The spin depolarization and spin rotation parameters in 500 MeV P P elastic interactions. Additional normalization uncertainty of 1 PCT (2 PCT for DLL and DLS).

The elastic P N analysing power at 500 MeV incident proton energy. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 1 PCT.

The spin depolarization and spin rotation parameters in 500 MeV P N elastic interactions. Additional normalization uncertainty of 1 PCT (2 PCT for DLL and DLS).

The standard deviation (DISPERSION) of the subject multiplicity for gluon jets and quark jets for different values of the subject resolution parameter Y0.

The ratio of the multiplicities and their standard deviations for the subject in quark and gluon jets as a function of the subject resolution parameter Y0.

The measured fragmentation function for charged particles within quark and gluon jets.

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS4 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS5 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS6 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS7 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS8 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS4 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS5 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS6 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS7 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS8 (see Table for event classification).

Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).

Differential ep cross section for dijet production as a function of the average pseudorapidity the two jets in two transverse energy regions and in the Y region 0.1 to 0.5.

Differential ep cross section for dijet production as a function of the average pseudorapidity the two jets in two transverse energy regions and in the Y region 0.5 to 0.9.

Differential ep cross section for dijet production as a function of the photon momentum fraction X(C=GAMMA) in two regions of proton fractional momentum XP.

Differential ep cross section for dijet production as a function of the proton momentum fraction XP in two regions of photon fractional momentum X(C=GAMMA).

Differential ep cross section for dijet production as a function of the photon momentum fraction X(C=GAMMA) in two regions maximum jet transverseenergy.

Differential ep cross section for dijet production as a function of COS(THETA*) in two regions of fractional photon momentum fraction X(C=GAMMA).

Differential ep cross section for dijet production as a function of COS(THETA*) for dijet masses > 65 GeV in two regions of fractional photon momentum fraction X(C=GAMMA).

FIG. 2: a) left side: The correlation data for the ratio of the histograms of same-event-pairs to mixed-event-pairs for unlike-sign charged pairs, shown in a two-dimensional (2-D) perspective plot $\Delta\phi$ - $\Delta\eta$. The plot was normalized to a mean of 1. b) right side: The similar correlation data for like-sign charge pairs.

FIG. 3: a) left side: Folded correlation data for unlike-sign charge pairs on $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$ based on demonstrated symmetries in the data. This increases the statistics in a typical bin by a factor of four. Henceforth we will be dealing with folded data only. b) right side: Similar folded data for like-sign charge pairs.

FIG. 3: a) left side: Folded correlation data for unlike-sign charge pairs on $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$ based on demonstrated symmetries in the data. This increases the statistics in a typical bin by a factor of four. Henceforth we will be dealing with folded data only. b) right side: Similar folded data for like-sign charge pairs.

FIG. 4: “(Color online)”a) left side: The 2 dimensional (2-D) approximately gaussian signal shape equation (4) from the fit to the normalized and folded unlike-sign charge pairs signal data. b) right side: The unlike-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjoining signal function on the left side.

FIG. 4: “(Color online)”a) left side: The 2 dimensional (2-D) approximately gaussian signal shape equation (4) from the fit to the normalized and folded unlike-sign charge pairs signal data. b) right side: The unlike-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjoining signal function on the left side.

FIG. 5 :“(Color online)”a) left side: A perspective plot of the fit to the 2-D like-sign charge pairs signal shape of equation (5). b) right side: Like-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left side.

FIG. 5: “(Color online)”a) left side: A perspective plot of the fit to the 2-D like-sign charge pairs signal shape of equation (5). b) right side: Like-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left side.

FIG. 6: “(Color online)”a) left side: The charge dependent (CD) signal shape is a 2 dimensional (2-D) approximate gaussian which is symmetrical. The average gaussian width is 27.5$^{\circ}$ $\pm$ 3.2$^{\circ}$ (0.48 $\pm$ 0.056 rad) both in $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$. Thus we are observing a greater probability for unlike-sign charge pairs of particles than for like-sign charge pairs emitted randomly on 2-D $\eta\phi$ directions. b) right side: The CD signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left.

FIG. 6: “(Color online)”a) left side: The charge dependent (CD) signal shape is a 2 dimensional (2-D) approximate gaussian which is symmetrical. The average gaussian width is 27.5$^{\circ}$ $\pm$ 3.2$^{\circ}$ (0.48 $\pm$ 0.056 rad) both in $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$. Thus we are observing a greater probability for unlike-sign charge pairs of particles than for like-sign charge pairs emitted randomly on 2-D $\eta\phi$ directions. b) right side: The CD signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left.

FIG. 7: “(Color online)”a) left side: The fit to the charge independent (CI) signal shape which is the sum of the fits of like-sign plus unlike-sign charge pairs signals. The 2-D gaussian equivalent RMS signal has a $\Delta\phi$ width of about 32$^{\circ}$ (0.52 rad), and $\Delta\eta$ width of about 66$^{\circ}$ (1.15 rad) which is about double the $\Delta\phi$ width. b) right side: The CI signal data corresponding to the adjacent fit on the left.

FIG. 7: “(Color online)”a) left side: The fit to the charge independent (CI) signal shape which is the sum of the fits of like-sign plus unlike-sign charge pairs signals. The 2-D gaussian equivalent RMS signal has a $\Delta\phi$ width of about 32$^{\circ}$ (0.52 rad), and $\Delta\eta$ width of about 66$^{\circ}$ (1.15 rad) which is about double the $\Delta\phi$ width. b) right side: The CI signal data corresponding to the adjacent fit on the left.

FIG. 8: a) left side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with the lower range of elliptic flow amplitude and the best $\chi^2$ (the same as Figure 7b) plotted as a 2-D perspective plot on $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$. b) right side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with our maximum elliptic flow amplitude used in our analysis ($\chi^2$ was worse by 1$\sigma$).

FIG. 8: a) left side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with the lower range of elliptic flow amplitude and the best $\chi^2$ (the same as Figure 7b) plotted as a 2-D perspective plot on $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$. b) right side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with our maximum elliptic flow amplitude used in our analysis ($\chi^2$ was worse by 1$\sigma$).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \Delta R (l,l)$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \Delta R (l,l)$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ N_{jets}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ N_{jets}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet1}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet1}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}/p_{T}^{Jet1}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}/p_{T}^{Jet1}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ m_{jj}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ m_{jj}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ m_{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ m_{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ H_{T}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ H_{T}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{\gamma} / \sqrt{H_{T}}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{\gamma} / \sqrt{H_{T}}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \Delta \phi (Jet,\gamma)$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \Delta \phi (Jet,\gamma)$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \phi_{CS}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \phi_{CS}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \cos \theta_{CS}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \cos \theta_{CS}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{\gamma} / \sqrt{H_{T}}$ (Fig. 8 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{\gamma} / \sqrt{H_{T}}$ (Fig. 8 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ H_{T}$ (Fig. 8 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ H_{T}$ (Fig. 8 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \Delta \phi (Jet,\gamma)$ (Fig. 8 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \Delta \phi (Jet,\gamma)$ (Fig. 8 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \Delta R (l,l)$ (Fig. 5 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \Delta R (l,l)$ (Fig. 5 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$ (Fig. 5 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$ (Fig. 5 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} < 200 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} < 200 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 200 GeV < p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} < 300 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 200 GeV < p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} < 300 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} > 300 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} > 300 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ m_{jj}$ (Fig. 7 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ m_{jj}$ (Fig. 7 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ m_{ll\gamma j}$ (Fig. 7 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ m_{ll\gamma j}$ (Fig. 7 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ N_{jets}$ (Fig. 6 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ N_{jets}$ (Fig. 6 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet1}$ (Fig. 6 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet1}$ (Fig. 6 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}$ (Fig. 6 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}$ (Fig. 6 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}/p_{T}^{Jet1}$ (Fig. 6 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}/p_{T}^{Jet1}$ (Fig. 6 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll}$ (Fig. 5 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll}$ (Fig. 5 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$ (Fig. 8 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$ (Fig. 8 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll\gamma} < 50 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll\gamma} < 50 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } 50 GeV < p_{T}^{ll\gamma} < 75 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } 50 GeV < p_{T}^{ll\gamma} < 75 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll\gamma} > 75 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll\gamma} > 75 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 125 GeV < m_{ll\gamma} < 200 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 125 GeV < m_{ll\gamma} < 200 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 200 GeV < m_{ll\gamma} < 300 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 200 GeV < m_{ll\gamma} < 300 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } m_{ll\gamma} > 300 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } m_{ll\gamma} > 300 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma}$ (Fig. 5 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma}$ (Fig. 5 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \cos \theta_{CS}$ (Fig. 9 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \cos \theta_{CS}$ (Fig. 9 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \phi_{CS}$ (Fig. 9 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \phi_{CS}$ (Fig. 9 (a))

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range < 1.5 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 TO 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range > 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range < 1.5 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 1.0.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 TO 2.2 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 1.0.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range > 2.2 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 1.0.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range < 1.5 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 1.0.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 TO 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 1.0.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range > 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 1.0.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range < 1.5 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 0.7.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 TO 2.2 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 0.7.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range > 2.2 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 0.7.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range < 1.5 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 0.7.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 TO 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 0.7.

The dependence of the jet shapes on the transverse jet energy ET in the pseudorapidity range > 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV using the cone jet finding algorthm with cone radius = 0.7.

The average number of subjets as a function of the resolution parameter YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm in the pseudorapidity range < 1.5 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The average number of subjets as a function of the resolution parameter YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 TO 2.2 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The average number of subjets as a function of the resolution parameter YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm in the pseudorapidity range > 2.2 and the ET range 5 TO 8 GeV YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The average number of subjets as a function of the resolution parameter YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm in the pseudorapidity range < 1.5 and the ET range > 8 GeV YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The average number of subjets as a function of the resolution parameter YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 TO 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

The average number of subjets as a function of the resolution parameter YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm in the pseudorapidity range > 2.2 and the ET range > 8 GeV YCUT using the inclusive KT jet finding algorithm.

Visible cross section for inclusive D*+- production with two jets.

Ratio of visible cross sections of inclusive D*+- production with and without the two jets.

Ratio of visible cross sections of inclusive D*+- production with and without the two jets.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of X.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of X.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of W.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of W.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of PT.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of PT.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of ETARAP.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of ETARAP.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Z.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in the visible kinematic region as a function of Z.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Double differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production in bins of Q**2 and X.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of Q**2 with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of Q**2 with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of X with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of X with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of PT with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of PT with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of ETARAP with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtualphoton-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for inclusive D*+- production as a function of ETARAP with the constraint that the transverse momentum of the D* in the virtualphoton-proton centre-of-mass frame is > 2 GeV.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of Q**2.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of ET(C=JET1).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of ET(C=JET1).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of M(C=JET2).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of M(C=JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and PHI(JET1)-PHI(JET2).

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the jet containing D*.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the jet containing D*.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the other jet.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of pseudorapidity of the other jet.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of the pseudorapidity difference of the two jets.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of the pseudorapidity difference of the two jets.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GAMMA), the observed fraction of the virtual photon momentum carried by the partons.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

Differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets as a function of X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production with dijets in bins of Q**2 and X(C=GLUON), the observed fraction of the proton momentum carried by the gluon.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The correlation between positive and negative charged particles measured by the FTPC and photons measured by the PMD using $v_{dyn}$ for real events.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

The moments $r_{m,1}$(m=1-3) for real and mixed events as a function of order m in a fixed multiplicity bin of 47$\langle \sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }\langle 54$.

The average number of toward(DPHI < 60 DEG), transverse (DPHI 60 TO 120 DEG) and away (DPHI > 120 DEG) charged particles as a function of the PT of the leading charged jet. The data in this table are from the JET20 events.

The average scalar PT sum of toward(DPHI < 60 DEG), transverse (DPHI 60 TO 120 DEG) and away (DPHI > 120 DEG) charged particles as a function of the PT of the leading charged jet. The data in this table are from the Min-Bias events.

The average scalar PT sum of toward(DPHI < 60 DEG), transverse (DPHI 60 TO 120 DEG) and away (DPHI > 120 DEG) charged particles as a function of the PT of the leading charged jet. The data fom this table are from the JET20 events.

The charged particle PT distribution for three lower limits of leading jet PT.

Cross sections for hadron production from the 1995 data. The first DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error. The second DSYS error is from the statistical error on the absolute luminosity. In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the systematic error of 0.039 PCT plus an absolute uncertainty of 3.2pb together with an additional error from the absolute luminosity of 0.091 PCT.

Cross sections for mu+ mu- production from the 1993 data extrapolated to full phase space. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error.In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the syst ematic error of 0.31 PCT plus an absolute uncertainty of 0.3pb.

Cross sections for mu+ mu- production from the 1994 data extrapolated to full phase space. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error.In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the syst ematic error of 0.31 PCT plus an absolute uncertainty of 0.3pb.

Cross sections for mu+ mu- production from the 1995 data extrapolated to full phase space. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error.In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the syst ematic error of 0.36 PCT plus an absolute uncertainty of 0.3pb.

Cross sections for tau+ tau- production from the 1993 data extrapolated to full phase space. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error. In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the systematic error of 0.57 PCT plus an absolute uncertainty of 1.2pb.

Cross sections for tau+ tau- production from the 1994 data extrapolated to full phase space. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error. In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the systematic error of 0.57 PCT plus an absolute uncertainty of 1.2pb.

Cross sections for tau+ tau- production from the 1995 data extrapolated to full phase space. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error. In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the systematic error of 0.57 PCT plus an absolute uncertainty of 1.2pb.

Cross sections for e+ e- production from the 1993 data in the fiducial volume (THETA) 44 to 136 degrees and (PSI) < 25 degrees. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error. In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the systematic error of 0.14 PCT. The right hand column gives the s-channel contribution to the total cross section in the full solid angle with its statistcal error.

Cross sections for e+ e- production from the 1994 data in the fiducial volume (THETA) 44 to 136 degrees and (PSI) < 25 degrees. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error. In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the systematic error of 0.14 PCT. The right hand column gives the s-channel contribution to the total cross section in the full solid angle with its statistcal error.

Cross sections for e+ e- production from the 1995 data in the fiducial volume (THETA) 44 to 136 degrees and (PSI) < 25 degrees. The DSYS error is the uncorrelated part of the systematic error. In addition there is a fully correlated multiplicative contribution to the systematic error of 0.23 PCT. The right hand column gives the s-channel contribution to the total cross section in the full solid angle with its statistcal error.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of mu+ mu- production from the 1993 data including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 15 degrees. The errors are statistical only and there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0008 to be added.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of mu+ mu- production from the 1994 data including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 15 degrees. The errors are statistical only and there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0008 to be added.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of mu+ mu- production from the 1995 data including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 15 degrees. The errors are statistical only and there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0015 to be added.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of tau+ tau- production from the 1993 data including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 10 degrees. The errors are statistical onlyand there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0032 to be added.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of tau+ tau- production from the 1994 data including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 10 degrees. The errors are statistical onlyand there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0032 to be added.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of tau+ tau- production from the 1995 data including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 10 degrees. The errors are statistical onlyand there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0032 to be added.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of e+ e- production from the 1993 data in the fiducial volume THETA from 44 to 136 degrees and including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 25 degrees. The errors are statistical only and there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0025 to be added. The right most column is the s-channel contribution in the full solid angle.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of e+ e- production from the 1994 data in the fiducial volume THETA from 44 to 136 degrees and including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 25 degrees. The errors are statistical only and there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0025 to be added. The right most column is the s-channel contribution in the full solid angle.

Forward-Backward Asymmetries of e+ e- production from the 1995 data in the fiducial volume THETA from 44 to 136 degrees and including an acollinearity cut of PSI < 25 degrees. The errors are statistical only and there is an additional correlated absolute error of 0.0025 to be added. The right most column is the s-channel contribution in the full solid angle.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0003 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0003 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0010 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=60.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0030 and Q^2=90.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=60.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=90.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=200.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0100 and Q^2=400.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=12.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=15.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=20.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=25.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=35.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=45.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=60.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=90.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=200.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=400.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=800.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

The reduced diffractive cross section multiplied by X_Pomeron at XP=0.0300 and Q^2=1600.0 GeV^2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

ETA ASYM(LL) measurements from 2005.

ETA ASYM(LL) measurements from 2006.

ETA ASYM(LL) measurements from 2009.

Combined PI0 ASYM(LL) values from the PHENIX data sets at sqrt(s) = 200 GeV.

Combined ETA ASYM(LL) values from the PHENIX data sets at sqrt(s) = 200 GeV.

The best fit value of the gluon polarization where the uncertainty is that at a chi-squared value of 9 when considering only statistical experimental uncertainties.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.