$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\tilde\lambda$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 10 to 15 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\lambda_\vartheta$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\lambda_\varphi$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\lambda_{\vartheta\varphi}$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\tilde\lambda$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

A summary of benchmark simplified models, the most sensitive $n_{\mathrm{jet}}$ categories, and representative values for the corresponding experimental acceptance times efficiency ($\mathcal{A}\varepsilon$), the dominant systematic uncertainties, the theoretical production cross section ($\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}$), and the expected and observed upper limits on the production cross section, expressed in terms of the signal strength parameter ($\mu$).

Summary of the mass limits obtained for the fourteen classes of simplified models. The limits indicate the strongest observed and expected (in parentheses) mass exclusions in $\tilde{g}$, $\tilde{q}$, $\tilde{b}$, $\tilde{t}$, and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The quoted values have uncertainties of $\pm 25$ and $\pm 10$ GeV for models involving the pair production of, respectively, gluinos and squarks.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Covariance matrix for the SM background estimates obtained using the simplified binning scheme, determined from a simultaneous fit to data in the control regions only (CR-only fit). The uncertainties in the background estimates are correlated in such a way that the covariance is typically positive. Small positive values, as well as the few negative values, are not shown.

Correlation matrix for the SM background estimates obtained using the simplified binning scheme, determined from a simultaneous fit to data in the control regions only (CR-only fit).

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Observed data counts and "post-fit" background expectations based on the result of a combined fit to the signal region and multiple control regions under the SM-only hypothesis for the "monojet" event category. The rows labelled SM "pre-fit' show the background expectations when excluding the signal region from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Observed data counts and "post-fit" background expectations based on the result of a combined fit to the signal region and multiple control regions under the SM-only hypothesis for the "asymmetric" event categories. The rows labelled SM "pre-fit" show the background expectations when excluding the signal region from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Observed data counts and "post-fit" background expectations based on the result of a combined fit to the signal region and multiple control regions under the SM-only hypothesis for the "symmetric" event categories. The rows labelled SM "pre-fit" show the background expectations when excluding the signal region from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Summary of a simplified binning scheme comprising $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ shapes for eight representative event topologies, defined in terms of requirements on $n_{\mathrm{jet}}$ both symmetric and asymmetric categories) and $n_{\mathrm{b}}$. For each topology, event yields are integrated over the full $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ range, $H_{\mathrm{T}} > 200$ GeV, and are categorised according to eight bins in $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ -- $130 < H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} < 200$ GeV, six bins 100 GeV wide in the region $200 < H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} < 800$ GeV, and an open final bin, $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} > 800$ GeV. This categorisation scheme leads to 64 bins that are exclusive, contiguous, and provide complete coverage of the signal region. The corresponding SM background estimates for these 64 bins are obtained using the nominal likelihood model. The $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ template for each topology is determined from simulation and the normalisation for each template is given by an aggregate of estimates from several ($n_{\mathrm{jet}}$, $n_{\mathrm{b}}$, $H_{\mathrm{T}}$) bins, defined according to the nominal binning scheme.

Observed data yields and "CR-only fit" SM background expectations using the simplified binning scheme, as a function of topology and $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The SM backgrounds are determined from a simultaneous fit to data in the control regions. The data yields in the signal region are masked and excluded from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Expected ($\mu_{\mathrm{exp}}$) and observed ($\mu_{\mathrm{obs}}$) upper limits on the production cross section, expressed in terms of the signal strength parameter, obtained using both the nominal and simplified binning schema. Comparable values are obtained from the two schema for these benchmark SUSY models because the signal events typically populate bins at high values of $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ and $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ and so are at or near the limit of the search sensitivity. Larger differences in $\mu$ can be observed for models that populate the core of these distributions.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Quadrangular flow (v4) measured with respect to symmetry plane Psi4, estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0), measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum for various centrality classes.

Quadrangular flow (v4) measured with respect to symmetry plane Psi2, estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0), measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum for various centrality classes.

Comparison of the ALICE results on v2, v3 and v4 obtained with the event plane method, measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum, for centrality 30-40%. Note that these results are the same as in Figure 1.

Relative event-by-event elliptic flow fluctuations for unidentified charged particles versus transverse momentum for different centrality classes.

Unidentified charged particle v2, v3, and v4 integrated over the transverse momentum range 10 < pT < 20 GeV as a function of collision centrality.

Elliptic flow (v2) estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0) of charged pion and proton as a function of transverse momentum for 10-50% centrality class compared to results for unidentified charged particles.

Triangular flow (v3) estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0) of charged pion and proton as a function of transverse momentum for 10-50% centrality class compared to results for unidentified charged particles.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 0-5%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 5-10%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 10-20%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 20-30%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 30-40%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 40-50%.

Upper panel, Azimuthal distributions of associated particles for trigger particles in-plane (squares) and out-of-plane (triangles) for Au+Au collisions at centrality 20-60%. Open symbols are reflections of solid symbols around $\Delta \phi$ = 0 and $\Delta \phi$ = $\pi$. Elliptic flow contribution is shown by dashed lines. Lower panel, Distributions after substracting elliptic flow, and the corresponding measurement in p + p collisions (histogram).

$v_{2}$ at 3 ≤ $p_{t}$ ≤ 6 GeV/c versus impact parameter, b, compared to models of particle emission by a static source (see text).

$v_4$ from three particle cumulant as a function of $p_T$ for the minimum bias Au+Au collisions. Background from secondary particles is expected to be less than 15%. Non-flow systematic uncertainties are approximately 20%. Fluctuations in initial geometry can lead to an effect of about a factor of 1.2 to 1.5.

$v_6$ with respect to the second harmonic event plane as a function of $p_T$ for the minimum bias Au+Au collisions. Background from secondary particles is expected to be less than 15%. Non-flow systematic uncertainties are approximately 20%. Fluctuations in initial geometry can lead to an effect of about a factor of 1.2 to 1.5.

$p_T$- and $\eta$-integrated $v_2$, $v_4$, $v_6$ as a function of centrality. Background from secondary particles is expected to be less than 15%. Non-flow systematic uncertainties are approximately 20%. Fluctuations in initial geometry can lead to an effect of about a factor of 1.2 to 1.5.

Charged hadron v2 for the centrality bin 0-50%.

v2(4) vs. p_T for pions for 20 - 60% centrality

v2(4) vs. p_T for kaons for 20 - 60% centrality

v2(4) vs. p_T for anti-protons for 20 - 60% centrality

v2(2) vs. centrality for pions

v2(2) vs. centrality for kaons

v2(2) vs. centrality for anti-protons

v2 vs. p_T for particles identified in the RICH (min. bias) for pions+kaons and protons/antiprotons

v2 for Kshort for min. bias

v2 for kaons from kinks for min. bias

v2 for kaons from dE/dx for min. bias

v2 for Lambda+Lambdabar for min. bias [PRL/92/052302/2004]. The PHENIX data are from [PRL/91/182301/2003]. The hydro calculations are from [P. Huovinen/private communication].

v2 for charged pions for min. bias. kaon data points are from Figure 9.

v2 for anti-protons for min. bias. kaon data points are from Figure 9.

Azimuthal correlations (\sum_i cos(2(\phi_pT -\phi_i))) in Au+Au collisions as a function of p_T along with results from p+p collisions.

Azimuthal correlations (\sum_i cos(2(\phi_pT -\phi_i))) from d+Au as a function of p_T for min bias collisions.

Azimuthal correlations (\sum_i cos(2(\phi_pT -\phi_i))) from d+Au as a function of p_T for three centralities.

Charged hadron v2 and v4{EP_2} as a function of pseudorapidity for minimum bias.

v2(2) and v2(4) vs. pseudorapidity

v2(2) and v2(4) vs. pseudorapidity,FTPC only

v2(4) 20-70% in TPC+FTPC and v2(2) 20-70% in FTPC.

MC v2 with FTPC momentum resolution.

Charged hadron v2 for the centrality bin 0-5% in standard and modified event plane methods.

Charged hadron v2 for the centrality bin 5-10% in standard and modified event plane methods.

Charged hadron v2 for the centrality bin 10-20% in standard and modified event plane methods.

Charged hadron v2 for the centrality bin 20-30% in standard and modified event plane methods.

Charged hadron v2 for the centrality bin 30-40% in standard and modified event plane methods.

Charged hadron v2 for the centrality bin 40-60% in standard and modified event plane methods.

Charged hadron v2{2} from modified reaction plane method and two-particle cumulant results (after subtracting the correlations measured in p+p collisions) for centrality bin 20-60% .

v4(EP2) for charged hadrons min. bias

v4(EP2) vs. centrality for charged hadrons

v4(EP2) for pions in min. bias

v4(EP2) for protons in min. bias

v4(EP2) for kaons in min. bias

v4(EP2) for Lambda in min. bias

Charged hadron v4{EP_2} as a function of pseudorapidity for minimum bias (TPC only).

charged hadrons high p_T (3 - 6 GeV/c) v4(3)

charged hadron integrated v2 as a function of centrality for the different methods

charged hadron v2(6) vs. centrality bin. v2(2) and v2(4) are from Figure 29(a).

g2 as a function of centrality from 200 GeV, 130 GeV,NA49 and q-dist methods. The solid points are from the cumulant method, while open circles are from the q distribution method. Please note that centrality percentage differs from different method. For 200 GeV-cumulant (0, 64.1, 53.9,44.7,35.2,25.4,15.1,7.7,0), for 200 GeV-q-dist (73.8,64.1,53.9,44.7,35.2,25.4,15.1,7.7,2.3), for 130 GeV (65,47,36,27.5,20,13,7.5,2.5,0) and for 17 GeV (0,0,0,61.2,38.2,29.1,18.2,8.5,3.8).

wounded nucleons as a function of centrality from 200 GeV, 130 GeV,NA49 and q-dist methods.Please note that centrality percentage differs from different method. For 200 GeV-cumulant (0, 64.1, 53.9,44.7,35.2,25.4,15.1,7.7,0), for 200 GeV-q-dist (73.8,64.1,53.9,44.7,35.2,25.4,15.1,7.7,2.3), for 130 GeV (65,47,36,27.5,20,13,7.5,2.5,0) and for 17 GeV (0,0,0,61.2,38.2,29.1,18.2,8.5,3.8).

v2/n for pions for three centrality bins

v2/n for protons for three centrality bins

v2/n for Kshort for three centrality bins

v2/n for Lambda + Lambda bar for three centrality bins

Blast Wave parameters rho_2 from pion v2(2),pion v2 and hadron v2

Blast Wave parameters rho_4 from hadron v2

Blast Wave parameters epsilon from pion v2(2),pion v2, hadron v2 and initial

Blast Wave parameters rho_0 from pion v2(2),pion v2 and hadron v2

Blast Wave parameters T from pion v2(2),pion v2 and hadron v2

Nuclear modification factor RAA of D0 mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in two 90-degree-wide azimuthal intervals centred on the IN-PLANE and on the OUT-OF-PLANE directions. The correlated, uncorrelated, and anti-correlated contributions to the systematic uncertainty are shown separately.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-5\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 5-10\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-20\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 5-10\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-20\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}^{high}$ as a function of $v_{2}^{low}$ results from SP method in PbPb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

The $v_{2}^{high}$ as a function of $v_{2}^{low}$ results from 4-particle cumulant method in PbPb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

The normalised differential cross section of the azmiuthal decorrelation variable DELTA for the GAMMA+2JET sample for the PT of the second jet in the range 25 TO 30 GeV.

Source eccentricity obtained with azimuthally sensitive HBT (epsilon_final) vs initial eccentricity from a Glauber model (epsilon_initial). The most peripheral collisions correspond to the largest eccentricity. Uncertainties on the precise nature of space-momentum correlations lead to 30% systematic errors on eps_final.

(Color online) Dynamical net charge fluctuations, $\nu_{+−,dyn}$, of particles produced with pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ < 0.5 scaled by (a) the multiplicity, $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. The dashed line corresponds to charge conservation effect and the solid line to the prediction for a resonance gas, (b) the number of participants, and (c) the number of binary collisions.

(Color online) Dynamical net charge fluctuations, $\nu_{+−,dyn}$, of particles produced with pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ < 0.5 scaled by (a) the multiplicity, $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. The dashed line corresponds to charge conservation effect and the solid line to the prediction for a resonance gas, (b) the number of participants, and (c) the number of binary collisions.

(Color online) Dynamical fluctuations $\nu_{+−,dyn}$, normalized to their value for |$\eta$| < 1, as function of the integrated pseudorapidity range. (a) data for $Au + Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (0-5%) along with data for $Cu + Cu$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (0-10%), are compared to inclusive $p + p$ data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV, and (b) data for $Au + Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (30-40%) along with data for $Cu + Cu$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (0-10%), are compared to inclusive $p + p$ collision data at $\sqrt{}s$ = 200 GeV.

(Color online) Dynamical fluctuations $\nu_{+−,dyn}$, normalized to their value for |$\eta$| < 1, as function of the integrated pseudorapidity range. (a) data for $Au + Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (0-5%) along with data for $Cu + Cu$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (0-10%), are compared to inclusive $p + p$ data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV, and (b) data for $Au + Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (30-40%) along with data for $Cu + Cu$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4, 200 GeV (0-10%), are compared to inclusive $p + p$ collision data at $\sqrt{}s$ = 200 GeV.

(Color online) Dynamical fluctuations $\nu_{+−,dyn}$, as a function of the integrated azimuthal range $\phi$ for selected collision centralities for (a) $Au + Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, and (b) $Cu + Cu$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

(Color online) Dynamical fluctuations $\nu_{+−,dyn}$, as a function of the integrated azimuthal range $\phi$ for selected collision centralities for (a) $Au + Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, and (b) $Cu + Cu$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

(Color online) Dynamical fluctuations $\nu_{+−,dyn}$, as a function of the integrated azimuthal range $\phi$ for similar number of participating nucleons for $Au + Au$ and $Cu + Cu$ $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Azimuthal correlation distribution between heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged hadrons, scaled by the number of electrons in EMCal triggered events in the electron transverse momentum range 4.5-6 GeV/c.

Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained with the method based on the track impact parameter.

Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained with the method based on the track impact parameter.

Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained from the method based on the azimuthal correlation of heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged tracks.

Relative beauty contribution to the heavy-flavour electron yield obtained from the method based on the azimuthal correlation of heavy-flavour decay electrons and charged tracks.

The $p_{\rm T}$-differential inclusive cross section of electrons (multiplied by $10^3$ for readability) from beauty hadron decays using the electron-hadron azimuthal correlation method.

The pT-differential inclusive cross section of electrons from beauty hadron decays using the electron-hadron azimuthal correlation method.

The $p_{\rm T}$-differential inclusive cross section of electrons (multiplied by $10^3$ for readability) from beauty hadron decays. A 1.9% normalization uncertainty not shown.

The pT-differential inclusive cross section of electrons from beauty hadron decays. A 1.9% normalization uncertainty not shown.

Inclusive bbbar production cross section per rapidity unit measured in mid-rapidity.

Inclusive bbbar production cross section per rapidity unit measured.

Total bbbar production cross section.

Total bbbar production cross section.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 20-30%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 30-40%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-50%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 50-60%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 60-70%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 70-80%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 0-10%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 0-20%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 20-40%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-60%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-80%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 60-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-5%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 5-10%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 10-20%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 20-30%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 30-40%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-50%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 50-60%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 60-70%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 70-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-10%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-20%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 20-40%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-60%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 60-80%.

Ratios of $p_{T}$ distributions within 0.5 $<$ $|\eta|$ $<$ 1 to those within $|\eta|$$<$ 0.5 in various centrality bins. Errors are combined statistical and systematic.

dN/d$\eta$ distributions for $p_{T}$ $>$ 2 GeV/c and -1 $<$ $\eta$ $<$ 1 scaled by $N_{bin}$ and divided by the NN reference

Ratio of charged hadron yields within $|\eta|$ $<$ 1 for Au+Au relative to the NN reference, scaled by $N_{part}$/2 as a function of centrality for a $p_{T}$ bin at $p_{T}$ = 2.05 GeV/c

Participant scaling exponent v of charged hadron yields as a function of $p_{T}$ within $|\eta|$ $<$ 1

Ratio of truncated mean $p_{T}$ in $p_{T}$ $>$ $p_{T}^{cut}$ within $|\eta|$$<$1 as a function of $p_{T}^{cut}$ for central and peripheral collisions.

Binary scaling fraction in $p_{T}$ $>$ $p_{T}^{cut}$ within $|\eta|$ $<$ 1 as a function of centrality for selected $p_{T}^{cut}$. For $p_{T}^{cut}$ $>$ 2 GeV/c, the fraction F decreases with centrality.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 80-90%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 0-5%. These data are also available from http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1126966.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 80-90%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 0-5%. These data are also available from http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1126966.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 80-90%.

Centrality dependence of charged particle multiplicity density and mid-rapidity particle yields for pi+, pi-, K+, K-, p, pbar production. The additional normalization uncertainty coming from the centrality definition is {0.5%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 1%, 2%, 2.4%, 3.5%, 5%, 6.7%, +12%/-8.5%} for the 10 centrality bins.

Centrality dependence of mean transverse momentum for pi+, pi-, K+, K-, p, pbar production.

pi-/pi+ ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

K-/K+ ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

PBAR/P ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

p/pi ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

K/pi ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 0-5%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 80-90%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 0-5%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 80-90%.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged hadrons with $|\eta| < 1.0$ in 10–40$%$ $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV, from the Lee-Yang Zero method (solid circles) with Sum Generating Function.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged hadrons with $|\eta| < 1.0$ in 0–80$%$ $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV, from the Event Plane method.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the Event Plane method ($v_{2}${EP}) (open circles). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.0$ was used.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the 4 Cumulant method ($v_{2}${4}) (solid squares). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.0$ was used.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the Lee-Yang Zero method with Sum Generating Function ($v_{2}$) (solid circles). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.3$ was used.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the Lee-Yang Zero method with Product Generating Function ($v_{2}$) (open stars). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.3$ was used.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using $\eta$-subevent method (open crosses), are shown in (a) for $\Lambda$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using Event Plane method (open circles), are shown in (a) for $\Lambda$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using $\eta$-subevent method (open crosses), are shown in (b) for $K_{S}^{0}$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using Event Plane method (open circles), are shown in (b) for $K_{S}^{0}$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using Lee-Yang Zero method with Sum Generating Function (solid circles), are shown in (a) and (b) for $\Lambda$ and $K_{S}^{0}$ respectively. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ of $K_{S}^{0}$ (open circles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$, (b) $40–80\%$, (c) $10–40\%$ and (d) $0–10\%$ centralities in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ (open squares) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$, (b) $40–80\%$, (c) $10–40\%$ and (d) $0–10\%$ centralities in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (b) $40–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (c) $10–40\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (d) $0–10\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega}^{+}$ (filled circles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega}^{+}$ (filled circles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (d) $0–10\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $p+\bar{p}$ (filled squares) and $\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$ (filled stars) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

Fig12d inset $\Lambda$ (open squares) expansion at low $p_{T}$

Fig12d inset for $K_{S}^{0}$ (filled circles) expansion at low $p_{T}$

Fig13 Centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ versus number of participants $N_{part}$ for charged hadrons (crosses) in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For identified particle's value, $v_{2}$ in Tab. II scaled by participant eccentricity in Tab. I versus number of participant in Tab. I.

Fig14 $p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ of $K_{S}^{0}$ at 200 GeV.

Fig14 $p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ of $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.

$\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ versus y distribution derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distribution along with pt distributions and particle ratios measured in ALICE. Errors are systematic.

The ratio of the standard deviation of the rapidity distribution of charged particles to that expected from Landau hydrodynamics versus versus $\sqrt{s}$/nucleon-pair. The standard deviation for data for all charged particles is derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distributions measured at various energies and converted to $\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ in a consistent manner. The data from the BRAHMS and PHOBOS experiments derived by the present authors from these experiments $dN/d\eta$ distributions.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Inclusive Jpsi Nuclear Modification Factor (Raa) measured in Lead-Lead collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV as a function of transverse momentum in 2.5 < y < 4 for the centrality range 0%-20%. Data have been collected in 2011 and the integrated luminosity is ~ 70 inverse microbarn.

Inclusive Jpsi Nuclear Modification Factor (Raa) measured in Lead-Lead collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV as a function of rapidity in 0 < pt < 8 GeV/c for the centrality range 0%-90%. Data have been collected in 2011 and the integrated luminosity is ~ 70 inverse microbarn.

The Balance Function as a function of the relative azimutuhal angle of two charged particles for the centrality class 0-5%.

The Balance Function as a function of the relative azimutuhal angle of two charged particles for the centrality class 30-40%.

The Balance Function as a function of the relative azimutuhal angle of two charged particles for the centrality class 70-80%.

The centrality dependence of the mean widths of the relative pseudorapidites and relative azimuthal angles for the correlations studied.

The centrality dependence of the relative decrease of the width of the balance function in the relative pseusdorapidity, DEL(ETARAP), and relative azimuthal angle, DEL(PHI).

The centrality dependence of the correlator three-particle charge-dependent MEAN(COS(PHI(A)+COS(PHI(B)-2*PHI(RP)) measured from correlations with the reaction plane (RP) estimated using the ZDC detector.

The centrality dependence of the two-particle charge-dependentcorrelator MEAN(COS(PHI(A)-COS(PHI(B)) measured with the cumulant method.

The decomposition of the correlators into the COS*COS terms.

The decomposition of the correlators into the SIN*SIN terms.

The dependence of the three-particle charge-dependent correlator MEAN(COS(PHI(A)+COS(PHI(B)-2*PHI(RP)) on the PT difference between the two particles A and B for the centrality range 30-40%.

The dependence of the three-particle charge-dependent correlator MEAN(COS(PHI(A)+COS(PHI(B)-2*PHI(RP)) on the average PT of the two particles A and B for the centrality range 30-40%.

The dependence of the three-particle charge-dependent correlator MEAN(COS(PHI(A)+COS(PHI(B)-2*PHI(RP)) on the difference in pseudorapidity of the two particles A and B for the centrality range 30-40%.