Showing 10 of 46 results
This paper presents a measurement of jet fragmentation functions in 0.49 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collisions and 25 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV collected in 2015 with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. These measurements provide insight into the jet quenching process in the quark-gluon plasma created in the aftermath of ultra-relativistic collisions between two nuclei. The modifications to the jet fragmentation functions are quantified by dividing the measurements in Pb+Pb collisions by baseline measurements in $pp$ collisions. This ratio is studied as a function of the transverse momentum of the jet, the jet rapidity, and the centrality of the collision. In both collision systems, the jet fragmentation functions are measured for jets with transverse momentum between 126 GeV and 398 GeV and with an absolute value of jet rapidity less than 2.1. An enhancement of particles carrying a small fraction of the jet momentum is observed, which increases with centrality and with increasing jet transverse momentum. Yields of particles carrying a very large fraction of the jet momentum are also observed to be enhanced. Between these two enhancements of the fragmentation functions a suppression of particles carrying an intermediate fraction of the jet momentum is observed in Pb+Pb collisions. A small dependence of the modifications on jet rapidity is observed.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.
Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.
Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.
A measurement of $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ production is presented. It is based on a data sample from Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV and $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2015, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $0.42\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ and $25\mathrm{pb}^{-1}$ in Pb+Pb and $pp$, respectively. The measurements of per-event yields, nuclear modification factors, and non-prompt fractions are performed in the dimuon decay channel for $9 < p_{T}^{\mu\mu} < 40$ GeV in dimuon transverse momentum, and $-2.0 < y_{\mu\mu} < 2.0$ in rapidity. Strong suppression is found in Pb+Pb collisions for both prompt and non-prompt $J/\psi$, as well as for prompt and non-prompt $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$, increasing with event centrality. The suppression of prompt $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ is observed to be stronger than that of $J/\psi$, while the suppression of non-prompt $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ is equal to that of the non-prompt $J/\psi$ within uncertainties, consistent with the expectation that both arise from \textit{b}-quarks propagating through the medium. Despite prompt and non-prompt $J/\psi$ arising from different mechanisms, the dependence of their nuclear modification factors on centrality is found to be quite similar.
Per-event-yield of prompt jpsi production in 5.02 TeV PbPb collision data as a function of pT for three different centrality slices in the rapidity range |y| < 2.
Per-event-yield of non-prompt jpsi production in 5.02 TeV PbPb collision data as a function of pT for three different centrality slices in the rapidity range |y| < 2.
Non-prompt fraction of jpsi production in 5.02 TeV PbPb collision data as a function of pT for three different centrality slices in the rapidity range |y| < 2.
Non-prompt fraction of jpsi production in 5.02 TeV PbPb collision data as a function of pT for integrated centrality in the rapidity range |y| < 2.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt and non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--20% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the non-prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the non-prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.
The nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV
The nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV
The double ratio of nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the prompt jpsi and psi(2S) for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV
The double ratio nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the non-prompt jpsi and psi(2S) for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV
The ATLAS Collaboration has measured the inclusive production of $Z$ bosons via their decays into electron and muon pairs in $p+$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$ TeV at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurements are made using data corresponding to integrated luminosities of 29.4 nb$^{-1}$ and 28.1 nb$^{-1}$ for $Z \rightarrow ee$ and $Z \rightarrow \mu\mu$, respectively. The results from the two channels are consistent and combined to obtain a cross section times the $Z \rightarrow \ell\ell$ branching ratio, integrated over the rapidity region $|y^{*}_{Z}|<3.5$, of 139.8 $\pm$ 4.8 (stat.) $\pm$ 6.2 (syst.) $\pm$ 3.8 (lumi.) nb. Differential cross sections are presented as functions of the $Z$ boson rapidity and transverse momentum, and compared with models based on parton distributions both with and without nuclear corrections. The centrality dependence of $Z$ boson production in $p+$Pb collisions is measured and analyzed within the framework of a standard Glauber model and the model's extension for fluctuations of the underlying nucleon-nucleon scattering cross section.
The centrality bias factors derived from data as explained in the text. Model calculations shown in the Figure are found in arXiv:1412.0976.
The differential $Z$ boson production cross section, $d\sigma/dy^\mathrm{*}_{Z}$, as a function of $Z$ boson rapidity in the center-of-mass frame $y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}$, for $Z\rightarrow ee$, $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$, and their combination $Z\rightarrow\ell\ell$.
The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production multiplied by the Bjorken $x$ of the parton in the lead nucleus, $x_{Pb} d\sigma /dx_{Pb}$, as a function of $x_{Pb}$.
The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$.
The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-2<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<0$ and $0<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2.
Centrality bias corrected $Z$ boson yields per event for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$ scaled by by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$. (To remove the centrality bias correction each value may be multiplied by the approriate correction value found in arXiv:1412.0976.).
The rapidity differential Z boson yields per event scaled by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$ for three centrality ranges.
Two-particle pseudorapidity correlations are measured in $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb, $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV $p$+Pb, and $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV $pp$ collisions at the LHC, with total integrated luminosities of approximately 7 $\mu\mathrm{b}^{-1}$, 28 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$, and 65 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$, respectively. The correlation function $C_{\rm N}(\eta_1,\eta_2)$ is measured as a function of event multiplicity using charged particles in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|<2.4$. The correlation function contains a significant short-range component, which is estimated and subtracted. After removal of the short-range component, the shape of the correlation function is described approximately by $1+\langle{a_1^2}\rangle \eta_1\eta_2$ in all collision systems over the full multiplicity range. The values of $\sqrt{\langle{a_1^2}\rangle}$ are consistent between the opposite-charge pairs and same-charge pairs, and for the three collision systems at similar multiplicity. The values of $\sqrt{\langle{a_1^2}\rangle}$ and the magnitude of the short-range component both follow a power-law dependence on the event multiplicity. The $\eta$ distribution of the short-range component, after symmetrizing the proton and lead directions in $p$+Pb collisions, is found to be smaller than that in $pp$ collisions with comparable multiplicity.
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
This paper presents a measurement of forward-forward and forward-central dijet azimuthal angular correlations and conditional yields in proton-proton ($pp$) and proton-lead ($p$+Pb) collisions as a probe of the nuclear gluon density in regions where the fraction of the average momentum per nucleon carried by the parton entering the hard scattering is low. In these regions, gluon saturation can modify the rapidly increasing parton distribution function of the gluon. The analysis utilizes 25 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ data and 360 $\mu \mathrm{b}^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb data, both at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, collected in 2015 and 2016, respectively, with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The measurement is performed in the center-of-mass frame of the nucleon-nucleon system in the rapidity range between $-$4.0 and 4.0 using the two highest transverse momentum jets in each event, with the highest transverse momentum jet restricted to the forward rapidity range. No significant broadening of azimuthal angular correlations is observed for forward-forward or forward-central dijets in $p$+Pb compared to $pp$ collisions. For forward-forward jet pairs in the proton-going direction, the ratio of conditional yields in $p$+Pb collisions to those in $pp$ collisions is suppressed by approximately 20%, with no significant dependence on the transverse momentum of the dijet system. No modification of conditional yields is observed for forward-central dijets.
Correlations between the elliptic or triangular flow coefficients $v_m$ ($m$=2 or 3) and other flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$=2 to 5) are measured using $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV Pb+Pb collision data collected in 2010 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated lumonisity of 7 $\mu$b$^{-1}$. The $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations are measured in midrapidity as a function of centrality, and, for events within the same centrality interval, as a function of event ellipticity or triangularity defined in a forward rapidity region. For events within the same centrality interval, $v_3$ is found to be anticorrelated with $v_2$ and this anticorrelation is consistent with similar anticorrelations between the corresponding eccentricities $\epsilon_2$ and $\epsilon_3$. On the other hand, it is observed that $v_4$ increases strongly with $v_2$, and $v_5$ increases strongly with both $v_2$ and $v_3$. The trend and strength of the $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations for $n$=4 and 5 are found to disagree with $\epsilon_m$-$\epsilon_n$ correlations predicted by initial-geometry models. Instead, these correlations are found to be consistent with the combined effects of a linear contribution to $v_n$ and a nonlinear term that is a function of $v_2^2$ or of $v_2v_3$, as predicted by hydrodynamic models. A simple two-component fit is used to separate these two contributions. The extracted linear and nonlinear contributions to $v_4$ and $v_5$ are found to be consistent with previously measured event-plane correlations.
Correlations of two flow harmonics $v_n$ and $v_m$ via three- and four-particle cumulants are measured in 13 TeV $pp$, 5.02 TeV $p$+Pb, and 2.76 TeV peripheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The goal is to understand the multi-particle nature of the long-range collective phenomenon in these collision systems. The large non-flow background from dijet production present in the standard cumulant method is suppressed using a method of subevent cumulants involving two, three and four subevents separated in pseudorapidity. The results show a negative correlation between $v_2$ and $v_3$ and a positive correlation between $v_2$ and $v_4$ for all collision systems and over the full multiplicity range. However, the magnitudes of the correlations are found to depend strongly on the event multiplicity, the choice of transverse momentum range and collision system. The relative correlation strength, obtained by normalisation of the cumulants with the $\langle v_n^2\rangle$ from a two-particle correlation analysis, is similar in the three collision systems and depends weakly on the event multiplicity and transverse momentum. These results based on the subevent methods provide strong evidence of a similar long-range multi-particle collectivity in $pp$, $p$+Pb and peripheral Pb+Pb collisions.
Multi-particle azimuthal cumulants are measured as a function of centrality and transverse momentum using 470 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. These cumulants provide information on the event-by-event fluctuations of harmonic flow coefficients $v_n$ and correlated fluctuations between two harmonics $v_n$ and $v_m$. For the first time, a non-zero four-particle cumulant is observed for dipolar flow, $v_1$. The four-particle cumulants for elliptic flow, $v_2$, and triangular flow, $v_3$, exhibit a strong centrality dependence and change sign in ultra-central collisions. This sign change is consistent with significant non-Gaussian fluctuations in $v_2$ and $v_3$. The four-particle cumulant for quadrangular flow, $v_4$, is found to change sign in mid-central collisions. Correlations between two harmonics are studied with three- and four-particle mixed-harmonic cumulants, which indicate an anti-correlation between $v_2$ and $v_3$, and a positive correlation between $v_2$ and $v_4$. These correlations decrease in strength towards central collisions and either approach zero or change sign in ultra-central collisions. To investigate the possible flow fluctuations arising from intrinsic centrality or volume fluctuations, the results are compared between two different event classes used for centrality definitions. In peripheral and mid-central collisions where the cumulant signals are large, only small differences are observed. In ultra-central collisions, the differences are much larger and transverse momentum dependent. These results provide new information to disentangle flow fluctuations from the initial and final states, as well as new insights on the influence of centrality fluctuations.
NchRec v.s. Et
<NchRec> w.r.t. Et
<Et> w.r.t. NchRec
Et distribution
NchRec distribution
v_2{2}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4} / v_2{2}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4} / v_2{2}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4} / v_2{2}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4} / v_2{2}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4} / v_3{2}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4} / v_3{2}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4} / v_3{2}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4} / v_3{2}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4} / v_4{2}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4} / v_4{2}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4} / v_4{2}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4} / v_4{2}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{6}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{6}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{6}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{6}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{6}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{6}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{6}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{6}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6} / v_2{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6} / v_2{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6} / v_2{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6} / v_2{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
c_1{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_1{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_1{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_1{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_1{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch} / v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch} / v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch} / v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch} / v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch} / v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch} / v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch} / v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{2, Nch} / v_2{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch} / v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{2, Nch} / v_3{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch} / v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{2, Nch} / v_4{2, Et}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nc_2{6, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et} / v_2{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et} / v_2{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et} / v_2{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et} / v_2{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch} / v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch} / v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch} / v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch} / v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nsc_2_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
nac_2{3, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_3{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_4{4, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Et}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
v_2{6, Nch}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_3{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
sc_2_4{4}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, standard, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, standard, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, standard, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, standard, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 0.5<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 1.0<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 1.5<pT<5.0 GeV
ac_2{3}, 3-subevent, 2.0<pT<5.0 GeV
This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a> <br><i>p+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a> <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a> <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 40-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 60-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 0-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a> <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Jet quenching is the process of color-charged partons losing energy via interactions with quark-gluon plasma droplets created in heavy-ion collisions. The collective expansion of such droplets is well described by viscous hydrodynamics. Similar evidence of collectivity is consistently observed in smaller collision systems, including $pp$ and $p$+Pb collisions. In contrast, while jet quenching is observed in Pb+Pb collisions, no evidence has been found in these small systems to date, raising fundamental questions about the nature of the system created in these collisions. The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider has measured the yield of charged hadrons correlated with reconstructed jets in 0.36 nb$^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb and 3.6 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at 5.02 TeV. The yields of charged hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >0.5$ GeV near and opposite in azimuth to jets with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{jet} > 30$ or $60$ GeV, and the ratios of these yields between $p$+Pb and $pp$ collisions, $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$, are reported. The collision centrality of $p$+Pb events is categorized by the energy deposited by forward neutrons from the struck nucleus. The $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$ values are consistent with unity within a few percent for hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >4$ GeV at all centralities. These data provide new, strong constraints which preclude almost any parton energy loss in central $p$+Pb collisions.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.