the combined contributions from a rapidity-even v_1 and global momentum conservation. A two-component fit is used to extract the v_1 contribution. The extracted v_1 is observed to cross zero at pT\sim1.0 GeV, reaches a maximum at 4-5 GeV with a value comparable to that for v_3, and decreases at higher pT.
The EP Resolution Factor vs. Centrality for n values from2 to 6.
The Chi Reolution Factor vs. Centrality for n values from 2 to 6.
The one-dimensional Delta(PHI) correlation function vs Delta(PHI) for |DETARAP| in the range 2 to 5 summed over all n values from 1 to 6.
The Fourier coefficient V_n,n vs. |Delta(ETARAP)| for individual n values.
The Fourier coefficient V_n vs. |Delta(ETARAP)| from the 2PC anaysis for individual n values from 2 to n.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 0 TO 5%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 5 TO 10%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 10 TO 20%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 20 TO 30%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 30 TO 40%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 40 TO 50%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 50 TO 60%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 60 TO 70%.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 1 TO 2 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 2 TO 3 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 3 TO 4 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 4 TO 8 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 8 TO 12 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 12 TO 20 GeV.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 1 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 5 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 5 TO 10 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 10 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 10 TO 20 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 20 TO 30 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 30 TO 40 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 40 TO 50 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 50 TO 60 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 60 TO 70 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 70 TO 80 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 1 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 5 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 5 TO 10 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 10 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 10 TO 20 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 20 TO 30 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 30 TO 40 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 40 TO 50 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 50 TO 60 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 60 TO 70 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 70 TO 80 %.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1} vs pT for different centrality selections, Figure 21.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
Using the ATLAS detector, observations have been made of a centrality-dependent dijet asymmetry in the collisions of lead ions at the Large Hadron Collider. In a sample of lead-lead events with a per-nucleon center of mass energy of 2.76 TeV, selected with a minimum bias trigger, jets are reconstructed in fine-grained, longitudinally-segmented electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters. The underlying event is measured and subtracted event-by-event, giving estimates of jet transverse energy above the ambient background. The transverse energies of dijets in opposite hemispheres is observed to become systematically more unbalanced with increasing event centrality leading to a large number of events which contain highly asymmetric dijets. This is the first observation of an enhancement of events with such large dijet asymmetries, not observed in proton-proton collisions, and which may point to an interpretation in terms of strong jet energy loss in a hot, dense medium.
Asymmetry in the different centrality regions for 2.76 TeV/Nucleon PB-PB collisions.
Asymmetry in 7 TeV P-P collisions.
DeltaPhi distribution in the different centrality regions for 2.76 TeV/Nucleon PB-PB collisions.
dDeltaPhi distribution in 7 TeV P-P collisions.
Measurements of the suppression and correlations of dijets is performed using 3 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ of Xe+Xe data at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.44$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Dijets with jets reconstructed using the $R=0.4$ anti-$k_t$ algorithm are measured differentially in jet $p_{\text{T}}$ over the range of 32 GeV to 398 GeV and the centrality of the collisions. Significant dijet momentum imbalance is found in the most central Xe+Xe collisions, which decreases in more peripheral collisions. Results from the measurement of per-pair normalized and absolutely normalized dijet $p_{\text{T}}$ balance are compared with previous Pb+Pb measurements at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} =5.02$ TeV. The differences between the dijet suppression in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb are further quantified by the ratio of pair nuclear-modification factors. The results are found to be consistent with those measured in Pb+Pb data when compared in classes of the same event activity and when taking into account the difference between the center-of-mass energies of the initial parton scattering process in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions. These results should provide input for a better understanding of the role of energy density, system size, path length, and fluctuations in the parton energy loss.
The centrality intervals in Xe+Xe collisions and their corresponding TAA with absolute uncertainties.
The centrality intervals in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions for matching SUM ET FCAL intervals and respective TAA values for Xe+Xe collisions.
The performance of the jet energy scale (JES) for jets with $|y| < 2.1$ evaluated as a function of pT_truth in different centrality bins. Simulated hard scatter events were overlaid onto events from a dedicated sample of minimum-bias Xe+Xe data.
The performance of jet energy resolution (JER) for jets with |y| < 2.1 evaluated as a function of pT_truth in different centrality bins. Simulated hard scatter events were overlaid onto events from a dedicated sample of minimum-bias Xe+Xe data. The fit parameters are listed in a sperate table (Extras 1)
The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for per-pair normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality
The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for absolutely normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality
The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for rho distributions for leading jets in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)
The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)
Parameter a,b, and c from JER fits in Figure 1b.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.
The correlations between flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n=2$, 3 and 4 and mean transverse momentum $[p_\mathrm{T}]$ in $^{129}$Xe+$^{129}$Xe and $^{208}$Pb+$^{208}$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV and 5.02 TeV, respectively, are measured using charged particles with the ATLAS detector. The correlations are sensitive to the shape and size of the initial geometry, nuclear deformation, and initial momentum anisotropy. The effects from non-flow and centrality fluctuations are minimized, respectively, via a subevent cumulant method and event activity selection based on particle production in the very forward rapidity. The results show strong dependences on centrality, harmonic number $n$, $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and pseudorapidity range. Current models describe qualitatively the overall centrality- and system-dependent trends but fail to quantitatively reproduce all the data. In the central collisions, where models generally show good agreement, the $v_2$-$[p_\mathrm{T}]$ correlations are sensitive to the triaxiality of the quadruple deformation. The comparison of model to the Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe data suggests that the $^{129}$Xe nucleus is a highly deformed triaxial ellipsoid that is neither a prolate nor an oblate shape. This provides strong evidence for a triaxial deformation of $^{129}$Xe nucleus using high-energy heavy-ion collision.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV
$\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality
$\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality
Studies of the correlations of the two highest transverse momentum (leading) jets in individual Pb+Pb collision events can provide information about the mechanism of jet quenching by the hot and dense matter created in such collisions. In Pb+Pb and pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV, measurements of the leading dijet transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) correlations are presented. Additionally, measurements in Pb+Pb collisions of the dijet pair nuclear modification factors projected along leading and subleading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ are made. The measurements are performed using the ATLAS detector at the LHC with 260 pb$^{-1}$ of pp data collected in 2017 and 2.2 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb data collected in 2015 and 2018. An unfolding procedure is applied to the two-dimensional leading and subleading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions to account for experimental effects in the measurement of both jets. Results are provided for dijets with leading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ greater than 100 GeV. Measurements of the dijet-yield-normalized $x_{\mathrm{J}}$ distributions in Pb+Pb collisions show an increased fraction of imbalanced jets compared to pp collisions; these measurements are in agreement with previous measurements of the same quantity at 2.76 TeV in the overlapping kinematic range. Measurements of the absolutely-normalized dijet rate in Pb+Pb and pp collisions are also presented, and show that balanced dijets are significantly more suppressed than imbalanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions. It is observed in the measurements of the pair nuclear modification factors that the subleading jets are significantly suppressed relative to leading jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ between 100 and 316 GeV for all centralities in Pb+Pb collisions.
absolutely normalized dijet cross sections from pp collisions
absolutely normalized dijet yields scaled by 1/<TAA> in 0-10% central PbPb collisions
absolutely normalized dijet yields scaled by 1/<TAA> in 10-20% central PbPb collisions
absolutely normalized dijet yields scaled by 1/<TAA> in 20-40% central PbPb collisions
absolutely normalized dijet yields scaled by 1/<TAA> in 40-60% central PbPb collisions
absolutely normalized dijet yields scaled by 1/<TAA> in 60-80% central PbPb collisions
self normalized dijets from pp collisions
self normalized dijet distributions in 0-10% central PbPb collisions
self normalized dijet distributions in 10-20% central PbPb collisions
self normalized dijet distributions in 20-40% central PbPb collisions
self normalized dijet distributions in 40-60% central PbPb collisions
self normalized dijet distributions in 60-80% central PbPb collisions
leading jet RAA^pair in 0-10% central PbPb collisions
subleading jet RAA^pair in 0-10% central PbPb collisions
leading jet RAA^pair in 10-20% central PbPb collisions
subleading jet RAA^pair in 10-20% central PbPb collisions
leading jet RAA^pair in 20-40% central PbPb collisions
subleading jet RAA^pair in 20-40% central PbPb collisions
leading jet RAA^pair in 40-60% central PbPb collisions
subleading jet RAA^pair in 40-60% central PbPb collisions
leading jet RAA^pair in 60-80% central PbPb collisions
subleading jet RAA^pair in 60-80% central PbPb collisions
ratio of subleading jet RAA^pair to leading jet RAA^pair in PbPb collisions
This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a> <br><i>p+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a> <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a> <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 40-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 60-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 0-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a> <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Jet quenching is the process of color-charged partons losing energy via interactions with quark-gluon plasma droplets created in heavy-ion collisions. The collective expansion of such droplets is well described by viscous hydrodynamics. Similar evidence of collectivity is consistently observed in smaller collision systems, including $pp$ and $p$+Pb collisions. In contrast, while jet quenching is observed in Pb+Pb collisions, no evidence has been found in these small systems to date, raising fundamental questions about the nature of the system created in these collisions. The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider has measured the yield of charged hadrons correlated with reconstructed jets in 0.36 nb$^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb and 3.6 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at 5.02 TeV. The yields of charged hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >0.5$ GeV near and opposite in azimuth to jets with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{jet} > 30$ or $60$ GeV, and the ratios of these yields between $p$+Pb and $pp$ collisions, $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$, are reported. The collision centrality of $p$+Pb events is categorized by the energy deposited by forward neutrons from the struck nucleus. The $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$ values are consistent with unity within a few percent for hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >4$ GeV at all centralities. These data provide new, strong constraints which preclude almost any parton energy loss in central $p$+Pb collisions.
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
The azimuthal variation of jet yields in heavy-ion collisions provides information about the path-length dependence of the energy loss experienced by partons passing through the hot, dense nuclear matter known as the quark-gluon plasma. This paper presents the azimuthal anisotropy coefficients $v_2$, $v_3$, and $v_4$ measured for jets in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The measurement uses data collected in 2015 and 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.2 nb$^{-1}$. The $v_n$ values are measured as a function of the transverse momentum of the jets between 71 GeV and 398 GeV and the event centrality. A nonzero value of $v_2$ is observed in all but the most central collisions. The value of $v_2$ is largest for jets with lower transverse momentum, with values up to 0.05 in mid-central collisions. A smaller, nonzero value of $v_3$ of approximately 0.01 is measured with no significant dependence on jet $p_T$ or centrality, suggesting that fluctuations in the initial state play a small but distinct role in jet energy loss. No significant deviation of $v_4$ from zero is observed in the measured kinematic region.
The JES for R = 0.2 jets in Pb+Pb collisions as a function of $p_T^{truth}$ for centrality selections of 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-40% and 40-60%.
The JER for R = 0.2 jets in Pb+Pb collisions as a function of $p_T^{truth}$ for centrality selections of 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-40% and 40-60%.
The JES for R = 0.2 jets in Pb+Pb collisions as a function of $2|\Psi_2-\phi^{reco}|$ for centrality selections of 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-40% and 40-60%.
The JER for R = 0.2 jets in Pb+Pb collisions as a function of $2|\Psi_2-\phi^{reco}|$ for centrality selections of 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-40% and 40-60%.
The systematic uncertainties in v2 for 20-40% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v2 for 5-10% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v3 for 20-40% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v3 for 5-10% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v4 for 20-40% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v4 for 5-10% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v2 for pT = 71--398 GeV jets as a function of centrality.
The systematic uncertainties in v3 for pT = 71--398 GeV jets as a function of centrality.
The systematic uncertainties in v4 for pT = 71--398 GeV jets as a function of centrality.
Angular distribution of jets as a function of the observed psi2 plane for jets with 71 < pT < 79 GeV in the 10-20% centrality bin.
Angular distribution of jets as a function of the observed psi3 plane for jets with 71 < pT < 79 GeV in the 10-20% centrality bin.
Angular distribution of jets as a function of the observed psi4 plane for jets with 71 < pT < 79 GeV in the 10-20% centrality bin.
The v2 values for R = 0.2 jets as a function of centrality for jets in several pT ranges.
The v2 values for R = 0.2 jets as a function of pT for 0-5%, 5-10%, and 20-40% centrality collisions.
The v2, v3, and v4 as a function of centrality for jets with pT = 71-398 GeV.
The v3 values for R = 0.2 jets as a function of centrality for jets in several pT ranges.
The v4 values for R = 0.2 jets as a function of centrality for jets in several pT ranges.
The v2 as a function of pT for jets in 10-20% centrality collisions.
The v3 as a function of pT for jets in 10-20% centrality collisions.
The v2 as a function of pT for jets in 20-40% centrality collisions.
The v3 as a function of pT for jets in 20-40% centrality collisions.
The v2 for jets in 10-20% centrality collisions.
The v3 for jets in 10-20% centrality collisions.
R2max as a function of pT (filled circles). Also shown is 1 - 4v2/(1+2v2).
R3max as a function of pT (filled circles). Also shown is 1 - 4v3/(1+2v3).
The systematic uncertainties in v2 for 40-60% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v3 for 40-60% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v4 for 40-60% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v2 for 10-20% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v3 for 10-20% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v4 for 10-20% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v2 for 0-5% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v3 for 0-5% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The systematic uncertainties in v4 for 0-5% centrality Pb+Pb collisions as a function of pT.
The v2 as a function of pT for jets in 40-60% centrality collisions.
The v2 as a function of pT for jets in 5-10% centrality collisions.
The v2 as a function of pT for jets in 0-5% centrality collisions.
The v3 as a function of pT for jets in 40-60% centrality collisions.
The v3 as a function of pT for jets in 5-10% centrality collisions.
The v3 as a function of pT for jets in 0-5% centrality collisions.
Measurements of charged-particle fragmentation functions of jets produced in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions can provide insight into the modification of parton showers in the hot, dense medium created in the collisions. ATLAS has measured jets in $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 2.76$ TeV Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC using a data set recorded in 2011 with an integrated luminosity of 0.14 nb$^{-1}$. Jets were reconstructed using the anti-$k_{t}$ algorithm with distance parameter values $R$ = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4. Distributions of charged-particle transverse momentum and longitudinal momentum fraction are reported for seven bins in collision centrality for $R=0.4$ jets with $p_{{T}}^{\mathrm{jet}}> 100$ GeV. Commensurate minimum $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ values are used for the other radii. Ratios of fragment distributions in each centrality bin to those measured in the most peripheral bin are presented. These ratios show a reduction of fragment yield in central collisions relative to peripheral collisions at intermediate $z$ values, $0.04 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.2$ and an enhancement in fragment yield for $z \lesssim 0.04$. A smaller, less significant enhancement is observed at large $z$ and large $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in central collisions.
Differences of D(Z) distributions in different centralities with respect to peripheral events for R = 0.3 jets. The errors represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Differences of D(Z) distributions in different centralities with respect to peripheral events for R = 0.2 jets. The errors represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Measurements of the centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV proton--lead ($p$+Pb) collisions and the jet cross-section in $\sqrt{s} = 2.76$ TeV proton--proton collisions are presented. These quantities are measured in datasets corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 27.8 nb$^{-1}$ and 4.0 pb$^{-1}$, respectively, recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in 2013. The $p$+Pb collision centrality was characterised using the total transverse energy measured in the pseudorapidity interval $-4.9 < \eta < -3.2$ in the direction of the lead beam. Results are presented for the double-differential per-collision yields as a function of jet rapidity and transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) for minimum-bias and centrality-selected $p$+Pb collisions, and are compared to the jet rate from the geometric expectation. The total jet yield in minimum-bias events is slightly enhanced above the expectation in a $p_\mathrm{T}$-dependent manner but is consistent with the expectation within uncertainties. The ratios of jet spectra from different centrality selections show a strong modification of jet production at all $p_\mathrm{T}$ at forward rapidities and for large $p_\mathrm{T}$ at mid-rapidity, which manifests as a suppression of the jet yield in central events and an enhancement in peripheral events. These effects imply that the factorisation between hard and soft processes is violated at an unexpected level in proton-nucleus collisions. Furthermore, the modifications at forward rapidities are found to be a function of the total jet energy only, implying that the violations may have a simple dependence on the hard parton-parton kinematics.
The $R_{\mathrm{coll}}$ and $T_{p\mathrm{A}}$ values and their uncertainties in each centrality bin.
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).
The relationship between jet production in the central region and the underlying-event activity in a pseudorapidity-separated region is studied in 4.0 pb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s} = 2.76$ TeV $pp$ collision data recorded with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The underlying event is characterised through measurements of the average value of the sum of the transverse energy at large pseudorapidity downstream of one of the protons, which are reported here as a function of hard-scattering kinematic variables. The hard scattering is characterised by the average transverse momentum and pseudorapidity of the two highest transverse momentum jets in the event. The dijet kinematics are used to estimate, on an event-by-event basis, the scaled longitudinal momenta of the hard-scattered partons in the target and projectile beam-protons moving toward and away from the region measuring transverse energy, respectively. Transverse energy production at large pseudorapidity is observed to decrease with a linear dependence on the longitudinal momentum fraction in the target proton and to depend only weakly on that in the projectile proton. The results are compared to the predictions of various Monte Carlo event generators, which qualitatively reproduce the trends observed in data but generally underpredict the overall level of transverse energy at forward pseudorapidity.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +2.1 < eta^dijet < +2.8.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +1.2 < eta^dijet < +2.1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.8 < eta^dijet < +1.2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.8.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.3.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.8 < eta^dijet < -0.3.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -1.2 < eta^dijet < -0.8.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.1 < eta^dijet < -1.2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.8 < eta^dijet < -2.1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +2.1 < eta^dijet < +2.8.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +1.2 < eta^dijet < +2.1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.8 < eta^dijet < +1.2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.8.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.3.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.8 < eta^dijet < -0.3.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -1.2 < eta^dijet < -0.8.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.1 < eta^dijet < -1.2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.8 < eta^dijet < -2.1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 10^-2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-2 < x_targ < 10^-1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-1 < x_targ < 1$.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 1$.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 10^-2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-2 < x_proj < 10^-1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-1 < x_proj < 1$.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 1$.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 10^-2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-2 < x_targ < 10^-1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-1 < x_targ < 1$.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 1$.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 10^-2.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-2 < x_proj < 10^-1.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-1 < x_proj < 1$.
Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 1$.
Measurements of two-particle correlation functions and the first five azimuthal harmonics, $v_1$ to $v_5$, are presented, using 28 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Significant long-range "ridge-like" correlations are observed for pairs with small relative azimuthal angle ($|\Delta\phi|<\pi/3$) and back-to-back pairs ($|\Delta\phi| > 2\pi/3$) over the transverse momentum range $0.4 < p_{\rm T} < 12$ GeV and in different intervals of event activity. The event activity is defined by either the number of reconstructed tracks or the total transverse energy on the Pb-fragmentation side. The azimuthal structure of such long-range correlations is Fourier decomposed to obtain the harmonics $v_n$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ and event activity. The extracted $v_n$ values for $n=2$ to 5 decrease with $n$. The $v_2$ and $v_3$ values are found to be positive in the measured $p_{\rm T}$ range. The $v_1$ is also measured as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ and is observed to change sign around $p_{\rm T}\approx 1.5$-2.0 GeV and then increase to about 0.1 for $p_{\rm T}>4$ GeV. The $v_2(p_{\rm T})$, $v_3(p_{\rm T})$ and $v_4(p_{\rm T})$ are compared to the $v_n$ coefficients in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} =2.76$ TeV with similar event multiplicities. Reasonable agreement is observed after accounting for the difference in the average $p_{\rm T}$ of particles produced in the two collision systems.
The distributions of $N_{ch}^{rec}$ for MB and MB+HMT after applying an event-by-event weight, errors are statistical.
The distributions of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ [GeV] for MB and MB+HMT after applying an event-by-event weight, errors are statistical.
Per-trigger yield in 2D, $Y$($\Delta\phi$,$\Delta\eta$), for events with $E_{T}^{Pb} <$ 10 GeV and $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 200 and recoil-subtracted per-trigger yield, $Y^{sub}$($\Delta\phi$,$\Delta\eta$) for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 200. Errors are statistical.
$v_{2,2}^{unsub}$ and $v_{2,2}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
$v_{3,3}^{unsub}$ and $v_{3,3}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
$v_{4,4}^{unsub}$ and $v_{4,4}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.
The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{3}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{4}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{3}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The centrality dependence of $v_{4}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.
The $v_{2}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ obtained indirectly by mapping from the $N_{ch}^{rec}-dependence of $v_{2}$ using the correlation data shown in Fig. 2(b).
The $v_{3}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ obtained indirectly by mapping from the $N_{ch}^{rec}-dependence of $v_{3}$ using the correlation data shown in Fig. 2(b).
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.
$v_{2}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.
$v_{2}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.
$v_{3}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.
$v_{3}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.
$v_{4}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.
$v_{4}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.
Correlation between $E_{T}^{FCal}$ and $N_{ch}^{rec}$ for MB events (without weighting) and MB+HMT events (with weighting), errors are statistical.
The ATLAS Collaboration has measured the inclusive production of $Z$ bosons via their decays into electron and muon pairs in $p+$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$ TeV at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurements are made using data corresponding to integrated luminosities of 29.4 nb$^{-1}$ and 28.1 nb$^{-1}$ for $Z \rightarrow ee$ and $Z \rightarrow \mu\mu$, respectively. The results from the two channels are consistent and combined to obtain a cross section times the $Z \rightarrow \ell\ell$ branching ratio, integrated over the rapidity region $|y^{*}_{Z}|<3.5$, of 139.8 $\pm$ 4.8 (stat.) $\pm$ 6.2 (syst.) $\pm$ 3.8 (lumi.) nb. Differential cross sections are presented as functions of the $Z$ boson rapidity and transverse momentum, and compared with models based on parton distributions both with and without nuclear corrections. The centrality dependence of $Z$ boson production in $p+$Pb collisions is measured and analyzed within the framework of a standard Glauber model and the model's extension for fluctuations of the underlying nucleon-nucleon scattering cross section.
The centrality bias factors derived from data as explained in the text. Model calculations shown in the Figure are found in arXiv:1412.0976.
The differential $Z$ boson production cross section, $d\sigma/dy^\mathrm{*}_{Z}$, as a function of $Z$ boson rapidity in the center-of-mass frame $y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}$, for $Z\rightarrow ee$, $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$, and their combination $Z\rightarrow\ell\ell$.
The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production multiplied by the Bjorken $x$ of the parton in the lead nucleus, $x_{Pb} d\sigma /dx_{Pb}$, as a function of $x_{Pb}$.
The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$.
The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-2<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<0$ and $0<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2.
Centrality bias corrected $Z$ boson yields per event for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$ scaled by by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$. (To remove the centrality bias correction each value may be multiplied by the approriate correction value found in arXiv:1412.0976.).
The rapidity differential Z boson yields per event scaled by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$ for three centrality ranges.
A measurement of $\textit{W}$ boson production in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=$2.76 TeV is presented. It is based on the analysis of data collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2011 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 0.14 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ and 0.15 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ in the muon and electron decay channels, respectively. The differential production yields and lepton charge asymmetry are each measured as a function of the average number of participating nucleons $< N_{\mathrm{part}} >$ and absolute pseudorapidity of the charged lepton. The results are compared to predictions based on next-to-leading-order QCD calculations. These measurements are, in principle, sensitive to possible nuclear modifications to the parton distribution functions and also provide information on scaling of $\textit{W}$ boson production in multi-nucleon systems.
Ratio of W+ and W- candidates in $W\rightarrow \ell \nu_{\ell}$ as a function of the mean number of participants $N_{part}$.
$W^\pm$ boson production yield per binary collision as a function of the mean number of participants $N_{part}$.
Differential production yield per binary collision for $W^{+}$ bosons as a function of $|\eta_\ell|$.
Differential production yield per binary collision for $W^{-}$ bosons as a function of $|\eta_\ell|$.
The lepton charge asymmetry $A_{\ell}$ from $W^\pm$ bosons as a function of absolute pseudorapidity.
Two-particle pseudorapidity correlations are measured in $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb, $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV $p$+Pb, and $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV $pp$ collisions at the LHC, with total integrated luminosities of approximately 7 $\mu\mathrm{b}^{-1}$, 28 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$, and 65 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$, respectively. The correlation function $C_{\rm N}(\eta_1,\eta_2)$ is measured as a function of event multiplicity using charged particles in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|<2.4$. The correlation function contains a significant short-range component, which is estimated and subtracted. After removal of the short-range component, the shape of the correlation function is described approximately by $1+\langle{a_1^2}\rangle \eta_1\eta_2$ in all collision systems over the full multiplicity range. The values of $\sqrt{\langle{a_1^2}\rangle}$ are consistent between the opposite-charge pairs and same-charge pairs, and for the three collision systems at similar multiplicity. The values of $\sqrt{\langle{a_1^2}\rangle}$ and the magnitude of the short-range component both follow a power-law dependence on the event multiplicity. The $\eta$ distribution of the short-range component, after symmetrizing the proton and lead directions in $p$+Pb collisions, is found to be smaller than that in $pp$ collisions with comparable multiplicity.
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for pp, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, wo SRC, all pairs
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta-) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta-) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta+) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta+) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit r_N^sub(eta) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit r_N^sub(eta) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta1, eta2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta1, eta2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta-) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta-) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta+) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta+) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit r_N^sub(eta) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit r_N^sub(eta) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta1, eta2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta1, eta2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta-) for pp, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta-) for pp, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta+) for pp, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta+) for pp, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit r_N^sub(eta) for pp, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit r_N^sub(eta) for pp, pT>0.2GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta1, eta2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV
a1 from fit C_N^sub(eta1, eta2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, all pairs
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, all pairs
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, opposite pairs
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, opposite pairs
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, same pairs
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, same pairs
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, all pairs
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, all pairs
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, opposite pairs
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, opposite pairs
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, same pairs
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, same pairs
SRC for pp, pT>0.5GeV, all pairs
SRC for pp, pT>0.2GeV, all pairs
SRC for pp, pT>0.5GeV, opposite pairs
SRC for pp, pT>0.2GeV, opposite pairs
SRC for pp, pT>0.5GeV, same pairs
SRC for pp, pT>0.2GeV, same pairs
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
SRC for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
SRC for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
SRC for pp, pT>0.5GeV
SRC for pp, pT>0.2GeV
a1 for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV
a1 for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV
a1 for pp, pT>0.5GeV
a1 for pp, pT>0.2GeV
f(eta+) for p+Pb
f(eta+) for symmetrized p+Pb
f(eta+) for pp
f(eta+) for Pb+Pb
Two-particle long-range azimuthal correlations are measured in photonuclear collisions using 1.7 nb$^{-1}$ of 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Candidate events are selected using a dedicated high-multiplicity photonuclear event trigger, a combination of information from the zero-degree calorimeters and forward calorimeters, and from pseudorapidity gaps constructed using calorimeter energy clusters and charged-particle tracks. Distributions of event properties are compared between data and Monte Carlo simulations of photonuclear processes. Two-particle correlation functions are formed using charged-particle tracks in the selected events, and a template-fitting method is employed to subtract the non-flow contribution to the correlation. Significant nonzero values of the second- and third-order flow coefficients are observed and presented as a function of charged-particle multiplicity and transverse momentum. The results are compared with flow coefficients obtained in proton-proton and proton-lead collisions in similar multiplicity ranges, and with theoretical expectations. The unique initial conditions present in this measurement provide a new way to probe the origin of the collective signatures previously observed only in hadronic collisions.
The measured $v_2$ and $v_3$ charged-particle anisotropies as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in photonuclear collisions
The measured $v_2$ and $v_3$ charged-particle anisotropies as a function of charged-particle transverse momentum in photonuclear collisions
Correlations between the elliptic or triangular flow coefficients $v_m$ ($m$=2 or 3) and other flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$=2 to 5) are measured using $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV Pb+Pb collision data collected in 2010 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated lumonisity of 7 $\mu$b$^{-1}$. The $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations are measured in midrapidity as a function of centrality, and, for events within the same centrality interval, as a function of event ellipticity or triangularity defined in a forward rapidity region. For events within the same centrality interval, $v_3$ is found to be anticorrelated with $v_2$ and this anticorrelation is consistent with similar anticorrelations between the corresponding eccentricities $\epsilon_2$ and $\epsilon_3$. On the other hand, it is observed that $v_4$ increases strongly with $v_2$, and $v_5$ increases strongly with both $v_2$ and $v_3$. The trend and strength of the $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations for $n$=4 and 5 are found to disagree with $\epsilon_m$-$\epsilon_n$ correlations predicted by initial-geometry models. Instead, these correlations are found to be consistent with the combined effects of a linear contribution to $v_n$ and a nonlinear term that is a function of $v_2^2$ or of $v_2v_3$, as predicted by hydrodynamic models. A simple two-component fit is used to separate these two contributions. The extracted linear and nonlinear contributions to $v_4$ and $v_5$ are found to be consistent with previously measured event-plane correlations.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
linear fit result of $v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_5$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_5$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q3 event-shape selection.
RMS eccentricity scaled v_n.
RMS eccentricity scaled v_n.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{5}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{5}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{5}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{5}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
Measurements of inclusive jet suppression in heavy ion collisions at the LHC provide direct sensitivity to the physics of jet quenching. In a sample of lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of approximately 7 inverse microbarns, ATLAS has measured jets with a calorimeter over the pseudorapidity interval |$\eta$| < 2.1 and over the transverse momentum range 38 < pT < 210 GeV. Jets were reconstructed using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm with values for the distance parameter that determines the nominal jet radius of R = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5. The centrality dependence of the jet yield is characterized by the jet "central-to-peripheral ratio," $R_{cp}$. Jet production is found to be suppressed by approximately a factor of two in the 10% most central collisions relative to peripheral collisions. $R_{cp}$ varies smoothly with centrality as characterized by the number of participating nucleons. The observed suppression is only weakly dependent on jet radius and transverse momentum. These results provide the first direct measurement of inclusive jet suppression in heavy ion collisions and complement previous measurements of dijet transverse energy imbalance at the LHC.
Glauber model calculation of the mean numbers of Npart and its associated errors, the mean Ncoll ratios, and Rcoll with fractional errors as a function of the centrality bins.
The Rcp values as a function of jet PT for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the collision centrality in the range 0 - 10 %.
The Rcp values as a function of jet PT for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the collision centrality in the range 10 - 20 %.
The Rcp values as a function of jet PT for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the collision centrality in the range 20 - 30 %.
The Rcp values as a function of jet PT for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the collision centrality in the range 30 - 40 %.
The Rcp values as a function of jet PT for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the collision centrality in the range 40 - 50 %.
The Rcp values as a function of jet PT for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the collision centrality in the range 50 - 60 %.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 38.36 - 44.21 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 44.21 - 50.94 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 50.94 - 58.70 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 58.70 - 67.64 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 67.64 - 77.94 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 77.94 - 89.81 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 89.81 - 103.5 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 103.5 - 119.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 119.3 - 137.4 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 137.4 - 158.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 158.3 - 182.5 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of the mean number of participating nucleons, NPART, for the four R values, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 for the jet PT range 182.5 - 210.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 38.36 - 44.21 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 38.36 - 44.21 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 44.21 - 50.94 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 44.21 - 50.94 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 50.94 - 58.70 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 50.94 - 58.70 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 58.70 - 67.64 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 58.70 - 67.64 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 67.64 - 77.94 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 67.64 - 77.94 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 77.94 - 89.81 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 77.94 - 89.81 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 89.81 - 103.5 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 89.81 - 103.5 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 103.5 - 119.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 103.5 - 119.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 119.3 - 137.4 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 119.3 - 137.4 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 137.4 - 158.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 137.4 - 158.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 158.3 - 182.5 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 158.3 - 182.5 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 0 - 10 %, 10 - 20 % and 20 - 30 % for the jet PT range 182.5 - 210.3 GeV.
The Rcp values as a function of R for the three centrality ranges 30 - 40 %, 40 - 50 % and 50 - 60 % for the jet PT range 182.5 - 210.3 GeV.
The ratios of Rcp between R=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and R=0.2 jets as a function of the jet PT for the centrality range 0 - 10 %.
The ratios of Rcp between R=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and R=0.2 jets as a function of the jet PT for the centrality range 10 - 20 %.
The ratios of Rcp between R=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and R=0.2 jets as a function of the jet PT for the centrality range 20 - 30 %.
The ratios of Rcp between R=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and R=0.2 jets as a function of the jet PT for the centrality range 30 - 40 %.
The ratios of Rcp between R=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and R=0.2 jets as a function of the jet PT for the centrality range 40 - 50 %.
The ratios of Rcp between R=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and R=0.2 jets as a function of the jet PT for the centrality range 50 - 60 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.2 and centrality range 0 - 10 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.3 and centrality range 0 - 10 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.4 and centrality range 0 - 10 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.5 and centrality range 0 - 10 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.2 and centrality range 10 - 20 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.3 and centrality range 10 - 20 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.4 and centrality range 10 - 20 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.5 and centrality range 10 - 20 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.2 and centrality range 20 - 30 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.3 and centrality range 20 - 30 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.4 and centrality range 20 - 30 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.5 and centrality range 20 - 30 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.2 and centrality range 30 - 40 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.3 and centrality range 30 - 40 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.4 and centrality range 30 - 40 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.5 and centrality range 30 - 40 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.2 and centrality range 40 - 50 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.3 and centrality range 40 - 50 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.4 and centrality range 40 - 50 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.5 and centrality range 40 - 50 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.2 and centrality range 50 - 60 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.3 and centrality range 50 - 60 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.4 and centrality range 50 - 60 %.
The covariance matrix for statistcal correlations for R = 0.5 and centrality range 50 - 60 %.
The centrality dependence of the mean charged-particle multiplicity as a function of pseudorapidity is measured in approximately 1 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ of proton--lead collisions at a nucleon--nucleon centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}} = 5.02$ TeV using the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Charged particles with absolute pseudorapidity less than 2.7 are reconstructed using the ATLAS pixel detector. The $p$+Pb collision centrality is characterised by the total transverse energy measured in the Pb-going direction of the forward calorimeter. The charged-particle pseudorapidity distributions are found to vary strongly with centrality, with an increasing asymmetry between the proton-going and Pb-going directions as the collisions become more central. Three different estimations of the number of nucleons participating in the $p$+Pb collision have been carried out using the Glauber model as well as two Glauber--Gribov inspired extensions to the Glauber model. Charged-particle multiplicities per participant pair are found to vary differently for these three models, highlighting the importance of including colour fluctuations in nucleon--nucleon collisions in the modelling of the initial state of $p$+Pb collisions.
The $\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$ values and their uncertainties for centrality intervals used in this analysis together with asymmetric systematic uncertainties for Glauber model, GGFC with $\omega$=0.11 and GGFC with $\omega$=0.2.
Centrality dependence of the charged particle pseudorapidity distribution measured in several centrality intervals for charged particles with $p_{T} > 0.1$ GeV. The first uncertainty is statistical the second systematic.
Centrality dependence of the charged particle pseudorapidity distribution measured in several centrality intervals for charged particles with $p_{T} > 0$ GeV. The first uncertainty is statistical the second systematic.
Ratios of $dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distributions measured in different centrality intervals to that in the peripheral (60–90%) centrality interval. The first uncertainty is statistical the second systematic.
Charged-particle pseudorapidity distribution $dN_{ch}/d\eta$ as a function of centrality (related to the $\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$ by Table 3) for several $\eta$-regions. The first uncertainty is statistical the second is the systematic uncertianty without centrality determination uncertainty, the third is the centrality determination systematic uncertainty. The centrality determination systematic uncertainty shall not be used in ratios to any quantity determined in the same centrality interval, e.g. for $dN_{ch}/d\eta/(0.5 N_{\mathrm{part}})$ or in ratios of other particle yields. This uncertainty shall be used for comparing to results of other experiments.
In order to study further the long-range correlations ("ridge") observed recently in p+Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN) =5.02 TeV, the second-order azimuthal anisotropy parameter of charged particles, v_2, has been measured with the cumulant method using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. In a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of approximately 1 microb^(-1), the parameter v_2 has been obtained using two- and four-particle cumulants over the pseudorapidity range |eta|<2.5. The results are presented as a function of transverse momentum and the event activity, defined in terms of the transverse energy summed over 3.1<eta<4.9 in the direction of the Pb beam. They show features characteristic of collective anisotropic flow, similar to that observed in Pb+Pb collisions. A comparison is made to results obtained using two-particle correlation methods, and to predictions from hydrodynamic models of p+Pb collisions. Despite the small transverse spatial extent of the p+Pb collision system, the large magnitude of v_2 and its similarity to hydrodynamic predictions provide additional evidence for the importance of final-state effects in p+Pb reactions.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 25-40 GeV.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 40-55 GeV.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 55-80 GeV.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of >80 GeV.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 25-40 GeV.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 40-55 GeV.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 55-80 GeV.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of >80 GeV.
The second-order harmonic, v2, integrated over pT and eta, calculated with two-particle cumulants as a function of Sum ET^Pb.
The second-order harmonic, v2, integrated over pT and eta, calculated with four-particle cumulants as a function of Sum ET^Pb.
The ATLAS experiment has observed 1995 Z boson candidates in data corresponding to 0.15 inverse nb of integrated luminosity obtained in the 2011 LHC Pb+Pb run at sqrt(s_NN)=2.76 TeV. The Z bosons are reconstructed via di-electron and di-muon decay channels, with a background contamination of less than 3%. Results from the two channels are consistent and are combined. Within the statistical and systematic uncertainties, the per-event Z boson yield is proportional to the number of binary collisions estimated by the Glauber model. The elliptic anisotropy of the azimuthal distribution of the Z boson with respect to the event plane is found to be consistent with zero.
The corrected per-event rapidity distribution of Z bosons over the centrality region 0-80%.
The corrected per-event transverse momentum distribution of Z bosons in the centrality region 0-5%.
The corrected per-event transverse momentum distribution of Z bosons in the centrality region 5-10%.
The corrected per-event transverse momentum distribution of Z bosons in the centrality region 10-20%.
The corrected per-event transverse momentum distribution of Z bosons in the centrality region 20-40%.
The corrected per-event transverse momentum distribution of Z bosons in the centrality region 40-80%.
Combined results for the centrality (Npart) dependence of Z boson yields divided by Ncoll for the PT range > 0 GeV/c. The systematic error includes the uncertainty in Ncoll.
Combined results for the centrality (Npart) dependence of Z boson yields divided by Ncoll for the PT range 0 to 10 GeV/c. The systematic error includes the uncertainty in Ncoll.
Combined results for the centrality (Npart) dependence of Z boson yields divided by Ncoll for the PT range 10 to 30 GeV/c. The systematic error includes the uncertainty in Ncoll.
Combined results for the centrality (Npart) dependence of Z boson yields divided by Ncoll for the PT range > 30 GeV/c. The systematic error includes the uncertainty in Ncoll.
This paper describes a measurement of light-by-light scattering based on Pb+Pb collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment during Run 2 of the LHC. The study uses $2.2$ nb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity collected in 2015 and 2018 at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV. Light-by-light scattering candidates are selected in events with two photons produced exclusively, each with transverse energy $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma} > 2.5$ GeV, pseudorapidity $|\eta_{\gamma}| < 2.37$, diphoton invariant mass $m_{\gamma\gamma} > 5$ GeV, and with small diphoton transverse momentum and diphoton acoplanarity. The integrated and differential fiducial cross sections are measured and compared with theoretical predictions. The diphoton invariant mass distribution is used to set limits on the production of axion-like particles. This result provides the most stringent limits to date on axion-like particle production for masses in the range 6-100 GeV. Cross sections above 2 to 70 nb are excluded at the 95% CL in that mass interval.
Measured differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for diphoton invariant mass are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line) with bands denoting the theoretical uncertainty.
Measured normalised differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for diphoton invariant mass are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line).
Measured differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for diphoton $|cos(\theta*)|$ are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line) with bands denoting the theoretical uncertainty.
Measured normalised differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for diphoton $|cos(\theta*)|$ are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line).
Measured normalised differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for average photon transverse momentum are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line) with bands denoting the theoretical uncertainty.
Measured normalised differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for average photon transverse momentum are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line).
Measured differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for diphoton rapidity are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line) with bands denoting the theoretical uncertainty.
Measured normalised differential fiducial cross sections of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ production in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for diphoton rapidity are shown as points with error bars giving the statistical uncertainty and grey bands indicating the size of the total uncertainty. The results are compared with the prediction from the SuperChic v3.0 MC generator (solid line).
The 95% CL upper limit on the ALP cross section $\sigma_{\gamma\gamma\rightarrow a \rightarrow\gamma\gamma}$ for the $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow a \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ process as a function of ALP mass m$_{a}$. The observed upper limit is shown as a solid black line and the expected upper limit is shown by the dashed black line with its $\pm1$ and $\pm2$ standard deviation bands. The discontinuity at $m_{a}=70 GeV$ is caused by the increase of the mass-bin width which brings an increase in signal acceptance.
The 95% CL upper limit on the ALP coupling $1/\Lambda_{a}$ for the $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow a \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ process as a function of ALP mass m$_{a}$. The observed upper limit is shown as a solid black line and the expected upper limit is shown by the dashed black line with its $\pm1$ and $\pm2$ standard deviation bands. The discontinuity at $m_{a} = 70 GeV$ is caused by the increase of the mass-bin width which brings an increase in signal acceptance.
Fiducial cross section for light-by-light scattering
Light-by-light scattering ($\gamma\gamma\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$) is a quantum-mechanical process that is forbidden in the classical theory of electrodynamics. This reaction is accessible at the Large Hadron Collider thanks to the large electromagnetic field strengths generated by ultra-relativistic colliding lead (Pb) ions. Using 480 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collision data recorded at a centre-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of 5.02 TeV by the ATLAS detector, the ATLAS Collaboration reports evidence for the $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ reaction. A total of 13 candidate events are observed with an expected background of 2.6$\pm$0.7 events. After background subtraction and analysis corrections, the fiducial cross section of the process $\textrm{Pb+Pb}\,(\gamma\gamma)\rightarrow \textrm{Pb}^{(\ast)}\textrm{+}\textrm{Pb}^{(\ast)}\,\gamma\gamma$, for photon transverse energy $E_{\mathrm{T}}>$3 GeV, photon absolute pseudorapidity $|\eta|<$2.4, diphoton invariant mass greater than 6 GeV, diphoton transverse momentum lower than 2 GeV and diphoton acoplanarity below 0.01, is measured to be 70 $\pm$ 24 (stat.) $\pm$ 17 (syst.) nb, which is in agreement with Standard Model predictions.
Detector-level diphoton invariant mass distribution
Detector-level diphoton acoplanarity distribution
The measured total fiducial cross section
The distributions of transverse momentum and longitudinal momentum fraction of charged particles in jets are measured in Pb+Pb and pp collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The distributions are measured as a function of jet transverse momentum and rapidity. The analysis utilises an integrated luminosity of 0.14 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb data and 4.0 pb$^{-1}$ of pp data collected in 2011 and 2013, respectively, at the same centre-of-mass energy of 2.76 TeV per colliding nucleon pair. The distributions measured in pp collisions are used as a reference for those measured in Pb+Pb collisions in order to evaluate the impact on the internal structure of jets from the jet energy loss of fast partons propagating through the hot, dense medium created in heavy-ion collisions. Modest but significant centrality-dependent modifications of fragmentation functions in Pb+Pb collisions with respect to those in pp collisions are seen. No significant dependence of modifications on jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and rapidity selections is observed except for the fragments with the highest transverse momenta for which some reduction of yields is observed for more forward jets.
D(pt) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity |y| < 2.1.
D(pt) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity |y| < 0.3.
D(pt) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity 0.3 < |y| < 0.8.
D(pt) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity 1.2 < |y| < 2.1.
D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity |y| < 2.1.
D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity |y| < 0.3.
D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity 0.3 < |y| < 0.8.
D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity 1.2 < |y| < 2.1.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.
The difference between the total yield of particles with 1 < pt^trk < 4 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total yield measured in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
The difference between the total yield of particles with 4 < pt^trk < 25 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total yield measured in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
The difference between the total yield of particles with 25 < pt^trk < 100 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total yield measured in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
The difference between the total transverse momentum of particles with 1 < pt^trk < 4 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total transverse momentum of particles in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
The difference between the total transverse momentum of particles with 4 < pt^trk < 25 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total transverse momentum of particles in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
The difference between the total transverse momentum of particles with 25 < pt^trk < 100 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total transverse momentum of particles in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.
The ratio of R_D(z) distributions in three rapidity selections for 0-10 PCT Pb+Pb collisions.
The ratio of R_D(z) distributions in three rapidity selections for 10-20 PCT Pb+Pb collisions.
The ratio of R_D(z) distributions in three rapidity selections for 20-30 PCT Pb+Pb collisions.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.