The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Comparison between data and MC simulation for kinematic distributions based on events in the signal candidate sample for \Delta|y|. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the low mass region prior to maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the low mass region after the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the high mass region prior to the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the high mass region after the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Measured A_{C}^{fid} in different mass regions after combining the two lepton channels. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data

Measured A_{C} in the full phase space in different mass regions after combining the two lepton channels. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data

The +/- standard deviation (\sigma) impacts of the nuisance parameters corresponding to the systematic uncertainties in the full phase space A_{C} measurement for mttbar > 750GeV. The red and blue bars show the effect on the unfolded AC values for up and down variations of the systematic uncertainty. The MC statistical uncertainties are omitted here.

The fraction of photon-induced background as compared with the total amount of DY signal plus photon-induced events ($N_{\gamma\gamma}/(N_{\gamma\gamma} + N_\mathrm{DY})$) in different dilepton mass bins. These numbers are averaged across the different years and channels.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the coupling K_L for a Z' in the sequential standard model as a function of the Z' mass.

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3147 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3289 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3430 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3569 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3707 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3843 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3978 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.4112 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.4244 GeV

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle

Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity

Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity

Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity

Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$

Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity

Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$

Top quark spin asymmetry at the parton level in the muon and electron channel and their combination

The covariance matrix for the kinematic bins matrix of the $D_s^+$ production asymmetry measured using the combined $\sqrt{s} =7$ and 8 TeV data sets (corresponding to Table 1). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined. The kinematic bins are indexed as follows: the three rapidity bins, y, in the range from 2.0 to 4.5 are indexed with $i_y$ ranging from 0 to 2 with the following bin edges: 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.5. The four $p_{\rm T}$ bins in the range from 2.5 to 25.0 GeV/c are indexed with $i_{p_T}$ from 0 to 3 with the following bin edges: 2.5, 4.7, 6.5, 8.5, 25.0 GeV/c. The index of a kinematic bins is then given by: $i_{\rm bin} = 4 \times i_y + i_{p_T}$.

The covariance matrix for the kinematic bins matrix of the $D_s^+$ production asymmetry measured using the $\sqrt{s} =7$ TeV data set (corresponding to Table 2). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined. The kinematic bins are indexed as follows: the three rapidity bins, y, in the range from 2.0 to 4.5 are indexed with $i_y$ ranging from 0 to 2 with the following bin edges: 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.5. The four $p_{\rm T}$ bins in the range from 2.5 to 25.0 GeV/c are indexed with $i_{p_T}$ from 0 to 3 with the following bin edges: 2.5, 4.7, 6.5, 8.5, 25.0 GeV/c. The index of a kinematic bins is then given by: $i_{\rm bin} = 4 \times i_y + i_{p_T}$.

The covariance matrix for the kinematic bins matrix of the $D_s^+$ production asymmetry measured using the $\sqrt{s} =8$ TeV data set (corresponding to Table 3). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined. The kinematic bins are indexed as follows: the three rapidity bins, y, in the range from 2.0 to 4.5 are indexed with $i_y$ ranging from 0 to 2 with the following bin edges: 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.5. The four $p_{\rm T}$ bins in the range from 2.5 to 25.0 GeV/c are indexed with $i_{p_T}$ from 0 to 3 with the following bin edges: 2.5, 4.7, 6.5, 8.5, 25.0 GeV/c. The index of a kinematic bins is then given by: $i_{\rm bin} = 4 \times i_y + i_{p_T}$.

The particle-level di-jet differential cross section. The systematic uncertainty on the data contains contributions from track finding efficiency, track transverse momentum resolution, calorimeter energy resolution, and unfolding uncertainties. For the theory, values are given for the underlying event and hadronization (UEH) correction uncertainty and the quadrature sum of the UEH and theoretical uncertainties. Both the UEH and theoretical uncertainties include contributions from factorization and renormalization scale uncertainties and PDF uncertainties. An 8.8% uncertainty common to all points due to the integrated luminosity determination is also present, but not included in the systematic values quoted below.

Values of gluon X1 and X2 obtained from the PYTHIA detector-level simulation for the same-sign di-jet topology compared to the gluon X distribution for inclusive jets. The inclusive distribution has been scaled down by a factor of 20 compared to the di-jet distributions.

Values of gluon X1 and X2 obtained from the PYTHIA detector-level simulation for the opposite-sign di-jet topology compared to the gluon X distribution for inclusive jets. The inclusive distribution has been scaled down by a factor of 20 compared to the di-jet distributions.

Di-jet A_LL asymmetry vs parton-level invariant mass for the same-sign di-jet topology. The systematic uncertainty on the mass includes contributions from jet energy scale, the correction to parton-level, and the difference between NLO and PYTHIA cross sections. The systematic uncertainty on the asymmetry includes contributions from trigger and reconstruction bias and residual transverse beam polarization components. A 6.5% uncertainty common to all points due to uncertainty on the measured beam polarizations is also present, but not included in the uncertainties quoted below.

Theoretical predictions for the di-jet A_LL asymmetry for the same-sign topology using the DSSV14 and NNPDFpol1.1 polarized PDF sets. The DSSV14 prediction is presented without uncertainty while the systematic uncertainty on the NNPDFpol1.1 prediction contains contributions from factorization and renormalization scale uncertainties and PDF uncertainties.

Di-jet A_LL asymmetry vs parton-level invariant mass for the opposite-sign di-jet topology. The systematic uncertainty on the mass includes contributions from jet energy scale, the correction to parton-level, and the difference between NLO and PYTHIA cross sections. The systematic uncertainty on the asymmetry includes contributions from trigger and reconstruction bias and residual transverse beam polarization components. A 6.5% uncertainty common to all points due to uncertainty on the measured beam polarizations is also present, but not included in the uncertainties quoted below.

Theoretical predictions for the di-jet A_LL asymmetry for the opposite-sign topology using the DSSV14 and NNPDFpol1.1 polarized PDF sets. The DSSV14 prediction is presented without uncertainty while the systematic uncertainty on the NNPDFpol1.1 prediction contains contributions from factorization and renormalization scale uncertainties and PDF uncertainties.

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2254987 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2290003 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2324995 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2355029 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2389989 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2425001 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2455020 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2484967 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2514991 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2550029 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2584969 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2614979 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2644992 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2675008 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2705027 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2739984 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2774992 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2804996 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2835003 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2864940 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2895026 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2924970 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2954989 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.2989995 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3024980 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3054984 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3084992 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3115002 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3145016 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3175032 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3204980 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3235001 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3265026 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3294983 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3325013 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3354976 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3385012 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3414981 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3445022 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3474997 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3504974 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3535024 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3565007 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3594993 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3624982 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3654974 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3684968 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3714966 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3744966 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3774969 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3804974 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3834983 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3864994 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3890010 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3914981 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3945022 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.3974998 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4004978 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4035026 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4065011 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4094998 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4119939 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4144969 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4174985 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4205005 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4235027 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4259986 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4284967 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4315018 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4345006 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4374997 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4399974 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4424973 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4454993 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W=1.4485015 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.3693 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.3897 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4098 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4296 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4492 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4685 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4875 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5063 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5249 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5432 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5614 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5793 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5970 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6146 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6319 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6491 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6660 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6828 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6995 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7160 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7323 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7485 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7645 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7804 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7961 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8117 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8272 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8425 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8577 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8728 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8878 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3062 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3275 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3486 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3693 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3897 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4098 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4296 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4492 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4685 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4875 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5063 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5249 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5432 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5614 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5793 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5970 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6146 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6319 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6491 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6660 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6828 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6995 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7160 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7323 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7485 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7645 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7804 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7961 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8117 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8272 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8425 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8577 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8728 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8878 GeV

Correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for $\sigma^{\pm}$. The statistical and integrated luminosity uncertainties are not included. The first and the last eleven indices correspond to the systematic uncertainites of $W^+$ ($\sigma^+_{1-11}$) and $W^-$ ($\sigma^-_{1-11}$) cross sections, respectively, in 11 muon pseudorapidity bins. The values are expressed as percentages.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for $\sigma^{\pm}$. The first and the last eleven indices correspond to the statistical uncertainites of $W^+$ ($\sigma^+_{1-11}$) and $W^-$ ($\sigma^-_{1-11}$) cross sections, respectively, in 11 muon pseudorapidity bins. The values are expressed as percentages.

Correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for $\mathcal{A}$. The values are expressed as percentages.

Unfolded measurements of AFB in each M-|y| bin (e+e-).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Optimised angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

CP-averaged angular observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

CP-asymmetries evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

Optimised observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

Zero-crossing points determined with an amplitude fit.

Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.1 <q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 <q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 <q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 <q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 <q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 <q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 < q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Inclusive cross-section for $Z$ boson production in bins of PHI*. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Inclusive cross-section for $Z$ boson production in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

$W^{\pm}$ to $Z$ boson cross-section ratio in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Ratio of $W^+$ to $W^-$ cross-section in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Lepton charge asymmetry in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Ratios of $W^{\pm}$ to $Z$ boson cross-section ratios at differnent centre-of-mass energy (8 TeV to 7 TeV) in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical and systematic.

Inclusive cross-section for $Z$ boson production in bins of muon pseudorapidity at centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

$W^{\pm}$ to $Z$ boson cross-section ratio in bins of muon pseudorapidity at centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded. This table lists bin-to-bin correlations for $W^{+}$.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded. This table lists bin-to-bin correlations for $W^{-}$.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded. This table lists differential cross-section correlations between $W^{-}$ and $W^{+}$ bins.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $y_{Z}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of transverse momentum. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\phi^{*}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients between differential cross-section measurements as a function $y_{Z}$ and $W^{+}$ boson muon $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients between differential cross-section measurements as a function $y_{Z}$ and $W^{-}$ boson muon $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{+}}$ of the Z boson. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{-}}$ of the Z boson. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{+}}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{-}}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

The amplitude of the transverse single-spin asymmetry for $W^{+-}$ boson production as a function of $P_T^W$, in the |$y^W$| < 1 region, measured by STAR in proton+proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV with a recorded luminosity of 25 $pb^{-1}$. The average boson's rapidity value for each $P_T^W$ bin is $y^W=0.0$.

The amplitude of the transverse single-spin asymmetry for $W^{+-}$ boson production as a function of $y^W$, in the 0.5 GeV/c < $P_T^W$ < 10 GeV/c region, measured by STAR in proton+proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV with a recorded luminosity of 25 $pb^{-1}$. The average boson's transverse-momentum value for each $y^W$-bin is $P_T^W=5.3$ GeV/c.

The amplitude of the transverse single-spin asymmetry for $Z^0$ boson production, measured by STAR in proton+proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV with a recorded luminosity of 25 $pb^{-1}$.

The asymmetry $A_{\mu}$ extracted from the differential cross sections.

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.819

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.707

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.574

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.423

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.259

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.087

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.087

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.259

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.423

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.574

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.707

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.819

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.906

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.966

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.996

Measured charge asymmetry, $A_c$, values for the electron and muon channels combined after unfolding as a function of the $t\bar{t}$ transverse momentum, $p_{{\rm T}, t\bar{t}}$. The quoted uncertainties include statistical and systematic components after the marginalisation.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_c$ measurement as a function of the $t\bar{t}$ invariant mass, $m_{t\bar{t}}$.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_c$ measurement as a function of the $t\bar{t}$ velocity along the z-axis, $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_c$ measurement as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{{\rm T}, t\bar{t}}$.

Products of $\overline{B}^0$ production cross-sections and $\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}^0 \rightarrow J\psi \overline{K}^{*0})$ in bins of $p_\rm{T}$ and $y$ in the 2012 data sample.

Asymmetries $a_{\rm p+d}$ $(\%)$ of $\Lambda_b^0$ and $\overline{\Lambda}_b^0$ in bins of $p_\rm{T}$ for the 2011 and 2012 samples.

Asymmetries $a_{\rm p+d}$ $(\%)$ of $\Lambda_b^0$ and $\overline{\Lambda}_b^0$ in bins of $y$ for the 2011 and 2012 samples.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $p_\text{T}^\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $|y_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}|$ in the full phase space. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $|y_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}|$ in the full phase space. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $p_\text{T}^\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $p_\text{T}^\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Light quark ($uds$) Collins asymmetries obtained by fitting the U/L and U/C double ratios as a function of ($z_1$,$z_2$) for $K\pi$ hadron pairs. In the first column, the $z$ bins and their respective mean values for the hadron ($K$ or $\pi$) in one hemisphere are reported; in the following column, the same variables for the second hadron ($K$ or $\pi$) are shown; in the third column the mean value of $\sin^2\theta_{2}/(1+\cos^2\theta_{2})$ is summarized, calculated in the RF0 frame; in the last two columns the asymmetry results are summarized. The mean values of the quantities reported in the table are calculated by summing the corresponding values for each $K\pi$ pair and dividing by the number of $K\pi$ pairs that fall into each ($z_1$,$z_2$) interval. Note that the $A^{UL}$ and $A^{UC}$ results are strongly correlated since they are obtained by using the same data set.

Light quark ($uds$) Collins asymmetries obtained by fitting the U/L and U/C double ratios as a function of ($z_1$,$z_2$) for pion pairs. In the first column, the $z$ bins and their respective mean values for the pion in one hemisphere are reported; in the following column, the same variables for the second pion are shown; in the third column the mean value of $\sin^2\theta_{th}/(1+\cos^2\theta_{th})$ is summarized, calculated in the RF12 frame; in the last two columns the asymmetry results are summarized. The mean values of the quantities reported in the table are calculated by summing the corresponding values for each $\pi\pi$ pair and dividing by the number of $\pi\pi$ pairs that fall into each ($z_1$,$z_2$) interval. Note that the $A^{UL}$ and $A^{UC}$ results are strongly correlated since they are obtained by using the same data set.

Light quark ($uds$) Collins asymmetries obtained by fitting the U/L and U/C double ratios as a function of ($z_1$,$z_2$) for pion pairs. In the first column, the $z$ bins and their respective mean values for the pion in one hemisphere are reported; in the following column, the same variables for the second pion are shown; in the third column the mean value of $\sin^2\theta_{2}/(1+\cos^2\theta_{2})$ is summarized, calculated in the RF0 frame; in the last two columns the asymmetry results are summarized. The mean values of the quantities reported in the table are calculated by summing the corresponding values for each $\pi\pi$ pair and dividing by the number of $\pi\pi$ pairs that fall into each ($z_1$,$z_2$) interval. Note that the $A^{UL}$ and $A^{UC}$ results are strongly correlated since they are obtained by using the same data set.

Inclusive cross-section for $W^+$ and $W^-$ boson production in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Ratio of $W^+$ to $W^-$ cross-section in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Lepton charge asymmetry in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $y_{Z}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of transverse momentum. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\phi^{*}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients between differential cross-section measurements as a function $y_{Z}$ and $W^{\pm}$ boson muon $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

The slope parameter r as a function of centrality for collision energy of 200 GeV.

The slope parameter r as a function of centrality for collision energy of 62.4 GeV.

The slope parameter r as a function of centrality for collision energy of 39 GeV.

The slope parameter r as a function of centrality for collision energy of 27 GeV.

The slope parameter r as a function of centrality for collision energy of 19.6 GeV.

The slope parameter r as a function of centrality for collision energy of 11.5 GeV.

The slope parameter r as a function of centrality for collision energy of 7.7 GeV.

$<M_{inv}>$ asymmetries, $\eta$ > 0, maximum opening angle 0.2.

$p_T$ asymmetries, $\eta$ < 0, maximum opening angle 0.3.

$<M_{inv}>$ asymmetries, $\eta$ < 0, maximum opening angle 0.3.

$p_T$ asymmetries, $\eta$ > 0,maximum opening angle 0.3.

$<M_{inv}>$ asymmetries, $\eta$ > 0, maximum opening angle 0.3.

$p_T$ asymmetries, $\eta$ < 0, maximum opening angle 0.4.

$<M_{inv}>$ asymmetries, $\eta$ < 0, maximum opening angle 0.4.

$p_T$ asymmetries, $\eta$ > 0, maximum opening angle 0.4.

$<M_{inv}>$ asymmetries, $\eta$ > 0, maximum opening angle 0.4.

$\eta$ asymmetries, maximum opening angle 0.2.

$\eta$ asymmetries, maximum opening angle 0.3.

$\eta$ asymmetries, maximum opening angle 0.4.

Asymmetry results on $\vec e-^2$H parity-violating scattering from the PVDIS experiment at JLab, for RES IV settings.

Asymmetry results on $\vec e-^2$H parity-violating scattering from the PVDIS experiment at JLab, for RES III settings.

Differential production yield per binary collision for $W^{-}$ bosons as a function of $|\eta_\ell|$.

The lepton charge asymmetry $A_{\ell}$ from $W^\pm$ bosons as a function of absolute pseudorapidity.

Lepton charge asymmetry in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical and systematic.

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5584 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5882 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6175 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6462 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6745 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7022 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7431 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7961 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8476 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4969 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5156 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5341 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5584 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5882 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6175 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6462 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6745 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7022 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7431 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7961 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8476 GeV

Reconstructed $\cos\theta^*$ distributions for data and the SM background estimate in the dimuon channel.

Reconstructed $A_{\rm FB}$ distributions for data and the SM background estimate as a function of dielectron mass.

Reconstructed $A_{\rm FB}$ distributions for data and the SM background estimate as a function of dimuon mass.

Summary of 95% C.L. lower exclusion limits on $\Lambda$ for the combined dilepton contact interaction search, using a uniform positive prior in 1/$\Lambda^2$.

Summary of 95% C.L. lower exclusion limits on $M_{\rm S}$ for the combined dilepton ADD large extra dimensions search, using a uniform positive prior in 1/$M_{\rm S}^8$.

Reconstructed $\cos\theta^*$ distributions for data and the SM background estimate in the electron channel.

Reconstructed $\cos\theta^*$ distributions for data and the SM background estimate in the muon channel.