$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$=2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.

$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.

$ v_2\{4\} $ harmonics for reference particles with 0.2 $ < p_{T} < $ 3.0 GeV as a function of $ < N_{ch}(|\eta|<1) > $ for p+Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{ s_{NN} } $= 5.02 TeV.

$ v_2\{4\} $ harmonics for reference particles with 0.2 $ < p_{T}< $ 3.0 GeV as a function of $ < N_{ch}(|\eta|<1) > $ for Pb+Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{ s_{NN} } $= 2.76 TeV.

Study of relationship between linear and non-linear modes in higher order anisotropic flow in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.

Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of chi in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of chi in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of chi in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of chi in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Invariant differential cross section of $\eta$ produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energy 2.76 TeV, the uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of 2.5% is not included in the systematic error.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive $\eta$ to $\pi^0$ production at a centre-of-mass energy of 2.76 TeV.

Differential production cross sections of $\psi(2S)$ as a function of rapidity.

$\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

$\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a function of y.

Differential production cross sections of $J/\psi$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Differential production cross sections of $J/\psi$ as a function of rapidity.

$J/\psi$ mean transversee momentum vs collision energy. $p_{\rm T}$ integration ranges are 0<$p_{\rm T}$<8 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =2700 GeV, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<12 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =5020, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<20 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =7000, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<20 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =8000 and 0<$p_{\rm T}$<20 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =13000.

$J/\psi$ mean transversee momentum square vs collision energy. $p_{\rm T}$ integration ranges are 0<$p_{\rm T}$<8 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =2700 GeV, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<12 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =5020, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<20 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =7000, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<20 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =8000 and 0<$p_{\rm T}$<20 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =13000.

$\psi(2S)$ mean transversee momentum vs collision energy. $p_{\rm T}$ integration ranges are 0<$p_{\rm T}$<12 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =7000, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<12 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =8000 and 0<$p_{\rm T}$<16 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =13000.

$\psi(2S)$ mean transversee momentum square vs collision energy. $p_{\rm T}$ integration ranges are 0<$p_{\rm T}$<12 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =7000, 0<$p_{\rm T}$<12 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =8000 and 0<$p_{\rm T}$<16 GeV/$c$ at $\sqrt{s}$ =13000.

Differential production cross sections of $J/\psi$ vs collision energy.

Differential production cross sections of $\psi(2S)$ vs collision energy.

D(pt) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity 1.2 < |y| < 2.1.

D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity |y| < 2.1.

D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity |y| < 0.3.

D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity 0.3 < |y| < 0.8.

D(z) distributions for pp and Pb+Pb collisions, jet rapidity 1.2 < |y| < 2.1.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 0.3, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 0.3 < |y| < 0.8, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with 1.2 < |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(pt) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 126 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 126 < pt < 158 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 0-10 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 20-30 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 30-40 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

Ratio of D(z) distributions collisions, centrality 60-80 PCT for jets with |y| < 2.1, 158 < pt < 398 GeV.

The difference between the total yield of particles with 1 < pt^trk < 4 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total yield measured in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

The difference between the total yield of particles with 4 < pt^trk < 25 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total yield measured in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

The difference between the total yield of particles with 25 < pt^trk < 100 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total yield measured in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

The difference between the total transverse momentum of particles with 1 < pt^trk < 4 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total transverse momentum of particles in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

The difference between the total transverse momentum of particles with 4 < pt^trk < 25 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total transverse momentum of particles in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

The difference between the total transverse momentum of particles with 25 < pt^trk < 100 GeV measured in 0-80 PCT Pb+Pb collisions and the total transverse momentum of particles in the same pt interval measured in pp collisions in jets with |y| < 2.1, 100 < pt < 398 GeV.

The ratio of R_D(z) distributions in three rapidity selections for 0-10 PCT Pb+Pb collisions.

The ratio of R_D(z) distributions in three rapidity selections for 10-20 PCT Pb+Pb collisions.

The ratio of R_D(z) distributions in three rapidity selections for 20-30 PCT Pb+Pb collisions.

Jet mass distribution in PbPb collisions at cme 2760 GeV, pT,jet ch = 60-80 GeV/c

Jet mass distribution in PbPb collisions at cme 2760 GeV, pT,jet ch = 80-100 GeV/c

Jet mass distribution in PbPb collisions at cme 2760 GeV, pT,jet ch = 100-120 GeV/c

Mean of the jet mass distributions in pPb collisions as a function of pTjet ch

Mean of the jet mass distributions in PbPb collisions as a function of pTjet ch

Invariant yield of K$^{*0}$ meson for 5-10$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of K$^{*0}$ meson for 10-20$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of K$^{*0}$ meson for 20-30$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of K$^{*0}$ meson for 30-40$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of K$^{*0}$ meson for 40-50$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of $\phi$ meson for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of $\phi$ meson for 5-10$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of $\phi$ meson for 10-20$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of $\phi$ meson for 20-30$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of $\phi$ meson for 30-40$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of $\phi$ meson for 40-50$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Invariant yield of $\phi$ meson for 60-80$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

K$^{*0}$/K ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

K$^{*0}$/K ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for inelastic (INEL) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

$\phi$/K ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

$\phi$/K ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for inelastic (INEL) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

K$^{*0}/\pi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

K$^{*0}/\pi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for inelastic (INEL) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

$\phi$/$\pi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$

$\phi$/$\pi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for inelastic (INEL) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

p/K$^{*0}$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

p/K$^{*0}$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 60-80$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

p/K$^{*0}$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for inelastic (INEL) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

p/$\phi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

p/$\phi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 60-80$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

p/$\phi$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for inelastic (INEL) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of average $K^{*0}$ and $\overline{K^{*0}}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of average $K^{*0}$ and $\overline{K^{*0}}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 5-10$\%$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of average $K^{*0}$ and $\overline{K^{*0}}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 20-30$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of average $K^{*0}$ and $\overline{K^{*0}}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 40-50$\%$ centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of $\phi$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 0-5$\%$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of $\phi$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 5-10$\%$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of $\phi$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 20-30$\%$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Nuclear modification factor of $\phi$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for 40-50$\%$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(3S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(3S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their transverse momentum and per unit of rapidity in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(3S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(3S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in pp collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 3.7% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(1S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Differential cross section for Y(2S) states as a function of their rapidity and integrated over transverse momentum in PbPb collisions. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes). Global relative uncertainties of 6.5% are not displayed.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(1S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of pT. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(1S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of pT. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(2S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of pT. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(2S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of pT. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(1S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of |y|. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(1S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of |y|. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(2S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of |y|. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factor for Υ(2S) states in PbPb collisions as a function of |y|. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainty (7.5%) is displayed as a grey box at unity.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(1S) meson production in PbPb collisions, as a function of centrality, displayed as the average number of participating nucleons. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainties from the PbPb data (3.2%) or from the pp reference (6.3%) are displayed at unity as empty and filled red black boxes, respectively.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(1S) meson production in PbPb collisions, as a function of centrality, displayed as the average number of participating nucleons. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainties from the PbPb data (3.2%) or from the pp reference (6.3%) are displayed at unity as empty and filled red black boxes, respectively.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(2S) meson production in PbPb collisions, as a function of centrality, displayed as the average number of participating nucleons. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainties from the PbPb data (3.2%) or from the pp reference (6.9%) are displayed at unity as empty and filled black black boxes, respectively.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(2S) meson production in PbPb collisions, as a function of centrality, displayed as the average number of participating nucleons. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are displayed as error bars (boxes), while the global (fully correlated) uncertainties from the PbPb data (3.2%) or from the pp reference (6.9%) are displayed at unity as empty and filled black black boxes, respectively.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(1S), Υ(2S) and Υ(3S) meson production in PbPb collisions, integrated over centrality. For the Υ(3S), the upper limit derived on the nuclear modification factor is given.

Nuclear modification factors for Υ(1S), Υ(2S) and Υ(3S) meson production in PbPb collisions, integrated over centrality. For the Υ(3S), the upper limit derived on the nuclear modification factor is given.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of rapidity.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality at high $p_{\rm T}$, 6.5$<p_{\rm T}<$30 GeV/c, in three different $|y|$ regions.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality at high $p_{\rm T}$, 6.5$<p_{\rm T}<$30 GeV/c, in three different $|y|$ regions.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality, at forward rapidity, 1.6$<|y|<$2.4, for two different $p_{\rm T}$ regions.

Prompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality, at forward rapidity, 1.6$<|y|<$2.4, for two different $p_{\rm T}$ regions.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of rapidity.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Nonprompt J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of centrality. The average ${N}_{\rm part}$ values correspond to events flatly distributed across centrality.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 30-40%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 40-50%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 50-80%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 0-10%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 10-20%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 20-30%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 30-40%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 40-50%.

Pb-Pb collision centrality 50-80%.

RMS of raw subtracted $p_T$ for jets reconstructed in PbPb collisions (in different centrality bins) with the anti-k$_T$ algorythm with a distance parameter $R=0.3$, in $|\eta|<0.2$.

Inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets with a distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The '3.7%' luminosity uncertainty is a fully correlated uncertainty, and not included in the point-to-point uncertainty.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.2$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.3$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet spectra in different centrality bins of PbPb collisions, for anti-k$_T$ jets of distance parameter $R=0.4$, reconstructed in $|\eta|<0.2$. The PbPb spectra in each case are scaled by TAA. The uncertainty on the TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points for a given centrality), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 0-5\% PbPb centrality. The '5.5%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 5-10\% PbPb centrality. The '5.9%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 10-30\% PbPb centrality. The '6.9%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 30-50\% PbPb centrality. The '10%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 50-70\% PbPb centrality. The '15%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, with $|\eta|<2$, for 70-90\% PbPb centrality. The '18%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of average Npart, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in the range $80< p_T < 90$GeV/c and $|\eta|<2$.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of average Npart, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3, 0.4$, reconstructed in the range $130< p_T < 150$GeV/c and $|\eta|<2$.

Inclusive jet RAA as a function of jet $p_T$, for anti-k$_T$ jets with distance parameter $R=0.2, 0.3$, reconstructed in the range $|\eta|<2$, for 0-10\% PbPb centrality. The '5.7%' combined uncertainty on the pp luminosity and PbPb TAA is considered as global uncertainty (common to all points), and it is not included in the point-to-point uncertainties.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\text{AA}}$ of electrons from beauty-hadron decays as a function of transverse momentum for 20% most central Pb--Pb collisions in the rapidity interval $-0.8 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.8$. The systematic uncertainties do not include a global normalisation uncertainty of 5.25%.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of leading jet shape for peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%) to leading jet shape for pp data.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of leading jet shape for central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%) to leading jet shape for pp data.

Subleading jet shape rho(dR) versus dR for pp data, normalized to unity over the range dR < 0.3.

Subleading jet shape rho(dR) versus dR for peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), normalized to unity over the range dR < 0.3.

Subleading jet shape rho(dR) versus dR for central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), normalized to unity over the range dR < 0.3.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of subleading jet shape for peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%) to subleading jet shape for pp data.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of subleading jet shape for central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%) to subleading jet shape for pp data.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres in pp data (denoted d, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), in jet peak transverse momentum distributions, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference, central PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), in jet peak transverse momentum distributions, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, forunbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum for leading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum for subleading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading, in jet peak transverse momentum distributions (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), in jet peak transverse momentum distributions, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres in pp data (dP), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference of long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference of long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference of the long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference of the long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum in the long-range correlated distribution, as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum in the long-range correlated distribution, as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Per-trigger yield modification, $I_{\rm AA}$, on the away side with trigger $\pi^{0}$ particle at $8 < p_{T}^{trig} < 16~GeV/c$ for $0$-$10$$\%$ Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 2.76 TeV.

pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT in pp collision.

kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT in pp collision.

proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT in pp collision.

pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT in pp collision.

kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT in pp collision.

proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT in pp collision.

pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT in pp collision.

kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT in pp collision.

proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT in pp collision.

pion <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.

proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.

proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.

proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.

proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.

proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.

proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.

pion Integrated v2 as a function of centrality percentile:.

kaon Integrated v2 as a function of centrality percentile:.

proton Integrated v2 as a function of centrality percentile:.

pion Integrated v3 as a function of centrality percentile:.

kaon Integrated v3 as a function of centrality percentile:.

proton Integrated v3 as a function of centrality percentile:.

pion Integrated v4 as a function of centrality percentile:.

kaon Integrated v4 as a function of centrality percentile:.

proton Integrated v4 as a function of centrality percentile:.

pion Integrated v5 as a function of centrality percentile:.

kaon Integrated v5 as a function of centrality percentile:.

proton Integrated v5 as a function of centrality percentile:.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Centrality dependence of normalized observables SC(4,2) and SC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV, in 0-10% most central collisions.

Centrality dependence of $v_3$ and $v_4$, with two-particle correlations, integrated over the $p_{\rm T}$ range 0.2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5.0 GeV/c, at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

Centrality dependence of $v_2$, with two- and multi-particle correlations, integrated over the $p_{\rm T}$ range 0.2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5.0 GeV/c, at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of $v_2$, with two- and multi-particle correlations, integrated over the $p_{\rm T}$ range 0.2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5.0 GeV/c, at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of $v_3$ and $v_4$, with two-particle correlations, integrated over the $p_{\rm T}$ range 0.2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5.0 GeV/c, at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of $v_3$ and $v_4$, with two-particle correlations, integrated over the $p_{\rm T}$ range 0.2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5.0 GeV/c, at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated $v_2$ between $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 and 2.76 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated $v_2$ between $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 and 2.76 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated $v_3$ and $v_4$ between $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 and 2.76 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated $v_3$ and $v_4$ between $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 and 2.76 TeV.

$p_{\rm T}$ dependence of $v_2$, $v_3$ and $v_4$ for centrality 0-5%.

$p_{\rm T}$ dependence of $v_2$, $v_3$ and $v_4$ for centrality 0-5%.

$p_{\rm T}$ dependence of $v_2$, $v_3$ and $v_4$ for centrality 30-40%.

$p_{\rm T}$ dependence of $v_2$, $v_3$ and $v_4$ for centrality 30-40%.

$p_{\rm T}$ dependence of $v_2${4} for centralities 10-20%, 20-30% and 30-40%.

$p_{\rm T}$ dependence of $v_2${4} for centralities 10-20%, 20-30% and 30-40%.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-differential $v_2${4} between $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 and 2.76 TeV, for centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-differential $v_2${4} between $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 and 2.76 TeV, for centrality 20-30%.

Fully $p_{\rm T}$-integrated $v_2${4} at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV, for centrality 20-30%.

Fully $p_{\rm T}$-integrated $v_2${4} at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV, for centrality 20-30%.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV 0-10% central events.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 50-100% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 30-50% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 10-30% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 0-10% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Mixed charge (- - - +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at high KT4 in pPb collisions projected against Q4.

Mixed charge (- - - +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at low KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality. The varied c4QS represents an alternate calculation of the cumulant correlation function. By default, the three N2QS(+-)N1(+)N1(+) terms are subtracted. The varied c4QS leaves these terms unsubtracted. In the absence of pion coherence and perfect FSI correction, these terms should not contribute to the cumulant correlation function.

Mixed charge (- - - +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at high KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality. The varied c4QS represents an alternate calculation of the cumulant correlation function. By default, the three N2QS(+-)N1(+)N1(+) terms are subtracted. The varied c4QS leaves these terms unsubtracted. In the absence of pion coherence and perfect FSI correction, these terms should not contribute to the cumulant correlation function.

Mixed charge (- - + +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at low KT4 in pp collisions projected against Q4.

Mixed charge (- - + +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at high KT4 in pp collisions projected against Q4.

Mixed charge (- - + +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at low KT4 in pPb collisions projected against Q4.

Mixed charge (- - + +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at high KT4 in pPb collisions projected against Q4.

Mixed charge (- - + +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at low KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality. The varied c4QS represents an alternate calculation of the cumulant correlation function. By default, the four N2QS(+-)N1(+)N1(-) terms are subtracted. The varied c4QS leaves these terms unsubtracted. In the absence of pion coherence and perfect FSI correction, these terms should not contribute to the cumulant correlation function.

Mixed charge (- - + +) C4QS, a4QS, c4QS at high KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality. The varied c4QS represents an alternate calculation of the cumulant correlation function. By default, the four N2QS(+-)N1(+)N1(-) terms are subtracted. The varied c4QS leaves these terms unsubtracted. In the absence of pion coherence and perfect FSI correction, these terms should not contribute to the cumulant correlation function.

Same charge C3QS, and c3QS at low KT3 in pp collisions projected against Q3. 0-5% Centrality. Edgeworth parameters for the C3QS fit are: s=1.217, R=2.351, kappa_3=0.592, kappa_4=0.240, kappa_5=-0.217, kappa_6=2.512. Edgeworth parameters for the c3QS fit are: s=1.089, R=1.894, kappa_3=-0.042, kappa_4=1.243, kappa_5=-2.189, kappa_6=2.780.

Same charge C3QS, and c3QS at low KT3 in pPb collisions projected against Q3. 0-5% Centrality. Edgeworth parameters for the C3QS fit are: s=1.058, R=2.680, kappa_3=0.287, kappa_4=0.960, kappa_5=-1.486, kappa_6=3.415. Edgeworth parameters for the c3QS fit are: s=1.300, R=3.613, kappa_3=0.276, kappa_4=1.293, kappa_5=-2.423, kappa_6=5.069.

Same charge C3QS, and c3QS at low KT3 in PbPb collisions projected against Q3. 0-5% Centrality. Edgeworth parameters for the C3QS fit are: s=1.061, R=11.326, kappa_3=0.152, kappa_4=0.847, kappa_5=-1.380, kappa_6=2.374. Edgeworth parameters for the c3QS fit are: s=1.278, R=14.173, kappa_3=-0.055, kappa_4=1.864, kappa_5=-3.460, kappa_6=4.624.

Same charge C4QS, a4QS, b4QS, c4QS, and ratios in pp collisions projected against Q4.

Same charge 4-pion expected correlations in pp collisions projected against Q4.

Same charge C4QS, a4QS, b4QS, c4QS, and ratios in pPb collisions projected against Q4.

Same charge 4-pion expected correlations in pPb collisions projected against Q4.

Same charge C4QS, a4QS, b4QS, c4QS, and ratios in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 4-pion expected correlations in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 3-pion measured and expected correlations at low KT3 in PbPb collisions projected against Q3. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 3-pion measured and expected correlations at high KT3 in PbPb collisions projected against Q3. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 4-pion measured correlations and ratio at low KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 4-pion expected correlations at low KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 4-pion measured correlations and ratio at high KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 4-pion expected correlations at high KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 4-pion expected correlations and ratio at low KT4 in PbPb collisions projected against Q4. 0-5% Centrality.

Same charge 3-pion expected correlations and ratio at low KT3 in PbPb collisions projected against Q3. 0-5% Centrality.

Coherent fractions (G) extracted from 4-pion correlations versus centrality for low and high KT4 in PbPb collisions.

Three-pion mixed-charge cumulant correlation functions for low and high KT3 in PbPb collisions.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

three particle correlator, 3rd harmonic, difference neg-pos, as a function of centrality.

three particle correlator, 4th harmonic, as a function of centrality.

three particle correlator, 4th harmonic, difference neg-pos, as a function of centrality.

three particle correlator, 2nd harmonic, inferred slope parameter, as a function of centrality.

charge correlation, as a function of Delta eta.

three particle correlator, 2nd harmonic, as a function of Delta eta.

three particle correlator, 3rd harmonic, as a function of Delta eta.

three particle correlator, 4th harmonic, as a function of Delta eta.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.8 < eta^dijet < -0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -1.2 < eta^dijet < -0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.1 < eta^dijet < -1.2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.8 < eta^dijet < -2.1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +2.1 < eta^dijet < +2.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +1.2 < eta^dijet < +2.1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.8 < eta^dijet < +1.2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.8 < eta^dijet < -0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -1.2 < eta^dijet < -0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.1 < eta^dijet < -1.2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.8 < eta^dijet < -2.1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-2 < x_targ < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-1 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-2 < x_proj < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-1 < x_proj < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-2 < x_targ < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-1 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-2 < x_proj < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-1 < x_proj < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 1$.

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 and integrated over the region $|\Delta\Phi| < \Delta\Phi_{ZYAM}$ for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $p_{T}$ for events with $N^{offline}_{trk} \geq$ 105. The $p_{T}$ value for each $p_{T}$ bin is the average $p_{T}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 7 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $p_{T}$ for events with $N^{offline}_{trk} \geq$ 110. The $p_{T}$ value for each $p_{T}$ bin is the average $p_{T}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 and integrated over the region $|\Delta\Phi| < \Delta\Phi_{ZYAM}$ for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 7 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 pPb data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 5.02 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 PbPb data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 2.76 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Raw number of J/$\psi$ (N$_{\rm AA}^{\rm J/\psi}$), expected raw number of hadronic J/$\psi$ (N$_{\rm AA}^{\rm{h J}/\psi}$) and measured excess in the number of J/$\psi$ (N$_{\rm AA}^{\rm{exess J}/\psi}$), all three numbers in the $p_{\rm T}$ range (0-0.3) GeV/$c$, and J/$\psi$ coherent photoproduction cross section, as a function of centrality, with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. An additional correlated systematic uncertainty also applies to the cross section. In the most central classes, an upper limit (95% CL) on the J/$\psi$ yield excess and on the cross section is given.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of D$_s^+$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=2.76 TeV in the centrality class 20-50% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Ratio of D$_s^+$ to D$^0$ meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=2.76 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of D$_s^+$->$\phi\pi^+$->$K^+K^-\pi^+$ : 0.0224. Branching ratio of D$^0$->K$^-\pi^+$ : 0.0388.

Ratio of D$_s^+$ to D$^+$ meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=2.76 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of D$_s^+$->$\phi\pi^+$->$K^+K^-\pi^+$ : 0.0224. Branching ratio of D$^+$->K$^-\pi^+\pi^+$ : 0.0913.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.