Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 13 TeV data in fb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 13 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Correction factors for an assumed angular dependence $\propto 1+\lambda_{\theta} \cos^2\theta $ in the helicity frame, for several values of the parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$. The correction factors were found to be the same (within 1% - 2%) for $J\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ mesons, for prompt and non-prompt production mechanisms, and for the three rapidity intervals considered in this paper.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

The measured differential cross sections $\rm{d}\sigma/\rm{d}|\eta|$ of $D^{*\pm}$ and $D^\pm$ production with $20<p_T<100\,$GeV. The first and second errors are the statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The systematic uncertainty fractions corresponding to the tracking ($\delta_2$) uncertainties (Table 2 of the paper) are strongly correlated. The fully correlated uncertainties linked with the luminosity measurement ($3.5\%$) and branching fractions ($1.5\%$ and $2.1\%$ for $D^{*\pm}$ and $D^\pm$, respectively) are not shown.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Measured non-prompt J/psi differential cross-section multiplied by branching ratio. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty excluding luminosity, the second is the luminosity.

Measured prompt J/psi differential cross-section multiplied by branching ratio. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty excluding luminosity, the second is the luminosity.

Measured non-prompt J/psi differential cross-section multiplied by branching ratio. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty excluding luminosity, the second is the luminosity.

Measured forward-backward production ratio.

Measured forward-backward production ratio.

Measured cross section in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j}1}$.

Measured fractions in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{H}}$.

Measured fractions in bins of $|y^{\rm{H}}|$.

Measured fractions in bins of $N_{\rm{jets}}$.

Measured fractions in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j1}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{H}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $|y^{\rm{H}}|$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $N_{\rm{jets}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential cross-section measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j1}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{H}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $|y^{\rm{H}}|$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $N_{\rm{jets}}$.

Correlation matrix for the total uncertainty of the differential shape measurement in bins of $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{j1}}$.

The total $pp\to H$ cross section in the $H\to\gamma\gamma$ and $H\to ZZ^*\to 4\ell$ channels and their combination.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 10).

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 10).

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 12).

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 12).

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 12).

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 13).

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 13).

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals (not shown in Fig. 13).

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the hadronic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})|$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})|$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the muon channel.The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $m(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $m(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the hadronic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ after the electron and muon channel combination. The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 11(a).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the hadronic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ after the electron and muon channel combination. The results shown in this table correspond to the results presentedin figure 12(a).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of theleptonic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 11(b).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertaintyas a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})|$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 12(b).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function ofthe pseudo-top-quark-pair $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 13(a).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 13(b).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $m(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$after the electron and muon channel combination. The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 13(c).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Per-event jet yields in 0-90% p+Pb collisions, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +3.6 to +4.4 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.8 to +3.6 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RCP vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60%/60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 0-10% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 10-20% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 20-30% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 30-40% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 40-60% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +2.1 to +2.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +1.2 to +2.1 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.8 to +1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity +0.3 to +0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.3 to +0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -0.8 to -0.3 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -1.2 to -0.8 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

Jet RpPb vs. pT*cosh(y*) for 60-90% p+Pb events, within the centre of mass rapidity -2.1 to -1.2 (positive denotes downstream proton direction).

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.5 <= |y| < 2.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.0 <= |y| < 2.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.5 <= |y| < 3.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 0.0 <= |y| < 0.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 0.5 <= |y| < 1.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.0 <= |y| < 1.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.5 <= |y| < 2.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.0 <= |y| < 2.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.5 <= |y| < 3.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Prompt and non-prompt production cross-section times branching ratio as a function of $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ $p_{\rm T}$ for $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ rapidity interval of $0\leq |y| < 0.75$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic. Spin-alignment and luminosity ($\pm 1.8\%$) uncertainties are not included.

Prompt and non-prompt production cross-section times branching ratio as a function of $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ $p_{\rm T}$ for $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ rapidity interval of $0.75\leq |y| < 1.5$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic. Spin-alignment and luminosity ($\pm 1.8\%$) uncertainties are not included.

Prompt and non-prompt production cross-section times branching ratio as a function of $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ $p_{\rm T}$ for $\psi(2\mathrm{S})$ rapidity interval of $1.5\leq |y| < 2$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic. Spin-alignment and luminosity ($\pm 1.8\%$) uncertainties are not included.

Prompt and non-prompt production cross-section times branching ratio as a function of $J/\psi$ $p_{\rm T}$ for $J/\psi$ rapidity interval of $0\leq |y| < 0.75$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic. Spin-alignment and luminosity ($\pm 1.8\%$) uncertainties are not included.

Prompt and non-prompt production cross-section times branching ratio as a function of $J/\psi$ $p_{\rm T}$ for $J/\psi$ rapidity interval of $0.75\leq |y| < 1.5$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic. Spin-alignment and luminosity ($\pm 1.8\%$) uncertainties are not included.

Prompt and non-prompt production cross-section times branching ratio as a function of $J/\psi$ $p_{\rm T}$ for $J/\psi$ rapidity interval of $1.5\leq |y| < 2$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic. Spin-alignment and luminosity ($\pm 1.8\%$) uncertainties are not included.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of absolute rapidity of diphoton system. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of multiplicity of jets with transverse momentum pT(jet) > 30 GeV. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of multiplicity of jets with transverse momentum pT(jet) > 30 GeV. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of multiplicity of jets with transverse momentum pT(jet) > 30 GeV. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of multiplicity of jets with transverse momentum pT(jet) > 30 GeV. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of the leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of the leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of absolute rapidity of the leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of absolute rapidity of the leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of scalar transverse momentum sum of all jets. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of scalar transverse momentum sum of all jets. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of second leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of second leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of rapidity separation of leading two jets. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of rapidity separation of leading two jets. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of azimuthal angle between diphoton and dijet systems. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of azimuthal angle between diphoton and dijet systems. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of cosine of the decay angle in the Collins-Soper frame. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of cosine of the decay angle in the Collins-Soper frame. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of cosine of the decay angle in the Collins-Soper frame. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of cosine of the decay angle in the Collins-Soper frame. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of azimuthal angle between the two leading jets. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of azimuthal angle between the two leading jets. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of diphoton thrust pT. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of diphoton thrust pT. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of rapidity separation of the two photons. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of rapidity separation of the two photons. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of tau of highest-tau jet (see paper for description). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of tau of highest-tau jet (see paper for description). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of scalar sum of tau for all jets (see paper for description). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of scalar sum of tau for all jets (see paper for description). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of absolute rapidity of second leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of absolute rapidity of second leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of third leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of third leading jet. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of dijet invariant mass. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of dijet invariant mass. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of the combined diphoton and dijet system. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of transverse momentum of the combined diphoton and dijet system. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of cosine of the decay angle in the Collins-Soper frame in bins of diphoton transverse momentum. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of cosine of the decay angle in the Collins-Soper frame in bins of diphoton transverse momentum. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of diphoton transverse momentum in jet multiplicity bins. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of diphoton transverse momentum in jet multiplicity bins. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of leading jet transverse momentum for exclusive one-jet events. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of leading jet transverse momentum for exclusive one-jet events. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Diphoton kinematic acceptances in percent for gluon fusion for each fiducial region/variable bin studied in this paper, defined as the probability to fulfil the diphoton kinematic criteria: pT(2gam) < 0.35 (0.25) for the leading (subleading) photon and |eta(gam)|<2.37. The factors are evaluated using the POWHEG event generator with MPI modelling and hadronisation turned off. Consistent results for the diphoton variables are obtained by HRes 2.2. Uncertainties are taken from PDF variations. QCD scale varaitions have a negligible impact on these factors.

Diphoton kinematic acceptances in percent for gluon fusion for each fiducial region/variable bin studied in this paper, defined as the probability to fulfil the diphoton kinematic criteria: pT(2gam) < 0.35 (0.25) for the leading (subleading) photon and |eta(gam)|<2.37. The factors are evaluated using the POWHEG event generator with MPI modelling and hadronisation turned off. Consistent results for the diphoton variables are obtained by HRes 2.2. Uncertainties are taken from PDF variations. QCD scale varaitions have a negligible impact on these factors.

Isolation efficiencies in percent for gluon fusion H -> 2gam for each fiducial region/variable bin measured in this analysis. The isolation efficiency is defined as the probability for both photons to fulfil the isolation criteria (ETiso < 14 GeV as described in the text) for events that pass the diphoton kinematic criteria. Uncertainties are assigned in the same way as for the non-perturbative correction factors: by varying the fragmentation and underlying event modelling. These factors can be multiplied by the kinematic acceptance factors (see table~ ef{tab:fid_acceptance}) to extrapolate an inclusive gluon fusion Higgs prediction to the fiducial volume used in this analysis.

Isolation efficiencies in percent for gluon fusion H -> 2gam for each fiducial region/variable bin measured in this analysis. The isolation efficiency is defined as the probability for both photons to fulfil the isolation criteria (ETiso < 14 GeV as described in the text) for events that pass the diphoton kinematic criteria. Uncertainties are assigned in the same way as for the non-perturbative correction factors: by varying the fragmentation and underlying event modelling. These factors can be multiplied by the kinematic acceptance factors (see table~ ef{tab:fid_acceptance}) to extrapolate an inclusive gluon fusion Higgs prediction to the fiducial volume used in this analysis.

Non-perturbative correction factors in percent accounting for the impact of hadronisation and the underlying event activity for all measured variables and fiducial regions. Uncertainties are evaluated by deriving these factors using different generators and tunes as described in the text.

Non-perturbative correction factors in percent accounting for the impact of hadronisation and the underlying event activity for all measured variables and fiducial regions. Uncertainties are evaluated by deriving these factors using different generators and tunes as described in the text.

Fiducial cross sections in fb from WH, ZH and ttH combined, in each variable bin and fiducial region.

Fiducial cross sections in fb from WH, ZH and ttH combined, in each variable bin and fiducial region.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations between the 24 bins used in the analysis described in Phys.Lett. B753 (2016) 69-85 (arXiv:1508.02507). See Figure 3 of this paper for the bins used.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $b$-jet $p_T$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $b$-jet $|y|$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $b$-jet $|y|$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $y_{\text{boost}}(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $y_{\text{boost}}(Z,b)$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta y(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta y(Z,b)$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta\phi(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta\phi(Z,b)$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta R(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta R(Z,b)$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$.

Integrated $Z+\ge 2$ $b$-jets cross-section.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the integrated $Z+\ge 2$ $b$-jets cross-section.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta R(b,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta R(b,b)$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta m(b,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta m(b,b)$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$.

Measurement of the $t\overline{t}$ cross-section as a function of the jet multiplicity for jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ larger than 80 GeV. The uncertainties given correspond to the individual contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty as described in the paper.

Measurement of the $t\overline{t}$ cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading jet in $t\overline{t}$ events. The uncertainties given correspond to the individual contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty as described in the paper.

Measurement of the $t\overline{t}$ cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the 2nd leading jet in $t\overline{t}$ events. The uncertainties given correspond to the individual contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty as described in the paper.

Measurement of the $t\overline{t}$ cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the 3rd leading jet in $t\overline{t}$ events. The uncertainties given correspond to the individual contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty as described in the paper.

Measurement of the $t\overline{t}$ cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the 4th leading jet in $t\overline{t}$ events. The uncertainties given correspond to the individual contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty as described in the paper.

Measurement of the $t\overline{t}$ cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the 5th leading jet in $t\overline{t}$ events. The uncertainties given correspond to the individual contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty as described in the paper.

Normalized differential cross-sections for the absolute rapidity (|y|) of the ttbar system. The cross-section in each bin is given as the integral of the normalized differential cross-section over the bin width, divided by the bin width. The calculation of the cross-sections in the last bins includes events falling outside of the bin edges, and the normalization is done within the quoted bin width. The full covariance matrice is provided in Table 8 below.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the hadronically decaying top-quark PT. The elements of the covariance matrices are in units of TeV$^{-2}$.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the mass of the ttbar system. The elements of the covariance matrices are in units of TeV$^{-2}$.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the PT of the ttbar system. The elements of the covariance matrices are in units of TeV$^{-2}$.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the absolute rapidity (|y|) of the ttbar system.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty on the measured values of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, $R_t$, and $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. The evaluation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\,\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $1.0\,\%$ are marked with "$<1$" in the paper. To provide numerical values for this table in HEPdata, these uncertainties are approximated with $\pm 0.5\,\%$. This approximation is applied to all measurements for the following uncertainties$:$ JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by-jets, JES pileup, $b$-JES, jet vertex fraction, mistag efficiency and $W+\;$jets shape variation. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq)$ the approximation is applied in addition to the following uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $R_t$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES detector, $b$-tagging efficiency, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance and $tq$ scale variations. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(T)).

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(TBAR)).

Parametrization factors for the $m_{t}$ dependence [see Eq. (4) in the paper] of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar tq)$, and $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$.

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

The value of $|V_{tb}|^{2}$ is extracted by dividing the measured value of $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$ by the prediction of the approximate NNLO calculation. The experimental and theoretical uncertainties are added in quadrature.

Event yields for the 2-jet-$\ell^{+}$ and 2-jet-$\ell^{-}$ HPR channels. The expectation for the signal and background yields correspond to the result of the binned maximum-likelihood fit described in Sec. $\mathrm{VI~D}$ in the paper. The uncertainty of the expectations is the normalization uncertainty of each process after the fit, as described in Sec. $\mathrm{VII~F}$ in the paper.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $|y|$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(\bar t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $|y|$ distribution.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Comparison between the measured differential cross sections and the predictions from the NLO calculation using the MSTW2008 PDF set. For each variable and prediction a $\chi^{2}$ value is calculated with HERAfitter using the covariance matrix of each measured spectrum. The theory uncertainties of the predictions are treated as uncorrelated. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is equal to the number of bins in the measured spectrum.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, mistag efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The JES $\eta$ intercalibration uncertainty has a sign switch from the first to the second bin. For the $tq$ generator $+$ parton shower uncertainty a sign switch is denoted with $\mp$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $c-$tagging efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content $:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet energy resolution, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$ tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.

Differential cross-section for non-prompt chi_c2 production, measured in bins of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for prompt chi_c1 production, measured in bins of chi_c1 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for prompt chi_c2 production, measured in bins of chi_c2 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for non-prompt chi_c1 production, measured in bins of chi_c1 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for non-prompt chi_c2 production, measured in bins of chi_c2 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Fraction of prompt J/psi produced in feed-down from radiative chi_c decays as a function of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown. The spin-alignment envelope assumes that prompt J/psi are produced unpolarised and represents the maximum uncertainty due to the unknown chi_c spin alignment.

Production rate of prompt chi_c2 relative to prompt chi_c1, measured in bins of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The ratio is not corrected for the branching fractions of chi_c1 and chi_c2 into J/psi gamma. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Production rate of non-prompt chi_c2 relative to non-prompt chi_c1, measured in bins of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The ratio is not corrected for the branching fractions of chi_c1 and chi_c2 into J/psi gamma. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Fraction of chi_c1 produced in b-hadron decays as a function of chi_c1 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Fraction of chi_c2 produced in b-hadron decays as a function of chi_c2 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Measured differential cross sections as function of the lepton pseudo-rapidity of the production of a W boson with a D meson or a D* meson times the branching ratio W -> l nu in the fiducial regions together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Jets are not required for the W+D/D* cross sections. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events.

Measured cross section ratios of the production of a W boson with a D meson or a D* meson and the inclusive production of a W boson in the fiducial regions together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Jets are not required for the W+D/D* cross sections. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events.

Measured differential cross section ratios of the production of a W boson with a D meson or a D* meson and the inclusive production of a W boson in the fiducial regions as function of the D/D* meson pT together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Jets are not required for the W+D/D* cross sections. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events.

Measured integrated cross sections of the production of a W boson in association with a single c-jet and exactly zero or one additional non-c-jets times the branching ratio W -> l nu in the fiducial regions together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The particle-level c-jet is defined as the one containing a weakly decaying c-hadron with pt>5 GeV, within DeltaR<0.3. Jets containing c-hadrons originating from b-hadron decays are not counted as c-jets. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events.

Measured integrated cross sections ratio of the production of a W+ and W- bosons in association with a single c-jet and exactly zero or one additional non-c-jets in the fiducial regions together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The particle-level c-jet is defined as the one containing a weakly decaying c-hadron with pt>5 GeV, within DeltaR<0.3. Jets containing c-hadrons originating from b-hadron decays are not counted as c-jets. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events.

Measured integrated cross sections of the production of a W boson in association with a single c-jet decaying into a soft muon in the fiducial regions together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The particle-level c-jet is defined as the one containing a weakly decaying c-hadron with pt>5 GeV, within DeltaR<0.3. Jets containing c-hadrons originating from b-hadron decays are not counted as c-jets. Soft muons are associated to c-jets within a cone of DeltaR<0.5. Jets are not required for the W+D/D* cross sections. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events.

Correlation matrix corresponding to the total uncertainties of measured integrated cross sections of the production of a W boson with a single c-jet, a D meson or a D* meson times the branching ratio W -> l nu in the fiducial regions.

Systematic uncertainties after the averaging procedure of the inclusive cross sections in different channels. The first row (labeled Uncorr.) represents the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The following rows represent the diagonalized list of systematic uncertainties which are correlated across all channels. The luminosity is included in these correlated systematic uncertainties.

Systematic uncertainties after the averaging procedure of the differential cross sections as function of the lepton pseudo-rapidity in different channels. The first row (labeled Uncorr.) represents the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The following rows represent the diagonalized list of systematic uncertainties which are correlated across all channels and bins. The luminosity is included in these correlated systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties for the W+ + cbar-jet channel are shown in this table.

Systematic uncertainties after the averaging procedure of the differential cross sections as function of the lepton pseudo-rapidity in different channels. The first row (labeled Uncorr.) represents the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The following rows represent the diagonalized list of systematic uncertainties which are correlated across all channels and bins. The luminosity is included in these correlated systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties for the W- + c-jet channel are shown in this table.

Systematic uncertainties after the averaging procedure of the differential cross sections as function of the lepton pseudo-rapidity in different channels. The first row (labeled Uncorr.) represents the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The following rows represent the diagonalized list of systematic uncertainties which are correlated across all channels and bins. The luminosity is included in these correlated systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties for the W+ D- and W- D+ channels are shown in this table.

Systematic uncertainties after the averaging procedure of the differential cross sections as function of the lepton pseudo-rapidity in different channels. The first row (labeled Uncorr.) represents the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The following rows represent the diagonalized list of systematic uncertainties which are correlated across all channels and bins. The luminosity is included in these correlated systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties for the W+ D*- and W- D*+ channels are shown in this table.

Theoretical Predictions for the integrated cross section of the production of W+ and W- bosons associated with a single c-jet, a D meson or a D* meson in the fiducial regions together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. For the W+c-jet cross sections events with more than one c-jet are discarded. The particle-level c-jet is defined as the one containing a weakly decaying c-hadron with pt>5 GeV, within DeltaR<0.3. Jets containing c-hadrons originating from b-hadron decays are not counted as c-jets. Jets are not required for the W+D/D* cross sections. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events. The predictions have been obtained the aMC@NLO MC simulation interfaced to the Herwig++ parton shower programme. The uncertainties on the predictions entail PDF uncertainties, parton shower, fragmentation and scale uncertainties. The predictions are reweighted using LHAPDF from the CT10nlo PDF set to the following PDF sets with the LHAPDF IDs given in brackets: CT10nlo (11000), MSTW2008nlo68cl (21100), NNPDF23_nlo_as_0119 (230000), NNPDF23_nlo_collider_as_0119 (236000), HERAPDF15NLO (EIG+VAR, 60700+60730), ATLAS-epWZ12 (EIG+VAR, 65000+65040).

PDF uncertainty for each of the used PDF sets as well as the combined parton shower, fragmentation and scale uncertainties (given in percent) for the theoretical Predictions for the integrated cross section of the production of W+ and W- bosons associated with a single c-jet, a D meson or a D* meson in the fiducial regions together with the statistical and systematic uncertainties. If added quadratically, these uncertainties represent the total uncertainty on the quoted theory prediction. For the W+c-jet cross sections events with more than one c-jet are discarded. The particle-level c-jet is defined as the one containing a weakly decaying c-hadron with pt>5 GeV, within DeltaR<0.3. Jets containing c-hadrons originating from b-hadron decays are not counted as c-jets. Jets are not required for the W+D/D* cross sections. The cross sections are defined for OS-SS events. The predictions have been obtained the aMC@NLO MC simulation interfaced to the Herwig++ parton shower programme. The uncertainties on the predictions entail PDF uncertainties, FSR uncertainties and scale uncertainties. The predictions are reweighted using LHAPDF from the CT10nlo PDF set to the following PDF sets with the LHAPDF IDs given in brackets: CT10nlo (11000), MSTW2008nlo68cl (21100), NNPDF23_nlo_as_0119 (230000), NNPDF23_nlo_collider_as_0119 (236000), HERAPDF15NLO (EIG+VAR, 60700+60730), ATLAS-epWZ12 (EIG+VAR, 65000+65040). The determination of the parton shower, fragmentation and scale uncertainties is detailed in the paper.

Unfolded normalised differential Z+2j cross section as a function of the rapidity separation between the leading jets in the search region.

Unfolded normalised differential cross section distribution as a function of the number of jets in the rapidity interval between the two leading jets in the high mass region.

Unfolded normalised differential cross section distribution as a function of the normalised transverse momentum balance in the high mass region.

Unfolded normalised differential cross section distribution as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets in the high mass region.

Unfolded jet veto efficiency as a function of the dijet invariant mass in the baseline region.

Unfolded jet veto efficiency as a function of the rapidity separation between the two leading jets in the baseline region.

Unfolded average number of jets in the rapidity interval between the two leading jets as a function of the dijet invariant mass in the baseline region.

Unfolded average number of jets in the rapidity interval between the two leading jets as a function of the rapidity separation between the two leading jets in the baseline region.

Unfolded transverse momentum balance veto efficiency as a function of the dijet invariant mass in the baseline region.

Unfolded transverse momentum balance veto efficiency as a function of the rapidity separation between the two leading jets in the baseline region.

Unfolded normalised differential Z+2j cross section as a function of dijet invariant mass in the high-pt region.

Unfolded normalised differential Z+2j cross section as a function of dijet invariant mass in the control region.

Unfolded normalised differential Z+2j cross section as a function of the rapidity separation between the leading jets in the high-pt region.

Unfolded normalised differential Z+2j cross section as a function of the rapidity separation between the leading jets in the control region.

Unfolded jet veto efficiency as a function of the dijet invariant mass in the high-pt region.

Unfolded jet veto efficiency as a function of the rapidity separation between the two leading jets in the high-pt region.

Unfolded average number of jets in the rapidity interval between the two leading jets as a function of the dijet invariant mass in the high-pt region.

Unfolded average number of jets in the rapidity interval between the two leading jets as a function of the rapidity separation between the two leading jets in the high-pt region.

Unfolded transverse momentum balance veto efficiency as a function of the dijet invariant mass in the high-pt region.

Unfolded transverse momentum balance veto efficiency as a function of the rapidity separation between the two leading jets in the high-pt region.

The inclusive (SPS+DPS) cross-section ratio (times 10^6) as a function of J/psi transverse momentum under the TRANSVERSE-0 spin-alignment hypothesis. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second uncertainty is systematic.

The inclusive (SPS+DPS) cross-section ratio (times 10^6) as a function of J/psi transverse momentum under the TRANSVERSE-P spin-alignment hypothesis. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second uncertainty is systematic.

The inclusive (SPS+DPS) cross-section ratio (times 10^6) as a function of J/psi transverse momentum under the TRANSVERSE-M spin-alignment hypothesis. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second uncertainty is systematic.

Observed CLs contour with plus 1-sigma signal cross-section uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with minus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with plus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), TAU(CHARGINO) ) space for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Observed CLs contour in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Observed CLs contour with minus 1-sigma signal cross-section uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Observed CLs contour with plus 1-sigma signal cross-section uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with minus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

Expected CLs contour with plus 1-sigma experimental uncertainty in the ( M(CHARGINO), M(CHARGINO)-M(NEUTRALINO) ) space of the AMSB model for tan(beta) = 5 and mu > 0.

The K0S cross section for 5 jet ET ranges.

The LAMBDA cross section for 5 jet ET ranges.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ pT intervals in the B+ rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.25 The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ pt intervals in the B+ rapidity (y) range 0<|y|<2.25. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ rapidity intervals in the B+ pT range 9 GeV - 120 GeV. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Inclusive muon cross section from W+->mu+nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from W-->mu-nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from Z->mu+mu- simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV (the Z is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll > 60 GeV): the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from backgrounds: Z->tau tau, ttbar, Drell-Yan->mu+mu- (Drell-Yan is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll < 60 GeV) simulated with Pythia with MRSTLO* pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar production and decays simulated with FONLL with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is the uncertainty due to scale variation, alpha_s+pdf using CTEQ6.6 error set and the heavy quark masses.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar simulated with FONLL removing the resummation term with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV?.

Inclusive muon cross section for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: (stat) statistical error, (sys) systematic error. The first systematic error is the intrinsic error of the measurement, the second is the error due to the luminosity.

Inclusive muon cross section after subtraction of W,Z, Drell-Yan and top background for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: (stat): statistical error, (sys): systematic error. The first systematic error is the intrinsic error of the measurement, the second the error due to the luminosity, the third is due to the subtraction of the background and is dominated by the error on the W, Z inclusive cross sections.

Inclusive muon cross section from W+->mu+nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from W-->mu-nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from Z->mu+mu- simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV (the Z is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll > 60 GeV): the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from backgrounds: Z->tau tau, ttbar, Drell-Yan->mu+mu- (Drell-Yan is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll < 60 GeV) simulated with Pythia with MRSTLO* pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar production and decays simulated with FONLL with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is the uncertainty due to scale variation, alpha_s+pdf using CTEQ6.6 error set and the heavy quark masses.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar simulated with FONLL removing the resummation term with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV.

Double differential cross sections for charged particle jets as a function of the jet PT in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9, shown separately for the two R values. The first (sys) errors is the correlated efficiency uncertainty and the second (sys) error is the correlated vetex splitting uncertainty. The third (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Multiplicity of charged particles per jet in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.0-0.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 0.5-1.0 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.0-1.5 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the fragmentation variable Z in the |rapidity| range 1.5-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 4-6 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 6-10 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 10-15 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 15-24 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.

Distribution of the charged particle PT(rel) wrt anti-kt jets in the |rapidity| range 0.0-1.9 and transverse momentum 24-40 GeV shown separately for the two different jet radius parameter (R) values of 0.4 and 0.6.